Summary
Smith dismantles the popular policy of bounties—government payments to encourage exports—showing how they backfire spectacularly. Using corn exports as his main example, he demonstrates that these subsidies don't actually help farmers or increase production as promised. Instead, they force consumers to pay twice: once through taxes to fund the bounties, and again through higher food prices at home. The policy artificially inflates domestic prices while subsidizing foreign consumers to eat cheaper than locals can. Smith reveals how corn merchants—the middlemen politicians love to vilify—actually benefit society by smoothing out supply shortages and preventing famines through their profit-seeking behavior. He shows that when governments try to eliminate these traders or control prices, they create the very disasters they claim to prevent. The chapter exposes a fundamental truth about economic policy: good intentions often produce harmful results when they ignore how markets actually work. Smith uses the example of Spain and Portugal's gold and silver policies to show how countries can impoverish themselves through misguided regulations. He argues that the same natural forces that make individuals successful in business—self-interest guided by market signals—also serve the public good better than government interference. The lesson resonates today: beware of policies that promise easy solutions to complex economic problems.
Coming Up in Chapter 26
Having exposed how domestic subsidies backfire, Smith next examines international trade agreements and treaties. He'll reveal how nations try to manipulate trade relationships and why these diplomatic deals often harm the very people they claim to protect.
Share it with friends
An excerpt from the original text.(~500 words)
OF BOUNTIES. Bounties upon exportation are, in Great Britain, frequently petitioned for, and sometimes granted, to the produce of particular branches of domestic industry. By means of them, our merchants and manufacturers, it is pretended, will be enabled to sell their goods as cheap or cheaper than their rivals in the foreign market. A greater quantity, it is said, will thus be exported, and the balance of trade consequently turned more in favour of our own country. We cannot give our workmen a monopoly in the foreign, as we have done in the home market. We cannot force foreigners to buy their goods, as we have done our own countrymen. The next best expedient, it has been thought, therefore, is to pay them for buying. It is in this manner that the mercantile system proposes to enrich the whole country, and to put money into all our pockets, by means of the balance of trade. Bounties, it is allowed, ought to be given to those branches of trade only which cannot be carried on without them. But every branch of trade in which the merchant can sell his goods for a price which replaces to him, with the ordinary profits of stock, the whole capital employed in preparing and sending them to market, can be carried on without a bounty. Every such branch is evidently upon a level with all the other branches of trade which are carried on without bounties, and cannot, therefore, require one more than they. Those trades only require bounties, in which the merchant is obliged to sell his goods for a price which does not replace to him his capital, together with the ordinary profit, or in which he is obliged to sell them for less than it really cost him to send them to market. The bounty is given in order to make up this loss, and to encourage him to continue, or, perhaps, to begin a trade, of which the expense is supposed to be greater than the returns, of which every operation eats up a part of the capital employed in it, and which is of such a nature, that if all other trades resembled it, there would soon be no capital left in the country. The trades, it is to be observed, which are carried on by means of bounties, are the only ones which can be carried on between two nations for any considerable time together, in such a manner as that one of them shall always and regularly lose, or sell its goods for less than it really cost to send them to market. But if the bounty did not repay to the merchant what he would otherwise lose upon the price of his goods, his own interest would soon oblige him to employ his stock in another way, or to find out a trade in which the price of the goods would replace to him, with the ordinary profit, the capital employed in sending them to market. The...
Master this chapter. Complete your experience
Purchase the complete book to access all chapters and support classic literature
As an Amazon Associate, we earn a small commission from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.
Available in paperback, hardcover, and e-book formats
Intelligence Amplifier™ Analysis
The Road of Good Intentions - How Helping Can Harm
Well-meaning interventions often create the exact problems they're designed to solve by disrupting natural feedback systems.
Why This Matters
Connect literature to life
This chapter teaches how to spot when well-intentioned changes will create the exact problems they promise to solve.
Practice This Today
This week, notice when someone proposes eliminating 'middlemen' or 'streamlining' processes—ask what hidden functions might be lost and who really pays the price.
Now let's explore the literary elements.
Terms to Know
Bounties
Government payments to businesses to encourage exports - essentially taxpayer-funded subsidies to help companies sell their products overseas cheaper. Politicians promoted these as a way to boost trade and bring money into the country.
Modern Usage:
We see this today in agricultural subsidies, tax breaks for corporations that export, and government incentives for green energy companies.
Mercantile System
The dominant economic theory of Smith's time that viewed trade as a zero-sum game where one country's gain meant another's loss. It focused obsessively on accumulating gold and silver and maintaining a positive trade balance.
Modern Usage:
This thinking shows up in modern trade wars and politicians who obsess over trade deficits with other countries.
Balance of Trade
The difference between what a country exports versus what it imports. The mercantile system believed a country could only prosper by exporting more than it imported, bringing in more money than it sent out.
Modern Usage:
Politicians still use trade deficit numbers to argue we're 'losing' to China or other trading partners.
Corn Laws
British regulations that controlled grain imports and exports, including bounties for exported grain. These laws kept domestic food prices artificially high while subsidizing foreign consumers to buy British grain cheaper than Britons could.
Modern Usage:
Similar to how American farm subsidies can make our food exports cheaper for other countries while we pay higher prices at home.
Engrossers and Forestallers
Grain merchants who bought large quantities to store and resell later - the middlemen politicians blamed for high food prices. Smith shows these traders actually prevented famines by storing grain during good harvests and releasing it during shortages.
Modern Usage:
Like blaming gas station owners for high fuel prices or grocery stores for expensive food during shortages.
Invisible Hand
Smith's concept that individuals pursuing their own self-interest in free markets unintentionally benefit society as a whole. Market forces guide resources to where they're most needed without central planning.
Modern Usage:
When businesses compete for customers, prices drop and quality improves - benefiting everyone even though each business only cares about profit.
Characters in This Chapter
The Corn Merchant
Misunderstood hero
Smith uses this figure to show how middlemen actually serve society by storing grain during abundance and releasing it during scarcity, preventing famines. Politicians scapegoat these merchants for high prices they didn't create.
Modern Equivalent:
The gas station owner blamed for high fuel prices during a crisis
The Domestic Manufacturer
Opportunistic beneficiary
Represents businesses that lobby for bounties and export subsidies, claiming they need government help to compete abroad. Smith shows they're really just seeking unfair advantages at taxpayer expense.
Modern Equivalent:
The CEO lobbying Congress for tax breaks and subsidies
The Foreign Consumer
Unintended beneficiary
Through bounties, these consumers get to buy British goods cheaper than British citizens can, essentially being subsidized by British taxpayers. Smith uses this to show the absurdity of the policy.
Modern Equivalent:
Foreign buyers getting American products cheaper than Americans pay
The British Taxpayer
Unwitting victim
Pays twice under the bounty system - once through taxes to fund the subsidies, and again through higher domestic prices for the same goods being sold cheaper abroad.
Modern Equivalent:
The working person whose tax dollars subsidize corporate exports while paying higher prices at home
Key Quotes & Analysis
"We cannot force foreigners to buy their goods, as we have done our own countrymen. The next best expedient, it has been thought, therefore, is to pay them for buying."
Context: Smith explains the logic behind export bounties
This reveals the absurdity of the mercantile system's approach - since you can't force foreign customers to buy your products, politicians decided to bribe them instead. Smith shows how this backwards thinking hurts the very people it claims to help.
In Today's Words:
Since we can't make other countries buy our stuff, let's just pay them to do it.
"Every branch of trade in which the merchant can sell his goods for a price which replaces to him, with the ordinary profits of stock, the whole capital employed... can be carried on without a bounty."
Context: Smith argues that profitable businesses don't need government subsidies
This cuts through political rhetoric to a simple truth - if a business can make normal profits without help, why should taxpayers subsidize it? Smith exposes how bounties go to businesses that are already successful, not struggling ones.
In Today's Words:
If your business is already making money, you don't need taxpayer handouts.
"The pretence that corporations are necessary for the better government of the trade is without any foundation."
Context: Smith critiques the justification for trade monopolies and special privileges
Smith demolishes the argument that businesses need special government protection or privileges to function properly. He shows that competition and free markets regulate trade better than government-granted monopolies.
In Today's Words:
The idea that big corporations need special treatment to manage trade properly is complete nonsense.
Thematic Threads
Unintended Consequences
In This Chapter
Government bounties meant to help farmers actually harm consumers and distort markets
Development
Building on earlier themes about market complexity and interconnection
In Your Life:
Your workplace 'improvements' might be making your job harder without anyone realizing it
Hidden Costs
In This Chapter
Citizens pay twice for corn bounties—through taxes and higher food prices
Development
Extends Smith's theme that economic policies have multiple, often invisible effects
In Your Life:
That 'free' benefit at work probably comes out of your potential raises somehow
Scapegoating
In This Chapter
Politicians blame corn merchants while these traders actually prevent famines
Development
Continues pattern of misidentifying who helps versus who hurts society
In Your Life:
The person everyone complains about at work might be the one actually keeping things running
System Wisdom
In This Chapter
Market forces naturally distribute grain better than government planning
Development
Reinforces Smith's faith in emergent order over designed control
In Your Life:
Sometimes the messy way things naturally evolved works better than your organized plan
Political Theater
In This Chapter
Politicians get credit for bounties while shifting real costs to citizens
Development
Introduced here—the gap between political appearance and economic reality
In Your Life:
Your boss might be taking credit for improvements that actually make your life harder
You now have the context. Time to form your own thoughts.
Discussion Questions
- 1
Smith shows how corn bounties made taxpayers pay twice—once for the subsidy and again through higher food prices. What was the government trying to accomplish, and why did it backfire?
analysis • surface - 2
Why does Smith argue that corn merchants—who politicians often attack as greedy—actually prevent famines better than government price controls?
analysis • medium - 3
Where do you see this pattern today: well-intentioned policies that create the exact problems they're meant to solve?
application • medium - 4
When someone promises to 'eliminate the middleman' or bypass normal processes, how would you evaluate whether it's actually a good idea?
application • deep - 5
What does this chapter reveal about why people support policies that hurt them—and how can you avoid falling into the same trap?
reflection • deep
Critical Thinking Exercise
Trace the Hidden Costs
Think of a current policy or program that promises to help people (student loan forgiveness, rent control, minimum wage increases, etc.). Map out who pays, who benefits, and what unintended consequences might emerge. Follow the money and incentives, not just the stated goals.
Consider:
- •Who bears the costs that aren't immediately visible?
- •What behaviors does this policy encourage or discourage?
- •What happens to the people the policy claims to help in the long run?
Journaling Prompt
Write about a time when you supported something that sounded good but had hidden costs you didn't see at first. What would you look for now to spot these patterns earlier?
Coming Up Next...
Chapter 26: Trade Deals and Hidden Costs
As the story unfolds, you'll explore trade agreements create winners and losers within each country, while uncovering 'favorable' trade balances can actually hurt your economy. These lessons connect the classic to contemporary challenges we all face.