An excerpt from the original text.(complete · 1263 words)
he terrible spectacle of the battlefield covered with dead and wounded,
together with the heaviness of his head and the news that some twenty
generals he knew personally had been killed or wounded, and the
consciousness of the impotence of his once mighty arm, produced an
unexpected impression on Napoleon who usually liked to look at the
killed and wounded, thereby, he considered, testing his strength of
mind. This day the horrible appearance of the battlefield overcame
that strength of mind which he thought constituted his merit and his
greatness. He rode hurriedly from the battlefield and returned to the
Shevárdino knoll, where he sat on his campstool, his sallow face
swollen and heavy, his eyes dim, his nose red, and his voice hoarse,
involuntarily listening, with downcast eyes, to the sounds of firing.
With painful dejection he awaited the end of this action, in which he
regarded himself as a participant and which he was unable to arrest.
A personal, human feeling for a brief moment got the better of the
artificial phantasm of life he had served so long. He felt in his own
person the sufferings and death he had witnessed on the battlefield.
The heaviness of his head and chest reminded him of the possibility
of suffering and death for himself. At that moment he did not desire
Moscow, or victory, or glory (what need had he for any more glory?). The
one thing he wished for was rest, tranquillity, and freedom. But when he
had been on the Semënovsk heights the artillery commander had proposed
to him to bring several batteries of artillery up to those heights to
strengthen the fire on the Russian troops crowded in front of Knyazkóvo.
Napoleon had assented and had given orders that news should be brought
to him of the effect those batteries produced.
An adjutant came now to inform him that the fire of two hundred guns
had been concentrated on the Russians, as he had ordered, but that they
still held their ground.
“Our fire is mowing them down by rows, but still they hold on,” said the
adjutant.
“They want more!...” said Napoleon in a hoarse voice.
“Sire?” asked the adjutant who had not heard the remark.
“They want more!” croaked Napoleon frowning. “Let them have it!”
Even before he gave that order the thing he did not desire, and for
which he gave the order only because he thought it was expected of him,
was being done. And he fell back into that artificial realm of imaginary
greatness, and again—as a horse walking a treadmill thinks it is doing
something for itself—he submissively fulfilled the cruel, sad, gloomy,
and inhuman role predestined for him.
And not for that day and hour alone were the mind and conscience
darkened of this man on whom the responsibility for what was happening
lay more than on all the others who took part in it. Never to the end
of his life could he understand goodness, beauty, or truth, or the
significance of his actions which were too contrary to goodness and
truth, too remote from everything human, for him ever to be able to
grasp their meaning. He could not disavow his actions, belauded as they
were by half the world, and so he had to repudiate truth, goodness, and
all humanity.
Not only on that day, as he rode over the battlefield strewn with men
killed and maimed (by his will as he believed), did he reckon as he
looked at them how many Russians there were for each Frenchman and,
deceiving himself, find reason for rejoicing in the calculation that
there were five Russians for every Frenchman. Not on that day alone
did he write in a letter to Paris that “the battle field was superb,”
because fifty thousand corpses lay there, but even on the island of St.
Helena in the peaceful solitude where he said he intended to devote his
leisure to an account of the great deeds he had done, he wrote:
The Russian war should have been the most popular war of modern times:
it was a war of good sense, for real interests, for the tranquillity and
security of all; it was purely pacific and conservative.
It was a war for a great cause, the end of uncertainties and the
beginning of security. A new horizon and new labors were opening out,
full of well-being and prosperity for all. The European system was
already founded; all that remained was to organize it.
Satisfied on these great points and with tranquility everywhere, I
too should have had my Congress and my Holy Alliance. Those ideas were
stolen from me. In that reunion of great sovereigns we should have
discussed our interests like one family, and have rendered account to
the peoples as clerk to master.
Europe would in this way soon have been, in fact, but one people, and
anyone who traveled anywhere would have found himself always in the
common fatherland. I should have demanded the freedom of all navigable
rivers for everybody, that the seas should be common to all, and that
the great standing armies should be reduced henceforth to mere guards
for the sovereigns.
On returning to France, to the bosom of the great, strong, magnificent,
peaceful, and glorious fatherland, I should have proclaimed
her frontiers immutable; all future wars purely defensive, all
aggrandizement antinational. I should have associated my son in the
Empire; my dictatorship would have been finished, and his constitutional
reign would have begun.
Paris would have been the capital of the world, and the French the envy
of the nations!
My leisure then, and my old age, would have been devoted, in company
with the Empress and during the royal apprenticeship of my son, to
leisurely visiting, with our own horses and like a true country couple,
every corner of the Empire, receiving complaints, redressing wrongs,
and scattering public buildings and benefactions on all sides and
everywhere.
Napoleon, predestined by Providence for the gloomy role of executioner
of the peoples, assured himself that the aim of his actions had been the
peoples’ welfare and that he could control the fate of millions and by
the employment of power confer benefactions.
“Of four hundred thousand who crossed the Vistula,” he wrote further
of the Russian war, “half were Austrians, Prussians, Saxons, Poles,
Bavarians, Württembergers, Mecklenburgers, Spaniards, Italians, and
Neapolitans. The Imperial army, strictly speaking, was one third
composed of Dutch, Belgians, men from the borders of the Rhine,
Piedmontese, Swiss, Genevese, Tuscans, Romans, inhabitants of the
Thirty-second Military Division, of Bremen, of Hamburg, and so on: it
included scarcely a hundred and forty thousand who spoke French. The
Russian expedition actually cost France less than fifty thousand men;
the Russian army in its retreat from Vílna to Moscow lost in the various
battles four times more men than the French army; the burning of Moscow
cost the lives of a hundred thousand Russians who died of cold and want
in the woods; finally, in its march from Moscow to the Oder the Russian
army also suffered from the severity of the season; so that by the time
it reached Vílna it numbered only fifty thousand, and at Kálisch less
than eighteen thousand.”
He imagined that the war with Russia came about by his will, and the
horrors that occurred did not stagger his soul. He boldly took the
whole responsibility for what happened, and his darkened mind found
justification in the belief that among the hundreds of thousands who
perished there were fewer Frenchmen than Hessians and Bavarians.
Master this chapter. Complete your experience
Purchase the complete book to access all chapters and support classic literature
As an Amazon Associate, we earn a small commission from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.
Available in paperback, hardcover, and e-book formats
Why This Matters
Connect literature to life
This chapter teaches how to spot when someone is rewriting reality to protect their ego or reputation.
Practice This Today
This week, notice when politicians, bosses, or even friends explain away their mistakes by focusing on their good intentions rather than actual consequences.
Now let's explore the literary elements.
Key Quotes & Analysis
"A personal, human feeling for a brief moment got the better of the artificial phantasm of life he had served so long."
Context: Napoleon momentarily breaks through his emotional armor while viewing the battlefield carnage
This reveals how people in power often live behind a constructed identity that protects them from feeling the full impact of their decisions. The 'artificial phantasm' is the role Napoleon has created to justify his actions.
In Today's Words:
For just a second, he stopped playing the part and felt like a regular human being who had done something terrible.
"At that moment he did not desire Moscow, or victory, or glory. The one thing he wished for was rest, tranquillity, and freedom."
Context: Napoleon's brief moment of clarity about what really matters when faced with mortality
This shows how the pursuit of power and status can become a prison. In his moment of vulnerability, Napoleon realizes that all his ambitions are empty compared to basic human needs for peace.
In Today's Words:
He didn't want to win anymore—he just wanted to go home and not have to pretend to be important.
"The Russian war should have been the most popular war of modern times: it was a war of good sense, for real interests, for the tranquillity and security of all."
Context: Napoleon's later justification of the disastrous Russian campaign
This shows how people rewrite history to protect their self-image. Napoleon transforms his failed invasion into a noble mission for peace, demonstrating how power corrupts not just through action but through self-deception.
In Today's Words:
I wasn't invading Russia for my own ego—I was bringing peace and stability to Europe!
Thematic Threads
Power
In This Chapter
Napoleon's power allows him to rewrite history, but also traps him in increasingly elaborate lies to protect his self-image
Development
Power has evolved from battlefield control to psychological control—over his own narrative and legacy
In Your Life:
You might see this when someone with authority at work refuses to admit mistakes and doubles down on bad decisions.
Identity
In This Chapter
Napoleon cannot face the reality of being a mass killer because it would destroy his identity as a visionary peacemaker
Development
Identity protection has become more important than truth or accountability
In Your Life:
You might protect your identity as a 'good person' by justifying harmful actions rather than changing them.
Truth
In This Chapter
Truth becomes malleable in Napoleon's hands—casualties are minimized, motives are purified, failures become others' fault
Development
Truth has shifted from objective reality to whatever protects the ego
In Your Life:
You might find yourself adjusting facts when telling stories to make yourself look better or avoid responsibility.
Empathy
In This Chapter
Napoleon experiences a brief moment of genuine empathy for his victims but quickly suppresses it to maintain his self-image
Development
Empathy appears as a threat to power rather than a guide for action
In Your Life:
You might shut down feelings of guilt or concern when they threaten your sense of being right or justified.
Consequences
In This Chapter
Napoleon rewrites his memoirs to avoid facing the true consequences of his actions—the human cost of his ambition
Development
Consequences are reframed as noble sacrifices or others' failures rather than personal responsibility
In Your Life:
You might blame external factors for problems you created rather than examining your own role in the outcome.
You now have the context. Time to form your own thoughts.
Discussion Questions
- 1
What does Napoleon experience when he looks at the battlefield, and how does he respond to this feeling?
analysis • surface - 2
Why does Napoleon's moment of empathy disappear so quickly when he orders more bombardment?
analysis • medium - 3
Where have you seen people in positions of power rewrite their own stories to avoid responsibility for negative outcomes?
application • medium - 4
How can someone maintain accountability for their decisions when it's emotionally easier to create justifications?
application • deep - 5
What does Napoleon's pattern of self-deception reveal about how power affects a person's relationship with truth?
reflection • deep
Critical Thinking Exercise
Rewrite Your Own Story
Think of a decision you made that had negative consequences for others. Write two versions: first, the story you might tell to make yourself look better, then the honest version acknowledging your full responsibility. Notice what changes between the two versions and what emotions come up as you write each one.
Consider:
- •Pay attention to which version feels more comfortable to write
- •Notice what language you use to minimize or justify in the first version
- •Consider how the honest version might help you make better decisions going forward
Journaling Prompt
Write about a time when you caught yourself creating a story to avoid facing the full impact of your choices. What would change if you committed to telling yourself the truth about your decisions?
Coming Up Next...
Chapter 229: The Hollow Victory at Borodinó
As Napoleon grapples with the aftermath of Borodino, the focus shifts to how this massive battle has affected both armies and the broader course of the war.




