An excerpt from the original text.(complete · 1332 words)
yodor Pavlovitch Karamazov
Alexey Fyodorovitch Karamazov was the third son of Fyodor Pavlovitch
Karamazov, a land owner well known in our district in his own day, and
still remembered among us owing to his gloomy and tragic death, which
happened thirteen years ago, and which I shall describe in its proper
place. For the present I will only say that this “landowner”—for so we
used to call him, although he hardly spent a day of his life on his own
estate—was a strange type, yet one pretty frequently to be met with, a
type abject and vicious and at the same time senseless. But he was one
of those senseless persons who are very well capable of looking after
their worldly affairs, and, apparently, after nothing else. Fyodor
Pavlovitch, for instance, began with next to nothing; his estate was of
the smallest; he ran to dine at other men’s tables, and fastened on
them as a toady, yet at his death it appeared that he had a hundred
thousand roubles in hard cash. At the same time, he was all his life
one of the most senseless, fantastical fellows in the whole district. I
repeat, it was not stupidity—the majority of these fantastical fellows
are shrewd and intelligent enough—but just senselessness, and a
peculiar national form of it.
He was married twice, and had three sons, the eldest, Dmitri, by his
first wife, and two, Ivan and Alexey, by his second. Fyodor
Pavlovitch’s first wife, Adelaïda Ivanovna, belonged to a fairly rich
and distinguished noble family, also landowners in our district, the
Miüsovs. How it came to pass that an heiress, who was also a beauty,
and moreover one of those vigorous, intelligent girls, so common in
this generation, but sometimes also to be found in the last, could have
married such a worthless, puny weakling, as we all called him, I won’t
attempt to explain. I knew a young lady of the last “romantic”
generation who after some years of an enigmatic passion for a
gentleman, whom she might quite easily have married at any moment,
invented insuperable obstacles to their union, and ended by throwing
herself one stormy night into a rather deep and rapid river from a high
bank, almost a precipice, and so perished, entirely to satisfy her own
caprice, and to be like Shakespeare’s Ophelia. Indeed, if this
precipice, a chosen and favorite spot of hers, had been less
picturesque, if there had been a prosaic flat bank in its place, most
likely the suicide would never have taken place. This is a fact, and
probably there have been not a few similar instances in the last two or
three generations. Adelaïda Ivanovna Miüsov’s action was similarly, no
doubt, an echo of other people’s ideas, and was due to the irritation
caused by lack of mental freedom. She wanted, perhaps, to show her
feminine independence, to override class distinctions and the despotism
of her family. And a pliable imagination persuaded her, we must
suppose, for a brief moment, that Fyodor Pavlovitch, in spite of his
parasitic position, was one of the bold and ironical spirits of that
progressive epoch, though he was, in fact, an ill‐natured buffoon and
nothing more. What gave the marriage piquancy was that it was preceded
by an elopement, and this greatly captivated Adelaïda Ivanovna’s fancy.
Fyodor Pavlovitch’s position at the time made him specially eager for
any such enterprise, for he was passionately anxious to make a career
in one way or another. To attach himself to a good family and obtain a
dowry was an alluring prospect. As for mutual love it did not exist
apparently, either in the bride or in him, in spite of Adelaïda
Ivanovna’s beauty. This was, perhaps, a unique case of the kind in the
life of Fyodor Pavlovitch, who was always of a voluptuous temper, and
ready to run after any petticoat on the slightest encouragement. She
seems to have been the only woman who made no particular appeal to his
senses.
Immediately after the elopement Adelaïda Ivanovna discerned in a flash
that she had no feeling for her husband but contempt. The marriage
accordingly showed itself in its true colors with extraordinary
rapidity. Although the family accepted the event pretty quickly and
apportioned the runaway bride her dowry, the husband and wife began to
lead a most disorderly life, and there were everlasting scenes between
them. It was said that the young wife showed incomparably more
generosity and dignity than Fyodor Pavlovitch, who, as is now known,
got hold of all her money up to twenty‐five thousand roubles as soon as
she received it, so that those thousands were lost to her for ever. The
little village and the rather fine town house which formed part of her
dowry he did his utmost for a long time to transfer to his name, by
means of some deed of conveyance. He would probably have succeeded,
merely from her moral fatigue and desire to get rid of him, and from
the contempt and loathing he aroused by his persistent and shameless
importunity. But, fortunately, Adelaïda Ivanovna’s family intervened
and circumvented his greediness. It is known for a fact that frequent
fights took place between the husband and wife, but rumor had it that
Fyodor Pavlovitch did not beat his wife but was beaten by her, for she
was a hot‐tempered, bold, dark‐browed, impatient woman, possessed of
remarkable physical strength. Finally, she left the house and ran away
from Fyodor Pavlovitch with a destitute divinity student, leaving
Mitya, a child of three years old, in her husband’s hands. Immediately
Fyodor Pavlovitch introduced a regular harem into the house, and
abandoned himself to orgies of drunkenness. In the intervals he used to
drive all over the province, complaining tearfully to each and all of
Adelaïda Ivanovna’s having left him, going into details too disgraceful
for a husband to mention in regard to his own married life. What seemed
to gratify him and flatter his self‐love most was to play the
ridiculous part of the injured husband, and to parade his woes with
embellishments.
“One would think that you’d got a promotion, Fyodor Pavlovitch, you
seem so pleased in spite of your sorrow,” scoffers said to him. Many
even added that he was glad of a new comic part in which to play the
buffoon, and that it was simply to make it funnier that he pretended to
be unaware of his ludicrous position. But, who knows, it may have been
simplicity. At last he succeeded in getting on the track of his runaway
wife. The poor woman turned out to be in Petersburg, where she had gone
with her divinity student, and where she had thrown herself into a life
of complete emancipation. Fyodor Pavlovitch at once began bustling
about, making preparations to go to Petersburg, with what object he
could not himself have said. He would perhaps have really gone; but
having determined to do so he felt at once entitled to fortify himself
for the journey by another bout of reckless drinking. And just at that
time his wife’s family received the news of her death in Petersburg.
She had died quite suddenly in a garret, according to one story, of
typhus, or as another version had it, of starvation. Fyodor Pavlovitch
was drunk when he heard of his wife’s death, and the story is that he
ran out into the street and began shouting with joy, raising his hands
to Heaven: “Lord, now lettest Thou Thy servant depart in peace,” but
others say he wept without restraint like a little child, so much so
that people were sorry for him, in spite of the repulsion he inspired.
It is quite possible that both versions were true, that he rejoiced at
his release, and at the same time wept for her who released him. As a
general rule, people, even the wicked, are much more naïve and
simple‐hearted than we suppose. And we ourselves are, too.
Master this chapter. Complete your experience
Purchase the complete book to access all chapters and support classic literature
As an Amazon Associate, we earn a small commission from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.
Available in paperback, hardcover, and e-book formats
Let's Analyse the Pattern
Transforming genuine or self-created harm into ongoing performance for sympathy, control, and avoidance of accountability.
Why This Matters
Connect literature to life
This chapter teaches how to distinguish between genuine suffering and manipulative victim performances designed to avoid accountability.
Practice This Today
This week, notice when someone's victim story doesn't match their behavior patterns - trust the behavior, not the narrative.
Now let's explore the literary elements.
Key Quotes & Analysis
"He was one of those senseless persons who are very well capable of looking after their worldly affairs, and, apparently, after nothing else."
Context: Describing Fyodor's contradictory nature - smart about money, stupid about everything else
This perfectly captures how someone can be functionally intelligent in one area while being completely destructive in others. It shows that intelligence doesn't equal wisdom or good judgment.
In Today's Words:
He was great at making money but terrible at being a human being.
"It was not stupidity—the majority of these fantastical fellows are shrewd and intelligent enough—but just senselessness, and a peculiar national form of it."
Context: Explaining that Fyodor's problems aren't from lack of intelligence
Dostoevsky is making a distinction between being smart and being wise. These people know better but can't control their impulses. They're self-aware but self-destructive.
In Today's Words:
He wasn't dumb - he just couldn't get out of his own way.
"He ran to dine at other men's tables, and fastened on them as a toady, yet at his death it appeared that he had a hundred thousand roubles in hard cash."
Context: Describing how Fyodor built wealth through social manipulation
This shows the contradiction at Fyodor's core - he acted poor and needy to manipulate people, but was actually accumulating significant wealth. It reveals his fundamental dishonesty.
In Today's Words:
He mooched off everyone while secretly stashing away a fortune.
Thematic Threads
Class
In This Chapter
Fyodor uses cunning to climb socially and accumulate wealth, but remains fundamentally base in character
Development
Introduced here
In Your Life:
Money and status can't change core character—watch for people whose resources don't match their integrity
Identity
In This Chapter
Adelaide mistakes Fyodor for a progressive rebel when he's actually an opportunistic parasite
Development
Introduced here
In Your Life:
People often present false identities early in relationships—look for consistency between words and actions over time
Social Expectations
In This Chapter
Fyodor manipulates social sympathy by performing the role of abandoned husband while hiding his abusive behavior
Development
Introduced here
In Your Life:
Be cautious of one-sided victim narratives—abusers often control the story by speaking first and loudest
Human Relationships
In This Chapter
A marriage built on false premises becomes a battlefield of exploitation and violence
Development
Introduced here
In Your Life:
Relationships founded on misunderstanding or deception will eventually collapse into conflict and mutual harm
Personal Growth
In This Chapter
Fyodor shows no capacity for self-reflection or change, remaining a 'buffoon' despite life experiences
Development
Introduced here
In Your Life:
Some people never grow from their mistakes—recognize when you're dealing with someone incapable of change
You now have the context. Time to form your own thoughts.
Discussion Questions
- 1
How does Fyodor turn his wife's abandonment into something that benefits him?
analysis • surface - 2
Why do you think Adelaide married Fyodor in the first place, and what does this tell us about how people can misread each other?
analysis • medium - 3
Where have you seen someone play the victim while actually being the problem? How did they maintain that narrative?
application • medium - 4
If you were Adelaide's friend, what red flags would you have pointed out before she married Fyodor?
application • deep - 5
What does Fyodor's contradictory reaction to Adelaide's death reveal about how some people process relationships?
reflection • deep
Critical Thinking Exercise
Spot the Performance vs. Reality
Think of a situation where someone claimed to be the victim but their actions told a different story. Write down what they said happened versus what their behavior patterns showed. Then identify three specific ways they benefited from playing the victim role.
Consider:
- •Look for gaps between their victim story and their actual behavior patterns
- •Notice who gets sympathy, attention, or resources from the narrative
- •Consider what accountability they avoid by staying in the victim role
Journaling Prompt
Write about a time when you might have played victim instead of taking responsibility. What were you trying to avoid, and what did you gain from that narrative?
Coming Up Next...
Chapter 2: When Parents Abandon Their Children
Now we'll see what Fyodor did with his eldest son Dmitri after Adelaide abandoned them both. Spoiler alert: his parenting skills are about what you'd expect from someone who turned his wife's departure into dinner party entertainment.




