Amplified ClassicsAmplified Classics
Literature MattersLife IndexEducators
Sign inSign up
War and Peace - When Perfect Plans Meet Reality

Leo Tolstoy

War and Peace

When Perfect Plans Meet Reality

Home›Books›War and Peace›Chapter 217
Previous
217 of 361
Next

Summary

Napoleon spends an entire day crafting what seems like a masterful battle plan for the upcoming fight at Borodino. He rides around the battlefield looking important, nodding thoughtfully, and issuing commands that sound impressive on paper. His detailed orders specify exactly where batteries should be placed, which generals should attack where, and how the entire battle should unfold. The French historians later praise these dispositions as works of genius. But Tolstoy reveals the brutal truth: every single part of Napoleon's plan was fundamentally flawed and impossible to execute. The batteries couldn't reach their targets from where Napoleon placed them. The woods were impassable where he ordered troops to advance. The terrain didn't support the movements he commanded. Most damning of all, Napoleon positioned himself so far from the actual fighting that he couldn't see what was happening or adjust his orders when reality inevitably diverged from his plan. This chapter exposes the gap between Napoleon's legendary reputation and his actual performance as a military leader. Tolstoy shows how the emperor's distance from the ground truth, combined with everyone's reluctance to question his 'genius,' creates a perfect storm of failure. It's a masterclass in how leaders can become prisoners of their own mythology, making decisions based on how they think things should work rather than how they actually do work.

Coming Up in Chapter 218

The battle of Borodino is about to begin, and we'll see how Napoleon's flawed plans collide with the chaos of actual warfare. The real test isn't in the planning—it's in what happens when the shooting starts.

Share it with friends

Previous ChapterNext Chapter
GO ADS FREE — JOIN US

An excerpt from the original text.(complete · 1251 words)

O

n the twenty-fifth of August, so his historians tell us, Napoleon spent
the whole day on horseback inspecting the locality, considering plans
submitted to him by his marshals, and personally giving commands to his
generals.

The original line of the Russian forces along the river Kolochá had
been dislocated by the capture of the Shevárdino Redoubt on the
twenty-fourth, and part of the line—the left flank—had been drawn back.
That part of the line was not entrenched and in front of it the ground
was more open and level than elsewhere. It was evident to anyone,
military or not, that it was here the French should attack. It would
seem that not much consideration was needed to reach this conclusion,
nor any particular care or trouble on the part of the Emperor and his
marshals, nor was there any need of that special and supreme quality
called genius that people are so apt to ascribe to Napoleon; yet the
historians who described the event later and the men who then surrounded
Napoleon, and he himself, thought otherwise.

Napoleon rode over the plain and surveyed the locality with a profound
air and in silence, nodded with approval or shook his head dubiously,
and without communicating to the generals around him the profound
course of ideas which guided his decisions merely gave them his final
conclusions in the form of commands. Having listened to a suggestion
from Davout, who was now called Prince d’Eckmühl, to turn the Russian
left wing, Napoleon said it should not be done, without explaining
why not. To a proposal made by General Campan (who was to attack the
flèches)
to lead his division through the woods, Napoleon agreed, though
the so-called Duke of Elchingen (Ney) ventured to remark that a movement
through the woods was dangerous and might disorder the division.

Having inspected the country opposite the Shevárdino Redoubt, Napoleon
pondered a little in silence and then indicated the spots where two
batteries should be set up by the morrow to act against the Russian
entrenchments, and the places where, in line with them, the field
artillery should be placed.

After giving these and other commands he returned to his tent, and the
dispositions for the battle were written down from his dictation.

These dispositions, of which the French historians write with enthusiasm
and other historians with profound respect, were as follows:

At dawn the two new batteries established during the night on the
plain occupied by the Prince d’Eckmühl will open fire on the opposing
batteries of the enemy.

At the same time the commander of the artillery of the 1st Corps,
General Pernetti, with thirty cannon of Campan’s division and all the
howitzers of Dessaix’s and Friant’s divisions, will move forward, open
fire, and overwhelm with shellfire the enemy’s battery, against which
will operate:

24 guns of the artillery of the Guards
30 guns of Campan’s division

and 8 guns of Friant’s and Dessaix’s divisions
—

in all 62 guns.

The commander of the artillery of the 3rd Corps, General Fouché, will
place the howitzers of the 3rd and 8th Corps, sixteen in all, on the
flanks of the battery that is to bombard the entrenchment on the left,
which will have forty guns in all directed against it.

General Sorbier must be ready at the first order to advance with all the
howitzers of the Guard’s artillery against either one or other of the
entrenchments.

During the cannonade Prince Poniatowski is to advance through the wood
on the village and turn the enemy’s position.

General Campan will move through the wood to seize the first
fortification.

After the advance has begun in this manner, orders will be given in
accordance with the enemy’s movements.

The cannonade on the left flank will begin as soon as the guns of the
right wing are heard. The sharpshooters of Morand’s division and of
the vice-King’s division will open a heavy fire on seeing the attack
commence on the right wing.

The vice-King will occupy the village and cross by its three bridges,
advancing to the same heights as Morand’s and Gibrard’s divisions, which
under his leadership will be directed against the redoubt and come into
line with the rest of the forces.

All this must be done in good order (le tout se fera avec ordre et
méthode)
as far as possible retaining troops in reserve.

The Imperial Camp near Mozháysk,

September, 6, 1812.

These dispositions, which are very obscure and confused if one allows
oneself to regard the arrangements without religious awe of his genius,
related to Napoleon’s orders to deal with four points—four different
orders. Not one of these was, or could be, carried out.

In the disposition it is said first that the batteries placed on the
spot chosen by Napoleon, with the guns of Pernetti and Fouché; which
were to come in line with them, 102 guns in all, were to open fire and
shower shells on the Russian flèches and redoubts. This could not be
done, as from the spots selected by Napoleon the projectiles did not
carry to the Russian works, and those 102 guns shot into the air until
the nearest commander, contrary to Napoleon’s instructions, moved them
forward.

The second order was that Poniatowski, moving to the village through the
wood, should turn the Russian left flank. This could not be done and
was not done, because Poniatowski, advancing on the village through the
wood, met Túchkov there barring his way, and could not and did not turn
the Russian position.

The third order was: General Campan will move through the wood to seize
the first fortification. General Campan’s division did not seize the
first fortification but was driven back, for on emerging from the wood
it had to reform under grapeshot, of which Napoleon was unaware.

The fourth order was: The vice-King will occupy the village (Borodinó)
and cross by its three bridges, advancing to the same heights as
Morand’s and Gérard’s divisions (for whose movements no directions are
given)
, which under his leadership will be directed against the redoubt
and come into line with the rest of the forces.

As far as one can make out, not so much from this unintelligible
sentence as from the attempts the vice-King made to execute the orders
given him, he was to advance from the left through Borodinó to the
redoubt while the divisions of Morand and Gérard were to advance
simultaneously from the front.

All this, like the other parts of the disposition, was not and could
not be executed. After passing through Borodinó the vice-King was driven
back to the Kolochá and could get no farther; while the divisions of
Morand and Gérard did not take the redoubt but were driven back, and the
redoubt was only taken at the end of the battle by the cavalry (a thing
probably unforeseen and not heard of by Napoleon)
. So not one of
the orders in the disposition was, or could be, executed. But in the
disposition it is said that, after the fight has commenced in this
manner, orders will be given in accordance with the enemy’s movements,
and so it might be supposed that all necessary arrangements would be
made by Napoleon during the battle. But this was not and could not be
done, for during the whole battle Napoleon was so far away that, as
appeared later, he could not know the course of the battle and not one
of his orders during the fight could be executed.

Master this chapter. Complete your experience

Purchase the complete book to access all chapters and support classic literature

Read Free on GutenbergBuy at Powell'sBuy on Amazon

As an Amazon Associate, we earn a small commission from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.

Available in paperback, hardcover, and e-book formats

GO ADS FREE — JOIN US

Let's Analyse the Pattern

Pattern: The Ivory Tower Pattern
This chapter reveals the Ivory Tower Pattern: when leaders become so removed from ground-level reality that their plans, no matter how detailed or impressive-sounding, are doomed to fail. Napoleon crafts what looks like brilliant strategy on paper, but every element is flawed because he's too far from the actual battlefield to understand what's really happening. The mechanism is distance plus ego. The higher someone rises, the more layers separate them from real information. But instead of acknowledging this limitation, they often double down on detailed planning, mistaking complexity for competence. Everyone around them reinforces this delusion because questioning the boss feels dangerous. The leader becomes trapped in their own mythology, making decisions based on how they think things should work rather than how they actually do work. You see this everywhere today. Hospital administrators creating patient care protocols without understanding what nurses actually face on the floor. Corporate executives mandating productivity improvements without knowing how the work gets done. Parents setting rigid rules for teenagers without understanding their actual social pressures. Government officials crafting policies without talking to the people those policies will affect. The pattern is always the same: impressive-looking plans that crumble on contact with reality. When you recognize this pattern, ask three questions: Who made this plan? How close are they to the actual work? When did they last do this job themselves? If the answers reveal distance, dig deeper. Talk to people on the ground. Test assumptions. Build feedback loops. And if you're the one making plans, get your hands dirty regularly. The best leaders stay connected to the work, not just the reports about the work. When you can name the pattern, predict where it leads, and navigate it successfully—that's amplified intelligence.

Leaders become so removed from ground-level reality that their detailed plans, however impressive, are fundamentally flawed and doomed to fail.

Why This Matters

Connect literature to life

Skill: Spotting Disconnected Leadership

This chapter teaches how to identify when leaders are making decisions based on theory rather than reality, and how that always ends in failure.

Practice This Today

This week, notice when someone in authority makes a rule or plan - ask yourself: when did they last do this job themselves, and does their plan account for how the work actually gets done?

GO ADS FREE — JOIN US

Now let's explore the literary elements.

Key Quotes & Analysis

"It was evident to anyone, military or not, that it was here the French should attack."

— Narrator

Context: Describing how obvious the Russian weak point was to everyone

Tolstoy is setting up the irony - if the strategy was so obvious, why does Napoleon get credit for genius? This reveals how we often praise leaders for stating the obvious while ignoring their real failures.

In Today's Words:

Even a kid could see this was the obvious move.

"Yet the historians who described the event later and the men who then surrounded Napoleon, and he himself, thought otherwise."

— Narrator

Context: After explaining how obvious Napoleon's strategy was

This exposes how reputation creates its own reality. People see genius where there's just common sense because they need to believe in the myth. It shows how history gets rewritten to protect powerful people's images.

In Today's Words:

But everyone pretended it was brilliant because that's what they needed to believe.

"Without communicating to the generals around him the profound course of ideas which guided his decisions merely gave them his final conclusions in the form of commands."

— Narrator

Context: Describing how Napoleon issued orders without explanation

This reveals the arrogance of power - Napoleon doesn't explain his reasoning because he believes his authority makes him right. It also shows how isolation from feedback creates bad decisions.

In Today's Words:

He just barked orders without explaining his thinking because he figured they should trust him.

Thematic Threads

Power

In This Chapter

Napoleon's elevated position physically and socially distances him from battlefield reality, making his power counterproductive

Development

Building on earlier themes of power corrupting judgment and creating blind spots

In Your Life:

You might see this when your boss makes decisions without understanding your actual job challenges

Pride

In This Chapter

Napoleon's legendary reputation prevents him from acknowledging he might not understand the terrain or conditions

Development

Continues the thread of pride blinding characters to their limitations and mistakes

In Your Life:

You might catch yourself sticking to a plan that isn't working just because you don't want to admit you were wrong

Class

In This Chapter

The social hierarchy prevents lower-ranking officers from questioning Napoleon's flawed orders, even when they see the problems

Development

Reinforces how class barriers prevent crucial information from flowing upward

In Your Life:

You might hesitate to speak up about problems you see because the person in charge seems too important to question

Reality

In This Chapter

There's a stark gap between Napoleon's paper plans and the actual physical terrain and military capabilities

Development

Continues exploring the tension between how things appear and how they actually are

In Your Life:

You might find yourself frustrated when carefully made plans fall apart because you didn't account for real-world complications

GO ADS FREE — JOIN US

You now have the context. Time to form your own thoughts.

Discussion Questions

  1. 1

    What specific problems did Napoleon's battle plan have, and why couldn't it work in practice?

    analysis • surface
  2. 2

    Why didn't anyone tell Napoleon his plan was flawed? What does this reveal about power dynamics?

    analysis • medium
  3. 3

    Where have you seen leaders make detailed plans that fell apart because they were too removed from the actual work?

    application • medium
  4. 4

    How can you tell when someone in authority is making decisions based on theory rather than reality?

    application • deep
  5. 5

    What does Napoleon's distance from the battlefield teach us about the relationship between power and self-deception?

    reflection • deep

Critical Thinking Exercise

10 minutes

Map Your Own Ivory Tower

Think of an area where you make decisions for others - parenting, managing, teaching, or even planning family activities. List three assumptions you make about what the people affected actually need or want. Then identify when you last directly experienced what they're going through. This exercise reveals where your own 'distance from the battlefield' might be creating blind spots.

Consider:

  • •Consider how your position or role might filter the information you receive
  • •Think about whether people feel safe giving you honest feedback about your decisions
  • •Reflect on the difference between what you think works and what actually works for those affected

Journaling Prompt

Write about a time when you discovered your plan or assumption was completely wrong because you were too far removed from the situation. What did you learn about staying connected to ground-level reality?

Coming Up Next...

Chapter 218: The Myth of the Great Man

The battle of Borodino is about to begin, and we'll see how Napoleon's flawed plans collide with the chaos of actual warfare. The real test isn't in the planning—it's in what happens when the shooting starts.

Continue to Chapter 218
Previous
The Emperor's Morning Ritual
Contents
Next
The Myth of the Great Man

Continue Exploring

War and Peace Study GuideTeaching ResourcesEssential Life IndexBrowse by ThemeAll Books
Power & CorruptionLove & RelationshipsIdentity & Self-Discovery

You Might Also Like

Anna Karenina cover

Anna Karenina

Leo Tolstoy

Also by Leo Tolstoy

The Idiot cover

The Idiot

Fyodor Dostoevsky

Explores love & romance

Moby-Dick cover

Moby-Dick

Herman Melville

Explores mortality & legacy

Dracula cover

Dracula

Bram Stoker

Explores love & romance

Browse all 47+ books

Share This Chapter

Know someone who'd enjoy this? Spread the wisdom!

TwitterFacebookLinkedInEmail

Read ad-free with Prestige

Get rid of ads, unlock study guides and downloads, and support free access for everyone.

Subscribe to PrestigeCreate free account
Intelligence Amplifier
Intelligence Amplifier™Powering Amplified Classics

Exploring human-AI collaboration through books, essays, and philosophical dialogues. Classic literature transformed into navigational maps for modern life.

2025 Books

→ The Amplified Human Spirit→ The Alarming Rise of Stupidity Amplified→ San Francisco: The AI Capital of the World
Visit intelligenceamplifier.org
hello@amplifiedclassics.com

AC Originals

→ The Last Chapter First→ You Are Not Lost→ The Lit of Love→ The Wealth Paradox
Arvintech
arvintechAmplify your Mind
Visit at arvintech.com

Navigate

  • Home
  • Library
  • Essential Life Index
  • How It Works
  • Subscribe
  • Account
  • About
  • Contact
  • Authors
  • Suggest a Book
  • Landings

Made For You

  • Students
  • Educators
  • Families
  • Readers
  • Literary Analysis
  • Finding Purpose
  • Letting Go
  • Recovering from a Breakup
  • Corruption
  • Gaslighting in the Classics

Newsletter

Weekly insights from the classics. Amplify Your Mind.

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Cookie Policy
  • Accessibility

Why Public Domain?

We focus on public domain classics because these timeless works belong to everyone. No paywalls, no restrictions—just wisdom that has stood the test of centuries, freely accessible to all readers.

Public domain books have shaped humanity's understanding of love, justice, ambition, and the human condition. By amplifying these works, we help preserve and share literature that truly belongs to the world.

© 2025 Amplified Classics™. All Rights Reserved.

Intelligence Amplifier™ and Amplified Classics™ are proprietary trademarks of Arvin Lioanag.

Copyright Protection: All original content, analyses, discussion questions, pedagogical frameworks, and methodology are protected by U.S. and international copyright law. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, web scraping, or use for AI training is strictly prohibited. See our Copyright Notice for details.

Disclaimer: The information provided on this website is for general informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute professional, legal, financial, or technical advice. While we strive to ensure accuracy and relevance, we make no warranties regarding completeness, reliability, or suitability. Any reliance on such information is at your own risk. We are not liable for any losses or damages arising from use of this site. By using this site, you agree to these terms.