Summary
Smith demolishes one of the biggest economic myths of his time: that countries need to restrict trade with nations they buy more from than they sell to. Using the heated trade war between Britain and France as his main example, he shows how these restrictions—massive tariffs, import bans, and other barriers—actually hurt both countries while enriching only smugglers. The chapter reveals how merchants and manufacturers push for these policies not because they help the nation, but because they eliminate competition and boost profits for special interests. Smith argues that the whole concept of 'trade balance' is fundamentally flawed—countries don't lose when they import more than they export, any more than individuals lose when they buy groceries. He demonstrates that wealthy trading partners are actually beneficial, not threatening, comparing rich neighbors to good customers who can afford to buy more of your products. The chapter includes a fascinating deep dive into the Amsterdam Bank, showing how sophisticated financial systems developed to handle international trade. Smith's core message is revolutionary for his time: free trade benefits everyone involved, while trade restrictions impoverish nations and breed international hostility. He argues that the real measure of a country's economic health isn't its trade balance but whether it produces more than it consumes—the foundation of genuine wealth creation.
Coming Up in Chapter 24
Next, Smith examines drawbacks—government payments to exporters that seem designed to help domestic industry but often create perverse incentives. He'll reveal how these well-intentioned policies can actually harm the very businesses they're meant to support.
Share it with friends
An excerpt from the original text.(~500 words)
OF THE EXTRAORDINARY RESTRAINTS UPON THE IMPORTATION OF GOODS OF ALMOST ALL KINDS, FROM THOSE COUNTRIES WITH WHICH THE BALANCE IS SUPPOSED TO BE DISADVANTAGEOUS. Part I—Of the Unreasonableness of those Restraints, even upon the Principles of the Commercial System. To lay extraordinary restraints upon the importation of goods of almost all kinds, from those particular countries with which the balance of trade is supposed to be disadvantageous, is the second expedient by which the commercial system proposes to increase the quantity of gold and silver. Thus, in Great Britain, Silesia lawns may be imported for home consumption, upon paying certain duties; but French cambrics and lawns are prohibited to be imported, except into the port of London, there to be warehoused for exportation. Higher duties are imposed upon the wines of France than upon those of Portugal, or indeed of any other country. By what is called the impost 1692, a duty of five and-twenty per cent. of the rate or value, was laid upon all French goods; while the goods of other nations were, the greater part of them, subjected to much lighter duties, seldom exceeding five per cent. The wine, brandy, salt, and vinegar of France, were indeed excepted; these commodities being subjected to other heavy duties, either by other laws, or by particular clauses of the same law. In 1696, a second duty of twenty-five per cent. the first not having been thought a sufficient discouragement, was imposed upon all French goods, except brandy; together with a new duty of five-and-twenty pounds upon the ton of French wine, and another of fifteen pounds upon the ton of French vinegar. French goods have never been omitted in any of those general subsidies or duties of five per cent. which have been imposed upon all, or the greater part, of the goods enumerated in the book of rates. If we count the one-third and two-third subsidies as making a complete subsidy between them, there have been five of these general subsidies; so that, before the commencement of the present war, seventy-five per cent. may be considered as the lowest duty to which the greater part of the goods of the growth, produce, or manufacture of France, were liable. But upon the greater part of goods, those duties are equivalent to a prohibition. The French, in their turn, have, I believe, treated our goods and manufactures just as hardly; though I am not so well acquainted with the particular hardships which they have imposed upon them. Those mutual restraints have put an end to almost all fair commerce between the two nations; and smugglers are now the principal importers, either of British goods into France, or of French goods into Great Britain. The principles which I have been examining, in the foregoing chapter, took their origin from private interest and the spirit of monopoly; those which I am going te examine in this, from national prejudice and animosity. They are, accordingly, as might well be expected, still more unreasonable....
Master this chapter. Complete your experience
Purchase the complete book to access all chapters and support classic literature
As an Amazon Associate, we earn a small commission from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.
Available in paperback, hardcover, and e-book formats
Intelligence Amplifier™ Analysis
The Road of Special Interest Deception
Groups pursue their own narrow interests while claiming to serve the greater good, using fear and noble language to mask self-serving policies.
Why This Matters
Connect literature to life
This chapter teaches how special interests create artificial emergencies to justify policies that benefit them while claiming to serve everyone.
Practice This Today
This week, notice when someone proposes a solution that requires others to sacrifice while they gain power or money—then ask what would happen if we tried the opposite approach.
Now let's explore the literary elements.
Terms to Know
Commercial System
The dominant economic theory of Smith's time that said countries should export more than they import to accumulate gold and silver. It treated international trade like a zero-sum game where one country's gain meant another's loss.
Modern Usage:
We see this mindset today when politicians talk about 'winning' trade wars or complain about trade deficits as if they're automatically bad.
Balance of Trade
The difference between what a country exports versus what it imports. The commercial system obsessed over keeping this positive, believing countries were 'losing' if they imported more than they exported.
Modern Usage:
Modern politicians still use trade deficit numbers to claim other countries are 'ripping us off' in trade deals.
Extraordinary Restraints
Special taxes, bans, and barriers imposed on imports from specific countries to discourage trade. Britain used these against France, making French goods much more expensive or illegal to import.
Modern Usage:
Today we call these trade sanctions or tariffs - like when countries impose extra taxes on each other's products during trade disputes.
Prohibitive Duties
Taxes so high they're designed to stop imports completely rather than raise revenue. Smith shows how these 25-50% tariffs on French goods were meant to kill trade, not fund government.
Modern Usage:
We see this when countries impose crushing tariffs to protect domestic industries, like steel tariffs that make foreign steel too expensive to buy.
Smuggling Trade
The illegal importing of banned or heavily taxed goods. Smith shows how trade restrictions created massive smuggling operations between Britain and France.
Modern Usage:
Any time governments ban or heavily tax something people want, black markets emerge - from prohibition-era alcohol to modern drug trafficking.
Special Interest Advocacy
How specific merchants and manufacturers pushed for trade restrictions not to help the country, but to eliminate foreign competition and boost their own profits.
Modern Usage:
Today's lobbying works the same way - industries push for regulations that hurt their competitors while claiming it's for the public good.
Characters in This Chapter
British Merchants
Self-interested advocates
They lobby for restrictions on French goods not because it helps Britain, but because it eliminates competition and lets them charge higher prices. Smith exposes how they wrap personal profit in patriotic language.
Modern Equivalent:
Corporate lobbyists who push for regulations that hurt their competitors
French Traders
Economic victims
They're hurt by British trade restrictions and retaliate with their own barriers. Smith shows how this cycle of retaliation hurts both nations while enriching only smugglers.
Modern Equivalent:
Companies caught in the middle of trade wars between countries
Smugglers
Unintended beneficiaries
They're the only ones who actually profit from trade restrictions, creating illegal networks to move banned French goods into Britain at huge markups.
Modern Equivalent:
Black market dealers who profit when governments ban or heavily tax popular products
Amsterdam Bankers
Financial innovators
Smith uses them to show how sophisticated financial systems develop to handle international trade, demonstrating that global commerce creates beneficial institutions.
Modern Equivalent:
International financial institutions that facilitate global trade today
Key Quotes & Analysis
"Nothing can be more absurd than this whole doctrine of the balance of trade."
Context: After demolishing the logic behind trade restrictions
Smith directly attacks the core belief system of his era's economic policy. He's calling out the fundamental assumption that countries lose when they import more than they export.
In Today's Words:
This whole obsession with trade deficits is completely ridiculous.
"A rich country is likely to be a good customer, while a poor one can purchase very little."
Context: Explaining why wealthy trading partners benefit everyone
Smith flips conventional wisdom by showing that prosperous neighbors are assets, not threats. The richer your trading partners, the more they can buy from you.
In Today's Words:
You want your neighbors to be wealthy because rich people buy more stuff.
"The sneaking arts of underling tradesmen are thus erected into political maxims for the conduct of a great empire."
Context: Criticizing how merchant self-interest shapes national policy
Smith exposes how narrow business interests get disguised as grand economic strategy. He's showing that what's good for specific merchants isn't necessarily good for the country.
In Today's Words:
We're letting small-minded business tactics drive major national policies.
Thematic Threads
Power
In This Chapter
Merchants and manufacturers use their influence to shape national trade policy for personal profit
Development
Builds on earlier themes about how economic power translates to political influence
In Your Life:
You see this when employers claim company policies benefit workers while actually cutting costs or increasing control.
Deception
In This Chapter
Trade restrictions presented as patriotic duty when they actually harm the nation while enriching special interests
Development
Develops earlier themes about how self-interest disguises itself as virtue
In Your Life:
You encounter this when politicians or companies wrap unpopular decisions in language about protecting or helping you.
Competition
In This Chapter
Wealthy trading partners portrayed as threats when they're actually beneficial customers and suppliers
Development
Expands on themes about how artificial scarcity serves those in power
In Your Life:
You experience this when established businesses try to block new competitors by claiming they're protecting consumers.
Fear
In This Chapter
Trade deficits presented as national weakness when they're often signs of prosperity and consumer choice
Development
Continues examination of how fear is manufactured to serve special interests
In Your Life:
You see this when groups use scary language about change to preserve systems that benefit them at your expense.
Wealth Creation
In This Chapter
True prosperity comes from producing more than consuming, not from restricting trade with successful partners
Development
Builds on fundamental themes about what creates genuine economic value
In Your Life:
You apply this by focusing on developing your skills and productivity rather than trying to limit others' opportunities.
You now have the context. Time to form your own thoughts.
Discussion Questions
- 1
Smith shows how British merchants convinced their government that buying more from France than they sold was dangerous. What specific fears did these merchants exploit to get trade restrictions passed?
analysis • surface - 2
Why did wealthy merchants and manufacturers want trade restrictions when Smith shows these policies hurt both countries? What was really driving their push for these laws?
analysis • medium - 3
Think about modern debates over jobs, healthcare, or housing. Where do you see groups wrapping their self-interest in language about protecting others or serving the greater good?
application • medium - 4
When someone proposes a policy that sounds noble but seems to benefit them personally, what three questions should you ask to see through the rhetoric to the real effects?
application • deep - 5
Smith reveals how people can genuinely believe they're serving others while actually serving themselves. What does this teach us about how self-deception works in human nature?
reflection • deep
Critical Thinking Exercise
Follow the Money Trail
Pick a current policy debate you've heard about recently—healthcare, education, housing, workplace rules, anything. Write down who's arguing for what position, then trace who actually benefits if each side wins. Look past the stated reasons to see where the money and power flow.
Consider:
- •Don't judge the motives—just map who gains what from each outcome
- •Notice when the people pushing hardest for something aren't the ones who'd use it most
- •Pay attention to which arguments sound most noble versus which show clear self-interest
Journaling Prompt
Write about a time when you realized someone's 'helpful' advice actually served their interests more than yours. How did you figure it out, and what did you learn about reading people's real motivations?
Coming Up Next...
Chapter 24: When Government Gives Money Back
Moving forward, we'll examine tax refunds can actually boost business without distorting markets, and understand some government incentives work better than others. These insights bridge the gap between classic literature and modern experience.