Summary
Smith breaks down exactly how we decide if someone deserves praise or punishment, and it's more complex than you might think. When we admire a hero like those we read about in history, we're doing two things at once: we're imagining ourselves as that brave person (direct sympathy), and we're also feeling grateful on behalf of everyone they helped (indirect sympathy). It's like watching a movie where you both root for the hero AND feel happy for the people they save. The same double process happens with villains - we recoil from their cruel motives while also feeling angry on behalf of their victims. Smith argues this isn't just how we naturally think; it's actually essential for society to function. Without this built-in sense of justice, we wouldn't punish wrongdoers or reward good people. He tackles the uncomfortable truth that our moral judgments often depend on anger and resentment - emotions we usually think of as negative. But he shows that moderate, controlled anger at injustice is actually virtuous and necessary. The key is keeping that anger in check, matching it to what any reasonable person would feel. When someone's anger goes too far, we turn against them instead. This chapter reveals that our moral compass isn't some abstract principle we learned in school - it's a sophisticated emotional system that helps us navigate right and wrong by putting ourselves in other people's situations.
Coming Up in Chapter 19
Smith will compare justice and beneficence - the difference between not harming others versus actively helping them. He'll explore why society demands one but only admires the other.
Share it with friends
An excerpt from the original text.(~500 words)
The analysis of the sense of merit and demerit. 1. As our sense, therefore, of the propriety of conduct arises from what I shall call a direct sympathy with the affections and motives of the person who acts, so our sense of its merit arises from what I shall call an indirect sympathy with the gratitude of the person who is, if I may say so, acted upon. As we cannot indeed enter thoroughly into the gratitude of the person who receives the benefit, unless we beforehand approve of the motives of the benefactor, so, upon this account, the sense of merit seems to be a compounded sentiment, and to be made up of two distinct emotions; a direct sympathy with the sentiments of the agent, and an indirect sympathy with the gratitude of those who receive the benefit of his actions. We may, upon many different occasions, plainly distinguish those two different emotions combining and uniting together in our sense of the good desert of a particular character or action. When we read in history concerning actions of proper and beneficent greatness of mind, how eagerly do we enter into such designs? How much are we animated by that 113high-spirited generosity which directs them? How keen are we for their success? How grieved at their disappointment? In imagination we become the very person whose actions are represented to us: we transport ourselves in fancy to the scenes of those distant and forgotten adventures, and imagine ourselves acting the part of a Scipio or a Camillus, a Timoleon or an Aristides. So far our sentiments are founded upon the direct sympathy with the person who acts. Nor is the indirect sympathy with those who receive the benefit of such actions less sensibly felt. Whenever we place ourselves in the situation of these last, with what warm and affectionate fellow-feeling do we enter into their gratitude towards those who served them so essentially? We embrace, as it were, their benefactor along with them. Our heart readily sympathizes with the highest transports of their grateful affection. No honours, no rewards, we think, can be too great for them to bestow upon him. When they make this proper return for his services, we heartily applaud and go along with them; but are shocked beyond all measure, if by their conduct they appear to have little sense of the obligations conferred upon them. Our whole sense, in short, of the merit and good desert of such actions, of the propriety and fitness of recompensing them, and making the person who performed them rejoice in his turn, arises from the sympathetic emotions of gratitude and love, with which, when we bring home to our own breast the situation of those principally concerned, we feel ourselves naturally transported towards the man who could act with such proper and noble beneficence. 1142. In the same manner as our sense of the impropriety of conduct arises from a want of sympathy, or from a direct antipathy to the...
Master this chapter. Complete your experience
Purchase the complete book to access all chapters and support classic literature
As an Amazon Associate, we earn a small commission from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.
Available in paperback, hardcover, and e-book formats
Intelligence Amplifier™ Analysis
The Road of Double Vision - How We Judge Right and Wrong
We naturally judge actions by simultaneously imagining the actor's perspective and feeling for everyone affected by their choices.
Why This Matters
Connect literature to life
This chapter teaches how to spot when people judge the same action differently depending on who does it.
Practice This Today
This week, notice when someone gets praised or blamed - ask yourself if you'd judge the same action differently if someone else did it.
Now let's explore the literary elements.
Terms to Know
Direct sympathy
When we imagine ourselves in someone else's shoes and feel what they feel. Smith says this is how we judge whether someone's actions come from good or bad motives - we mentally become that person and see if their feelings make sense to us.
Modern Usage:
This is what happens when you watch someone get fired and think 'I would be devastated too' - you're directly sympathizing with their experience.
Indirect sympathy
When we feel grateful or angry on behalf of other people who were helped or harmed. It's not just understanding the doer's motives, but also caring about how their actions affected everyone else involved.
Modern Usage:
When you see a teacher go above and beyond for students and you feel thankful even though you're not in that class - you're indirectly sympathizing with the students who benefit.
Sense of merit
Our feeling that someone deserves praise, reward, or punishment. Smith argues this isn't just one emotion but a combination of understanding the person's motives plus caring about the people they affected.
Modern Usage:
This is why we feel good when jerks get their comeuppance or when hard workers get promoted - our sense of merit tells us they're getting what they deserve.
Compounded sentiment
An emotion made up of multiple feelings working together. Smith uses this to explain how moral judgments aren't simple - they're complex combinations of different types of sympathy and understanding.
Modern Usage:
Like how you might feel both proud and worried when your kid stands up to a bully - your emotions are compounded, not simple.
Good desert
What someone has earned or deserves based on their actions and character. In Smith's time, 'desert' meant what you merit, not a sandy wasteland - it's about earning consequences through your behavior.
Modern Usage:
When we say someone 'had it coming' or 'earned their success,' we're talking about their desert - what their actions have earned them.
Beneficent greatness of mind
The quality of being both generous and mentally strong - people who do good things not for reward but because they genuinely care about others. Smith admired this combination of kindness and courage.
Modern Usage:
Think of people who volunteer at homeless shelters or donate anonymously - they have beneficent greatness of mind.
Transport ourselves in fancy
Using our imagination to mentally travel to different times, places, or situations. Smith believed this ability to imagine ourselves elsewhere is crucial for developing moral judgment and empathy.
Modern Usage:
This is what happens when you get so absorbed in a book or movie that you forget where you are - you've transported yourself in fancy.
Characters in This Chapter
The benefactor
moral exemplar
Represents people who do good deeds from pure motives. Smith uses this figure to show how we judge merit - we have to approve of both their intentions and the good they accomplish for others.
Modern Equivalent:
The coworker who stays late to help others without expecting recognition
The person who receives the benefit
grateful recipient
Shows how our moral judgments depend partly on considering the people affected by actions. Their gratitude becomes part of how we evaluate whether the benefactor deserves praise.
Modern Equivalent:
The student whose teacher went the extra mile to help them succeed
Historical heroes
inspiring examples
Smith references great figures from history to demonstrate how we can feel moral emotions about people we've never met. Their stories teach us about virtue and vice across time and distance.
Modern Equivalent:
The activists or leaders we admire from documentaries or biographies
The impartial spectator
internal moral judge
The imaginary fair-minded person inside our heads who helps us evaluate right and wrong. This spectator combines direct sympathy with the actor and indirect sympathy with those affected.
Modern Equivalent:
Your conscience when it's working properly - the voice that asks 'What would a reasonable person think?'
Key Quotes & Analysis
"Our sense of merit seems to be a compounded sentiment, and to be made up of two distinct emotions; a direct sympathy with the sentiments of the agent, and an indirect sympathy with the gratitude of those who receive the benefit of his actions."
Context: Smith is explaining his theory of how we judge whether people deserve praise or blame
This is the core insight of the chapter - that moral judgment isn't simple but involves understanding both the doer's motives and caring about the people affected. It explains why we can sometimes approve of someone's intentions but still disapprove if they harm innocent people.
In Today's Words:
When we decide if someone deserves credit, we're doing two things: putting ourselves in their shoes AND thinking about everyone they helped or hurt.
"In imagination we become the very person whose actions are represented to us: we transport ourselves in fancy to the scenes of those distant and forgotten adventures."
Context: Describing how we respond emotionally to historical accounts of heroic actions
Smith is showing that moral imagination is powerful enough to make us care about people from centuries ago. This ability to mentally time-travel and role-play is essential for developing ethical judgment and learning from others' examples.
In Today's Words:
When we read about heroes from history, we get so into it that we imagine we're right there with them, feeling what they felt.
"How eagerly do we enter into such designs? How much are we animated by that high-spirited generosity which directs them?"
Context: Describing our emotional response to reading about great and generous actions in history
Smith uses these rhetorical questions to show how automatically and intensely we respond to virtue. We don't have to force ourselves to admire good people - it happens naturally when we truly understand their motives and see their positive impact.
In Today's Words:
Don't you just love it when you read about someone doing something really generous and brave? Don't you find yourself getting excited about their plans?
Thematic Threads
Human Relationships
In This Chapter
Smith shows how we form judgments about others through complex emotional processes that consider multiple perspectives simultaneously
Development
Builds on earlier discussions of sympathy by revealing the sophisticated dual mechanism behind moral evaluation
In Your Life:
You might notice this when deciding whether to forgive someone who hurt you while helping others
Social Expectations
In This Chapter
Our anger and resentment serve social functions by enforcing standards of behavior and protecting community welfare
Development
Expands previous themes by showing how negative emotions actually support positive social order
In Your Life:
Your outrage at workplace unfairness isn't just personal - it's protecting standards for everyone
Personal Growth
In This Chapter
Learning to moderate our emotional responses to match what any reasonable person would feel in the same situation
Development
Continues the theme of emotional regulation but focuses specifically on anger and moral indignation
In Your Life:
You grow by calibrating your anger to fit the situation rather than letting it run wild or disappear entirely
Identity
In This Chapter
We define ourselves partly through our moral judgments and our ability to feel appropriate levels of sympathy and resentment
Development
Deepens earlier identity themes by showing how moral emotions shape who we become
In Your Life:
Your identity includes how you respond to injustice - both what angers you and how you express that anger
You now have the context. Time to form your own thoughts.
Discussion Questions
- 1
Smith says we judge people through 'double vision' - feeling both what the actor felt and what their victims felt. Can you think of a recent news story where you experienced this double perspective?
analysis • surface - 2
Why does Smith argue that anger and resentment, usually seen as negative emotions, are actually necessary for a functioning society?
analysis • medium - 3
Think about a workplace conflict you've witnessed. How did people's judgments change based on whether they focused on intentions versus impact?
application • medium - 4
Smith suggests our moral compass works by putting ourselves in multiple people's shoes simultaneously. How could this 'double vision' help you navigate a current relationship challenge?
application • deep - 5
If our sense of justice depends on controlled anger rather than pure logic, what does this reveal about the role of emotions in making good decisions?
reflection • deep
Critical Thinking Exercise
Practice Double Vision Judgment
Think of someone whose recent actions bothered you - at work, in your family, or in your community. Write down two separate judgments: first, imagine their perspective and motivations (what drove them to act this way?), then consider the impact on everyone affected (who got hurt and how?). Notice how combining both views changes your overall assessment.
Consider:
- •Don't rush to defend or condemn - sit with both perspectives equally
- •Look for how intentions and impact might both be true at the same time
- •Consider whether your anger level matches what most reasonable people would feel
Journaling Prompt
Write about a time when someone judged you harshly without considering your intentions, or too leniently without acknowledging the harm caused. How did their single vision affect the situation, and what would double vision have looked like?
Coming Up Next...
Chapter 19: When Kindness Can't Be Forced
Moving forward, we'll examine you can't force someone to be grateful or generous, and understand the crucial difference between justice and kindness in relationships. These insights bridge the gap between classic literature and modern experience.