An excerpt from the original text.(complete · 664 words)
rom the time he received this news to the end of the campaign all
Kutúzov’s activity was directed toward restraining his troops, by
authority, by guile, and by entreaty, from useless attacks,
maneuvers, or encounters with the perishing enemy. Dokhtúrov went to
Málo-Yaroslávets, but Kutúzov lingered with the main army and gave
orders for the evacuation of Kalúga—a retreat beyond which town seemed
to him quite possible.
Everywhere Kutúzov retreated, but the enemy without waiting for his
retreat fled in the opposite direction.
Napoleon’s historians describe to us his skilled maneuvers at Tarútino
and Málo-Yaroslávets, and make conjectures as to what would have
happened had Napoleon been in time to penetrate into the rich southern
provinces.
But not to speak of the fact that nothing prevented him from advancing
into those southern provinces (for the Russian army did not bar his
way), the historians forget that nothing could have saved his army, for
then already it bore within itself the germs of inevitable ruin. How
could that army—which had found abundant supplies in Moscow and had
trampled them underfoot instead of keeping them, and on arriving at
Smolénsk had looted provisions instead of storing them—how could that
army recuperate in Kalúga province, which was inhabited by Russians such
as those who lived in Moscow, and where fire had the same property of
consuming what was set ablaze?
That army could not recover anywhere. Since the battle of Borodinó
and the pillage of Moscow it had borne within itself, as it were, the
chemical elements of dissolution.
The members of what had once been an army—Napoleon himself and all his
soldiers--fled without knowing whither, each concerned only to make his
escape as quickly as possible from this position, of the hopelessness of
which they were all more or less vaguely conscious.
So it came about that at the council at Málo-Yaroslávets, when the
generals pretending to confer together expressed various opinions, all
mouths were closed by the opinion uttered by the simple-minded soldier
Mouton who, speaking last, said what they all felt: that the one thing
needful was to get away as quickly as possible; and no one, not
even Napoleon, could say anything against that truth which they all
recognized.
But though they all realized that it was necessary to get away, there
still remained a feeling of shame at admitting that they must flee. An
external shock was needed to overcome that shame, and this shock came in
due time. It was what the French called “le hourra de l’Empereur.”
The day after the council at Málo-Yaroslávets Napoleon rode out early in
the morning amid the lines of his army with his suite of marshals and
an escort, on the pretext of inspecting the army and the scene of the
previous and of the impending battle. Some Cossacks on the prowl for
booty fell in with the Emperor and very nearly captured him. If the
Cossacks did not capture Napoleon then, what saved him was the very
thing that was destroying the French army, the booty on which the
Cossacks fell. Here as at Tarútino they went after plunder, leaving the
men. Disregarding Napoleon they rushed after the plunder and Napoleon
managed to escape.
When les enfants du Don might so easily have taken the Emperor himself
in the midst of his army, it was clear that there was nothing for it but
to fly as fast as possible along the nearest, familiar road. Napoleon
with his forty-year-old stomach understood that hint, not feeling his
former agility and boldness, and under the influence of the fright
the Cossacks had given him he at once agreed with Mouton and issued
orders—as the historians tell us—to retreat by the Smolénsk road.
That Napoleon agreed with Mouton, and that the army retreated, does
not prove that Napoleon caused it to retreat, but that the forces which
influenced the whole army and directed it along the Mozháysk (that is,
the Smolénsk) road acted simultaneously on him also.
Master this chapter. Complete your experience
Purchase the complete book to access all chapters and support classic literature
As an Amazon Associate, we earn a small commission from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.
Available in paperback, hardcover, and e-book formats
Let's Analyse the Pattern
When we know a situation is failing but wait for external drama to justify the action we already know we need to take.
Why This Matters
Connect literature to life
This chapter teaches how to spot the early signs when organizations, relationships, or situations are failing from within.
Practice This Today
This week, notice when people start hoarding information, avoiding responsibility, or explaining away obvious problems—these are your early warning signs.
Now let's explore the literary elements.
Key Quotes & Analysis
"That army could not recover anywhere. Since the battle of Borodinó and the pillage of Moscow it had borne within itself the chemical elements of dissolution."
Context: Tolstoy explaining why Napoleon's army was doomed regardless of strategy
This shows how some damage can't be undone. The French army's discipline and morale were so broken that no amount of tactical brilliance could save them. The rot was internal and irreversible.
In Today's Words:
Once you've poisoned the well, you can't just move to a new location and expect clean water.
"Nothing prevented him from advancing into those southern provinces, but nothing could have saved his army."
Context: Responding to historians who claim Napoleon should have moved south
Tolstoy argues that strategic options are meaningless when your fundamental situation is hopeless. Geography couldn't fix what was broken about Napoleon's forces.
In Today's Words:
You can change your location, but you can't run away from your problems.
"How could that army which had found abundant supplies in Moscow and had trampled them underfoot instead of keeping them recuperate anywhere?"
Context: Explaining why the French army was beyond saving
This highlights how self-destructive behavior becomes a pattern. An organization that wastes resources when times are good won't suddenly become disciplined when times are hard.
In Today's Words:
If you can't manage money when you have it, you won't suddenly get smart when you're broke.
Thematic Threads
Self-Deception
In This Chapter
Napoleon and his generals all know they need to retreat but can't admit it until forced by external circumstances
Development
Deepening from earlier chapters where characters rationalized their choices
In Your Life:
You might catch yourself making excuses for staying in situations you know aren't working
Leadership
In This Chapter
Kutúzov shows true leadership by restraint, while Napoleon's leadership is revealed as reactive rather than decisive
Development
Contrasting leadership styles have been building throughout the war sections
In Your Life:
Sometimes the best leadership decision is knowing when not to act or when to step back
Truth-Telling
In This Chapter
Simple soldier Mouton speaks the obvious truth that all the generals are dancing around
Development
Continues theme of common people seeing clearly what elites obscure
In Your Life:
The person willing to state the obvious truth often has the most power in the room
Internal Decay
In This Chapter
The French army carries 'chemical elements of dissolution'—greed and indiscipline rotting them from within
Development
Building on earlier themes about how corruption spreads through systems
In Your Life:
You can spot failing organizations by watching for hoarding, blame-shifting, and resource waste
Circumstantial Forces
In This Chapter
Tolstoy shows how the same forces destroying the army also act on Napoleon—he's not above the patterns he's caught in
Development
Reinforces ongoing theme that individuals are shaped by larger forces beyond their control
In Your Life:
When you're struggling, consider whether you're fighting circumstances or working with them
You now have the context. Time to form your own thoughts.
Discussion Questions
- 1
Why couldn't the French generals at the war council say what soldier Mouton said so plainly—that they needed to retreat immediately?
analysis • surface - 2
How did the same greed that was destroying Napoleon's army end up saving him from capture by the Cossacks?
analysis • medium - 3
Think about a workplace or organization you know—what are the 'chemical elements of dissolution' that show when a system is rotting from within?
application • medium - 4
Napoleon needed the shock of nearly being captured to justify doing what he already knew he should do. What's something in your life you know needs to change but you're waiting for 'permission' to act?
application • deep - 5
Why is it often easier to see problems in other people's situations than in our own, even when the warning signs are obvious?
reflection • deep
Critical Thinking Exercise
Permission Audit
Make two lists: situations in your life where you're seeing warning signs but haven't acted, and external events you're unconsciously waiting for to give you 'permission' to make changes. For each situation, write down what the early warning signs are telling you and what action you'd take if you gave yourself permission right now.
Consider:
- •Look for patterns where you explain away obvious problems
- •Notice if you're waiting for someone else to make the decision for you
- •Consider what you'd advise a friend in the same situation
Journaling Prompt
Write about a time when you waited too long to act on something you knew needed to change. What would have happened if you'd trusted your instincts earlier instead of waiting for external permission?
Coming Up Next...
Chapter 298: The Psychology of Retreat
The French army begins its infamous retreat, but the real horror is just beginning. Winter is coming, and Napoleon's forces are about to face their greatest enemy yet.




