Summary
At a dinner party hosted by Avis's father, Ernest faces off with a room full of small business owners who are being crushed by big corporations and trusts. These middle-class entrepreneurs - grocery store owners, quarry operators, druggists - all tell the same story: they're losing their profits to massive corporations that can operate more efficiently and cheaply. Their solution? 'Bust the trusts' and return to the competitive free market of their fathers' time. Ernest systematically dismantles their position, calling them 'machine breakers' - like the 18th-century English workers who destroyed industrial machinery instead of adapting to progress. He shows how each businessman has already destroyed smaller competitors through superior organization, yet hypocritically complains when larger trusts do the same to them. The real revelation comes when Ernest exposes a secret 1903 law that allows the government to draft all able-bodied men into militia service and execute those who refuse - meaning these businessmen's dreams of armed resistance are futile. Their 'strength' would literally be turned against them. Ernest offers an alternative: instead of trying to destroy efficient production methods, why not take control of them through socialism? The chapter reveals how people often fight for their right to exploit others while calling it freedom, and how those in power have already rigged the game to prevent meaningful resistance.
Coming Up in Chapter 9
Ernest has shattered the businessmen's illusions about their power and options, but now he must show them the mathematical inevitability of their doom. The next chapter promises to reveal the cold, hard numbers behind capitalism's self-destruction.
Share it with friends
An excerpt from the original text.(~500 words)
HE MACHINE BREAKERS It was just before Ernest ran for Congress, on the socialist ticket, that father gave what he privately called his “Profit and Loss” dinner. Ernest called it the dinner of the Machine Breakers. In point of fact, it was merely a dinner for business men—small business men, of course. I doubt if one of them was interested in any business the total capitalization of which exceeded a couple of hundred thousand dollars. They were truly representative middle-class business men. There was Owen, of Silverberg, Owen & Company—a large grocery firm with several branch stores. We bought our groceries from them. There were both partners of the big drug firm of Kowalt & Washburn, and Mr. Asmunsen, the owner of a large granite quarry in Contra Costa County. And there were many similar men, owners or part-owners in small factories, small businesses and small industries—small capitalists, in short. They were shrewd-faced, interesting men, and they talked with simplicity and clearness. Their unanimous complaint was against the corporations and trusts. Their creed was, “Bust the Trusts.” All oppression originated in the trusts, and one and all told the same tale of woe. They advocated government ownership of such trusts as the railroads and telegraphs, and excessive income taxes, graduated with ferocity, to destroy large accumulations. Likewise they advocated, as a cure for local ills, municipal ownership of such public utilities as water, gas, telephones, and street railways. Especially interesting was Mr. Asmunsen’s narrative of his tribulations as a quarry owner. He confessed that he never made any profits out of his quarry, and this, in spite of the enormous volume of business that had been caused by the destruction of San Francisco by the big earthquake. For six years the rebuilding of San Francisco had been going on, and his business had quadrupled and octupled, and yet he was no better off. “The railroad knows my business just a little bit better than I do,” he said. “It knows my operating expenses to a cent, and it knows the terms of my contracts. How it knows these things I can only guess. It must have spies in my employ, and it must have access to the parties to all my contracts. For look you, when I place a big contract, the terms of which favor me a goodly profit, the freight rate from my quarry to market is promptly raised. No explanation is made. The railroad gets my profit. Under such circumstances I have never succeeded in getting the railroad to reconsider its raise. On the other hand, when there have been accidents, increased expenses of operating, or contracts with less profitable terms, I have always succeeded in getting the railroad to lower its rate. What is the result? Large or small, the railroad always gets my profits.” “What remains to you over and above,” Ernest interrupted to ask, “would roughly be the equivalent of your salary as a manager did the railroad own the quarry.” “The very thing,”...
Master this chapter. Complete your experience
Purchase the complete book to access all chapters and support classic literature
As an Amazon Associate, we earn a small commission from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.
Available in paperback, hardcover, and e-book formats
Intelligence Amplifier™ Analysis
The Road of Righteous Hypocrisy - When Your Own Success Blinds You to Your Methods
People who succeed using certain methods suddenly condemn those same methods when used against them by more powerful players.
Why This Matters
Connect literature to life
This chapter teaches how to spot when people rewrite the rules of fairness based on their current position in the hierarchy.
Practice This Today
This week, notice when someone complains about tactics they've used themselves - the supervisor who gossips but calls it 'unprofessional' in others, the coworker who cuts corners but criticizes others' shortcuts.
Now let's explore the literary elements.
Terms to Know
Machine Breakers
Workers in 18th-century England who destroyed industrial machinery because they blamed machines for taking their jobs. London uses this as a metaphor for the small businessmen who want to 'bust the trusts' instead of adapting to economic change.
Modern Usage:
We see this when people blame technology or globalization for economic problems instead of finding ways to adapt or change the system.
Trusts
Large business combinations that controlled entire industries in early 1900s America, like Standard Oil or U.S. Steel. They could undercut smaller competitors and monopolize markets through their massive scale and efficiency.
Modern Usage:
Today we call them mega-corporations like Amazon, Google, or Walmart that dominate their industries.
Small Capitalists
Business owners who employ workers and own property but aren't wealthy enough to compete with big corporations. They're caught between the working class below and the super-rich above.
Modern Usage:
Think small business owners today who struggle against big box stores and online retailers while still having employees of their own.
Municipal Ownership
The idea that local governments should own and operate public utilities like water, gas, and transportation instead of private companies. These businessmen support this to fight corporate control.
Modern Usage:
We see this debate today over whether cities should provide their own internet service or whether utilities should be publicly or privately owned.
Graduated Income Tax
A tax system where higher earners pay higher rates, designed to prevent massive wealth accumulation. The businessmen want this to destroy the trusts that are crushing them.
Modern Usage:
This is how our current tax system works, though people still debate how progressive it should be.
Militia Draft Law
A secret 1903 law Ernest reveals that allows the government to draft all able-bodied men into militia service and execute those who refuse, making armed resistance impossible.
Modern Usage:
Similar to how governments today have emergency powers and surveillance capabilities that make organized resistance much harder than people realize.
Characters in This Chapter
Ernest Everhard
Socialist protagonist
Systematically dismantles the businessmen's arguments, showing how their 'solutions' are hypocritical and their resistance is futile. Reveals the secret militia law that makes their dreams of armed revolt impossible.
Modern Equivalent:
The policy wonk who comes to dinner and ruins everyone's comfortable assumptions with uncomfortable facts
Owen
Small business owner
Partner in a grocery chain being crushed by larger competitors. Represents the middle-class businessman who wants to 'bust the trusts' while ignoring his own role in destroying smaller competitors.
Modern Equivalent:
The franchise owner complaining about Amazon while putting local mom-and-pop stores out of business
Asmunsen
Quarry owner
Tells his story of being squeezed by larger corporations, representing how even successful small capitalists are vulnerable to bigger players with more resources and efficiency.
Modern Equivalent:
The local contractor losing bids to national companies with better equipment and lower overhead
Kowalt
Drug store partner
One of the partners in a pharmaceutical business facing pressure from larger competitors. Shows how professional small business owners share the same fears as other entrepreneurs.
Modern Equivalent:
The independent pharmacy owner competing against CVS and Walgreens
Washburn
Drug store partner
The other partner in the pharmaceutical business, representing how even partnerships can't protect small businesses from corporate consolidation.
Modern Equivalent:
The business partner watching their industry get swallowed by bigger players
Key Quotes & Analysis
"You are machine-breakers. Do you know what a machine-breaker is? Let me tell you. In the eighteenth century, in England, men and women wove cloth on hand-looms in their own cottages. It was a slow, clumsy, and costly way of weaving cloth, this cottage system of manufacture. Along came the factories, with their superior organization and machinery. The cottage weavers could not compete. What did they do? They broke the machines."
Context: Ernest explains why the businessmen's desire to 'bust the trusts' is backwards thinking
This reveals Ernest's core argument that fighting efficiency and progress is futile. The businessmen want to destroy superior systems instead of adapting or taking control of them for everyone's benefit.
In Today's Words:
You're like people who want to ban self-checkout machines instead of figuring out how to make technology work for everyone
"You have been destroying competition right along. You have been doing this for years. Every one of you. Mr. Owen destroyed competition in his neighborhood when he drove the small grocers out of business."
Context: Ernest points out the businessmen's hypocrisy in complaining about trusts while having destroyed smaller competitors themselves
This exposes how people often fight for their right to exploit others while calling it freedom. The businessmen want protection from bigger players but offered none to those they crushed.
In Today's Words:
You're complaining about Walmart putting you out of business, but you put the corner store out of business first
"In 1903 the militia law was passed. It is still on the statute books. Under it, every able-bodied man in the United States is automatically a soldier. In time of need he can be called to military duty. Refuse, and he can be shot."
Context: Ernest reveals a secret law that makes the businessmen's dreams of armed resistance impossible
This shows how those in power have already rigged the game to prevent meaningful resistance. The businessmen's 'strength' would literally be turned against them by the very system they want to preserve.
In Today's Words:
The government already has laws that can turn your neighbors into soldiers against you if you try to revolt
Thematic Threads
Class
In This Chapter
Small business owners occupy a precarious middle position - powerful enough to crush individual competitors but powerless against corporate trusts
Development
Builds on earlier exploration of class divisions, showing how middle-class interests differ from both workers and oligarchs
In Your Life:
You might find yourself caught between management and labor, with different interests than both groups.
Identity
In This Chapter
The businessmen's self-image as independent entrepreneurs prevents them from seeing their own role in the system they now condemn
Development
Continues the theme of how people's identities blind them to uncomfortable truths about their position
In Your Life:
Your professional identity might prevent you from admitting how you actually got ahead or succeeded.
Power
In This Chapter
Ernest reveals the secret militia law showing how apparent strength can be turned into weakness by those who truly hold power
Development
Deepens the exploration of how real power operates - often invisibly and through legal mechanisms
In Your Life:
The systems you think give you security or leverage might actually be controlled by others who can use them against you.
Resistance
In This Chapter
The businessmen's plan to 'bust the trusts' is revealed as both hypocritical and futile given existing power structures
Development
Introduced here - explores how resistance movements can be misdirected or co-opted
In Your Life:
Your attempts to fight unfair treatment might be targeting the wrong level of the system or using ineffective methods.
Progress
In This Chapter
Ernest frames the trusts as inevitable technological and organizational progress that cannot be reversed
Development
Builds on earlier themes about adaptation versus resistance to social and economic change
In Your Life:
You might be fighting changes in your industry or workplace that are actually inevitable and need to be adapted to rather than resisted.
You now have the context. Time to form your own thoughts.
Discussion Questions
- 1
What specific complaints did the small business owners have about the big trusts, and how does Ernest expose the contradiction in their position?
analysis • surface - 2
Why does Ernest call these businessmen 'machine breakers,' and what does this reveal about their understanding of economic progress?
analysis • medium - 3
Where do you see this same pattern today - people who used certain tactics to succeed but then complain when others use those same tactics against them?
application • medium - 4
How would you respond if you found yourself in the position of these businessmen - being outcompeted by someone using your own successful strategies?
application • deep - 5
What does this chapter reveal about how people protect their self-image when their success methods are turned against them?
reflection • deep
Critical Thinking Exercise
The Rules You Live By
Think of a strategy or approach you've used to get ahead in work, relationships, or life - maybe you worked longer hours than colleagues, found ways to save money others didn't, or used your network to get opportunities. Now imagine someone bigger or more connected using that exact same approach to outcompete you. Write down both perspectives: how you'd describe your method when you used it, and how you'd describe their method when they use it against you.
Consider:
- •Notice the different language you use to describe the same behavior
- •Consider whether your success actually came from the method itself or from circumstances
- •Think about what rules you'd want everyone to follow, including yourself
Journaling Prompt
Write about a time when you felt someone else was 'cheating' or being unfair, but they were actually using tactics similar to ones you'd used before. How did you reconcile this contradiction?
Coming Up Next...
Chapter 9: The Mathematics of Collapse
Ernest has shattered the businessmen's illusions about their power and options, but now he must show them the mathematical inevitability of their doom. The next chapter promises to reveal the cold, hard numbers behind capitalism's self-destruction.
