Summary
Prince Myshkin frantically searches Petersburg for Nastasia Philipovna, visiting her lodgings and Rogojin's house repeatedly. Everyone claims ignorance, but the prince senses deception everywhere. His desperation grows as he finds no trace of her. Finally, Rogojin appears mysteriously on the street and leads the prince to his house through elaborate secrecy. Inside, Rogojin reveals the horrifying truth: Nastasia lies dead behind a curtain, killed by his knife in a moment of jealous rage. The two men spend the night together beside her body, with Rogojin descending into madness while the prince tries helplessly to comfort him. Rogojin had killed her the previous night when she begged him to hide her from the prince, fearing discovery after fleeing their wedding. The chapter ends with both men discovered the next day - Rogojin unconscious with fever, the prince returned to his previous state of mental incapacity. This devastating conclusion shows how obsessive love, jealousy, and the inability to accept loss can destroy everyone involved. The prince's compassion remains even in horror, as he stays with Rogojin rather than flee. Dostoevsky demonstrates that some truths are too terrible for the human mind to bear, and that innocence like the prince's cannot survive in a world of such destructive passion.
Share it with friends
An excerpt from the original text.(~500 words)
An hour later he was in St. Petersburg, and by ten o’clock he had rung the bell at Rogojin’s. He had gone to the front door, and was kept waiting a long while before anyone came. At last the door of old Mrs. Rogojin’s flat was opened, and an aged servant appeared. “Parfen Semionovitch is not at home,” she announced from the doorway. “Whom do you want?” “Parfen Semionovitch.” “He is not in.” The old woman examined the prince from head to foot with great curiosity. “At all events tell me whether he slept at home last night, and whether he came alone?” The old woman continued to stare at him, but said nothing. “Was not Nastasia Philipovna here with him, yesterday evening?” “And, pray, who are you yourself?” “Prince Lef Nicolaievitch Muishkin; he knows me well.” “He is not at home.” The woman lowered her eyes. “And Nastasia Philipovna?” “I know nothing about it.” “Stop a minute! When will he come back?” “I don’t know that either.” The door was shut with these words, and the old woman disappeared. The prince decided to come back within an hour. Passing out of the house, he met the porter. “Is Parfen Semionovitch at home?” he asked. “Yes.” “Why did they tell me he was not at home, then?” “Where did they tell you so,—at his door?” “No, at his mother’s flat; I rang at Parfen Semionovitch’s door and nobody came.” “Well, he may have gone out. I can’t tell. Sometimes he takes the keys with him, and leaves the rooms empty for two or three days.” “Do you know for certain that he was at home last night?” “Yes, he was.” “Was Nastasia Philipovna with him?” “I don’t know; she doesn’t come often. I think I should have known if she had come.” The prince went out deep in thought, and walked up and down the pavement for some time. The windows of all the rooms occupied by Rogojin were closed, those of his mother’s apartments were open. It was a hot, bright day. The prince crossed the road in order to have a good look at the windows again; not only were Rogojin’s closed, but the white blinds were all down as well. He stood there for a minute and then, suddenly and strangely enough, it seemed to him that a little corner of one of the blinds was lifted, and Rogojin’s face appeared for an instant and then vanished. He waited another minute, and decided to go and ring the bell once more; however, he thought better of it again and put it off for an hour. The chief object in his mind at this moment was to get as quickly as he could to Nastasia Philipovna’s lodging. He remembered that, not long since, when she had left Pavlofsk at his request, he had begged her to put up in town at the house of a respectable widow, who had well-furnished rooms to let, near the Ismailofsky barracks. Probably...
Master this chapter. Complete your experience
Purchase the complete book to access all chapters and support classic literature
As an Amazon Associate, we earn a small commission from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.
Available in paperback, hardcover, and e-book formats
Intelligence Amplifier™ Analysis
The Road of Unbearable Truth
When reality exceeds our mental capacity to process it, the mind shuts down as an emergency protection mechanism.
Why This Matters
Connect literature to life
This chapter teaches how to identify when emotional stress is approaching the breaking point before permanent damage occurs.
Practice This Today
This week, notice when you feel emotionally 'full'—that's your early warning system telling you to seek support before overload hits.
Now let's explore the literary elements.
Terms to Know
Obsessive jealousy
A destructive form of love where possessiveness and fear of loss consume rational thought. It drives people to extreme actions they would never normally consider. In 19th-century Russia, passionate emotions were often seen as both romantic and dangerous.
Modern Usage:
We see this in stalking behaviors, domestic violence, and people who can't let go after breakups.
Psychological breakdown
When the mind cannot process traumatic reality and retreats into madness or previous states of mental illness. Dostoevsky was fascinated by how extreme stress affects mental stability. The human psyche has limits for what it can endure.
Modern Usage:
We recognize this as PTSD, nervous breakdowns, or when people 'snap' under pressure.
Complicit silence
When people know terrible things are happening but choose not to speak up or intervene. Servants and neighbors often protected their employers' secrets, even criminal ones. Social hierarchies made speaking out dangerous.
Modern Usage:
We see this in workplace harassment, family abuse, or when communities protect powerful predators.
Tragic inevitability
The sense that disaster was always coming, that the characters' flaws and circumstances made a terrible ending unavoidable. Russian literature often explores how human nature leads to self-destruction. Some people seem doomed by their own patterns.
Modern Usage:
We recognize this in people who keep making the same destructive choices despite warnings.
Innocent witness
A pure-hearted person who observes evil but cannot prevent or fully understand it. Prince Myshkin represents Christ-like goodness in a corrupt world. His innocence makes him powerless against human darkness.
Modern Usage:
We see this in whistleblowers, children in abusive homes, or good people caught in toxic situations.
Russian fatalism
The cultural belief that suffering is inevitable and that humans are powerless against their destinies. This philosophical outlook shaped how Russians viewed tragedy and moral responsibility. Acceptance of pain as part of life's meaning.
Modern Usage:
We see this attitude in people who say 'it is what it is' or believe some things are just meant to happen.
Characters in This Chapter
Prince Lev Nikolaevich Myshkin
Tragic protagonist
Desperately searches for Nastasia, showing his genuine love and concern for her safety. His innocence and compassion remain intact even when faced with horror, as he comforts Rogojin instead of condemning him. The trauma breaks his fragile mental state completely.
Modern Equivalent:
The genuinely good person who gets destroyed trying to save someone in a toxic relationship
Parfyon Semyonovich Rogojin
Tragic antagonist
Kills Nastasia in a jealous rage when she begs him to hide her from the prince. His obsessive love transforms into murderous possession. He descends into complete madness after the act, showing he never truly wanted to harm her.
Modern Equivalent:
The ex who says 'if I can't have you, nobody can' and follows through
Nastasia Philipovna
Tragic victim
Dies at Rogojin's hands after fleeing her own wedding to the prince. Her final act is seeking protection from the very man who kills her, showing how trauma distorts judgment. Her death represents the destruction of beauty and possibility.
Modern Equivalent:
The woman trapped between two men who both claim to love her but neither can actually protect her
Old servant woman
Protective enabler
Lies to protect Rogojin, claiming he's not home while knowing the terrible truth inside. Her loyalty to her employer outweighs any moral obligation to help the prince or reveal the crime.
Modern Equivalent:
The family member who covers for an abuser because 'that's just how things are'
Key Quotes & Analysis
"He is not at home."
Context: Repeatedly lying to Prince Myshkin about Rogojin's whereabouts
This simple lie represents how ordinary people become complicit in extraordinary evil. The servant chooses loyalty over truth, protecting her employer even when murder has been committed. Her repeated denial shows how institutions protect the powerful.
In Today's Words:
I don't know anything about that.
"Come, brother, let us go in together."
Context: Leading the prince into his house where Nastasia's body lies hidden
Rogojin's use of 'brother' shows how killers can still crave human connection and understanding. He needs the prince to witness his crime, perhaps seeking absolution or shared guilt. The invitation into horror reflects how evil draws innocence into its web.
In Today's Words:
Come on, man, we're in this together now.
"She's there... behind the curtain."
Context: Revealing Nastasia's corpse to the horrified prince
This revelation shatters all hope and illusion. Rogojin's matter-of-fact tone shows his disconnection from reality after committing murder. The curtain symbolizes how thin the barrier is between normal life and absolute horror.
In Today's Words:
There she is... I did it.
Thematic Threads
Truth
In This Chapter
The horrifying reality of Nastasia's murder represents truth too terrible for the human mind to bear
Development
Throughout the novel, truth has been elusive and complex; here it becomes literally unbearable
In Your Life:
You might recognize this when avoiding medical test results or refusing to acknowledge a relationship's end
Compassion
In This Chapter
Even in horror, Myshkin stays with Rogojin rather than flee, showing compassion's persistence
Development
Myshkin's compassion has been tested repeatedly; here it survives even ultimate tragedy
In Your Life:
You might see this when comforting someone who has hurt you, choosing empathy over self-protection
Obsession
In This Chapter
Rogojin's jealous obsession with Nastasia leads to murder and his complete mental collapse
Development
His obsession has escalated from pursuit to possession to destruction
In Your Life:
You might recognize this in relationships where love becomes control, or in any consuming fixation
Innocence
In This Chapter
Myshkin's innocent nature cannot survive exposure to such deliberate evil and violence
Development
His innocence has been challenged throughout; here it finally breaks under unbearable weight
In Your Life:
You might experience this when discovering betrayal by someone you trusted completely
Destruction
In This Chapter
All three main characters are destroyed: Nastasia dead, Rogojin mad, Myshkin mentally broken
Development
The novel's destructive forces reach their ultimate conclusion, sparing no one
In Your Life:
You might see this pattern when toxic situations escalate until everyone involved is damaged
You now have the context. Time to form your own thoughts.
Discussion Questions
- 1
What does Prince Myshkin's frantic search through Petersburg reveal about how we behave when someone we care about disappears?
analysis • surface - 2
Why does Myshkin's mind retreat into incapacity after witnessing Nastasia's death, while Rogojin descends into madness?
analysis • medium - 3
Where do you see this pattern of 'psychological overload' in modern professions like healthcare, social work, or emergency services?
application • medium - 4
How would you build support systems to protect yourself from emotional circuit overload in high-stress situations?
application • deep - 5
What does this chapter teach us about the relationship between compassion and self-preservation when facing unbearable truths?
reflection • deep
Critical Thinking Exercise
Map Your Breaking Points
Think about the most emotionally overwhelming situation you've faced or witnessed. Create a simple map showing: the trigger event, your initial reaction, how your mind/body protected you, and what support you needed. This isn't about reliving trauma, but understanding your psychological patterns.
Consider:
- •Notice whether you tend toward shutdown (like Myshkin) or spiraling (like Rogojin)
- •Identify early warning signs that you're approaching emotional overload
- •Consider who in your life could provide grounding during crisis
Journaling Prompt
Write about a time when you had to step back from a situation to protect your mental health. What did that decision cost you, and what did it save you?