Summary
Smith dismantles the popular belief that blocking foreign goods helps a nation's economy. He argues that when governments impose high tariffs or ban imports to protect domestic industries, they're essentially forcing citizens to buy inferior or overpriced products. Using vivid examples—like how absurd it would be to ban French wine to encourage Scottish vineyards—he shows that such policies waste national resources and make everyone poorer. The chapter introduces Smith's famous 'invisible hand' concept: when individuals pursue their own profit, they naturally choose the most efficient investments, accidentally benefiting society more than if they tried to serve the public good directly. Smith acknowledges two legitimate exceptions to free trade: protecting industries vital for national defense (like shipbuilding for naval power) and matching foreign taxes on domestic goods to level the playing field. He also discusses the political reality that powerful manufacturers and merchants lobby for these protections because they concentrate benefits on themselves while spreading costs across all consumers. The chapter warns that once these protections are established, removing them becomes politically dangerous—protected industries become like 'an overgrown standing army' that intimidates legislators. Smith's central message is that what seems patriotic—buying domestic—often undermines national prosperity by preventing resources from flowing to their most productive uses.
Coming Up in Chapter 23
Smith turns to an even more controversial trade policy: the obsession with maintaining a 'favorable' balance of trade. He'll expose how this popular economic theory leads nations into destructive trade wars and currency manipulation.
Share it with friends
An excerpt from the original text.(~500 words)
OF RESTRAINTS UPON IMPORTATION FROM FOREIGN COUNTRIES OF SUCH GOODS AS CAN BE PRODUCED AT HOME. By restraining, either by high duties, or by absolute prohibitions, the importation of such goods from foreign countries as can be produced at home, the monopoly of the home market is more or less secured to the domestic industry employed in producing them. Thus the prohibition of importing either live cattle or salt provisions from foreign countries, secures to the graziers of Great Britain the monopoly of the home market for butcher’s meat. The high duties upon the importation of corn, which, in times of moderate plenty, amount to a prohibition, give a like advantage to the growers of that commodity. The prohibition of the importation of foreign woollen is equally favourable to the woollen manufacturers. The silk manufacture, though altogether employed upon foreign materials, has lately obtained the same advantage. The linen manufacture has not yet obtained it, but is making great strides towards it. Many other sorts of manufactures have, in the same manner obtained in Great Britain, either altogether, or very nearly, a monopoly against their countrymen. The variety of goods, of which the importation into Great Britain is prohibited, either absolutely, or under certain circumstances, greatly exceeds what can easily be suspected by those who are not well acquainted with the laws of the customs. That this monopoly of the home market frequently gives great encouragement to that particular species of industry which enjoys it, and frequently turns towards that employment a greater share of both the labour and stock of the society than would otherwise have gone to it, cannot be doubted. But whether it tends either to increase the general industry of the society, or to give it the most advantageous direction, is not, perhaps, altogether so evident. The general industry of the society can never exceed what the capital of the society can employ. As the number of workmen that can be kept in employment by any particular person must bear a certain proportion to his capital, so the number of those that can be continually employed by all the members of a great society must bear a certain proportion to the whole capital of the society, and never can exceed that proportion. No regulation of commerce can increase the quantity of industry in any society beyond what its capital can maintain. It can only divert a part of it into a direction into which it might not otherwise have gone; and it is by no means certain that this artificial direction is likely to be more advantageous to the society, than that into which it would have gone of its own accord. Every individual is continually exerting himself to find out the most advantageous employment for whatever capital he can command. It is his own advantage, indeed, and not that of the society, which he has in view. But the study of his own advantage naturally, or rather necessarily, leads him to prefer that employment which...
Master this chapter. Complete your experience
Purchase the complete book to access all chapters and support classic literature
As an Amazon Associate, we earn a small commission from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.
Available in paperback, hardcover, and e-book formats
Intelligence Amplifier™ Analysis
The Road of Good Intentions - Why Protecting Always Backfires
Attempts to shield someone or something from natural consequences often weaken rather than strengthen what we're trying to protect.
Why This Matters
Connect literature to life
This chapter teaches how to spot when shielding someone from consequences weakens rather than strengthens them.
Practice This Today
This week, notice when you're tempted to 'rescue' someone from a natural consequence - ask yourself whether you're building their capability or creating dependency.
Now let's explore the literary elements.
Terms to Know
Monopoly of the home market
When the government blocks foreign competition so domestic businesses can charge higher prices without losing customers. Smith shows this hurts consumers who pay more for worse products while making lazy businesses rich.
Modern Usage:
Like how some cities only allow certain cable companies to operate, leaving residents stuck with bad service and high prices.
High duties/tariffs
Taxes on imported goods that make foreign products so expensive that people buy domestic ones instead. Smith argues this forces citizens to waste money on inferior local products.
Modern Usage:
When politicians promise to 'bring jobs back' by taxing foreign goods, making everything from cars to clothes more expensive for working families.
Invisible hand
Smith's famous idea that when people pursue their own profit, they accidentally help society by putting resources where they're most needed. Self-interest guides better choices than government planning.
Modern Usage:
How Uber drivers choosing profitable routes accidentally solve transportation problems better than city planners could.
Mercantile system
The old economic belief that wealth comes from hoarding gold and blocking imports. Smith shows this thinking makes nations poorer by preventing efficient trade and competition.
Modern Usage:
Like thinking your family gets richer by refusing to shop anywhere but the most expensive local stores.
National defense exception
Smith's acknowledgment that some industries are too important for military security to rely on foreign suppliers. But he warns against using this excuse to protect every business.
Modern Usage:
How we still make our own military equipment domestically, but politicians often claim potato chips or steel are 'national security' issues to help donors.
Standing army of manufacturers
Smith's metaphor for how protected industries become a powerful political force that intimidates lawmakers into keeping their special privileges, even when it hurts everyone else.
Modern Usage:
How big corporations lobby Congress to keep tax breaks and subsidies that ordinary taxpayers end up paying for.
Characters in This Chapter
The graziers of Great Britain
Protected interest group
Cattle ranchers who got the government to ban foreign meat imports so they could charge higher prices. Smith uses them to show how small groups benefit while all consumers pay more.
Modern Equivalent:
The local contractors who get city councils to require expensive permits that block competition
The corn growers
Protected agricultural lobby
Grain farmers who convinced government to tax foreign grain so heavily it's basically banned. They profit while bread becomes more expensive for working families.
Modern Equivalent:
The dairy lobby that keeps milk prices high by limiting foreign imports
The woollen manufacturers
Industrial protectionists
Textile makers who got foreign wool products completely banned to eliminate competition. Smith shows how this makes British clothing more expensive and lower quality.
Modern Equivalent:
The American car manufacturers who lobby for tariffs on foreign cars
The individual pursuing his own interest
Economic protagonist
Smith's ideal economic actor who, by seeking personal profit, accidentally benefits society more than someone trying to serve the public good directly.
Modern Equivalent:
The small business owner who creates jobs and serves customers just by trying to make money
Key Quotes & Analysis
"By pursuing his own interest he frequently promotes that of the society more effectually than when he really intends to promote it."
Context: Smith explaining why self-interest works better than government planning
This is the core of Smith's invisible hand theory. He argues that people making choices based on their own needs and knowledge create better outcomes than bureaucrats trying to manage the economy from above.
In Today's Words:
People looking out for themselves accidentally help everyone more than politicians trying to 'fix' the economy.
"To give the monopoly of the home market to the produce of domestic industry, in any particular art or manufacture, is in some measure to direct private people in what manner they ought to employ their capitals."
Context: Smith criticizing government interference in business decisions
Smith argues that protecting domestic industries is really the government telling citizens how to spend their money, forcing them to buy inferior products instead of letting them choose what's best.
In Today's Words:
When politicians block foreign competition, they're basically telling you where you have to shop and what you have to buy.
"What is prudence in the conduct of every private family, can scarce be folly in that of a great kingdom."
Context: Smith explaining why nations should buy from whoever offers the best deal
Smith uses a simple family analogy to show the absurdity of economic nationalism. Just as families buy from the cheapest store, nations should trade with whoever offers the best value.
In Today's Words:
If it makes sense for your family to shop at Walmart instead of paying twice as much at the corner store, why wouldn't the same logic apply to countries?
Thematic Threads
Hidden Costs
In This Chapter
Trade protections benefit a few manufacturers while making all consumers pay higher prices for inferior goods
Development
Introduced here - the idea that policies that seem beneficial often have invisible negative consequences
In Your Life:
You might pay hidden costs when avoiding short-term discomfort creates long-term problems, like staying in a dead-end job for security.
Self-Interest vs. Common Good
In This Chapter
Smith's 'invisible hand' shows how pursuing individual profit accidentally serves society better than trying to serve society directly
Development
Introduced here - the counterintuitive idea that selfish motives can produce unselfish results
In Your Life:
You serve your family best by developing your own skills and pursuing excellence, not by constantly sacrificing yourself.
Political Manipulation
In This Chapter
Manufacturers lobby for protections by wrapping self-interest in patriotic language about supporting domestic industry
Development
Introduced here - how special interests use noble-sounding arguments to hide personal gain
In Your Life:
You might encounter this when colleagues frame personal agendas as 'what's best for the team' or 'company loyalty.'
Institutional Inertia
In This Chapter
Protected industries become 'overgrown standing armies' that intimidate legislators and resist change
Development
Introduced here - how temporary protections become permanent power structures
In Your Life:
You see this in workplaces where inefficient departments survive by making themselves seem indispensable rather than improving.
Resource Efficiency
In This Chapter
Free trade allows resources to flow to their most productive uses, while protectionism wastes national wealth
Development
Introduced here - the principle that artificial barriers prevent optimal allocation of time, money, and effort
In Your Life:
You maximize your potential by putting energy into activities where you have natural advantages rather than forcing yourself into ill-fitting roles.
You now have the context. Time to form your own thoughts.
Discussion Questions
- 1
Smith argues that blocking foreign goods to protect domestic industries often makes citizens poorer. What examples does he give, and why does he think this protection backfires?
analysis • surface - 2
What does Smith mean by the 'invisible hand'? Why does he believe people pursuing their own profit accidentally helps society more than trying to serve the public good directly?
analysis • medium - 3
Where do you see the Protection Paradox in your own life - situations where shielding someone from consequences actually weakened them instead of helping?
application • medium - 4
Think about a time when you were overprotected or when you overprotected someone else. How would you handle that situation differently now, knowing the difference between protection that strengthens versus protection that creates dependency?
application • deep - 5
Smith shows how powerful groups lobby for protections that benefit them while spreading costs to everyone else. What does this reveal about how self-interest can both help and harm society?
reflection • deep
Critical Thinking Exercise
Protection Audit: Strengthen or Weaken?
List three areas where you're currently being protected or protecting someone else (work, family, finances, health, relationships). For each situation, write whether this protection is building capability for independence or creating dependency. Then identify one small step to shift toward protection that strengthens rather than weakens.
Consider:
- •True protection prepares someone for future challenges, false protection prevents them from developing necessary skills
- •The person being protected should gradually need less help over time, not more
- •Ask yourself: 'Am I solving their problem or helping them learn to solve it themselves?'
Journaling Prompt
Write about a time when someone let you struggle through a challenge instead of rescuing you. How did that experience change your ability to handle similar situations later?
Coming Up Next...
Chapter 23: Trade Wars and Economic Myths
What lies ahead teaches us trade restrictions often backfire on the countries that impose them, and shows us to spot when economic arguments are driven by special interests rather than facts. These patterns appear in literature and life alike.