An excerpt from the original text.(complete · 1713 words)
he fundamental and essential significance of the European events of the
beginning of the nineteenth century lies in the movement of the mass of
the European peoples from west to east and afterwards from east to west.
The commencement of that movement was the movement from west to east.
For the peoples of the west to be able to make their warlike movement
to Moscow it was necessary: (1) that they should form themselves into
a military group of a size able to endure a collision with the warlike
military group of the east, (2) that they should abandon all established
traditions and customs, and (3) that during their military movement they
should have at their head a man who could justify to himself and to them
the deceptions, robberies, and murders which would have to be committed
during that movement.
And beginning with the French Revolution the old inadequately large
group was destroyed, as well as the old habits and traditions, and step
by step a group was formed of larger dimensions with new customs and
traditions, and a man was produced who would stand at the head of the
coming movement and bear the responsibility for all that had to be done.
A man without convictions, without habits, without traditions, without
a name, and not even a Frenchman, emerges—by what seem the strangest
chances—from among all the seething French parties, and without joining
any one of them is borne forward to a prominent position.
The ignorance of his colleagues, the weakness and insignificance of
his opponents, the frankness of his falsehoods, and the dazzling and
self-confident limitations of this man raise him to the head of the
army. The brilliant qualities of the soldiers of the army sent to Italy,
his opponents’ reluctance to fight, and his own childish audacity and
self-confidence secure him military fame. Innumerable so-called chances
accompany him everywhere. The disfavor into which he falls with the
rulers of France turns to his advantage. His attempts to avoid his
predestined path are unsuccessful: he is not received into the Russian
service, and the appointment he seeks in Turkey comes to nothing. During
the war in Italy he is several times on the verge of destruction and
each time is saved in an unexpected manner. Owing to various diplomatic
considerations the Russian armies—just those which might have destroyed
his prestige—do not appear upon the scene till he is no longer there.
On his return from Italy he finds the government in Paris in a process
of dissolution in which all those who are in it are inevitably wiped
out and destroyed. And by chance an escape from this dangerous position
presents itself in the form of an aimless and senseless expedition
to Africa. Again so-called chance accompanies him. Impregnable Malta
surrenders without a shot; his most reckless schemes are crowned with
success. The enemy’s fleet, which subsequently did not let a single boat
pass, allows his entire army to elude it. In Africa a whole series of
outrages are committed against the almost unarmed inhabitants. And the
men who commit these crimes, especially their leader, assure themselves
that this is admirable, this is glory—it resembles Caesar and Alexander
the Great and is therefore good.
This ideal of glory and grandeur—which consists not merely in
considering nothing wrong that one does but in priding oneself on every
crime one commits, ascribing to it an incomprehensible supernatural
significance—that ideal, destined to guide this man and his associates,
had scope for its development in Africa. Whatever he does succeeds. The
plague does not touch him. The cruelty of murdering prisoners is not
imputed to him as a fault. His childishly rash, uncalled-for, and
ignoble departure from Africa, leaving his comrades in distress, is
set down to his credit, and again the enemy’s fleet twice lets him slip
past. When, intoxicated by the crimes he has committed so successfully,
he reaches Paris, the dissolution of the republican government, which a
year earlier might have ruined him, has reached its extreme limit, and
his presence there now as a newcomer free from party entanglements can
only serve to exalt him—and though he himself has no plan, he is quite
ready for his new rôle.
He had no plan, he was afraid of everything, but the parties snatched at
him and demanded his participation.
He alone—with his ideal of glory and grandeur developed in Italy and
Egypt, his insane self-adulation, his boldness in crime and frankness in
lying—he alone could justify what had to be done.
He is needed for the place that awaits him, and so almost apart from
his will and despite his indecision, his lack of a plan, and all his
mistakes, he is drawn into a conspiracy that aims at seizing power and
the conspiracy is crowned with success.
He is pushed into a meeting of the legislature. In alarm he wishes to
flee, considering himself lost. He pretends to fall into a swoon and
says senseless things that should have ruined him. But the once proud
and shrewd rulers of France, feeling that their part is played out, are
even more bewildered than he, and do not say the words they should have
said to destroy him and retain their power.
Chance, millions of chances, give him power, and all men as if by
agreement co-operate to confirm that power. Chance forms the characters
of the rulers of France, who submit to him; chance forms the character
of Paul I of Russia who recognizes his government; chance contrives
a plot against him which not only fails to harm him but confirms his
power. Chance puts the Duc d’Enghien in his hands and unexpectedly
causes him to kill him—thereby convincing the mob more forcibly than
in any other way that he had the right, since he had the might.
Chance contrives that though he directs all his efforts to prepare an
expedition against England (which would inevitably have ruined him) he
never carries out that intention, but unexpectedly falls upon Mack and
the Austrians, who surrender without a battle. Chance and genius give
him the victory at Austerlitz; and by chance all men, not only the
French but all Europe—except England which does not take part in the
events about to happen—despite their former horror and detestation of
his crimes, now recognize his authority, the title he has given
himself, and his ideal of grandeur and glory, which seems excellent and
reasonable to them all.
As if measuring themselves and preparing for the coming movement, the
western forces push toward the east several times in 1805, 1806, 1807,
and 1809, gaining strength and growing. In 1811 the group of people that
had formed in France unites into one group with the peoples of Central
Europe. The strength of the justification of the man who stands at the
head of the movement grows with the increased size of the group. During
the ten-year preparatory period this man had formed relations with all
the crowned heads of Europe. The discredited rulers of the world can
oppose no reasonable ideal to the insensate Napoleonic ideal of
glory and grandeur. One after another they hasten to display their
insignificance before him. The King of Prussia sends his wife to seek
the great man’s mercy; the Emperor of Austria considers it a favor that
this man receives a daughter of the Caesars into his bed; the Pope, the
guardian of all that the nations hold sacred, utilizes religion for the
aggrandizement of the great man. It is not Napoleon who prepares himself
for the accomplishment of his role, so much as all those round him who
prepare him to take on himself the whole responsibility for what is
happening and has to happen. There is no step, no crime or petty fraud
he commits, which in the mouths of those around him is not at once
represented as a great deed. The most suitable fête the Germans can
devise for him is a celebration of Jena and Auerstädt. Not only is he
great, but so are his ancestors, his brothers, his stepsons, and his
brothers-in-law. Everything is done to deprive him of the remains of his
reason and to prepare him for his terrible part. And when he is ready so
too are the forces.
The invasion pushes eastward and reaches its final goal—Moscow. That
city is taken; the Russian army suffers heavier losses than the opposing
armies had suffered in the former war from Austerlitz to Wagram. But
suddenly instead of those chances and that genius which hitherto had
so consistently led him by an uninterrupted series of successes to the
predestined goal, an innumerable sequence of inverse chances occur—from
the cold in his head at Borodinó to the sparks which set Moscow on
fire, and the frosts—and instead of genius, stupidity and immeasurable
baseness become evident.
The invaders flee, turn back, flee again, and all the chances are now
not for Napoleon but always against him.
A countermovement is then accomplished from east to west with a
remarkable resemblance to the preceding movement from west to east.
Attempted drives from east to west—similar to the contrary movements of
1805, 1807, and 1809—precede the great westward movement; there is the
same coalescence into a group of enormous dimensions; the same adhesion
of the people of Central Europe to the movement; the same hesitation
midway, and the same increasing rapidity as the goal is approached.
Paris, the ultimate goal, is reached. The Napoleonic government and army
are destroyed. Napoleon himself is no longer of any account; all his
actions are evidently pitiful and mean, but again an inexplicable chance
occurs. The allies detest Napoleon whom they regard as the cause of
their sufferings. Deprived of power and authority, his crimes and his
craft exposed, he should have appeared to them what he appeared ten
years previously and one year later—an outlawed brigand. But by some
strange chance no one perceives this. His part is not yet ended. The man
who ten years before and a year later was considered an outlawed brigand
is sent to an island two days’ sail from France, which for some reason
is presented to him as his dominion, and guards are given to him and
millions of money are paid him.
Master this chapter. Complete your experience
Purchase the complete book to access all chapters and support classic literature
As an Amazon Associate, we earn a small commission from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.
Available in paperback, hardcover, and e-book formats
Let's Analyse the Pattern
When people rise through luck rather than skill, they often develop dangerous entitlement that society enables until they catastrophically overreach.
Why This Matters
Connect literature to life
This chapter teaches how to identify when someone's success comes from being in the right place at the right time versus actual ability.
Practice This Today
This week, notice when someone gets credit or authority - ask yourself whether they earned it through skill or just happened to be available when opportunity struck.
Now let's explore the literary elements.
Key Quotes & Analysis
"A man without convictions, without habits, without traditions, without a name, and not even a Frenchman, emerges—by what seem the strangest chances—from among all the seething French parties"
Context: Tolstoy describing how Napoleon rose to power during the chaos following the French Revolution
This quote challenges the myth of Napoleon as a destined leader. Tolstoy argues he was just an outsider with no deep roots who happened to be in the right place when society needed someone to fill the power vacuum.
In Today's Words:
This nobody from nowhere suddenly becomes important because everything's falling apart and someone has to be in charge.
"The ignorance of his colleagues, the weakness and insignificance of his opponents, the frankness of his falsehoods, and the dazzling and self-confident limitations of the man raise him to the head of the army"
Context: Explaining how Napoleon's rise was enabled by the incompetence and weakness of those around him
Tolstoy suggests that Napoleon succeeded not through brilliance but because everyone else was worse. His confidence in his own lies became a strength when surrounded by confusion and weakness.
In Today's Words:
He got ahead because everyone else was terrible at their jobs, and he was confident enough to lie with a straight face.
"Chance forms the characters of the rulers of France, who submit to him; chance forms the character of Paul I of Russia who recognizes his government"
Context: Describing how seemingly random events kept working in Napoleon's favor
Tolstoy emphasizes that Napoleon's success depended on a series of lucky breaks - weak opponents, favorable timing, rulers who inexplicably supported him. This wasn't destiny, just coincidence.
In Today's Words:
He kept getting lucky - his enemies were weak, his allies were useful, and everything just happened to work out for him.
Thematic Threads
Power
In This Chapter
Napoleon's rise shows how power attracts itself—each success made the next easier, until he believed his own mythology
Development
Evolved from earlier themes about individual agency to show how power operates at historical scale
In Your Life:
You might see this in how workplace bullies gain influence, or how family dynamics shift when someone gets money or authority
Social Expectations
In This Chapter
Society collectively enabled Napoleon by celebrating his crimes as genius and competing to flatter him
Development
Builds on earlier exploration of how social pressure shapes behavior, now showing how it creates monsters
In Your Life:
You participate in this when you laugh at the boss's bad jokes or praise someone's 'success' when you know they're harmful
Identity
In This Chapter
Napoleon developed a completely false self-image based on lucky circumstances, believing himself chosen by destiny
Development
Continues the theme of how people construct identity, showing the extreme danger of self-delusion
In Your Life:
You might struggle with this after any major success—wondering if you earned it or just got lucky
Class
In This Chapter
Kings and nobles debased themselves before Napoleon, showing how power can temporarily override traditional class structures
Development
Expands earlier class themes to show how dramatic social upheaval can scramble hierarchies
In Your Life:
You see this when economic changes suddenly elevate or diminish people's social status in your community
You now have the context. Time to form your own thoughts.
Discussion Questions
- 1
According to Tolstoy, what really allowed Napoleon to conquer Europe - his genius or his circumstances?
analysis • surface - 2
How did society's reaction to Napoleon's early successes enable his later crimes?
analysis • medium - 3
Where do you see this pattern of 'lucky breaks creating dangerous entitlement' in your workplace or community?
application • medium - 4
When someone in your life gets promoted or gains power through luck rather than competence, how do you protect yourself from their potential overreach?
application • deep - 5
What does Napoleon's rise and fall reveal about how societies create their own monsters?
reflection • deep
Critical Thinking Exercise
Trace Your Own Lucky Breaks
Think of a time when you succeeded or got ahead primarily due to good timing or circumstances rather than pure skill. Write down what happened, then honestly assess: Did this success make you feel more entitled or special? How did others react to your success? What did you learn about staying humble when things go your way?
Consider:
- •Be honest about the role luck played versus your actual contribution
- •Notice how success changed your self-perception and expectations
- •Consider how you can recognize this pattern in others before it becomes dangerous
Journaling Prompt
Write about someone you know who let early lucky breaks go to their head. How did their behavior change? What warning signs did you notice? How will you handle your own future successes differently?
Coming Up Next...
Chapter 341: The Puppet Master Revealed
Having examined how Napoleon rose and fell, Tolstoy will explore the deeper forces that drive historical change—and what this means for understanding human agency in the sweep of events.




