An excerpt from the original text.(complete · 834 words)
avout was to Napoleon what Arakchéev was to Alexander—though not a
coward like Arakchéev, he was as precise, as cruel, and as unable to
express his devotion to his monarch except by cruelty.
In the organism of states such men are necessary, as wolves are
necessary in the organism of nature, and they always exist, always
appear and hold their own, however incongruous their presence and their
proximity to the head of the government may be. This inevitability alone
can explain how the cruel Arakchéev, who tore out a grenadier’s mustache
with his own hands, whose weak nerves rendered him unable to face
danger, and who was neither an educated man nor a courtier, was able to
maintain his powerful position with Alexander, whose own character was
chivalrous, noble, and gentle.
Balashëv found Davout seated on a barrel in the shed of a peasant’s hut,
writing—he was auditing accounts. Better quarters could have been
found him, but Marshal Davout was one of those men who purposely put
themselves in most depressing conditions to have a justification for
being gloomy. For the same reason they are always hard at work and in a
hurry. “How can I think of the bright side of life when, as you see, I
am sitting on a barrel and working in a dirty shed?” the expression of
his face seemed to say. The chief pleasure and necessity of such men,
when they encounter anyone who shows animation, is to flaunt their own
dreary, persistent activity. Davout allowed himself that pleasure when
Balashëv was brought in. He became still more absorbed in his task when
the Russian general entered, and after glancing over his spectacles at
Balashëv’s face, which was animated by the beauty of the morning and
by his talk with Murat, he did not rise or even stir, but scowled still
more and sneered malevolently.
When he noticed in Balashëv’s face the disagreeable impression this
reception produced, Davout raised his head and coldly asked what he
wanted.
Thinking he could have been received in such a manner only because
Davout did not know that he was adjutant general to the Emperor
Alexander and even his envoy to Napoleon, Balashëv hastened to inform
him of his rank and mission. Contrary to his expectation, Davout, after
hearing him, became still surlier and ruder.
“Where is your dispatch?” he inquired. “Give it to me. I will send it to
the Emperor.”
Balashëv replied that he had been ordered to hand it personally to the
Emperor.
“Your Emperor’s orders are obeyed in your army, but here,” said Davout,
“you must do as you’re told.”
And, as if to make the Russian general still more conscious of his
dependence on brute force, Davout sent an adjutant to call the officer
on duty.
Balashëv took out the packet containing the Emperor’s letter and laid it
on the table (made of a door with its hinges still hanging on it, laid
across two barrels). Davout took the packet and read the inscription.
“You are perfectly at liberty to treat me with respect or not,”
protested Balashëv, “but permit me to observe that I have the honor to
be adjutant general to His Majesty....”
Davout glanced at him silently and plainly derived pleasure from the
signs of agitation and confusion which appeared on Balashëv’s face.
“You will be treated as is fitting,” said he and, putting the packet in
his pocket, left the shed.
A minute later the marshal’s adjutant, de Castrès, came in and conducted
Balashëv to the quarters assigned him.
That day he dined with the marshal, at the same board on the barrels.
Next day Davout rode out early and, after asking Balashëv to come to
him, peremptorily requested him to remain there, to move on with the
baggage train should orders come for it to move, and to talk to no one
except Monsieur de Castrès.
After four days of solitude, ennui, and consciousness of his impotence
and insignificance—particularly acute by contrast with the sphere of
power in which he had so lately moved—and after several marches with
the marshal’s baggage and the French army, which occupied the
whole district, Balashëv was brought to Vílna—now occupied by the
French—through the very gate by which he had left it four days
previously.
Next day the imperial gentleman-in-waiting, the Comte de Turenne, came
to Balashëv and informed him of the Emperor Napoleon’s wish to honor him
with an audience.
Four days before, sentinels of the Preobrazhénsk regiment had stood in
front of the house to which Balashëv was conducted, and now two French
grenadiers stood there in blue uniforms unfastened in front and with
shaggy caps on their heads, and an escort of hussars and Uhlans and a
brilliant suite of aides-de-camp, pages, and generals, who were waiting
for Napoleon to come out, were standing at the porch, round his saddle
horse and his Mameluke, Rustan. Napoleon received Balashëv in the very
house in Vílna from which Alexander had dispatched him on his mission.
Master this chapter. Complete your experience
Purchase the complete book to access all chapters and support classic literature
As an Amazon Associate, we earn a small commission from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.
Available in paperback, hardcover, and e-book formats
Let's Analyse the Pattern
People who use their official position to channel personal misery into systematic cruelty against those seeking basic dignity or service.
Why This Matters
Connect literature to life
This chapter teaches how to recognize people who use their position to inflict personal misery on others while claiming they're just doing their job.
Practice This Today
This week, notice when someone in authority seems to enjoy making others uncomfortable—watch if they get more hostile when you show confidence or joy.
Now let's explore the literary elements.
Key Quotes & Analysis
"In the organism of states such men are necessary, as wolves are necessary in the organism of nature, and they always exist, always appear and hold their own."
Context: Tolstoy explaining why cruel enforcers like Davout exist in every power structure
This reveals Tolstoy's dark insight about how systems work - they need people willing to do terrible things. It's not a bug, it's a feature of how power operates.
In Today's Words:
Every organization needs someone willing to be the bad guy - and there's always someone ready to fill that role.
"How can I think of the bright side of life when, as you see, I am sitting on a barrel and working in a dirty shed?"
Context: Davout's self-justification for his perpetual gloom and cruelty toward others
This shows how some people weaponize their own misery. Davout chooses these conditions to justify his behavior - it's performative suffering.
In Today's Words:
I'm having a hard time, so I'm going to make sure everyone else does too.
"The chief pleasure and necessity of such men, when they encounter anyone who shows animation, is to flaunt their own dreary existence."
Context: Explaining why Davout becomes more hostile when he sees Balashev's good spirits
Tolstoy identifies a specific psychological pattern - how miserable people actively resent and attack happiness in others. It's not accidental; it's intentional cruelty.
In Today's Words:
Some people can't stand to see others happy, so they make it their mission to bring everyone down to their level.
Thematic Threads
Power
In This Chapter
Davout uses his authority not to serve military goals but to satisfy personal cruelty, treating diplomatic protocol as an opportunity for psychological warfare
Development
Evolved from earlier portrayals of power as corrupting to show how systems actively reward and protect those who weaponize their positions
In Your Life:
You encounter this when dealing with gatekeepers who seem to enjoy making simple processes difficult or painful.
Class
In This Chapter
Davout deliberately works in peasant conditions to justify treating a nobleman with contempt, using artificial humility as a weapon
Development
Continues the theme of class boundaries but shows how they can be weaponized by those who claim to reject them
In Your Life:
You see this when people use their humble backgrounds to justify treating others poorly, claiming moral superiority through suffering.
Identity
In This Chapter
Davout has crafted an identity around justified misery, making others' happiness feel like a personal attack on his worldview
Development
Shows how some people build identity around their wounds and then defend that identity through cruelty
In Your Life:
You encounter this in people who seem threatened by your success or happiness, as if your well-being diminishes their story.
Social Expectations
In This Chapter
The diplomatic protocols that should protect Balashev become tools for his humiliation when someone chooses to ignore civilized norms
Development
Reveals how social contracts only work when all parties honor them, and systems often protect those who violate them
In Your Life:
You experience this when following proper procedures or being polite gets you nowhere because someone in power enjoys breaking the rules.
Human Relationships
In This Chapter
The interaction reveals how some relationships are purely predatory, with one person feeding off another's distress or confusion
Development
Introduced here as a dark counterpoint to the novel's emphasis on human connection and understanding
In Your Life:
You recognize this in relationships where someone seems energized by your problems and disappointed by your successes.
You now have the context. Time to form your own thoughts.
Discussion Questions
- 1
Why does Davout choose to work in miserable conditions when he could demand better accommodations?
analysis • surface - 2
How does Davout use Balashev's good spirits against him, and what does this reveal about his psychology?
analysis • medium - 3
Where have you encountered people who seem to enjoy making others uncomfortable or miserable in professional settings?
application • medium - 4
What strategies would you use to protect yourself when dealing with someone who weaponizes their authority for personal satisfaction?
application • deep - 5
Why do power systems reward people like Davout, and what does this teach us about institutional behavior?
reflection • deep
Critical Thinking Exercise
Identify the Institutional Sadist
Think of a time when you encountered someone in authority who seemed to enjoy making your life difficult—not because of rules or necessity, but because they could. Write down what they did, how they justified it, and what the real motivation seemed to be. Then identify three warning signs that could help you spot this pattern earlier next time.
Consider:
- •Look for people who create unnecessary obstacles while claiming to follow procedure
- •Notice when someone's mood improves as yours gets worse during an interaction
- •Pay attention to whether they treat different people differently based on perceived power or status
Journaling Prompt
Write about a situation where you had to deal with institutional cruelty. How did you handle it? What would you do differently now that you can name this pattern?
Coming Up Next...
Chapter 173: Napoleon's Power Performance Unravels
After days of deliberate humiliation, Balashev finally gets his audience with Napoleon himself. But will the Emperor prove more reasonable than his brutal marshal, or is this just another layer of the power game?




