Summary
Zarathustra, lost in thought while walking through a swamp, accidentally steps on a man lying hidden in the marsh. Both react with startled aggression, but Zarathustra quickly apologizes with a parable about two lonely beings—a dreaming wanderer and a sleeping dog—who snap at each other when startled, though they might have been friends. The stepped-on man reveals he's been deliberately lying in the swamp, letting leeches bite his arm as part of his research. When he learns Zarathustra's identity, he becomes ecstatic, calling Zarathustra the greatest 'conscience-leech' of all. This man identifies himself as 'the spiritually conscientious one'—a scholar who has devoted his entire life to studying one tiny thing: the brain of the leech. He explains his philosophy: better to know one thing completely than many things partially. He's sacrificed broad knowledge for deep expertise, accepting 'black ignorance' in all other areas to achieve true understanding in his chosen field. His dedication is so extreme he uses his own blood to feed the leeches he studies. Zarathustra is impressed by this man's rigorous honesty and single-minded pursuit, recognizing a kindred spirit who takes intellectual integrity to its logical extreme. The encounter shows how true expertise requires sacrifice and how accidental meetings can reveal unexpected wisdom. Both men represent different approaches to knowledge—Zarathustra the broad philosopher, the scholar the focused specialist.
Coming Up in Chapter 65
A cry of distress interrupts their conversation, calling Zarathustra away from this fascinating encounter. What emergency awaits, and will these two devoted seekers of truth meet again?
Share it with friends
An excerpt from the original text.(~500 words)
And Zarathustra went thoughtfully on, further and lower down, through forests and past moory bottoms; as it happeneth, however, to every one who meditateth upon hard matters, he trod thereby unawares upon a man. And lo, there spurted into his face all at once a cry of pain, and two curses and twenty bad invectives, so that in his fright he raised his stick and also struck the trodden one. Immediately afterwards, however, he regained his composure, and his heart laughed at the folly he had just committed. “Pardon me,” said he to the trodden one, who had got up enraged, and had seated himself, “pardon me, and hear first of all a parable. As a wanderer who dreameth of remote things on a lonesome highway, runneth unawares against a sleeping dog, a dog which lieth in the sun: —As both of them then start up and snap at each other, like deadly enemies, those two beings mortally frightened—so did it happen unto us. And yet! And yet—how little was lacking for them to caress each other, that dog and that lonesome one! Are they not both—lonesome ones!” —“Whoever thou art,” said the trodden one, still enraged, “thou treadest also too nigh me with thy parable, and not only with thy foot! Lo! am I then a dog?”—And thereupon the sitting one got up, and pulled his naked arm out of the swamp. For at first he had lain outstretched on the ground, hidden and indiscernible, like those who lie in wait for swamp-game. “But whatever art thou about!” called out Zarathustra in alarm, for he saw a deal of blood streaming over the naked arm,—“what hath hurt thee? Hath an evil beast bit thee, thou unfortunate one?” The bleeding one laughed, still angry, “What matter is it to thee!” said he, and was about to go on. “Here am I at home and in my province. Let him question me whoever will: to a dolt, however, I shall hardly answer.” “Thou art mistaken,” said Zarathustra sympathetically, and held him fast; “thou art mistaken. Here thou art not at home, but in my domain, and therein shall no one receive any hurt. Call me however what thou wilt—I am who I must be. I call myself Zarathustra. Well! Up thither is the way to Zarathustra’s cave: it is not far,—wilt thou not attend to thy wounds at my home? It hath gone badly with thee, thou unfortunate one, in this life: first a beast bit thee, and then—a man trod upon thee!”— When however the trodden one had heard the name of Zarathustra he was transformed. “What happeneth unto me!” he exclaimed, “WHO preoccupieth me so much in this life as this one man, namely Zarathustra, and that one animal that liveth on blood, the leech? For the sake of the leech did I lie here by this swamp, like a fisher, and already had mine outstretched arm been bitten ten times, when there biteth a still finer leech at...
Master this chapter. Complete your experience
Purchase the complete book to access all chapters and support classic literature
As an Amazon Associate, we earn a small commission from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.
Available in paperback, hardcover, and e-book formats
Intelligence Amplifier™ Analysis
The Road of Deep Expertise
True mastery requires sacrificing breadth for depth, accepting ignorance in many areas to achieve real knowledge in one.
Why This Matters
Connect literature to life
This chapter teaches how to identify where deep focus creates more value than broad knowledge.
Practice This Today
This week, notice which colleagues are indispensable because they know one thing deeply—then consider what your 'leech brain' specialty could be.
Now let's explore the literary elements.
Terms to Know
Parable
A simple story used to illustrate a moral or spiritual lesson. Zarathustra uses the story of the wanderer and sleeping dog to explain how two lonely beings can react with hostility when they might have been friends.
Modern Usage:
We still use parables in everyday conversation when we say 'It's like when...' to help someone understand a situation through comparison.
Conscience
Your inner sense of what's right and wrong that guides your behavior. The leech scholar calls Zarathustra a 'conscience-leech' because he sucks out people's moral certainties and makes them question everything.
Modern Usage:
When we say someone 'has no conscience' or feel 'guilt-ridden,' we're talking about this same internal moral compass.
Specialization vs. Generalization
The choice between knowing one thing extremely well versus knowing many things at a surface level. The leech scholar has chosen to know everything about leech brains while remaining ignorant about everything else.
Modern Usage:
This is the modern debate between being a specialist (like a brain surgeon) versus a generalist (like a family doctor).
Intellectual Integrity
The commitment to honest thinking and research, even when it's uncomfortable or inconvenient. The scholar sacrifices his own blood and comfort to truly understand his subject.
Modern Usage:
We see this when researchers refuse to fudge data or when someone admits they don't know something instead of pretending they do.
Asceticism
The practice of severe self-discipline and avoiding indulgence, usually for spiritual or intellectual purposes. The scholar lives in poverty and discomfort to pursue pure knowledge.
Modern Usage:
Modern examples include athletes who give up social lives to train, or students who work multiple jobs to afford education.
Serendipity
A fortunate accident or unexpected discovery. Zarathustra's accidental stepping on the scholar leads to an important encounter about different approaches to knowledge.
Modern Usage:
When we say 'everything happens for a reason' or talk about 'lucky breaks,' we're describing serendipitous moments.
Characters in This Chapter
Zarathustra
Wandering philosopher
He's walking through difficult terrain while deep in thought, accidentally steps on someone, and responds with immediate apology and wisdom. His encounter reveals his respect for different forms of dedication to truth.
Modern Equivalent:
The thoughtful mentor who learns from everyone they meet
The Spiritually Conscientious One
Extreme specialist scholar
A researcher who has devoted his entire life to studying leech brains, living in the swamp and feeding leeches with his own blood. He represents the path of absolute specialization and intellectual honesty.
Modern Equivalent:
The PhD researcher who spends decades studying one tiny aspect of science
The Leeches
Objects of study
They represent the scholar's chosen field of expertise and literally feed off his blood, showing the physical cost of his dedication to knowledge.
Modern Equivalent:
The demanding project that consumes all your time and energy
Key Quotes & Analysis
"Are they not both—lonesome ones!"
Context: Explaining why he and the scholar reacted with hostility when they're actually similar
This reveals Zarathustra's insight that conflict often comes from similarity rather than difference. Two isolated people can lash out at each other precisely because they recognize their shared loneliness.
In Today's Words:
We're both just lonely people trying to figure things out
"Better to know nothing than to half-know many things!"
Context: Defending his choice to specialize in one tiny field rather than study broadly
This challenges our modern assumption that knowing a little about everything is better than deep expertise. The scholar argues that true knowledge requires complete commitment and sacrifice.
In Today's Words:
I'd rather be an expert in one thing than a know-it-all about everything
"My poverty is my pride!"
Context: Explaining why he's chosen to live in the swamp studying leeches
He's turned material deprivation into a badge of honor, showing that his values prioritize intellectual integrity over comfort or social status. His poverty proves his commitment to pure research.
In Today's Words:
Being broke is worth it because I'm doing what matters to me
Thematic Threads
Expertise
In This Chapter
The scholar has devoted his life to studying only leech brains, accepting ignorance in all other areas
Development
Introduced here as extreme specialization versus Zarathustra's broad philosophical approach
In Your Life:
You might recognize this when deciding whether to become the workplace expert in one specific skill or stay a generalist
Sacrifice
In This Chapter
The scholar uses his own blood to feed leeches and lies in swamps for his research
Development
Continues theme of what true commitment costs from earlier chapters
In Your Life:
You see this when pursuing any goal requires giving up other opportunities or comforts
Recognition
In This Chapter
The scholar becomes ecstatic when he realizes he's met Zarathustra, calling him the greatest 'conscience-leech'
Development
Builds on earlier themes of seeking validation from those we admire
In Your Life:
You experience this when someone you respect acknowledges your work or expertise
Unexpected Encounters
In This Chapter
Zarathustra accidentally steps on the scholar while lost in thought, leading to meaningful exchange
Development
Continues pattern of chance meetings revealing wisdom throughout the book
In Your Life:
You might find this in conversations with strangers or colleagues that unexpectedly teach you something valuable
Different Paths
In This Chapter
Zarathustra represents broad philosophical thinking while the scholar embodies focused scientific method
Development
Explores how different approaches to knowledge can coexist and respect each other
In Your Life:
You see this when working with people who have completely different professional approaches but shared dedication
You now have the context. Time to form your own thoughts.
Discussion Questions
- 1
What does the leech scholar mean when he says it's 'better to know one thing completely than many things partially'?
analysis • surface - 2
Why does the scholar accept 'black ignorance' in all other areas of knowledge? What does he gain from this trade-off?
analysis • medium - 3
Where do you see this pattern of deep specialization versus broad knowledge in your workplace or community? Who are the 'leech scholars' you know?
application • medium - 4
If you had to choose one area to become deeply expert in—accepting ignorance elsewhere—what would it be and why?
application • deep - 5
What does this chapter suggest about the relationship between sacrifice and mastery? Is the scholar's extreme dedication admirable or concerning?
reflection • deep
Critical Thinking Exercise
Map Your Expertise Investment
List three areas where you currently spend significant learning time or energy. For each area, estimate how deep your knowledge goes compared to others around you. Then identify one area where you could go much deeper if you were willing to sacrifice breadth elsewhere. Consider what you'd have to give up and what you might gain.
Consider:
- •True expertise requires years of focused attention, not just casual interest
- •Every hour spent going deep in one area is an hour not available for other learning
- •Deep expertise often makes you valuable in ways that broad general knowledge cannot
Journaling Prompt
Write about a time when your specialized knowledge helped you solve a problem that others couldn't. What did it feel like to be the expert in the room? What did you sacrifice to develop that expertise?
Coming Up Next...
Chapter 65: The Magician's Performance
In the next chapter, you'll discover to spot when someone is performing their pain for attention or manipulation, and learn authentic vulnerability differs from theatrical suffering. These insights reveal timeless patterns that resonate in our own lives and relationships.