Summary
Smith delivers a devastating critique of European colonial policies, revealing how the pursuit of empire has enriched a few merchants while impoverishing nations. He traces the origins of colonization from ancient Greece and Rome to the Spanish conquest of America, showing how the search for gold and silver mines drove expansion but created economic imbalances. The chapter exposes how colonial monopolies—where mother countries restrict trade to benefit specific merchant classes—actually reduce overall wealth by forcing capital into less productive uses. Smith demonstrates that while colonies like those in North America prospered despite these restrictions (due to abundant land and relative freedom), the monopoly system diverted British capital from more profitable European trade into slower, more distant colonial commerce. He argues that true free trade would benefit everyone more than the current system of exclusive privileges. The analysis reveals how political interests override economic sense: merchants lobby for protective policies that boost their profits while reducing national wealth. Smith's prescription is gradual liberalization rather than sudden change, recognizing that entire industries have grown dependent on artificial monopolies. This chapter crystallizes Smith's central argument that individual liberty and free markets create more prosperity than government-directed trade, even when that direction appears to serve national interests.
Coming Up in Chapter 28
Having dissected the colonial system, Smith prepares to deliver his final verdict on mercantilism itself, revealing why this entire economic philosophy rests on fundamental misconceptions about wealth and trade.
Share it with friends
An excerpt from the original text.(~500 words)
OF COLONIES. PART I. Of the Motives for Establishing New Colonies. The interest which occasioned the first settlement of the different European colonies in America and the West Indies, was not altogether so plain and distinct as that which directed the establishment of those of ancient Greece and Rome. All the different states of ancient Greece possessed, each of them, but a very small territory; and when the people in anyone of them multiplied beyond what that territory could easily maintain, a part of them were sent in quest of a new habitation, in some remote and distant part of the world; the warlike neighbours who surrounded them on all sides, rendering it difficult for any of them to enlarge very much its territory at home. The colonies of the Dorians resorted chiefly to Italy and Sicily, which, in the times preceding the foundation of Rome, were inhabited by barbarous and uncivilized nations; those of the Ionians and Aeolians, the two other great tribes of the Greeks, to Asia Minor and the islands of the Aegean sea, of which the inhabitants sewn at that time to have been pretty much in the same state as those of Sicily and Italy. The mother city, though she considered the colony as a child, at all times entitled to great favour and assistance, and owing in return much gratitude and respect, yet considered it as an emancipated child, over whom she pretended to claim no direct authority or jurisdiction. The colony settled its own form of government, enacted its own laws, elected its own magistrates, and made peace or war with its neighbours, as an independent state, which had no occasion to wait for the approbation or consent of the mother city. Nothing can be more plain and distinct than the interest which directed every such establishment. Rome, like most of the other ancient republics, was originally founded upon an agrarian law, which divided the public territory, in a certain proportion, among the different citizens who composed the state. The course of human affairs, by marriage, by succession, and by alienation, necessarily deranged this original division, and frequently threw the lands which had been allotted for the maintenance of many different families, into the possession of a single person. To remedy this disorder, for such it was supposed to be, a law was made, restricting the quantity of land which any citizen could possess to five hundred jugera; about 350 English acres. This law, however, though we read of its having been executed upon one or two occasions, was either neglected or evaded, and the inequality of fortunes went on continually increasing. The greater part of the citizens had no land; and without it the manners and customs of those times rendered it difficult for a freeman to maintain his independency. In the present times, though a poor man has no land of his own, if he has a little stock, he may either farm the lands of another, or he may carry...
Master this chapter. Complete your experience
Purchase the complete book to access all chapters and support classic literature
As an Amazon Associate, we earn a small commission from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.
Available in paperback, hardcover, and e-book formats
Intelligence Amplifier™ Analysis
The Road of Special Interests - When the Few Profit from the Many's Loss
Small organized groups use government power to extract benefits from the larger population by concentrating gains while dispersing costs.
Why This Matters
Connect literature to life
This chapter teaches how to identify when small groups use official-sounding justifications to capture benefits while spreading costs to everyone else.
Practice This Today
This week, notice when someone advocates strongly for a rule or restriction that would directly benefit their role or department—ask yourself who really pays the hidden costs.
Now let's explore the literary elements.
Terms to Know
Colonial Monopoly
A system where a mother country forces its colonies to trade only with them, cutting out competitors. The government grants exclusive trading rights to certain merchants, who then charge higher prices and offer worse service because they face no competition.
Modern Usage:
Like when your cable company is the only option in your neighborhood, so they can charge whatever they want and provide terrible customer service.
Mercantilism
The belief that national wealth comes from hoarding gold and silver, and that trade is a zero-sum game where one country's gain must be another's loss. This led governments to restrict imports and push exports at all costs.
Modern Usage:
Similar to how some people think immigrants 'steal' jobs, assuming there's only a fixed number of opportunities to go around.
Mother Country
The original nation that establishes and controls colonies. Smith shows how these countries often hurt themselves by forcing inefficient trade relationships that benefit a few merchants but cost everyone else.
Modern Usage:
Like a parent company that forces all its subsidiaries to buy overpriced supplies from the main office instead of shopping around.
Exclusive Company
A business granted special government privileges to be the only trader in certain goods or regions. These companies lobbied hard to maintain their monopolies, even when it hurt the broader economy.
Modern Usage:
Think pharmaceutical companies that lobby to extend patents and block generic drugs, keeping prices high for everyone.
Capital Diversion
When government policies force money and investment away from naturally profitable activities into less efficient ones. Smith argues this makes the whole economy poorer, even if it enriches specific groups.
Modern Usage:
Like when tax breaks for certain industries pull investment away from more promising startups or technologies.
Gradual Reform
Smith's approach to fixing bad economic policies slowly rather than all at once, recognizing that people have built their lives around existing systems. He advocates for phasing out harmful monopolies over time.
Modern Usage:
Similar to how cities gradually phase out rent control or how we slowly transition away from fossil fuels rather than shutting everything down overnight.
Characters in This Chapter
The Colonial Merchants
Antagonists
These traders lobby the government for exclusive rights to colonial trade, claiming it serves the national interest. Smith exposes how they're really just protecting their own profits at everyone else's expense.
Modern Equivalent:
Corporate lobbyists who push for regulations that hurt consumers but boost their bottom line
The Colonial Settlers
Unlikely heroes
Despite being restricted by monopoly policies, they prosper through hard work and abundant land. Smith uses them to show that freedom and opportunity create wealth better than government control.
Modern Equivalent:
Small business owners who succeed despite bureaucratic red tape and unfair competition from big corporations
The Spanish Conquistadors
Cautionary examples
Their obsession with finding gold and silver mines led to destructive policies that ultimately weakened Spain. Smith uses them to show how chasing the wrong kind of wealth backfires.
Modern Equivalent:
Get-rich-quick schemers who chase flashy investments instead of building real value
Ancient Greek Colonizers
Positive examples
Unlike later European colonizers, they gave their colonies independence and freedom to trade. Smith shows this approach created more prosperity for everyone involved.
Modern Equivalent:
Companies that spin off successful divisions instead of micromanaging them from headquarters
Key Quotes & Analysis
"The colony settled its own form of government, enacted its own laws, elected its own magistrates, and made peace or war with its neighbours as an independent state."
Context: Contrasting ancient Greek colonial policy with modern European restrictions
Smith shows that giving colonies freedom actually created more wealth and stability than trying to control them. This challenges the assumption that tight control leads to better outcomes.
In Today's Words:
The best managers are the ones who train their people well and then get out of the way.
"The exclusive trade of the mother countries tends to diminish, or at least to keep down below what they would otherwise rise to, both the enjoyments and industry of all those nations in general."
Context: Explaining how colonial monopolies hurt everyone, including the mother country
This reveals Smith's core insight that win-lose thinking actually creates lose-lose outcomes. When you try to grab more than your fair share, you end up shrinking the whole pie.
In Today's Words:
When companies try to squeeze every penny out of customers and suppliers, they usually end up hurting their own long-term profits too.
"To found a great empire for the sole purpose of raising up a people of customers may at first sight appear a project fit only for a nation of shopkeepers."
Context: Criticizing the British approach to colonization as purely commercial
Smith is being sarcastic here, showing how reducing complex relationships to simple buyer-seller transactions misses the bigger picture and often backfires.
In Today's Words:
Building your whole business strategy around forcing people to buy from you is pretty short-sighted thinking.
Thematic Threads
Class
In This Chapter
Colonial merchants form a privileged class through government-granted monopolies, not productive work
Development
Expanded from earlier discussions of how wealth concentrates through artificial barriers
In Your Life:
You might see this when established professionals lobby to restrict who can do certain jobs
Power
In This Chapter
Political connections matter more than economic efficiency in determining trade policies
Development
Builds on previous examples of how political influence shapes markets
In Your Life:
You experience this when regulations seem designed to protect existing businesses rather than consumers
Identity
In This Chapter
Merchants define themselves as patriots serving national interests while serving personal profit
Development
New theme showing how self-interest disguises itself as public service
In Your Life:
You might notice this when people frame their personal benefits as being good for everyone
Social Expectations
In This Chapter
Society expects government to direct trade for national advantage, despite evidence this reduces prosperity
Development
Continues theme of how conventional wisdom often contradicts actual results
In Your Life:
You see this when popular policies sound good but create unintended consequences
Human Relationships
In This Chapter
Colonial relationships based on extraction and control rather than mutual benefit
Development
Extends earlier analysis of how unequal relationships create instability
In Your Life:
You might recognize this in any relationship where one party benefits by limiting the other's options
You now have the context. Time to form your own thoughts.
Discussion Questions
- 1
Smith shows how colonial merchants got rich while their home countries got poorer. What specific advantages did these merchants gain from government-granted monopolies?
analysis • surface - 2
Why did concentrated benefits for merchants create stronger political pressure than the dispersed costs felt by ordinary citizens?
analysis • medium - 3
Where do you see this same pattern today—small groups capturing benefits while spreading costs across everyone else?
application • medium - 4
When you hear someone advocating for new regulations or restrictions 'for your protection,' how would you figure out who really benefits?
application • deep - 5
What does this colonial example reveal about the difference between creating wealth and redirecting existing wealth?
reflection • deep
Critical Thinking Exercise
Follow the Money Trail
Pick a current regulation or restriction in your industry or daily life—licensing requirements, safety rules, trade restrictions, or professional standards. Map out who benefits most from this rule and who pays the hidden costs. Look beyond the stated purpose to the actual winners and losers.
Consider:
- •Who lobbies hardest to keep this rule in place?
- •What would happen to established players if this restriction disappeared?
- •How does this rule affect newcomers trying to enter the market?
Journaling Prompt
Write about a time when you encountered a rule or restriction that seemed designed to protect consumers but actually protected established businesses. How did you recognize what was really happening?
Coming Up Next...
Chapter 28: The Mercantile System's Hidden Costs
What lies ahead teaches us special interests manipulate government policy for private gain, and shows us protectionist policies often hurt the very people they claim to help. These patterns appear in literature and life alike.