Summary
Raskolnikov's Choice
Crime and Punishment by Fyodor Dostoevsky
The decision is made. After days of anguish, wavering, and internal debate, the protagonist finally chooses confession. But even this decision is complicated - he doesn't go straight to the police station. He wanders, delays, second-guesses. At one point he nearly turns back. The chapter shows that even when we know what we must do, actually doing it requires immense courage. He stops at the Haymarket, where Sonia told him to bow down and kiss the earth, to publicly acknowledge his sin. He tries, but can't quite do it - people are watching, and his pride rebels. He manages a small gesture, enough to move forward. Finally, he enters the police station. The confession itself is almost anticlimactic - a few words, and it's done. The chapter's power comes from showing how difficult it is to surrender, to give up control, to accept consequences. The protagonist has spent the entire novel trying to prove he's extraordinary, above conventional morality. Confession means admitting he's not - that he's human, fallible, and subject to the same moral laws as everyone else.
Coming Up in Chapter 35
Now that Sonia knows the truth, Raskolnikov must face what comes next. Will she help him find a path toward redemption, or will the weight of his confession drive them apart?
Share it with friends
An excerpt from the original text.(~500 words)
He hurried to Svidrigaïlov’s. What he had to hope from that man he did not know. But that man had some hidden power over him. Having once recognised this, he could not rest, and now the time had come. On the way, one question particularly worried him: had Svidrigaïlov been to Porfiry’s? As far as he could judge, he would swear to it, that he had not. He pondered again and again, went over Porfiry’s visit; no, he hadn’t been, of course he hadn’t. But if he had not been yet, would he go? Meanwhile, for the present he fancied he couldn’t. Why? He could not have explained, but if he could, he would not have wasted much thought over it at the moment. It all worried him and at the same time he could not attend to it. Strange to say, none would have believed it perhaps, but he only felt a faint vague anxiety about his immediate future. Another, much more important anxiety tormented him--it concerned himself, but in a different, more vital way. Moreover, he was conscious of immense moral fatigue, though his mind was working better that morning than it had done of late. And was it worth while, after all that had happened, to contend with these new trivial difficulties? Was it worth while, for instance, to manoeuvre that Svidrigaïlov should not go to Porfiry’s? Was it worth while to investigate, to ascertain the facts, to waste time over anyone like Svidrigaïlov? Oh, how sick he was of it all! And yet he was hastening to Svidrigaïlov; could he be expecting something _new_ from him, information, or means of escape? Men will catch at straws! Was it destiny or some instinct bringing them together? Perhaps it was only fatigue, despair; perhaps it was not Svidrigaïlov but some other whom he needed, and Svidrigaïlov had simply presented himself by chance. Sonia? But what should he go to Sonia for now? To beg her tears again? He was afraid of Sonia, too. Sonia stood before him as an irrevocable sentence. He must go his own way or hers. At that moment especially he did not feel equal to seeing her. No, would it not be better to try Svidrigaïlov? And he could not help inwardly owning that he had long felt that he must see him for some reason. But what could they have in common? Their very evil-doing could not be of the same kind. The man, moreover, was very unpleasant, evidently depraved, undoubtedly cunning and deceitful, possibly malignant. Such stories were told about him. It is true he was befriending Katerina Ivanovna’s children, but who could tell with what motive and what it meant? The man always had some design, some project. There was another thought which had been continually hovering of late about Raskolnikov’s mind, and causing him great uneasiness. It was so painful that he made distinct efforts to get rid of it. He sometimes thought that Svidrigaïlov was dogging his footsteps. Svidrigaïlov...
Master this chapter. Complete your experience
Purchase the complete book to access all chapters and support classic literature
As an Amazon Associate, we earn a small commission from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.
Available in paperback, hardcover, and e-book formats
Intelligence Amplifier™ Analysis
Why This Matters
Connect literature to life
This chapter teaches how to identify people who respond to pain with compassion rather than judgment—a crucial skill when you need to share something that could destroy you.
Now let's explore the literary elements.
Terms to Know
Confession
The act of admitting wrongdoing, especially something deeply shameful or criminal. In this chapter, it's not just about telling the truth - it's about finally sharing a burden that's been destroying someone from the inside. Confession can be the first step toward healing, but it requires tremendous courage.
Redemption
The possibility of being saved or forgiven, even after doing terrible things. It doesn't mean the bad actions disappear, but that a person can still find meaning and goodness in their life. Redemption often requires both admitting what you've done wrong and accepting help from others.
Moral isolation
Being cut off from others because of guilt or shame about your actions. When you've done something terrible, you may feel like you can't connect with anyone because they don't know the 'real' you. This isolation makes the guilt grow stronger and more poisonous over time.
Witness to suffering
Someone who sees your pain and doesn't turn away. In Russian culture and literature, bearing witness to another person's suffering is seen as a sacred act. It means you're willing to share their burden rather than judge them for it.
Sacred prostitute
A literary concept where a character who sells their body is portrayed as spiritually pure or holy. Dostoevsky uses this paradox with Sonia - society sees her as fallen, but she represents Christ-like compassion and forgiveness. Her circumstances don't diminish her moral authority.
Russian Orthodox Christianity
The dominant religion in 19th century Russia, emphasizing suffering, confession, and redemption through love. These themes run throughout Dostoevsky's work. The idea is that suffering can lead to spiritual growth if you open your heart to God and others.
Characters in This Chapter
Raskolnikov
protagonist
Finally breaks down and confesses his double murder to Sonia, unable to carry the secret alone any longer. His choice to trust her with the truth shows he's beginning to recognize his need for human connection and forgiveness, marking the start of his possible redemption.
Sonia
moral guide
Receives Raskolnikov's confession with shock but responds with compassion rather than judgment. Her reaction proves she has the spiritual strength to help him find redemption. She becomes his witness and potential savior, showing that love can exist even in the face of horrible truth.
Key Quotes & Analysis
"I killed her! I killed the old woman and her sister! I killed them with an axe and robbed them."
Context: The moment he finally speaks the truth aloud to Sonia
This brutal confession strips away all his philosophical justifications and theories. By stating it so plainly, he's forced to confront the raw reality of what he's done. The repetition of 'I killed' shows he's taking full responsibility for the first time.
"What have you done to yourself?"
Context: Her first response after hearing his confession
She doesn't ask 'How could you do this to them?' but focuses on what he's done to his own soul. This shows her immediate understanding that he's destroyed himself through these actions. Her concern is for his spiritual state, not just the victims.
"We will suffer together, and together we will carry our cross."
Context: When she commits to helping him through his redemption
She uses Christian imagery of bearing the cross together, showing she's willing to share his burden. This isn't just romantic love - it's spiritual partnership in the work of redemption. She's offering to walk the difficult path with him rather than abandon him to his guilt.
Thematic Threads
Isolation
In This Chapter
Raskolnikov's crushing loneliness ends when he finally shares his secret with someone who can handle the truth
Development
Evolved from his earlier withdrawal from family and friends to this breakthrough moment of connection
Redemption
In This Chapter
Sonia's compassionate response shows that redemption requires both confession and the right witness
Development
Introduced here as the first real possibility of healing for Raskolnikov
Class
In This Chapter
Raskolnikov confesses to a prostitute because her low social status means she won't judge him from a position of moral superiority
Development
Continues the theme of how social position affects moral authority and judgment
Human Connection
In This Chapter
The confession scene demonstrates how we need witnesses to our pain who won't abandon us
Development
Builds on earlier failed connections to show what authentic human bond looks like
Truth
In This Chapter
Speaking the truth about his crimes begins Raskolnikov's psychological healing process
Development
Contrasts with his earlier lies and self-deception, marking a crucial turning point
You now have the context. Time to form your own thoughts.
Discussion Questions
- 1
What does Raskolnikov finally tell Sonia, and how does she react to his confession?
- 2
Why do you think Raskolnikov chose Sonia to confess to rather than anyone else in his life?
- 3
When have you seen someone carrying a secret that was clearly eating them alive? What signs did you notice?
- 4
If you had to confess something difficult, how would you choose the right person to tell? What qualities would you look for?
- 5
What does Sonia's response teach us about the difference between judgment and accountability when someone admits wrongdoing?
Critical Thinking Exercise
Map Your Confession Strategy
Think of a time you carried guilt or a difficult secret (it doesn't have to be criminal—maybe a mistake at work, a lie to family, or a moment you're not proud of). Create a simple map: Who would be the worst person to tell? Who would be the best? What makes the difference between these two people? Consider their own struggles, how they handle other people's problems, and whether they see mistakes as character flaws or human experiences.
Consider:
- •The best confessor often has their own struggles and won't judge from a position of superiority
- •Someone who responds to pain with curiosity rather than immediate advice or judgment
- •A person who can separate your actions from your worth as a human being
Coming Up Next...
Chapter 35: Sonia's Faith
In the next chapter, you'll discover faith sustains through darkness, and learn the power of unwavering belief in another's goodness. These insights reveal timeless patterns that resonate in our own lives and relationships.
