Summary
Ivan visits Smerdyakov in the hospital, determined to uncover the truth about his father's murder. The conversation becomes a tense psychological chess match as Ivan probes Smerdyakov's convenient epileptic fit and his cryptic warnings before the murder. Smerdyakov, though physically weakened, proves mentally sharp, deflecting Ivan's accusations with logical explanations that somehow feel both truthful and evasive. He claims his warnings were meant to protect the family, his fit was genuine fear-induced, and his knowledge of the murder method was coincidental. The exchange reveals Ivan's own guilt - he admits to Alyosha that he secretly wished for his father's death and hoped Dmitri would kill him. This confession drives a wedge between the brothers, as Alyosha confirms he sensed Ivan's dark desires. Ivan leaves feeling relieved that Mitya appears guilty rather than Smerdyakov, yet tormented by questions about his own moral complicity. The chapter explores how we rationalize our darkest impulses and how guilt can manifest as aggressive interrogation of others. Ivan's relief at Mitya's apparent guilt reveals his need for someone else to bear the burden of the violence he secretly craved.
Coming Up in Chapter 76
Ivan's doubts about Smerdyakov refuse to stay buried. Despite his relief and the mounting evidence against Mitya, something about that hospital conversation continues to gnaw at him, drawing him back for another confrontation.
Share it with friends
An excerpt from the original text.(~500 words)
The First Interview With Smerdyakov This was the third time that Ivan had been to see Smerdyakov since his return from Moscow. The first time he had seen him and talked to him was on the first day of his arrival, then he had visited him once more, a fortnight later. But his visits had ended with that second one, so that it was now over a month since he had seen him. And he had scarcely heard anything of him. Ivan had only returned five days after his father’s death, so that he was not present at the funeral, which took place the day before he came back. The cause of his delay was that Alyosha, not knowing his Moscow address, had to apply to Katerina Ivanovna to telegraph to him, and she, not knowing his address either, telegraphed to her sister and aunt, reckoning on Ivan’s going to see them as soon as he arrived in Moscow. But he did not go to them till four days after his arrival. When he got the telegram, he had, of course, set off post‐haste to our town. The first to meet him was Alyosha, and Ivan was greatly surprised to find that, in opposition to the general opinion of the town, he refused to entertain a suspicion against Mitya, and spoke openly of Smerdyakov as the murderer. Later on, after seeing the police captain and the prosecutor, and hearing the details of the charge and the arrest, he was still more surprised at Alyosha, and ascribed his opinion only to his exaggerated brotherly feeling and sympathy with Mitya, of whom Alyosha, as Ivan knew, was very fond. By the way, let us say a word or two of Ivan’s feeling to his brother Dmitri. He positively disliked him; at most, felt sometimes a compassion for him, and even that was mixed with great contempt, almost repugnance. Mitya’s whole personality, even his appearance, was extremely unattractive to him. Ivan looked with indignation on Katerina Ivanovna’s love for his brother. Yet he went to see Mitya on the first day of his arrival, and that interview, far from shaking Ivan’s belief in his guilt, positively strengthened it. He found his brother agitated, nervously excited. Mitya had been talkative, but very absent‐minded and incoherent. He used violent language, accused Smerdyakov, and was fearfully muddled. He talked principally about the three thousand roubles, which he said had been “stolen” from him by his father. “The money was mine, it was my money,” Mitya kept repeating. “Even if I had stolen it, I should have had the right.” He hardly contested the evidence against him, and if he tried to turn a fact to his advantage, it was in an absurd and incoherent way. He hardly seemed to wish to defend himself to Ivan or any one else. Quite the contrary, he was angry and proudly scornful of the charges against him; he was continually firing up and abusing every one. He only laughed contemptuously...
Master this chapter. Complete your experience
Purchase the complete book to access all chapters and support classic literature
As an Amazon Associate, we earn a small commission from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.
Available in paperback, hardcover, and e-book formats
Intelligence Amplifier™ Analysis
The Road of Projected Guilt - When We Interrogate Others to Avoid Ourselves
When carrying secret guilt or shame, we become aggressive investigators of others' wrongdoing to avoid confronting our own.
Why This Matters
Connect literature to life
This chapter teaches how aggressive moral policing often masks personal guilt and unexamined conscience.
Practice This Today
This week, notice when you become unusually focused on someone else's wrongdoing - pause and ask yourself what you might be avoiding examining in your own behavior.
Now let's explore the literary elements.
Terms to Know
Epileptic fit
A seizure disorder that was poorly understood in the 19th century and often seen as mysterious or even supernatural. In this chapter, Smerdyakov claims his epileptic attack was triggered by fear, making it a convenient alibi for the murder timing.
Modern Usage:
Today we understand epilepsy medically, but people still use health conditions as excuses or alibis when convenient.
Moral complicity
Being partially responsible for wrongdoing through your thoughts, wishes, or inaction rather than direct participation. Ivan struggles with guilt because he secretly wanted his father dead, even though he didn't kill him.
Modern Usage:
We see this when someone feels guilty for wishing harm on another person, or when bystanders feel responsible for not preventing something bad.
Psychological chess match
A conversation where both parties are strategically maneuvering, trying to get information while protecting themselves. Each statement has hidden meaning and purpose beyond the surface words.
Modern Usage:
This happens in job interviews, relationship arguments, or when police question suspects - everyone's playing mental games.
Rationalization
Creating logical-sounding explanations for behavior that's actually driven by emotion or self-interest. Characters convince themselves their motives are pure when they're really protecting themselves.
Modern Usage:
We do this constantly - explaining away our bad choices or finding reasons why our selfish actions are actually justified.
Guilt projection
Aggressively focusing on someone else's wrongdoing to avoid facing your own moral failures. Ivan interrogates Smerdyakov partly to distract from his own dark wishes.
Modern Usage:
People who cheat often become obsessively suspicious of their partners, or those who lie become hypervigilant about others lying.
Convenient timing
When events happen at suspiciously perfect moments that benefit someone. Smerdyakov's epileptic fit occurred exactly when it would provide him an alibi for the murder.
Modern Usage:
We notice this when someone gets 'sick' right before a big presentation or when convenient excuses always seem to appear when needed.
Characters in This Chapter
Ivan Karamazov
Tormented investigator
Returns from Moscow to investigate his father's murder, but his questioning of Smerdyakov reveals his own guilt about secretly wishing for his father's death. He's both seeking truth and trying to ease his conscience.
Modern Equivalent:
The family member who asks all the hard questions at a crisis but is really trying to prove their own innocence
Smerdyakov
Suspected murderer
Lies in the hospital after an epileptic fit, providing clever but evasive answers to Ivan's probing questions. He appears weak physically but remains mentally sharp, deflecting suspicion with logical explanations.
Modern Equivalent:
The coworker who always has a perfect excuse and makes you feel crazy for being suspicious
Alyosha
Moral compass brother
Confirms Ivan's worst fears by admitting he sensed Ivan's desire for their father's death. His honesty drives a wedge between the brothers and forces Ivan to face his own darkness.
Modern Equivalent:
The sibling who calls you out on your BS even when it hurts
Mitya (Dmitri)
Convenient scapegoat
Though not present in this scene, his apparent guilt provides Ivan with relief - if Mitya is the murderer, then Ivan doesn't have to examine his own moral complicity as deeply.
Modern Equivalent:
The family troublemaker everyone blames when things go wrong
Key Quotes & Analysis
"I was afraid that you might do something crazy in your anger"
Context: Explaining why he warned Ivan about leaving town before the murder
This shows Smerdyakov's manipulative intelligence - he plants the idea that his warnings were protective rather than incriminating. He's making Ivan complicit by suggesting Ivan was capable of violence.
In Today's Words:
I was worried you might lose it and do something stupid when you got mad
"I hoped that Mitya would kill him, and I didn't try to prevent it"
Context: Ivan's confession to Alyosha about his true feelings
This brutal honesty reveals Ivan's moral crisis - he's admitting to passive participation in his father's potential murder through his wishes and inaction. It's the core of his guilt.
In Today's Words:
I wanted my brother to kill our dad, and I didn't try to stop it
"You knew it would happen, and you went away"
Context: Confronting Ivan about his departure before the murder
Alyosha cuts through Ivan's rationalizations to the heart of his moral failure. This simple statement forces Ivan to face that his leaving wasn't innocent - it was enabling.
In Today's Words:
You saw this coming and you bailed
Thematic Threads
Guilt
In This Chapter
Ivan's secret wish for his father's death creates desperate need to prove someone else is the killer
Development
Evolved from Ivan's earlier philosophical detachment to active psychological torment
In Your Life:
Notice when your strongest moral outrage might be covering your own uncomfortable truths
Truth
In This Chapter
Smerdyakov's answers are simultaneously truthful and evasive, revealing how facts can mislead
Development
Building on earlier themes about multiple versions of truth within families
In Your Life:
Someone can tell you facts while hiding the real truth you need to hear
Class
In This Chapter
Ivan interrogates the servant while avoiding his own privileged complicity in family violence
Development
Continues pattern of upper-class characters using lower-class ones as scapegoats
In Your Life:
Power dynamics shape who gets blamed and who gets believed in difficult situations
Brotherhood
In This Chapter
Ivan's confession to Alyosha creates distance between them, showing how honesty can damage relationships
Development
First major crack in the brothers' bonds, contrasting earlier mutual support
In Your Life:
Sometimes telling the truth about your dark thoughts pushes away the people you need most
Complicity
In This Chapter
Ivan realizes his desires contributed to the murder without his direct action
Development
Introduced here as new recognition of indirect responsibility
In Your Life:
Your unexpressed wishes and silent encouragement can make you partly responsible for others' actions
You now have the context. Time to form your own thoughts.
Discussion Questions
- 1
Why does Ivan interrogate Smerdyakov so aggressively, and what is he really trying to prove?
analysis • surface - 2
How does Ivan's confession to Alyosha about secretly wishing their father dead change our understanding of his behavior throughout the investigation?
analysis • medium - 3
Think about times when people become unusually focused on others' mistakes or wrongdoing. What patterns do you notice in your workplace, family, or community?
application • medium - 4
When you catch yourself obsessing over someone else's behavior or building a case against them, what questions should you ask yourself first?
application • deep - 5
What does Ivan's relief at Mitya's apparent guilt reveal about how we handle our own moral failures and dark impulses?
reflection • deep
Critical Thinking Exercise
Track Your Projection Patterns
Think of a recent situation where you found yourself unusually critical of someone else's behavior or mistakes. Write down what they did wrong, then honestly examine what you might have been avoiding in your own actions or thoughts. Look for connections between your criticism of them and your own unresolved guilt or shortcomings.
Consider:
- •The louder your criticism, the more likely you're projecting something personal
- •Ask yourself: 'Am I building a case or addressing a genuine concern?'
- •Notice if you feel relief when others are caught doing what you've done or wanted to do
Journaling Prompt
Write about a time when you realized your harsh judgment of someone else was really about your own behavior or desires. How did recognizing this pattern change how you handled similar situations?
Coming Up Next...
Chapter 76: The Web of Mutual Accusation
As the story unfolds, you'll explore guilt and suspicion can create toxic power dynamics between people, while uncovering leaving situations ambiguous often makes them more dangerous. These lessons connect the classic to contemporary challenges we all face.