Summary
Tolstoy steps back from his story to tackle a big question: How do we really understand what causes major historical events? He uses a famous ancient puzzle about Achilles racing a tortoise to make his point. The puzzle seems impossible to solve until mathematicians learned to work with infinitely small pieces—then suddenly it makes perfect sense. History has the same problem, Tolstoy argues. We try to explain massive movements like the Napoleonic Wars by focusing on a few famous people—Napoleon, generals, politicians—as if they single-handedly caused everything. But that's like saying the church bells cause your clock to strike ten just because they happen at the same time. The real forces of history come from millions of ordinary people making individual choices. When peasants leave their farms, when soldiers march, when families flee—these tiny human decisions add up to create the massive movements we see. Historians love to write about kings and battles because it's dramatic and seems to explain everything neatly. But Tolstoy insists this approach is fundamentally wrong. It's like trying to understand a steam engine by only looking at the whistle. To truly understand historical change, we need to study the 'infinitesimally small elements'—the common people whose combined actions actually drive events. This isn't just academic theory. It's about recognizing that real power and change come from the bottom up, not the top down. Your individual choices matter more than you think, because they're part of the vast equation that shapes the world.
Coming Up in Chapter 231
Having laid out his theory about how history really works, Tolstoy will now apply these ideas to examine the forces that actually drove the events we've been following. The focus shifts from individual heroes to the deeper currents moving entire nations.
Share it with friends
An excerpt from the original text.(~500 words)
Absolute continuity of motion is not comprehensible to the human mind. Laws of motion of any kind become comprehensible to man only when he examines arbitrarily selected elements of that motion; but at the same time, a large proportion of human error comes from the arbitrary division of continuous motion into discontinuous elements. There is a well-known, so-called sophism of the ancients consisting in this, that Achilles could never catch up with a tortoise he was following, in spite of the fact that he traveled ten times as fast as the tortoise. By the time Achilles has covered the distance that separated him from the tortoise, the tortoise has covered one tenth of that distance ahead of him: when Achilles has covered that tenth, the tortoise has covered another one hundredth, and so on forever. This problem seemed to the ancients insoluble. The absurd answer (that Achilles could never overtake the tortoise) resulted from this: that motion was arbitrarily divided into discontinuous elements, whereas the motion both of Achilles and of the tortoise was continuous. By adopting smaller and smaller elements of motion we only approach a solution of the problem, but never reach it. Only when we have admitted the conception of the infinitely small, and the resulting geometrical progression with a common ratio of one tenth, and have found the sum of this progression to infinity, do we reach a solution of the problem. A modern branch of mathematics having achieved the art of dealing with the infinitely small can now yield solutions in other more complex problems of motion which used to appear insoluble. This modern branch of mathematics, unknown to the ancients, when dealing with problems of motion admits the conception of the infinitely small, and so conforms to the chief condition of motion (absolute continuity) and thereby corrects the inevitable error which the human mind cannot avoid when it deals with separate elements of motion instead of examining continuous motion. In seeking the laws of historical movement just the same thing happens. The movement of humanity, arising as it does from innumerable arbitrary human wills, is continuous. To understand the laws of this continuous movement is the aim of history. But to arrive at these laws, resulting from the sum of all those human wills, man’s mind postulates arbitrary and disconnected units. The first method of history is to take an arbitrarily selected series of continuous events and examine it apart from others, though there is and can be no beginning to any event, for one event always flows uninterruptedly from another. The second method is to consider the actions of some one man—a king or a commander—as equivalent to the sum of many individual wills; whereas the sum of individual wills is never expressed by the activity of a single historic personage. Historical science in its endeavor to draw nearer to truth continually takes smaller and smaller units for examination. But however small the units it takes, we feel that to take any unit...
Master this chapter. Complete your experience
Purchase the complete book to access all chapters and support classic literature
As an Amazon Associate, we earn a small commission from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.
Available in paperback, hardcover, and e-book formats
Intelligence Amplifier™ Analysis
The Bottom-Up Truth - How Real Change Actually Happens
Mistaking visible authority figures for the actual forces that drive change and events.
Why This Matters
Connect literature to life
This chapter teaches how to trace problems back to their actual systemic sources rather than blaming convenient individual targets.
Practice This Today
This week, notice when people blame one person for complex problems—ask yourself what accumulated pressures and small decisions actually created the situation.
Now let's explore the literary elements.
Terms to Know
Sophism
A clever-sounding argument that seems logical but is actually flawed or misleading. The ancient Greeks used these puzzles to explore problems with reasoning. Tolstoy uses the famous Achilles and tortoise puzzle to show how breaking continuous motion into pieces creates false problems.
Modern Usage:
Like when politicians use misleading statistics that sound convincing but ignore the bigger picture.
Infinitesimally small elements
Incredibly tiny pieces that, when added together, create the whole picture. In math, this concept solved the Achilles puzzle. In history, Tolstoy argues these are the millions of individual human decisions that actually drive major events.
Modern Usage:
Like how viral videos spread through millions of individual shares, not because one celebrity posted it.
Historical determinism
The idea that events in history happen because of larger forces, not just the decisions of famous people. Tolstoy believes wars and social changes result from countless ordinary people's choices, not just what kings and generals decide.
Modern Usage:
Like how economic recessions happen because millions of people change their spending habits, not just because of what politicians do.
Great man theory
The belief that history is shaped primarily by the impact of great individuals - kings, generals, heroes. Tolstoy strongly disagrees with this view, arguing it's like crediting the church bells for making your clock strike ten.
Modern Usage:
Like giving all credit for a company's success to the CEO while ignoring the thousands of workers who actually do the work.
Continuous motion
Movement that flows without breaks or gaps, like real life and real history. When we try to understand it by chopping it into separate pieces, we miss how everything connects and influences everything else.
Modern Usage:
Like trying to understand a relationship by only looking at the fights, missing all the daily interactions that actually shape it.
Arbitrary division
Breaking something whole into artificial pieces that don't reflect reality. Tolstoy says historians do this when they focus only on battles and famous people instead of seeing the continuous flow of human choices.
Modern Usage:
Like judging a student's intelligence based only on test scores while ignoring their creativity, work ethic, and life experience.
Characters in This Chapter
Tolstoy (as narrator/philosopher)
Philosophical guide
Steps away from storytelling to directly challenge how we think about history and causation. Uses mathematical concepts to argue that real historical forces come from ordinary people, not famous leaders.
Modern Equivalent:
The documentary filmmaker who stops the story to explain the bigger picture
Key Quotes & Analysis
"Absolute continuity of motion is not comprehensible to the human mind."
Context: Opening the philosophical discussion about how we understand historical events
Tolstoy argues that humans naturally want to break complex, flowing processes into simple, separate pieces to understand them. But this creates false problems and wrong conclusions about what really causes major events.
In Today's Words:
Our brains can't handle how everything flows together, so we chop it up into pieces and miss the real picture.
"A large proportion of human error comes from the arbitrary division of continuous motion into discontinuous elements."
Context: Explaining why the Achilles puzzle seems impossible to solve
This is Tolstoy's core argument about historical understanding. We create false problems by artificially separating things that are actually connected, like focusing only on Napoleon while ignoring the millions of people whose choices enabled his actions.
In Today's Words:
We mess up our understanding by cutting up things that actually flow together.
"Only when we have admitted the conception of the infinitely small... do we reach a solution of the problem."
Context: Explaining how mathematicians solved the ancient puzzle
Tolstoy uses this mathematical breakthrough as a metaphor for understanding history. Just as math needed to consider infinitely small elements, historians need to study the countless small human choices that create large historical movements.
In Today's Words:
The answer comes when you look at all the tiny pieces that actually make up the whole thing.
Thematic Threads
Power
In This Chapter
Tolstoy reveals that real historical power comes from millions of ordinary people's decisions, not from famous leaders
Development
Evolved from earlier chapters showing how individual characters' choices ripple outward to affect larger events
In Your Life:
You have more influence than you think through your daily choices and interactions
Truth
In This Chapter
The truth about historical causation is hidden beneath convenient but false narratives about great men
Development
Builds on the novel's ongoing theme of characters discovering uncomfortable truths about themselves and society
In Your Life:
The real reasons behind workplace or family problems are often different from the obvious explanations
Class
In This Chapter
Common people are revealed as the true drivers of history, while aristocrats and leaders are shown as largely irrelevant
Development
Continues the novel's critique of aristocratic society and elevation of ordinary people's experiences
In Your Life:
Your working-class perspective and choices matter more in shaping the world than elite opinions
Understanding
In This Chapter
Tolstoy argues we need new ways of thinking to understand complex systems and events
Development
Reflects the characters' journeys toward deeper understanding of themselves and their world
In Your Life:
Simple explanations for complex problems at work or home are usually wrong
Individual Agency
In This Chapter
Each person's small choices contribute to massive historical movements
Development
Culminates the novel's focus on how individual character development affects broader outcomes
In Your Life:
Your individual actions and decisions are part of larger changes happening around you
You now have the context. Time to form your own thoughts.
Discussion Questions
- 1
Why does Tolstoy compare understanding history to the ancient puzzle about Achilles and the tortoise?
analysis • surface - 2
According to Tolstoy, why do we focus on famous leaders instead of ordinary people when trying to explain major changes?
analysis • medium - 3
Think about a major change in your workplace, community, or family. Who got the credit, and who actually did the work to make it happen?
application • medium - 4
When you're facing a problem that seems controlled by people in authority, how can you identify where your individual choices might actually make a difference?
application • deep - 5
What does this chapter suggest about why we often feel powerless to create change, and how might that feeling be wrong?
reflection • deep
Critical Thinking Exercise
Map the Real Power Sources
Pick a current situation in your life where change is needed—at work, in your family, or in your community. Write down who appears to be 'in charge' of this situation. Then dig deeper: list all the small, daily actions by regular people that actually keep this situation running the way it does. Finally, identify three specific small changes you could make that might contribute to the larger change you want to see.
Consider:
- •Look for repeated behaviors and habits, not just dramatic decisions
- •Consider how your daily choices either support or resist the current system
- •Think about what would happen if many people made similar small changes
Journaling Prompt
Write about a time when you underestimated your own influence in a situation. What small actions did you take that ended up having bigger consequences than you expected?
Coming Up Next...
Chapter 231: The Reality of Command Decisions
As the story unfolds, you'll explore good leaders sometimes make decisions that look wrong from the outside, while uncovering momentum and circumstances can override even the best intentions. These lessons connect the classic to contemporary challenges we all face.