An excerpt from the original text.(complete · 1013 words)
THAT THE HOUR OF PARLEY DANGEROUS
I saw, notwithstanding, lately at Mussidan, a place not far from my
house, that those who were driven out thence by our army, and others of
their party, highly complained of treachery, for that during a treaty of
accommodation, and in the very interim that their deputies were treating,
they were surprised and cut to pieces: a thing that, peradventure, in
another age, might have had some colour of foul play; but, as I have just
said, the practice of arms in these days is quite another thing, and
there is now no confidence in an enemy excusable till the treaty is
finally sealed; and even then the conqueror has enough to do to keep his
word: so hazardous a thing it is to entrust the observation of the faith
a man has engaged to a town that surrenders upon easy and favourable
conditions, to the licence of a victorious army, and to give the soldier
free entrance into it in the heat of blood.
Lucius AEmilius Regillus, the Roman praetor, having lost his time in
attempting to take the city of Phocaea by force, by reason of the
singular valour wherewith the inhabitants defended themselves,
conditioned, at last, to receive them as friends to the people of Rome,
and to enter the town, as into a confederate city, without any manner of
hostility, of which he gave them all assurance; but having, for the
greater pomp, brought his whole army in with him, it was no more in his
power, with all the endeavour he could use, to restrain his people: so
that, avarice and revenge trampling under foot both his authority and all
military discipline, he there saw a considerable part of the city sacked
and ruined before his face.
Cleomenes was wont to say, “that what mischief soever a man could do his
enemy in time of war was above justice, and nothing accountable to it in
the sight of gods and men.” And so, having concluded a truce with those
of Argos for seven days, the third night after he fell upon them when
they were all buried in sleep, and put them to the sword, alleging that
there had no nights been mentioned in the truce; but the gods punished
this subtle perfidy.
In a time of parley also; and while the citizens were relying upon their
safety warrant, the city of Casilinum was taken by surprise, and that
even in the age of the justest captains and the most perfect Roman
military discipline; for it is not said that it is not lawful for us, in
time and place, to make advantage of our enemies’ want of understanding,
as well as their want of courage.
And, doubtless, war has naturally many privileges that appear reasonable
even to the prejudice of reason. And therefore here the rule fails,
“Neminem id agere ut ex alte rius praedetur inscitia.”--[“No one should
preys upon another’s folly.”--Cicero, De Offic., iii. 17.]--But I am
astonished at the great liberty allowed by Xenophon in such cases, and
that both by precept and by the example of several exploits of his
complete emperor; an author of very great authority, I confess, in those
affairs, as being in his own person both a great captain and a
philosopher of the first form of Socrates’ disciples; and yet I cannot
consent to such a measure of licence as he dispenses in all things and
places.
Monsieur d’Aubigny, besieging Capua, and after having directed a furious
battery against it, Signor Fabricio Colonna, governor of the town, having
from a bastion begun to parley, and his soldiers in the meantime being a
little more remiss in their guard, our people entered the place at
unawares, and put them all to the sword. And of later memory, at Yvoy,
Signor Juliano Romero having played that part of a novice to go out to
parley with the Constable, at his return found his place taken. But,
that we might not scape scot-free, the Marquess of Pescara having laid
siege to Genoa, where Duke Ottaviano Fregosa commanded under our
protection, and the articles betwixt them being so far advanced that it
was looked upon as a done thing, and upon the point to be concluded, the
Spaniards in the meantime having slipped in, made use of this treachery
as an absolute victory. And since, at Ligny, in Barrois, where the Count
de Brienne commanded, the emperor having in his own person beleaguered
that place, and Bertheville, the said Count’s lieutenant, going out to
parley, whilst he was capitulating the town was taken.
“Fu il vincer sempremai laudabil cosa,
Vincasi o per fortuna, o per ingegno,”
[“Victory is ever worthy of praise, whether obtained by valour or
wisdom.”--Ariosto, xv. I.]
But the philosopher Chrysippus was of another opinion, wherein I also
concur; for he was used to say that those who run a race ought to employ
all the force they have in what they are about, and to run as fast as
they can; but that it is by no means fair in them to lay any hand upon
their adversary to stop him, nor to set a leg before him to throw him
down. And yet more generous was the answer of that great Alexander to
Polypercon who was persuading him to take the advantage of the night’s
obscurity to fall upon Darius. “By no means,” said be; “it is not for
such a man as I am to steal a victory, ‘Malo me fortunae poeniteat, quam
victoria pudeat.’”--[“I had rather complain of ill-fortune than be
ashamed of victory.” Quint. Curt, iv. 13]--
“Atque idem fugientem baud est dignatus Oroden
Sternere, nec jacta caecum dare cuspide vulnus
Obvius, adversoque occurrit, seque viro vir
Contulit, haud furto melior, sed fortibus armis.”
[“He deigned not to throw down Orodes as he fled, or with the darted
spear to give him a wound unseen; but overtaking him, he confronted
him face to face, and encountered man to man: superior, not in
stratagem, but in valiant arms.”--AEneid, x. 732.]
Master this chapter. Complete your experience
Purchase the complete book to access all chapters and support classic literature
As an Amazon Associate, we earn a small commission from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.
Available in paperback, hardcover, and e-book formats
Let's Analyse the Pattern
When stakes become life-or-death, moral codes get abandoned in favor of immediate survival needs.
Why This Matters
Connect literature to life
This chapter teaches how to recognize when cooperative situations are actually competitive battlefields in disguise.
Practice This Today
This week, notice when people's behavior changes as stakes increase—watch for the moment cooperation becomes performance.
Now let's explore the literary elements.
Key Quotes & Analysis
"there is now no confidence in an enemy excusable till the treaty is finally sealed; and even then the conqueror has enough to do to keep his word"
Context: Montaigne explaining why the massacre at Mussidan, while tragic, reflects the reality of his times
This reveals Montaigne's pragmatic worldview - he's not endorsing treachery, but acknowledging that trust is dangerous when survival is at stake. Even signed agreements aren't guarantees.
In Today's Words:
Don't trust your enemies until the deal is completely done, and even then, winners often break their promises.
"so hazardous a thing it is to entrust the observation of the faith a man has engaged to a town that surrenders upon easy and favourable conditions, to the licence of a victorious army"
Context: Explaining why commanders can't always control their soldiers even when they want to keep promises
Montaigne understands that good intentions aren't enough - systemic forces (like soldiers' bloodlust) can override individual moral choices. Leaders aren't always in control.
In Today's Words:
It's risky to expect people to keep their word when they're riding high and their team is fired up for revenge.
"I had rather lose the victory than my reputation"
Context: Alexander's response when urged to attack Darius at night for an easy victory
This represents the ideal of honor over advantage - some things matter more than winning. Alexander chooses long-term reputation over short-term gain.
In Today's Words:
I'd rather lose fair and square than win by cheating.
Thematic Threads
Trust
In This Chapter
Montaigne shows how trust becomes weaponized during negotiations, with peace talks turning into death traps
Development
Introduced here
In Your Life:
You might recognize this when a coworker suddenly stops sharing information before layoffs are announced
Honor
In This Chapter
Alexander's refusal to attack at night contrasts with Roman pragmatism about breaking truces
Development
Introduced here
In Your Life:
You face this dilemma when choosing between playing fair and protecting your interests in competitive situations
Power
In This Chapter
Military commanders lose control of bloodthirsty troops, showing how power can slip away in critical moments
Development
Introduced here
In Your Life:
You might see this when a manager promises one thing but their boss forces them to deliver something else
Survival
In This Chapter
The chapter explores when survival instincts override moral principles in warfare
Development
Introduced here
In Your Life:
You experience this when financial pressure makes you consider compromising your values at work
Moral_Complexity
In This Chapter
Montaigne presents the philosophical debate about whether all tactics are justified against enemies
Development
Introduced here
In Your Life:
You wrestle with this when deciding how far to go in protecting yourself from someone who's hurt you
You now have the context. Time to form your own thoughts.
Discussion Questions
- 1
What pattern does Montaigne show us through his examples of Romans breaking truces and soldiers being massacred during peace talks?
analysis • surface - 2
Why do you think people who normally follow rules suddenly abandon them when they feel threatened or desperate?
analysis • medium - 3
Where have you seen the 'Survival Override Pattern' play out in modern situations - at work, in families, or in your community?
application • medium - 4
How can you protect yourself when you sense someone might abandon their principles due to pressure, without becoming untrustworthy yourself?
application • deep - 5
What does Montaigne's contrast between the pragmatic Romans and honorable Alexander teach us about choosing our values when the stakes get high?
reflection • deep
Critical Thinking Exercise
Map Your Trust Boundaries
Think of a current situation where you're cooperating with someone who might have competing interests (workplace project, family decision, financial arrangement). Draw a simple map showing what you're trusting them with, what they're trusting you with, and what could go wrong if either of you felt cornered. Then identify one concrete step you could take to protect both parties without breaking trust.
Consider:
- •Consider what pressures might cause this person to prioritize their survival over your agreement
- •Think about what documentation or backup plans would be wise without seeming paranoid
- •Reflect on how you can maintain your own integrity even if they don't maintain theirs
Journaling Prompt
Write about a time when you had to choose between being honorable and protecting yourself. What did you learn about your own values from that experience?
Coming Up Next...
Chapter 7: Your True Intentions Matter Most
Having examined when actions might be justified by circumstances, Montaigne next turns to a deeper question: how do we judge the morality of any action? The answer lies not in what people do, but in why they do it.




