Summary
Fetyukovitch delivers his closing argument in Dmitri's defense, making a radical claim that shocks the courtroom: not all fathers deserve the title simply by virtue of biology. He argues that Fyodor Karamazov was no true father to Dmitri—neglecting, abusing, and corrupting him from childhood. The lawyer paints Dmitri as a man with a tender heart beneath his rough exterior, someone who thirsted for love and guidance but received only cruelty and abandonment. He challenges the jury to think beyond traditional notions of filial duty, arguing that love cannot be commanded—it must be earned through care and devotion. The courtroom erupts in applause as he declares that killing such a 'father' cannot truly be called parricide. But Fetyukovitch goes further, questioning whether Dmitri actually committed the murder at all, suggesting it was at most an impulse of natural justice against an unnatural parent. His most powerful argument comes at the end: mercy will transform Dmitri's soul, while punishment will only harden his heart and create a lifelong enemy of society. He appeals to Russian ideals of redemption over retribution, asking the jury to save both Dmitri and the integrity of Russian justice. The speech represents a revolutionary challenge to traditional family authority and religious obligation, arguing instead for relationships based on mutual respect and genuine care.
Coming Up in Chapter 93
The jury retires to deliberate, but their decision may not align with the defense's passionate plea. The peasants who make up the jury have their own ideas about justice, family, and the proper order of things.
Share it with friends
An excerpt from the original text.(~500 words)
A Corrupter Of Thought “It’s not only the accumulation of facts that threatens my client with ruin, gentlemen of the jury,” he began, “what is really damning for my client is one fact—the dead body of his father. Had it been an ordinary case of murder you would have rejected the charge in view of the triviality, the incompleteness, and the fantastic character of the evidence, if you examine each part of it separately; or, at least, you would have hesitated to ruin a man’s life simply from the prejudice against him which he has, alas! only too well deserved. But it’s not an ordinary case of murder, it’s a case of parricide. That impresses men’s minds, and to such a degree that the very triviality and incompleteness of the evidence becomes less trivial and less incomplete even to an unprejudiced mind. How can such a prisoner be acquitted? What if he committed the murder and gets off unpunished? That is what every one, almost involuntarily, instinctively, feels at heart. “Yes, it’s a fearful thing to shed a father’s blood—the father who has begotten me, loved me, not spared his life for me, grieved over my illnesses from childhood up, troubled all his life for my happiness, and has lived in my joys, in my successes. To murder such a father—that’s inconceivable. Gentlemen of the jury, what is a father—a real father? What is the meaning of that great word? What is the great idea in that name? We have just indicated in part what a true father is and what he ought to be. In the case in which we are now so deeply occupied and over which our hearts are aching—in the present case, the father, Fyodor Pavlovitch Karamazov, did not correspond to that conception of a father to which we have just referred. That’s the misfortune. And indeed some fathers are a misfortune. Let us examine this misfortune rather more closely: we must shrink from nothing, gentlemen of the jury, considering the importance of the decision you have to make. It’s our particular duty not to shrink from any idea, like children or frightened women, as the talented prosecutor happily expresses it. “But in the course of his heated speech my esteemed opponent (and he was my opponent before I opened my lips) exclaimed several times, ‘Oh, I will not yield the defense of the prisoner to the lawyer who has come down from Petersburg. I accuse, but I defend also!’ He exclaimed that several times, but forgot to mention that if this terrible prisoner was for twenty‐three years so grateful for a mere pound of nuts given him by the only man who had been kind to him, as a child in his father’s house, might not such a man well have remembered for twenty‐three years how he ran in his father’s back‐yard, ‘without boots on his feet and with his little trousers hanging by one button’—to use the expression of the kind‐hearted doctor, Herzenstube? “Oh,...
Master this chapter. Complete your experience
Purchase the complete book to access all chapters and support classic literature
As an Amazon Associate, we earn a small commission from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.
Available in paperback, hardcover, and e-book formats
Intelligence Amplifier™ Analysis
The Road of Earned Authority - When Biology Isn't Enough
When someone demands respect based on their role or title rather than earning it through their actions and character.
Why This Matters
Connect literature to life
This chapter teaches how to distinguish between authority that's earned through care and competence versus authority that's simply claimed through titles or positions.
Practice This Today
This week, notice when someone demands respect based on their position alone—ask yourself what they've actually done to earn your loyalty.
Now let's explore the literary elements.
Terms to Know
Parricide
The act of killing one's own father or parent. In 19th century Russia, this was considered the most heinous crime possible, worse than regular murder because it violated sacred family bonds and religious commandments.
Modern Usage:
We still see this concept when people talk about 'betraying' those who raised them, or when family loyalty is tested in extreme situations.
Closing argument
The final speech a defense lawyer makes to convince a jury of their client's innocence. This is the lawyer's last chance to sway the verdict before the jury deliberates.
Modern Usage:
Any time someone makes their final pitch - whether it's a job interview, asking for a raise, or trying to convince someone to see things your way.
Filial duty
The obligation children are supposed to have toward their parents - to love, honor, and obey them no matter what. In traditional societies, this duty was considered sacred and unbreakable.
Modern Usage:
We still struggle with this when dealing with toxic parents - how much do we owe someone just because they're family?
Natural justice
The idea that sometimes what's morally right conflicts with what's legally right. It suggests there's a higher law based on fairness and human nature that might justify breaking man-made laws.
Modern Usage:
When people say 'he had it coming' or justify breaking rules to do what feels morally right.
Redemption
The belief that people can be saved or transformed through mercy and forgiveness rather than punishment. In Russian Orthodox culture, this was a central spiritual concept.
Modern Usage:
Modern rehabilitation programs, second-chance hiring, and the idea that people can change if given the opportunity.
Prejudice against the accused
When a defendant's bad reputation or past behavior makes people assume they're guilty before hearing all the evidence. The lawyer argues this clouds judgment.
Modern Usage:
How someone's criminal record, appearance, or social media history can bias people against them in court or job interviews.
Characters in This Chapter
Fetyukovitch
Defense attorney
Delivers a revolutionary closing argument that challenges traditional ideas about family duty and parental authority. He argues that fathers must earn respect through love and care, not demand it through biology alone.
Modern Equivalent:
The progressive lawyer who takes on controversial cases and isn't afraid to challenge social norms
Dmitri Karamazov
Defendant
On trial for murdering his father. Through his lawyer's speech, we see him portrayed as a victim of parental neglect who deserves mercy rather than punishment.
Modern Equivalent:
The troubled adult whose destructive behavior stems from childhood trauma and abandonment
Fyodor Karamazov
Murder victim (deceased)
Though dead, he's put on trial by the defense lawyer who portrays him as an unworthy father who abandoned and corrupted his children rather than nurturing them.
Modern Equivalent:
The deadbeat dad whose neglect and abuse created lasting damage in his children's lives
Key Quotes & Analysis
"What is a father—a real father? What is the meaning of that great word?"
Context: During his closing argument, challenging the jury to think beyond biological relationships
This question strikes at the heart of the novel's exploration of family bonds. Fetyukovitch is arguing that being a father requires more than just biology - it requires love, care, and moral guidance.
In Today's Words:
Just because someone got you pregnant doesn't make them a real dad.
"Love cannot be commanded—it must be earned through care and devotion"
Context: Arguing that children don't automatically owe love to parents who mistreat them
This revolutionary idea challenges centuries of tradition about family duty. It suggests relationships should be based on mutual respect rather than obligation or fear.
In Today's Words:
You can't force someone to love you - you have to actually be worthy of their love.
"Mercy will transform his soul, while punishment will only harden his heart"
Context: His final appeal to the jury about how to treat Dmitri
This captures the novel's central theme about redemption versus retribution. The lawyer argues that kindness can change people while cruelty only makes them worse.
In Today's Words:
If you show him compassion, he might become a better person, but if you crush him, you'll just create a lifelong enemy.
Thematic Threads
Authority
In This Chapter
Fetyukovitch challenges the automatic authority of fatherhood, arguing it must be earned through care and devotion
Development
Builds on earlier themes of failed patriarchal authority in the Karamazov family
In Your Life:
You might question whether certain authority figures in your life have actually earned the respect they demand.
Justice
In This Chapter
The lawyer redefines justice as mercy and redemption rather than punishment and retribution
Development
Continues the novel's exploration of different concepts of justice—legal, moral, and spiritual
In Your Life:
You might consider whether your approach to conflicts focuses on punishment or genuine resolution.
Identity
In This Chapter
Dmitri is reframed not as a murderous son but as an abandoned child seeking love and guidance
Development
Develops the theme of how childhood neglect shapes adult behavior and identity
In Your Life:
You might recognize how your own childhood experiences continue to influence your adult relationships and reactions.
Relationships
In This Chapter
The argument that love cannot be commanded but must be earned through genuine care and respect
Development
Expands on the novel's examination of authentic versus obligatory family bonds
In Your Life:
You might evaluate whether your relationships are based on mutual care or mere obligation and duty.
Social Expectations
In This Chapter
The speech challenges traditional notions of filial duty and family hierarchy
Development
Culminates the novel's critique of rigid social structures that ignore individual circumstances
In Your Life:
You might question which social expectations you follow out of genuine belief versus fear of judgment.
You now have the context. Time to form your own thoughts.
Discussion Questions
- 1
What radical argument does Fetyukovitch make about fathers and why does it shock the courtroom?
analysis • surface - 2
Why does Fetyukovitch argue that respect and love must be earned rather than automatically given to authority figures?
analysis • medium - 3
Where do you see people today demanding respect based on their title or position without earning it through their actions?
application • medium - 4
How would you handle a situation where someone in authority over you expects loyalty they haven't earned through care or competence?
application • deep - 5
What does this chapter reveal about the difference between hollow authority and genuine leadership?
reflection • deep
Critical Thinking Exercise
Authority Audit
Think of three authority figures in your life—past or present. For each person, create two columns: what their position entitled them to expect from you, and what they actually did to earn that respect. Look for patterns in who made you feel obligated versus who made you feel genuinely supported.
Consider:
- •Notice the difference between fear-based compliance and genuine respect
- •Consider how your body felt around each person—tense or relaxed
- •Think about whether their authority helped you grow or kept you small
Journaling Prompt
Write about a time when you felt guilty for not respecting someone in authority. Looking back, what had they actually done to earn that respect? How might you handle a similar situation now?
Coming Up Next...
Chapter 93: The Peasants Stand Firm
What lies ahead teaches us public opinion can shift dramatically in high-stakes situations, and shows us the power dynamics between different social classes in justice systems. These patterns appear in literature and life alike.