Summary
Smith exposes the mercantile system's contradictions and cruelties through detailed examples of how manufacturers manipulated government policy. He shows how wool producers convinced Parliament to impose barbaric penalties—including hand amputation and death—on anyone exporting sheep or wool, supposedly to protect England's competitive advantage. Yet Smith reveals these laws were based on false claims about English wool's superiority and actually depressed domestic wool prices while enriching manufacturers. The chapter details similarly oppressive regulations on leather, metals, and manufacturing tools, all designed to give domestic producers monopoly power. Smith demonstrates how these policies systematically sacrifice consumer interests to producer profits, forcing people to pay higher prices for inferior goods. He traces how manufacturers obtained bounties for importing raw materials while blocking exports that might benefit farmers or workers. The regulations become increasingly absurd—even restricting the movement of wool within England and requiring detailed paperwork for sheep farmers. Smith argues these laws violate basic principles of justice and liberty, turning the state into an enforcer for private monopolies. He concludes that the entire mercantile system serves not national wealth but the narrow interests of merchants and manufacturers who designed it. The chapter reveals how economic policy becomes corrupted when special interests capture the legislative process, creating a system that enriches the few while impoverishing the many.
Coming Up in Chapter 29
Having demolished the mercantile system, Smith turns to examine agricultural systems of political economy that view land as the primary source of national wealth. He'll explore whether these alternative approaches offer better solutions for promoting genuine prosperity.
Share it with friends
An excerpt from the original text.(~500 words)
CONCLUSION OF THE MERCANTILE SYSTEM. Though the encouragement of exportation, and the discouragement of importation, are the two great engines by which the mercantile system proposes to enrich every country, yet, with regard to some particular commodities, it seems to follow an opposite plan: to discourage exportation, and to encourage importation. Its ultimate object, however, it pretends, is always the same, to enrich the country by an advantageous balance of trade. It discourages the exportation of the materials of manufacture, and of the instruments of trade, in order to give our own workmen an advantage, and to enable them to undersell those of other nations in all foreign markets; and by restraining, in this manner, the exportation of a few commodities, of no great price, it proposes to occasion a much greater and more valuable exportation of others. It encourages the importation of the materials of manufacture, in order that our own people may be enabled to work them up more cheaply, and thereby prevent a greater and more valuable importation of the manufactured commodities. I do not observe, at least in our statute book, any encouragement given to the importation of the instruments of trade. When manufactures have advanced to a certain pitch of greatness, the fabrication of the instruments of trade becomes itself the object of a great number of very important manufactures. To give any particular encouragement to the importation of such instruments, would interfere too much with the interest of those manufactures. Such importation, therefore, instead of being encouraged, has frequently been prohibited. Thus the importation of wool cards, except from Ireland, or when brought in as wreck or prize goods, was prohibited by the 3rd of Edward IV.; which prohibition was renewed by the 39th of Elizabeth, and has been continued and rendered perpetual by subsequent laws. The importation of the materials of manufacture has sometimes been encouraged by an exemption from the duties to which other goods are subject, and sometimes by bounties. The importation of sheep’s wool from several different countries, of cotton wool from all countries, of undressed flax, of the greater part of dyeing drugs, of the greater part of undressed hides from Ireland, or the British colonies, of seal skins from the British Greenland fishery, of pig and bar iron from the British colonies, as well as of several other materials of manufacture, has been encouraged by an exemption from all duties, if properly entered at the custom-house. The private interest of our merchants and manufacturers may, perhaps, have extorted from the legislature these exemptions, as well as the greater part of our other commercial regulations. They are, however, perfectly just and reasonable; and if, consistently with the necessities of the state, they could be extended to all the other materials of manufacture, the public would certainly be a gainer. The avidity of our great manufacturers, however, has in some cases extended these exemptions a good deal beyond what can justly be considered as the rude materials of their work....
Master this chapter. Complete your experience
Purchase the complete book to access all chapters and support classic literature
As an Amazon Associate, we earn a small commission from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.
Available in paperback, hardcover, and e-book formats
Intelligence Amplifier™ Analysis
The Road of Regulatory Capture - When Special Interests Hijack the System
Concentrated interests manipulate rules to benefit themselves while claiming to serve the public good, creating systems that enrich the few at everyone else's expense.
Why This Matters
Connect literature to life
This chapter teaches how to spot when rules are written by those who benefit from them, disguised as serving the common good.
Practice This Today
This week, notice when workplace policies, community regulations, or even family rules seem to benefit the rule-makers more than everyone else—then ask who really pays the cost.
Now let's explore the literary elements.
Terms to Know
Mercantile System
An economic theory that says countries get rich by exporting more than they import, hoarding gold and silver. It treats trade like a zero-sum game where one country's gain must be another's loss.
Modern Usage:
We see this in trade wars where politicians promise to 'bring jobs back' by blocking imports and subsidizing exports.
Monopoly Power
When producers use government regulations to eliminate competition and force consumers to buy only from them at inflated prices. They claim it's for national good but it really just protects their profits.
Modern Usage:
Think cable companies lobbying against municipal broadband or pharmaceutical companies extending patents to block generic drugs.
Regulatory Capture
When industries write the laws that are supposed to regulate them, creating rules that benefit producers at consumers' expense. The foxes literally guard the henhouse.
Modern Usage:
Wall Street executives becoming Treasury secretaries, or telecom lobbyists writing internet privacy laws.
Export Bounties
Government payments to manufacturers for selling goods overseas, funded by taxpayer money. Supposedly helps the national economy but really just subsidizes private profits.
Modern Usage:
Agricultural subsidies that help big agribusiness export corn while small farmers struggle with debt.
Barbaric Penalties
Extreme punishments like hand amputation or death for economic crimes like exporting wool. Shows how far governments will go to enforce bad economic policies.
Modern Usage:
Modern examples include life sentences for drug possession or massive fines for file sharing that destroy people's lives.
False Claims of Superiority
Manufacturers lying about their products being the best in the world to justify protectionist policies. They use patriotic rhetoric to hide their real motive of avoiding competition.
Modern Usage:
Companies claiming American-made products are automatically better while lobbying for tariffs against foreign competitors.
Special Interest Legislation
Laws written to benefit specific industries or companies rather than the general public. They're disguised as national policy but really serve narrow private interests.
Modern Usage:
Tax loopholes for specific industries or licensing requirements that protect existing businesses from new competitors.
Characters in This Chapter
Wool Producers
Primary antagonists
They convinced Parliament to impose death penalties for exporting wool while spreading lies about English wool's superiority. They manipulated patriotic sentiment to create laws that enriched them while harming everyone else.
Modern Equivalent:
The lobbying group that gets Congress to pass laws helping their industry while claiming it's for national security
Parliament
Corrupted authority figure
The legislative body that passed these oppressive laws based on manufacturers' false claims. They became enforcers for private monopolies instead of serving the public interest.
Modern Equivalent:
The politician who votes for whatever the biggest campaign donor wants
Consumers
Victims
Ordinary people forced to pay higher prices for inferior goods because of these protectionist policies. Their interests are completely ignored in favor of producer profits.
Modern Equivalent:
Regular people paying inflated prices for prescription drugs because of patent manipulation
Sheep Farmers
Oppressed workers
Required to fill out detailed paperwork and forbidden from moving their wool freely. They face severe restrictions on their livelihood to benefit manufacturers downstream.
Modern Equivalent:
The small business owner buried in regulations designed by big corporations to eliminate competition
Foreign Competitors
Scapegoats
Blamed for England's economic problems when the real issue is domestic policies that protect inefficient producers. Used as bogeymen to justify harmful regulations.
Modern Equivalent:
Foreign workers blamed for job losses caused by automation and bad management decisions
Key Quotes & Analysis
"It discourages the exportation of the materials of manufacture, and of the instruments of trade, in order to give our own workmen an advantage, and to enable them to undersell those of other nations in all foreign markets"
Context: Smith explains the mercantile system's supposed logic for restricting exports
Smith shows how manufacturers use worker welfare as cover for policies that really just protect their monopoly profits. The 'advantage' goes to owners, not workers, who end up paying higher prices as consumers.
In Today's Words:
They block exports claiming it helps American workers, but it really just lets companies charge more by eliminating competition.
"Such importation would interfere too much with the interest of those manufactures"
Context: Describing why tool imports aren't encouraged even though raw material imports are
This reveals the system's true priority: protecting established manufacturers from any competition whatsoever. National interest becomes whatever serves producer profits.
In Today's Words:
They won't allow anything that might hurt their bottom line, even if it would help everyone else.
"The ultimate object, however, it pretends, is always the same, to enrich the country by an advantageous balance of trade"
Context: Smith notes the gap between stated goals and actual effects of these policies
Smith uses 'pretends' to show these policies don't actually serve national wealth but private interests. The system enriches a few while impoverishing the country overall.
In Today's Words:
They claim it's all about making America richer, but it's really about making themselves richer.
Thematic Threads
Power
In This Chapter
Manufacturers use concentrated wealth and organization to capture government policy, turning state power into their private enforcement mechanism
Development
Evolved from earlier discussions of merchant influence to show systematic corruption of democratic institutions
In Your Life:
You see this when your workplace policies mysteriously favor management or when community rules benefit established residents over newcomers
Deception
In This Chapter
Special interests disguise self-serving policies as patriotic necessity, claiming wool export bans protect England when they only protect profits
Development
Builds on themes of merchant dishonesty to reveal how economic lies become political propaganda
In Your Life:
You encounter this when companies claim policies are 'for your protection' but actually increase their control or profits
Class
In This Chapter
Working farmers and consumers bear the costs of policies designed by and for wealthy manufacturers, creating systematic wealth transfer upward
Development
Deepens earlier class analysis by showing how political systems institutionalize economic inequality
In Your Life:
You experience this when regulations make your life harder or more expensive while benefiting those who can afford to influence the rules
Justice
In This Chapter
The state enforces barbaric penalties including death and amputation to protect private monopolies, perverting justice into corporate enforcement
Development
Introduced here as Smith reveals how captured systems corrupt moral and legal principles
In Your Life:
You see this when authorities punish people for violating rules that serve private interests rather than public good
Organization
In This Chapter
Concentrated manufacturer interests easily outmaneuver scattered consumer interests because organization beats numbers in political influence
Development
Introduced here as key mechanism explaining how small groups dominate large populations
In Your Life:
You face this disadvantage when dealing with organized interests like employers, landlords, or service providers who coordinate while customers remain isolated
You now have the context. Time to form your own thoughts.
Discussion Questions
- 1
Smith describes manufacturers convincing Parliament to impose death penalties for exporting wool while claiming it would make England wealthy. What was really happening behind these dramatic laws?
analysis • surface - 2
Why were wool producers able to get such extreme laws passed while consumers had no voice in the process? What made this power imbalance possible?
analysis • medium - 3
Where do you see this same pattern today—powerful groups writing rules that benefit them while claiming it's for everyone's good?
application • medium - 4
When you encounter a new policy at work, in your community, or in government, how would you figure out who really benefits and who pays the cost?
application • deep - 5
What does this chapter reveal about how people justify harming others for their own benefit? How do we recognize when we're doing this ourselves?
reflection • deep
Critical Thinking Exercise
Decode the Real Story
Think of a rule or policy in your workplace, community, or life that seems complicated or unfair. Write down the official explanation for why this rule exists. Then identify who actually benefits from it and who pays the real cost. Finally, rewrite the rule's purpose in plain language based on what it actually does, not what it claims to do.
Consider:
- •Look for gaps between stated purpose and actual effects
- •Follow the money—who profits and who loses financially?
- •Notice who had a voice in creating the rule and who was excluded
- •Consider whether complexity might be hiding simple unfairness
Journaling Prompt
Write about a time when you realized a rule or system wasn't what it appeared to be. How did you figure it out, and what did you do with that knowledge?
Coming Up Next...
Chapter 29: The Agricultural System Debate
Moving forward, we'll examine extreme economic theories can miss the bigger picture of how value is actually created, and understand balanced approaches often work better than rigid ideological systems. These insights bridge the gap between classic literature and modern experience.