Summary
The prosecution's case against Mitya strengthens as witness after witness testifies about the money he spent. Trifon Borissovitch, the inn's owner, insists Mitya spent three thousand rubles both times he visited, not fifteen hundred as Mitya claims. The testimony about a 'sixth thousand' particularly damages Mitya's case. Even reluctant witness Kalganov confirms hearing about the large sum. The Polish card players add damaging evidence about Mitya trying to buy them off with money he claimed not to have. Old Maximov's confused testimony about seeing twenty thousand rubles only makes things worse. When Grushenka takes the stand, she provides the one bright moment for Mitya. Though her testimony about the money doesn't help his case, she publicly declares her faith in his innocence and noble heart. This gives Mitya courage to proclaim his innocence directly to her. Exhausted after the interrogation, Mitya falls asleep and dreams of driving through a barren landscape where he sees starving peasant mothers with crying babies. In the dream, he's overwhelmed by compassion and wants to help end all suffering. He awakens with renewed hope, touched that someone had kindly placed a pillow under his head while he slept. The chapter shows how legal proceedings can feel stacked against the accused, but also how human connection and compassion can sustain us through the darkest moments.
Coming Up in Chapter 62
With the investigation complete, Mitya faces the next phase of his ordeal. The authorities must decide his immediate fate as the weight of the evidence presses down on him.
Share it with friends
An excerpt from the original text.(~500 words)
he Evidence Of The Witnesses. The Babe The examination of the witnesses began. But we will not continue our story in such detail as before. And so we will not dwell on how Nikolay Parfenovitch impressed on every witness called that he must give his evidence in accordance with truth and conscience, and that he would afterwards have to repeat his evidence on oath, how every witness was called upon to sign the protocol of his evidence, and so on. We will only note that the point principally insisted upon in the examination was the question of the three thousand roubles, that is, was the sum spent here, at Mokroe, by Mitya on the first occasion, a month before, three thousand or fifteen hundred? And again had he spent three thousand or fifteen hundred yesterday? Alas, all the evidence given by every one turned out to be against Mitya. There was not one in his favor, and some witnesses introduced new, almost crushing facts, in contradiction of his, Mitya’s, story. The first witness examined was Trifon Borissovitch. He was not in the least abashed as he stood before the lawyers. He had, on the contrary, an air of stern and severe indignation with the accused, which gave him an appearance of truthfulness and personal dignity. He spoke little, and with reserve, waited to be questioned, answered precisely and deliberately. Firmly and unhesitatingly he bore witness that the sum spent a month before could not have been less than three thousand, that all the peasants about here would testify that they had heard the sum of three thousand mentioned by Dmitri Fyodorovitch himself. “What a lot of money he flung away on the gypsy girls alone! He wasted a thousand, I daresay, on them alone.” “I don’t believe I gave them five hundred,” was Mitya’s gloomy comment on this. “It’s a pity I didn’t count the money at the time, but I was drunk....” Mitya was sitting sideways with his back to the curtains. He listened gloomily, with a melancholy and exhausted air, as though he would say: “Oh, say what you like. It makes no difference now.” “More than a thousand went on them, Dmitri Fyodorovitch,” retorted Trifon Borissovitch firmly. “You flung it about at random and they picked it up. They were a rascally, thievish lot, horse‐stealers, they’ve been driven away from here, or maybe they’d bear witness themselves how much they got from you. I saw the sum in your hands, myself—count it I didn’t, you didn’t let me, that’s true enough—but by the look of it I should say it was far more than fifteen hundred ... fifteen hundred, indeed! We’ve seen money too. We can judge of amounts....” As for the sum spent yesterday he asserted that Dmitri Fyodorovitch had told him, as soon as he arrived, that he had brought three thousand with him. “Come now, is that so, Trifon Borissovitch?” replied Mitya. “Surely I didn’t declare so positively that I’d brought three thousand?” “You...
Master this chapter. Complete your experience
Purchase the complete book to access all chapters and support classic literature
As an Amazon Associate, we earn a small commission from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.
Available in paperback, hardcover, and e-book formats
Intelligence Amplifier™ Analysis
The Road of Mounting Evidence - When the System Stacks Against You
Once institutional momentum builds against someone, all subsequent evidence gets interpreted to support the predetermined narrative, regardless of actual truth.
Why This Matters
Connect literature to life
This chapter teaches how to recognize when systems build cases rather than seek truth.
Practice This Today
Next time you hear workplace gossip building against someone, notice how each new 'fact' gets interpreted to support the existing narrative rather than questioned.
Now let's explore the literary elements.
Terms to Know
Protocol
The official written record of legal proceedings, including witness testimony and evidence. In 19th century Russian courts, everything had to be carefully documented and signed by witnesses.
Modern Usage:
Like when HR documents every detail of a workplace investigation, or when police take your statement and make you sign it.
Cross-examination
The process of questioning witnesses to test their credibility and find contradictions in their stories. Here, each witness is grilled about the exact amount of money Mitya spent.
Modern Usage:
What happens when your manager questions different employees about the same incident to see if their stories match up.
Circumstantial evidence
Evidence that suggests guilt through a pattern of facts rather than direct proof. The witnesses' testimony about money creates a web of suspicion around Mitya without anyone actually seeing him commit murder.
Modern Usage:
Like when someone's story doesn't add up - you can't prove they're lying, but all the pieces point in that direction.
Character witness
Someone who testifies about a person's reputation and moral character rather than specific facts about a crime. Grushenka serves this role when she declares faith in Mitya's goodness.
Modern Usage:
When friends write letters to a judge before sentencing, or when coworkers vouch for someone facing workplace accusations.
Peasant class
The lowest social class in 19th century Russia - poor farmers bound to the land, often illiterate and struggling to survive. Mitya's dream of starving peasant mothers reflects the harsh reality of their lives.
Modern Usage:
Today's working poor - people working multiple jobs but still struggling to afford basics like food and healthcare.
Social conscience
The awareness of suffering and injustice in society, combined with a desire to help. Mitya's dream awakens his compassion for the poor and powerless.
Modern Usage:
When you see homeless people and actually think about systemic problems instead of just walking by, or when you donate to food banks.
Characters in This Chapter
Trifon Borissovitch
Key prosecution witness
The innkeeper who insists Mitya spent three thousand rubles both times he visited, not fifteen hundred as Mitya claims. His confident, indignant testimony seriously damages Mitya's case.
Modern Equivalent:
The store manager who swears they saw you shoplift and won't back down
Mitya
Defendant
Watches helplessly as witness after witness testifies against him about the money. Despite the mounting evidence, he maintains his innocence and finds strength in Grushenka's support.
Modern Equivalent:
The employee everyone thinks stole from the register, watching coworkers testify against them
Grushenka
Character witness and love interest
The only witness who supports Mitya, publicly declaring her faith in his innocence and noble heart. Her testimony about money doesn't help his case, but her emotional support gives him courage.
Modern Equivalent:
The girlfriend who stands by her man even when everyone else thinks he's guilty
Kalganov
Reluctant witness
A young man who reluctantly confirms hearing about the large sum of money, adding to the evidence against Mitya despite not wanting to hurt him.
Modern Equivalent:
The friend who has to tell the truth in court even though it hurts someone they care about
Nikolay Parfenovitch
Investigating magistrate
The official conducting the examination of witnesses, making sure each person gives sworn testimony according to legal procedures.
Modern Equivalent:
The detective or prosecutor running the investigation and taking everyone's statements
Key Quotes & Analysis
"Alas, all the evidence given by every one turned out to be against Mitya. There was not one in his favor."
Context: Describing how witness after witness testifies against Mitya about the money
This shows how isolated and hopeless Mitya's situation has become. Even when people don't mean to hurt him, their honest testimony makes him look guilty.
In Today's Words:
Everyone who took the stand basically made him look worse - nobody had anything good to say that would help his case.
"I believe in his noble heart, I will prove his innocence!"
Context: Her passionate declaration of faith in Mitya during her testimony
This moment of loyalty and love gives Mitya strength when everything else is falling apart. It shows how human connection can sustain us through legal nightmares.
In Today's Words:
I know he's a good person and I'm going to prove everyone wrong about him!
"Why is the babe so poor? Why don't they hug each other and kiss? Why don't they sing songs of joy?"
Context: Speaking in his dream about the starving peasant children he sees
Mitya's dream reveals his awakening social conscience and genuine compassion for suffering. Even facing his own destruction, he's moved by others' pain.
In Today's Words:
Why do kids have to go hungry? Why can't everyone just be happy and take care of each other?
Thematic Threads
Institutional Power
In This Chapter
The court system shapes witness testimony to fit its narrative, regardless of truth
Development
Evolved from earlier class tensions to show how formal institutions crush individuals
In Your Life:
You might see this when HR, management, or any bureaucracy decides you're the problem before investigating fairly.
Truth vs Narrative
In This Chapter
Facts become malleable when filtered through people's need to conform to expected stories
Development
Builds on earlier themes of self-deception to show how collective deception works
In Your Life:
You experience this when family members rewrite history during conflicts, or when workplace gossip becomes 'fact.'
Human Connection
In This Chapter
Grushenka's loyal testimony and the pillow under Mitya's head show compassion surviving institutional coldness
Development
Continues the theme that authentic relationships matter more than social position
In Your Life:
You see this when someone stands by you during your worst moments, or when small acts of kindness sustain you through crises.
Compassion
In This Chapter
Mitya's dream of suffering mothers reveals his capacity for empathy despite his own desperate situation
Development
Shows how suffering can either embitter or deepen our humanity
In Your Life:
You might find that your own struggles make you more sensitive to others' pain, not less.
Class Dynamics
In This Chapter
Working-class witnesses feel pressure to tell authorities what they want to hear
Development
Continues showing how economic vulnerability affects people's ability to tell truth to power
In Your Life:
You experience this when you can't afford to contradict your boss, landlord, or anyone who controls your livelihood.
You now have the context. Time to form your own thoughts.
Discussion Questions
- 1
Why does witness after witness seem to support the prosecution's version of events, even when some details don't add up?
analysis • surface - 2
What makes Grushenka's testimony different from all the other witnesses, and why does it give Mitya hope despite not helping his legal case?
analysis • medium - 3
Where have you seen this pattern of 'institutional momentum' building against someone - at work, school, or in your community?
application • medium - 4
If you were facing a situation where everyone seemed to be turning against you, what would you do differently based on what happens to Mitya?
application • deep - 5
What does Mitya's dream about the suffering mothers reveal about how crisis can either harden us or open our hearts to others?
reflection • deep
Critical Thinking Exercise
Document Your Truth Before You Need To
Think of a current situation in your life where you might need to defend your actions or character later - a workplace conflict, family tension, or community issue. Write down the facts as they actually happened, including dates, witnesses, and your motivations. Then identify who in your life would vouch for your character if things went sideways.
Consider:
- •People's memories change to fit whatever story becomes popular later
- •Your allies today might feel pressured to stay neutral if conflict escalates
- •Documentation created in real-time is more credible than explanations after the fact
Journaling Prompt
Write about a time when you felt like everyone was against you. What would have helped you get through it? How did you maintain your sense of who you really were when others saw you differently?
Coming Up Next...
Chapter 62: The Moment of Reckoning
With the investigation complete, Mitya faces the next phase of his ordeal. The authorities must decide his immediate fate as the weight of the evidence presses down on him.
