An excerpt from the original text.(complete · 1058 words)
he so-called partisan war began with the entry of the French into
Smolénsk.
Before partisan warfare had been officially recognized by the
government, thousands of enemy stragglers, marauders, and foragers had
been destroyed by the Cossacks and the peasants, who killed them off
as instinctively as dogs worry a stray mad dog to death. Denís Davýdov,
with his Russian instinct, was the first to recognize the value of
this terrible cudgel which regardless of the rules of military science
destroyed the French, and to him belongs the credit for taking the first
step toward regularizing this method of warfare.
On August 24 Davýdov’s first partisan detachment was formed and then
others were recognized. The further the campaign progressed the more
numerous these detachments became.
The irregulars destroyed the great army piecemeal. They gathered the
fallen leaves that dropped of themselves from that withered tree—the
French army—and sometimes shook that tree itself. By October, when
the French were fleeing toward Smolénsk, there were hundreds of such
companies, of various sizes and characters. There were some that adopted
all the army methods and had infantry, artillery, staffs, and the
comforts of life. Others consisted solely of Cossack cavalry. There were
also small scratch groups of foot and horse, and groups of peasants and
landowners that remained unknown. A sacristan commanded one party which
captured several hundred prisoners in the course of a month; and there
was Vasílisa, the wife of a village elder, who slew hundreds of the
French.
The partisan warfare flamed up most fiercely in the latter days of
October. Its first period had passed: when the partisans themselves,
amazed at their own boldness, feared every minute to be surrounded
and captured by the French, and hid in the forests without unsaddling,
hardly daring to dismount and always expecting to be pursued. By the end
of October this kind of warfare had taken definite shape: it had become
clear to all what could be ventured against the French and what could
not. Now only the commanders of detachments with staffs, and moving
according to rules at a distance from the French, still regarded many
things as impossible. The small bands that had started their activities
long before and had already observed the French closely considered
things possible which the commanders of the big detachments did not dare
to contemplate. The Cossacks and peasants who crept in among the French
now considered everything possible.
On October 22, Denísov (who was one of the irregulars) was with his
group at the height of the guerrilla enthusiasm. Since early morning he
and his party had been on the move. All day long he had been watching
from the forest that skirted the highroad a large French convoy of
cavalry baggage and Russian prisoners separated from the rest of the
army, which—as was learned from spies and prisoners—was moving under a
strong escort to Smolénsk. Besides Denísov and Dólokhov (who also led
a small party and moved in Denísov’s vicinity), the commanders of some
large divisions with staffs also knew of this convoy and, as Denísov
expressed it, were sharpening their teeth for it. Two of the commanders
of large parties—one a Pole and the other a German—sent invitations
to Denísov almost simultaneously, requesting him to join up with their
divisions to attack the convoy.
“No, bwother, I have gwown mustaches myself,” said Denísov on reading
these documents, and he wrote to the German that, despite his heartfelt
desire to serve under so valiant and renowned a general, he had to forgo
that pleasure because he was already under the command of the Polish
general. To the Polish general he replied to the same effect, informing
him that he was already under the command of the German.
Having arranged matters thus, Denísov and Dólokhov intended, without
reporting matters to the higher command, to attack and seize that
convoy with their own small forces. On October 22 it was moving from
the village of Mikúlino to that of Shámshevo. To the left of the road
between Mikúlino and Shámshevo there were large forests, extending in
some places up to the road itself though in others a mile or more back
from it. Through these forests Denísov and his party rode all day,
sometimes keeping well back in them and sometimes coming to the very
edge, but never losing sight of the moving French. That morning,
Cossacks of Denísov’s party had seized and carried off into the forest
two wagons loaded with cavalry saddles, which had stuck in the mud not
far from Mikúlino where the forest ran close to the road. Since then,
and until evening, the party had watched the movements of the French
without attacking. It was necessary to let the French reach Shámshevo
quietly without alarming them and then, after joining Dólokhov who was
to come that evening to a consultation at a watchman’s hut in the forest
less than a mile from Shámshevo, to surprise the French at dawn, falling
like an avalanche on their heads from two sides, and rout and capture
them all at one blow.
In their rear, more than a mile from Mikúlino where the forest came
right up to the road, six Cossacks were posted to report if any fresh
columns of French should show themselves.
Beyond Shámshevo, Dólokhov was to observe the road in the same way, to
find out at what distance there were other French troops. They reckoned
that the convoy had fifteen hundred men. Denísov had two hundred, and
Dólokhov might have as many more, but the disparity of numbers did not
deter Denísov. All that he now wanted to know was what troops these were
and to learn that he had to capture a “tongue”—that is, a man from
the enemy column. That morning’s attack on the wagons had been made so
hastily that the Frenchmen with the wagons had all been killed; only a
little drummer boy had been taken alive, and as he was a straggler he
could tell them nothing definite about the troops in that column.
Denísov considered it dangerous to make a second attack for fear of
putting the whole column on the alert, so he sent Tíkhon Shcherbáty, a
peasant of his party, to Shámshevo to try and seize at least one of the
French quartermasters who had been sent on in advance.
Master this chapter. Complete your experience
Purchase the complete book to access all chapters and support classic literature
As an Amazon Associate, we earn a small commission from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.
Available in paperback, hardcover, and e-book formats
Let's Analyse the Pattern
Small, independent groups can achieve what large institutions cannot by staying nimble, learning quickly, and chipping away at problems through persistent, coordinated action.
Why This Matters
Connect literature to life
This chapter teaches how to identify when informal networks are more effective than official channels for creating change.
Practice This Today
This week, notice when small groups of coworkers, neighbors, or community members accomplish things that formal organizations struggle with—and consider how you might apply their tactics.
Now let's explore the literary elements.
Key Quotes & Analysis
"They gathered the fallen leaves that dropped of themselves from that withered tree—the French army—and sometimes shook that tree itself."
Context: Describing how partisan fighters picked off stragglers and weakened the French forces
This metaphor shows how small actions can bring down something that looks powerful. The French army seemed mighty, but it was actually dying from within, and the partisans just helped it along.
In Today's Words:
They cleaned up the mess the French left behind, and sometimes gave them a push to make more mess.
"Before partisan warfare had been officially recognized by the government, thousands of enemy stragglers, marauders, and foragers had been destroyed by the Cossacks and the peasants, who killed them off as instinctively as dogs worry a stray mad dog to death."
Context: Explaining how resistance started naturally before becoming official policy
People didn't wait for permission to defend themselves. Their survival instincts kicked in automatically when threatened, just like animals protecting their territory.
In Today's Words:
Regular folks were already fighting back before the government made it official—they didn't need anyone's permission to protect themselves.
"The irregulars destroyed the great army piecemeal."
Context: Summarizing how small groups defeated a massive military force
This shows the power of persistent, small actions over time. Instead of one big battle, countless little victories added up to total defeat for the French.
In Today's Words:
The little guys took down the big army bit by bit.
Thematic Threads
Class
In This Chapter
Peasants and ordinary Russians prove more effective than aristocratic military leaders
Development
Continues the theme of common people showing greater wisdom and effectiveness than their social superiors
In Your Life:
You might find that your coworkers have better solutions than management, or that community groups accomplish more than official agencies.
Identity
In This Chapter
Russians discover they can be effective fighters even without formal military training
Development
Builds on earlier themes of characters discovering unexpected capabilities within themselves
In Your Life:
You might surprise yourself by succeeding in roles or situations you never thought you could handle.
Power
In This Chapter
True power emerges from coordinated small groups rather than centralized authority
Development
Challenges earlier assumptions about where real influence comes from
In Your Life:
You might find more influence through informal networks and grassroots organizing than through official channels.
Strategy
In This Chapter
Denisov uses political maneuvering to maintain independence while appearing cooperative
Development
Shows how tactical thinking can overcome both enemies and allies who might limit your effectiveness
In Your Life:
You might need to navigate competing demands from different authority figures by being strategically vague about your commitments.
Persistence
In This Chapter
Partisan groups gradually grow bolder and more effective through accumulated small victories
Development
Demonstrates how sustained effort builds confidence and capability over time
In Your Life:
You might find that tackling small, manageable challenges builds the skills and confidence needed for bigger ones.
You now have the context. Time to form your own thoughts.
Discussion Questions
- 1
What made the Russian peasants and Cossacks more effective against the French than the official army?
analysis • surface - 2
Why did small, independent groups succeed where massive military formations failed?
analysis • medium - 3
Where do you see this 'distributed resistance' pattern working in your community or workplace today?
application • medium - 4
How would you use Denisov's strategy of maintaining independence when facing pressure from larger organizations?
application • deep - 5
What does this chapter reveal about where real change actually comes from in society?
reflection • deep
Critical Thinking Exercise
Map Your Own Guerrilla Campaign
Think of a problem in your life that feels too big to tackle directly. Map out how you could use the partisan strategy: identify 3-4 small, specific actions you could take that would chip away at the larger problem. Consider who your natural allies might be and what resources you already have access to.
Consider:
- •Start with what feels manageable rather than trying to solve everything at once
- •Look for informal networks and relationships rather than official channels
- •Focus on maintaining your independence while building strategic alliances
Journaling Prompt
Write about a time when you achieved something important by working around the system rather than through it. What made that approach successful?
Coming Up Next...
Chapter 302: Waiting in the Rain
Denisov needs crucial intelligence about the French convoy before launching his daring attack. He sends Tikhon, a resourceful peasant, on a dangerous mission to capture a French soldier who can provide the information they need.




