Summary
Marmeladov's Death
Crime and Punishment by Fyodor Dostoevsky
In Sonia's presence, the mask finally cracks completely. This chapter shows their second meeting after his confession, and the dynamic has shifted. She now carries the weight of his secret, and it's transformed her from a timid, degraded woman into something stronger - a moral compass and spiritual guide. Their conversation reveals the fundamental conflict at the novel's heart: his intellectual pride versus her humble faith. He still wants to justify what he's done, to explain his theory about extraordinary men who have the right to transgress moral boundaries for higher purposes. But Sonia won't let him hide behind philosophy. She forces him to confront the human reality of his crime - two women dead, blood on his hands, his soul in torment. Her response is simple and devastating: "Go now, this minute, stand at the crossroads, bow down, and first kiss the earth you've defiled. Then bow to the whole world, to the four corners of the earth, and say aloud to everyone: 'I have killed!' Then God will send you life again." It's a call for public repentance, for humbling himself before the community he's harmed. For someone whose entire crime was premised on being above ordinary morality, this is the hardest possible path. Yet Sonia believes it's the only way to redemption. The chapter asks: Is suffering punishment or purification?
Coming Up in Chapter 20
Now that Raskolnikov has finally told someone his secret, he faces a choice that will determine his fate. Sonya challenges him to take the next step - one that could save his soul or destroy him completely.
Share it with friends
An excerpt from the original text.(~500 words)
Raskolnikov was already entering the room. He came in looking as though he had the utmost difficulty not to burst out laughing again. Behind him Razumihin strode in gawky and awkward, shamefaced and red as a peony, with an utterly crestfallen and ferocious expression. His face and whole figure really were ridiculous at that moment and amply justified Raskolnikov’s laughter. Raskolnikov, not waiting for an introduction, bowed to Porfiry Petrovitch, who stood in the middle of the room looking inquiringly at them. He held out his hand and shook hands, still apparently making desperate efforts to subdue his mirth and utter a few words to introduce himself. But he had no sooner succeeded in assuming a serious air and muttering something when he suddenly glanced again as though accidentally at Razumihin, and could no longer control himself: his stifled laughter broke out the more irresistibly the more he tried to restrain it. The extraordinary ferocity with which Razumihin received this “spontaneous” mirth gave the whole scene the appearance of most genuine fun and naturalness. Razumihin strengthened this impression as though on purpose. “Fool! You fiend,” he roared, waving his arm which at once struck a little round table with an empty tea-glass on it. Everything was sent flying and crashing. “But why break chairs, gentlemen? You know it’s a loss to the Crown,” Porfiry Petrovitch quoted gaily. Raskolnikov was still laughing, with his hand in Porfiry Petrovitch’s, but anxious not to overdo it, awaited the right moment to put a natural end to it. Razumihin, completely put to confusion by upsetting the table and smashing the glass, gazed gloomily at the fragments, cursed and turned sharply to the window where he stood looking out with his back to the company with a fiercely scowling countenance, seeing nothing. Porfiry Petrovitch laughed and was ready to go on laughing, but obviously looked for explanations. Zametov had been sitting in the corner, but he rose at the visitors’ entrance and was standing in expectation with a smile on his lips, though he looked with surprise and even it seemed incredulity at the whole scene and at Raskolnikov with a certain embarrassment. Zametov’s unexpected presence struck Raskolnikov unpleasantly. “I’ve got to think of that,” he thought. “Excuse me, please,” he began, affecting extreme embarrassment. “Raskolnikov.” “Not at all, very pleasant to see you... and how pleasantly you’ve come in.... Why, won’t he even say good-morning?” Porfiry Petrovitch nodded at Razumihin. “Upon my honour I don’t know why he is in such a rage with me. I only told him as we came along that he was like Romeo... and proved it. And that was all, I think!” “Pig!” ejaculated Razumihin, without turning round. “There must have been very grave grounds for it, if he is so furious at the word,” Porfiry laughed. “Oh, you sharp lawyer!... Damn you all!” snapped Razumihin, and suddenly bursting out laughing himself, he went up to Porfiry with a more cheerful face as though nothing had happened. “That’ll do!...
Master this chapter. Complete your experience
Purchase the complete book to access all chapters and support classic literature
As an Amazon Associate, we earn a small commission from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.
Available in paperback, hardcover, and e-book formats
Intelligence Amplifier™ Analysis
Why This Matters
Connect literature to life
This chapter teaches how to recognize when self-hatred is actually preventing healing, and how the right witness can transform destructive shame into productive guilt.
Now let's explore the literary elements.
Terms to Know
Confession
In Russian Orthodox tradition, confession isn't just admitting wrongdoing - it's a spiritual cleansing that reconnects you to community. Raskolnikov's confession to Sonya represents his first step back toward humanity after months of isolation.
Guilt vs. Shame
Guilt says 'I did something bad' while shame says 'I am bad.' Raskolnikov has been drowning in shame, believing he's fundamentally evil. Sonya's response offers him a path back to guilt - which can be forgiven.
Lazarus Story
A Biblical tale about Jesus raising a dead man back to life. Sonya reads this to show Raskolnikov that spiritual resurrection is possible. It's Dostoevsky's central metaphor for how love can bring someone back from emotional death.
Spiritual Death
The state of being cut off from human connection and empathy. Raskolnikov has been spiritually dead since the murders - alive physically but dead to love, compassion, and community.
Unconditional Love
Love that doesn't depend on someone being good or deserving it. Sonya demonstrates this by staying with Raskolnikov after his confession, seeing his humanity even in his worst moment.
Redemption
The possibility that someone can be saved or made whole again, no matter what they've done. This chapter is about whether Raskolnikov can be redeemed through love and genuine human connection.
Characters in This Chapter
Raskolnikov
protagonist
Finally breaks down and confesses his murders to Sonya, releasing months of isolation and torment. His confession shows he's desperate for human connection but terrified of being rejected completely.
Sonya
moral guide
Responds to Raskolnikov's confession with horror but also compassion, refusing to abandon him. She becomes his lifeline back to humanity by offering unconditional love when he expects only judgment.
Lizaveta
victim
The innocent sister Raskolnikov also killed, whose death weighs heavily on his conscience. Her memory haunts this confession scene as the murder that proved his theory completely wrong.
The Old Pawnbroker
victim
The woman Raskolnikov murdered, whose death he tries to justify as ridding the world of someone useless. Her memory represents his failed attempt to prove he was above moral law.
Key Quotes & Analysis
"What have you done to yourself?"
Context: Her immediate response after Raskolnikov confesses to murder
This question cuts to the heart of everything. Sonya doesn't ask what he did to his victims - she sees that he's destroyed himself. It's the response of someone who loves him and recognizes his suffering.
"We will go together... we will bear the cross together!"
Context: After reading the Lazarus story and promising to follow him to Siberia
Sonya commits to sharing his burden rather than letting him carry it alone. This promise of companionship offers him what he's been missing - genuine human connection through the worst circumstances.
"I murdered myself, not the old woman!"
Context: During his breakdown while confessing to Sonya
He finally understands that his crime destroyed him more than anyone else. This recognition that he's the real victim of his own actions is the beginning of his path toward healing.
Thematic Threads
Confession
In This Chapter
Raskolnikov finally tells Sonya about the murders, breaking his isolation through truth-telling
Development
Culmination of his internal struggle with secrecy that's been building since chapter one
Redemption
In This Chapter
Sonya's response suggests possibility of spiritual resurrection through human connection
Development
First genuine hope for Raskolnikov's recovery after chapters of despair
Class
In This Chapter
Sonya, despite her poverty and prostitution, becomes Raskolnikov's moral superior and guide
Development
Continues inversion of social hierarchies—the 'lowest' person offers salvation to the 'educated'
Isolation
In This Chapter
Raskolnikov's confession breaks the deadly silence that's been consuming him
Development
Turning point from the crushing loneliness that's driven him toward madness
Identity
In This Chapter
Question of whether Raskolnikov is a murderer or a person who murdered—fundamental difference
Development
Core identity crisis reaches resolution through Sonya's ability to separate person from actions
You now have the context. Time to form your own thoughts.
Discussion Questions
- 1
What does Raskolnikov finally tell Sonya, and how does she react differently than he expected?
- 2
Why does Sonya ask 'What have you done to yourself?' instead of 'How could you do this to others?' What's the difference?
- 3
Think about times when someone confessed something difficult to you, or when you needed to confess. What made the difference between shame and healing?
- 4
If you were Sonya, how would you handle someone's worst confession? What would help them move forward without minimizing their actions?
- 5
What does this scene teach us about the difference between being broken and doing broken things? Why does that distinction matter for how we treat ourselves and others?
Critical Thinking Exercise
Practice Being Someone's Sonya
Think of someone in your life who might be carrying shame about something - maybe a mistake at work, a parenting moment they regret, or a choice they can't forgive themselves for. Write down exactly what you would say to help them separate their actions from their worth as a person. Practice the difference between 'You're not that kind of person' (which dismisses) and 'You're a good person who did something harmful' (which holds both truth and hope).
Consider:
- •Focus on what this has done TO them, not what they did to others
- •Avoid rushing to minimize or fix - sometimes people need their pain witnessed first
- •Ask yourself: Am I strong enough to hold their full truth without making it about my comfort?
Coming Up Next...
Chapter 20: The Funeral Dinner
In the next chapter, you'll discover the psychology of public grief, and learn guilt distorts even sympathy. These insights reveal timeless patterns that resonate in our own lives and relationships.