Summary
Smith explores how we judge whether other people's reactions are appropriate by comparing them to our own feelings. When it comes to neutral topics—like whether a painting is beautiful or a math problem is solved correctly—disagreements are manageable because neither person has skin in the game. We might respect someone's superior taste in art or their mathematical genius, but we won't lose sleep over different opinions. The real test comes with personal matters that affect us directly. If you've been hurt or wronged, you desperately want others to feel your pain and share your outrage. When they don't match your emotional intensity, relationships fracture. You can't stand their cold indifference; they can't handle your overwhelming passion. Smith reveals that successful relationships require emotional compromise from both sides. The hurt person must tone down their intensity to a level others can relate to, while observers must make an effort to understand and share some of the sufferer's feelings. This creates what Smith calls 'concord'—not perfect harmony, but close enough for society to function. He notes that simply being around other people naturally moderates our extreme emotions. Friends calm us more than acquaintances, and acquaintances more than strangers, because we automatically adjust our emotional display to what each audience can handle. This isn't fake—it's how our minds actually work, and it's why isolation amplifies both grief and anger while social connection provides natural therapy.
Coming Up in Chapter 5
Smith will examine what makes certain virtues lovable versus respectable, exploring why we're drawn to some good qualities while merely admiring others from a distance.
Share it with friends
An excerpt from the original text.(~500 words)
The same subject continued. We may judge of the propriety or impropriety of the sentiments of another person by their correspondence or disagreement with our own, upon two different occasions; either, first, when the objects which excite them are considered without any peculiar relation, either to themselves or to the person whose sentiments we judge of; or, secondly, when they are considered as peculiarly affecting one or other of us. 201. With regard to those objects which are considered without any peculiar relation either to ourselves or to the person whose sentiments we judge of; wherever his sentiments intirely correspond with our own, we ascribe to him the qualities of taste and good judgment. The beauty of a plain, the greatness of a mountain, the ornaments of a building, the expression of a picture, the composition of a discourse, the conduct of a third person, the proportions of different quantities and numbers, the various appearances which the great machine of the universe is perpetually exhibiting, with the secret wheels and springs which produce them; all the general subjects of science and taste, are what we and our companions regard, as having no peculiar relation to either of us. We both look at them from the same point of view, and we have no occasion for sympathy, or for that imaginary change of situations from which it arises, in order to produce, with regard to these, the most perfect harmony of sentiments and affections. If, notwithstanding, we are often differently affected, it arises either from the different degrees of attention, which our different habits of life allow us to give easily to the several parts of those complex objects, or from the different degrees of natural acuteness in the faculty of the mind to which they are addressed. When the sentiments of our companion coincide with our own in things of this kind, which are obvious and easy, and in which, perhaps, we never found a single person who differed from us, though we, no doubt, must approve of them, yet he seems to deserve no praise or admiration on account of them. But when they not only coincide with our 21own, but lead and direct our own; when in forming them he appears to have attended to many things which we had overlooked, and to have adjusted them to all the various circumstances of their objects; we not only approve of them, but wonder and are surprised at their uncommon and unexpected acuteness and comprehensiveness, and he appears to deserve a very high degree of admiration and applause. For approbation heightened by wonder and surprise, constitutes the sentiment which is properly palled admiration, and of which applause is the natural expression. The decision of the man who judges that exquisite beauty is preferable to the grossest deformity, or that twice two are equal to four, must certainly be approved of by all the world, but will not, surely, be much admired. It is the acute and delicate discernment of the...
Master this chapter. Complete your experience
Purchase the complete book to access all chapters and support classic literature
As an Amazon Associate, we earn a small commission from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.
Available in paperback, hardcover, and e-book formats
Intelligence Amplifier™ Analysis
The Road of Emotional Calibration
The natural disconnect between how intensely we feel our own experiences versus how others can relate to them, requiring conscious adjustment from both sides to maintain relationships.
Why This Matters
Connect literature to life
This chapter teaches you to recognize when relationship conflicts stem from different emotional intensities rather than lack of caring.
Practice This Today
This week, notice when someone's pain feels too intense for you or when your own pain isn't being matched by others—name it as emotional physics, not personal rejection.
Now let's explore the literary elements.
Terms to Know
Propriety of Sentiments
Smith's concept that our emotions and reactions should match the situation appropriately. It's not about having the 'right' feelings, but having feelings that make sense given the circumstances and that others can understand.
Modern Usage:
We see this when we judge someone for overreacting to minor problems or under-reacting to serious ones.
Impartial Spectator
An imaginary neutral observer inside our heads who helps us judge whether our emotions are reasonable. This inner voice asks 'How would a fair-minded stranger view my reaction?'
Modern Usage:
It's like having an internal reality check that stops us from sending angry texts or making dramatic social media posts.
Sympathy
For Smith, this doesn't mean feeling sorry for someone. It means our ability to imagine ourselves in another person's situation and feel what they might feel. It's emotional imagination.
Modern Usage:
This is what happens when you wince watching someone fall down or feel nervous watching someone give a speech.
Concord of Sentiments
The emotional harmony that happens when people's feelings roughly match each other. Not perfect agreement, but close enough that everyone feels understood and validated.
Modern Usage:
It's when your friend group all agrees that your ex was terrible, or when coworkers share your frustration about a new policy.
Objects of Indifferent Nature
Things that don't personally affect either you or the person you're talking to - like art, nature, or other people's business. These are easier to discuss because nobody's ego is on the line.
Modern Usage:
Debating which movie is better or discussing a celebrity scandal - topics where disagreement doesn't threaten relationships.
Imaginary Change of Situations
The mental exercise of putting yourself in someone else's shoes to understand their perspective. Smith sees this as the foundation of all moral judgment.
Modern Usage:
When you try to understand why your teenager is so upset about something that seems trivial to you.
Characters in This Chapter
The Person Whose Sentiments We Judge
Subject of moral evaluation
This represents anyone whose emotional reactions we're trying to understand or evaluate. Smith uses this as a universal figure to show how we constantly assess whether other people's feelings make sense.
Modern Equivalent:
The friend whose reaction you're trying to figure out
The Judging Observer
Moral evaluator
This is us - the person doing the judging. Smith shows how we use our own feelings as the starting point for understanding others, but must work to bridge the gap between our experience and theirs.
Modern Equivalent:
You, trying to decide if someone's being reasonable
The Companion
Neutral discussion partner
Someone we can discuss impersonal topics with because neither of us has a personal stake in the outcome. These conversations help us develop taste and judgment without emotional complications.
Modern Equivalent:
The friend you can debate movies with without it getting personal
Key Quotes & Analysis
"We both look at them from the same point of view, and we have no occasion for sympathy, or for that imaginary change of situations from which it arises, in order to produce, with regard to these, the most perfect harmony of sentiments and affections."
Context: Smith explains why it's easier to agree about neutral topics like art or math
This shows why some conversations flow easily while others create conflict. When nobody's personal interests are threatened, we can focus on the topic itself rather than protecting our egos or validating our experiences.
In Today's Words:
It's easy to agree about stuff that doesn't affect either of us personally.
"If, notwithstanding, we are often differently affected, it is not always from any difference of constitution, but from the different degrees of attention, which our different habits of life allow us to give easily to the several parts of those complex objects."
Context: Explaining why people have different opinions even about neutral topics
Smith recognizes that our backgrounds shape what we notice and value. This isn't about being right or wrong, but about having different life experiences that highlight different aspects of the same situation.
In Today's Words:
We see different things because we've lived different lives and learned to pay attention to different details.
"We ascribe to him the qualities of taste and good judgment."
Context: When someone's opinions about neutral topics match our own
This reveals how we use agreement as a shortcut to judge someone's intelligence and character. When people share our aesthetic or intellectual preferences, we assume they're smart and sophisticated.
In Today's Words:
When someone likes what we like, we think they have good taste.
Thematic Threads
Human Relationships
In This Chapter
Smith shows how emotional mismatches create relationship fractures and how successful connections require mutual emotional adjustment
Development
Building on earlier chapters about sympathy, now focusing on the practical mechanics of maintaining relationships
In Your Life:
You might recognize this when friends seem less concerned about your problems than you think they should be
Social Expectations
In This Chapter
Society expects us to moderate our emotional displays based on our audience, and this expectation actually shapes how we feel
Development
Expanding the concept of social pressure to include emotional regulation as a social skill
In Your Life:
You probably already adjust how much emotion you show at work versus with family without realizing it
Personal Growth
In This Chapter
Learning to calibrate emotional expression and reception becomes a crucial life skill for maintaining relationships
Development
Moving from understanding emotions to actively managing them for better outcomes
In Your Life:
You might need to develop better skills at either expressing your needs or responding to others' emotional needs
Class
In This Chapter
Different social circles have different tolerance levels for emotional expression, requiring code-switching
Development
Introduced here as emotional class differences rather than economic ones
In Your Life:
You might express frustration differently with work colleagues than with family members from your background
You now have the context. Time to form your own thoughts.
Discussion Questions
- 1
According to Smith, why is it easier to disagree about neutral topics like art or math than about personal matters that affect us directly?
analysis • surface - 2
What creates the emotional gap between someone experiencing pain and those observing it, and why does this gap naturally occur?
analysis • medium - 3
Think of a time when you felt hurt or wronged but others didn't match your emotional intensity. Where do you see this pattern playing out in workplaces, families, or friendships today?
application • medium - 4
When someone close to you is suffering, how could you deliberately close the emotional gap without taking on their full intensity? What specific actions would help?
application • deep - 5
Smith suggests that being around others naturally moderates our extreme emotions. What does this reveal about why isolation can be dangerous and social connection can be healing?
reflection • deep
Critical Thinking Exercise
Emotional Translation Practice
Think of a current frustration or disappointment in your life that feels intense to you. Write two versions of explaining this situation: first, expressing your full emotional intensity as you actually feel it, then translating it into terms that others could absorb and respond to helpfully. Notice what changes between the two versions.
Consider:
- •What details do you emphasize differently in each version?
- •How does the emotional temperature change between versions?
- •Which version would be more likely to get you the support you actually need?
Journaling Prompt
Write about a time when someone's emotional intensity overwhelmed you, or when your own intensity pushed others away. How might understanding Smith's emotional gap concept change how you handle similar situations in the future?
Coming Up Next...
Chapter 5: Two Types of Virtue
In the next chapter, you'll discover empathy and self-control create different but equally valuable virtues, and learn emotional restraint earns respect while compassion earns love. These insights reveal timeless patterns that resonate in our own lives and relationships.