Summary
In the aftermath of the Battle of Borodinó, tens of thousands lie dead across fields where peasants once peacefully harvested crops. The scene is horrific—blood soaks the earth for acres, rain falls on the wounded and dying, and both armies are exhausted beyond measure. Soldiers on both sides begin questioning the senseless slaughter, wondering 'For what, for whom, must I kill and be killed?' Yet some mysterious force keeps them fighting even as they stumble with fatigue and horror at their own actions. Both armies are broken—the Russians have lost half their men but still block the road to Moscow, while the French have lost a quarter of theirs but retain their elite Guards. Neither side makes the final push that could end the battle decisively. The French, despite their superior position and intact reserves, cannot summon the will to attack. Napoleon doesn't deploy his Guards not from choice, but because his army's spirit is broken. Though the French technically won by holding the field, they suffered a devastating moral defeat. The Russians proved they could absorb terrible punishment and keep fighting, breaking the myth of French invincibility. This moral victory, Tolstoy argues, is more significant than any tactical gain. The French army, like a mortally wounded animal, can still stumble forward to Moscow through momentum alone, but it's already doomed. Borodinó marks the beginning of Napoleon's downfall—not through military defeat, but through the collapse of his army's belief in itself.
Coming Up in Chapter 230
The story shifts to a new phase as we enter Book Eleven, set in 1812. The consequences of Borodinó will soon ripple through the lives of our characters as the war's true cost becomes clear.
Share it with friends
An excerpt from the original text.(~500 words)
Several tens of thousands of the slain lay in diverse postures and various uniforms on the fields and meadows belonging to the Davýdov family and to the crown serfs—those fields and meadows where for hundreds of years the peasants of Borodinó, Górki, Shevárdino, and Semënovsk had reaped their harvests and pastured their cattle. At the dressing stations the grass and earth were soaked with blood for a space of some three acres around. Crowds of men of various arms, wounded and unwounded, with frightened faces, dragged themselves back to Mozháysk from the one army and back to Valúevo from the other. Other crowds, exhausted and hungry, went forward led by their officers. Others held their ground and continued to fire. Over the whole field, previously so gaily beautiful with the glitter of bayonets and cloudlets of smoke in the morning sun, there now spread a mist of damp and smoke and a strange acid smell of saltpeter and blood. Clouds gathered and drops of rain began to fall on the dead and wounded, on the frightened, exhausted, and hesitating men, as if to say: “Enough, men! Enough! Cease... bethink yourselves! What are you doing?” To the men of both sides alike, worn out by want of food and rest, it began equally to appear doubtful whether they should continue to slaughter one another; all the faces expressed hesitation, and the question arose in every soul: “For what, for whom, must I kill and be killed?... You may go and kill whom you please, but I don’t want to do so any more!” By evening this thought had ripened in every soul. At any moment these men might have been seized with horror at what they were doing and might have thrown up everything and run away anywhere. But though toward the end of the battle the men felt all the horror of what they were doing, though they would have been glad to leave off, some incomprehensible, mysterious power continued to control them, and they still brought up the charges, loaded, aimed, and applied the match, though only one artilleryman survived out of every three, and though they stumbled and panted with fatigue, perspiring and stained with blood and powder. The cannon balls flew just as swiftly and cruelly from both sides, crushing human bodies, and that terrible work which was not done by the will of a man but at the will of Him who governs men and worlds continued. Anyone looking at the disorganized rear of the Russian army would have said that, if only the French made one more slight effort, it would disappear; and anyone looking at the rear of the French army would have said that the Russians need only make one more slight effort and the French would be destroyed. But neither the French nor the Russians made that effort, and the flame of battle burned slowly out. The Russians did not make that effort because they were not attacking the French. At the...
Master this chapter. Complete your experience
Purchase the complete book to access all chapters and support classic literature
As an Amazon Associate, we earn a small commission from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.
Available in paperback, hardcover, and e-book formats
Intelligence Amplifier™ Analysis
The Road of Moral Victory
Standing your ground against superior force can break your opponent's confidence and shift power, even when you technically lose.
Why This Matters
Connect literature to life
This chapter teaches how to identify when losing a battle can win the war by breaking an opponent's psychological advantage.
Practice This Today
This week, notice when someone's power depends entirely on others believing they're unstoppable—and watch what happens when that belief cracks.
Now let's explore the literary elements.
Terms to Know
Pyrrhic victory
A victory that costs so much it's almost like losing. Named after King Pyrrhus who said 'One more such victory and I am lost.' The French technically won Borodinó by holding the battlefield, but they lost so many men and so much morale that it destroyed them.
Modern Usage:
Like when you win an argument with your spouse but damage your relationship, or get a promotion that ruins your health from stress.
Moral defeat
When you lose the will to fight even if you're still standing. The French army's spirit broke at Borodinó even though they weren't militarily defeated. They stopped believing they were invincible.
Modern Usage:
When a bully finally meets someone who fights back and realizes they're not as tough as they thought.
Attrition warfare
Wearing down your enemy through continuous losses rather than one decisive battle. The Russians couldn't beat Napoleon in a fair fight, but they could bleed his army to death slowly.
Modern Usage:
Like a union striking not to win immediately, but to make the company lose money until they give in.
Momentum vs. morale
Momentum is physical force that keeps things moving. Morale is the will to keep fighting. Tolstoy shows how an army can keep advancing on momentum even after its morale is broken, like a dying animal still stumbling forward.
Modern Usage:
Like staying in a dead-end job because it's easier than changing, even when you've lost all motivation.
Questioning authority
When people start asking 'Why am I doing this?' instead of just following orders. The soldiers on both sides begin wondering what they're really fighting for as they see the senseless slaughter.
Modern Usage:
Like employees finally asking why they're working unpaid overtime when the company doesn't care about them.
The fog of war
The confusion and uncertainty that happens during battle. Nobody really knows what's happening or who's winning. Leaders make decisions based on incomplete information and gut feelings.
Modern Usage:
Like trying to make family decisions during a crisis when everyone's stressed and no one has all the facts.
Characters in This Chapter
Napoleon
Antagonist
Though he technically won the battle, Napoleon fails to use his reserves (the Guards) to finish off the Russians. His hesitation reveals that even he senses his army's spirit is broken.
Modern Equivalent:
The CEO who's lost confidence in his own company but won't admit it
The Russian soldiers
Collective protagonist
They absorb devastating losses but refuse to break completely. Their willingness to keep fighting despite being outnumbered proves they can't be conquered by force alone.
Modern Equivalent:
The striking workers who won't give up even when things look hopeless
The French soldiers
Collective antagonist
They fight effectively but begin questioning why they're killing and dying so far from home. Their doubt spreads through the ranks like a disease.
Modern Equivalent:
Employees at a company doing layoffs who start wondering if they're next
Key Quotes & Analysis
"For what, for whom, must I kill and be killed?"
Context: Both armies are exhausted and starting to question the purpose of the slaughter
This question cuts to the heart of all human conflict. When people stop accepting 'because I said so' as an answer, authority begins to crumble. It's the moment when blind obedience turns into conscious choice.
In Today's Words:
What's the point of all this? Why am I destroying myself for someone else's goals?
"Enough, men! Enough! Cease... bethink yourselves! What are you doing?"
Context: Rain begins falling on the battlefield covered with dead and wounded
Tolstoy uses nature as a voice of reason and humanity. Even the weather seems to be pleading for sanity. It's his way of showing that war goes against the natural order of things.
In Today's Words:
Stop this madness! Think about what you're actually doing to each other!
"The strange acid smell of saltpeter and blood"
Context: Describing the battlefield after the fighting
This sensory detail makes the horror real and immediate. Tolstoy doesn't just tell us war is terrible - he makes us smell it. The mixture of gunpowder and blood represents the collision of technology and humanity.
In Today's Words:
The air reeked of gunpowder and death
Thematic Threads
Class
In This Chapter
Russian peasant-soldiers prove they're equal to Napoleon's elite forces in courage and endurance
Development
Evolution from earlier themes of aristocratic superiority—here common people demonstrate their true worth
In Your Life:
You might underestimate your own strength when facing people with more money, education, or status
Identity
In This Chapter
Both armies question who they really are as they commit senseless slaughter
Development
Deepening of identity crisis theme—war strips away pretense and forces self-examination
In Your Life:
Crisis moments force you to confront whether your actions match your values
Power
In This Chapter
Napoleon's power begins crumbling not through defeat but through his army's lost faith
Development
Continuation of power's fragility theme—showing how belief sustains authority more than force
In Your Life:
Your influence depends more on others' belief in you than your actual position
Sacrifice
In This Chapter
Soldiers on both sides sacrifice everything while questioning why
Development
Introduced here—the terrible cost of grand ambitions on ordinary people
In Your Life:
You might be sacrificing your wellbeing for goals that aren't really yours
Resilience
In This Chapter
Russians demonstrate they can absorb devastating punishment and keep fighting
Development
Introduced here—the power of refusing to be broken
In Your Life:
Your ability to endure and bounce back is often your greatest strength
You now have the context. Time to form your own thoughts.
Discussion Questions
- 1
Why does Tolstoy say the French technically won the battle but suffered a 'moral defeat'?
analysis • surface - 2
What broke first - the French army's bodies or their belief in themselves? How did this happen?
analysis • medium - 3
Think of a time when someone seemed to 'win' against you but actually lost respect or power. What made that happen?
application • medium - 4
When facing a stronger opponent at work or in life, how could you use the 'Russian strategy' of absorbing punishment while staying strong?
application • deep - 5
Why do people sometimes gain more power by losing with dignity than by winning through force?
reflection • deep
Critical Thinking Exercise
Map Your Own Borodino
Think of a current situation where someone has more obvious power than you - a difficult boss, family member, or institution. Write down what their 'superior force' looks like, then identify what your 'Russian strengths' are - the things they can't break about you. Map out how standing your ground might create a moral victory even if you face short-term consequences.
Consider:
- •What beliefs or values are you absolutely unwilling to compromise?
- •How might your refusal to break affect their confidence over time?
- •What would 'winning while losing' look like in your specific situation?
Journaling Prompt
Write about a time when you stood your ground against someone more powerful. What did you learn about yourself? What did they learn about you?
Coming Up Next...
Chapter 230: The Math of History
In the next chapter, you'll discover focusing on individual leaders misses the bigger picture, and learn small actions by ordinary people create massive change. These insights reveal timeless patterns that resonate in our own lives and relationships.