Summary
Smith wraps up his exploration of how we judge merit and blame by explaining a crucial insight: we don't automatically feel grateful to someone just because they helped us, and we don't automatically resent someone just because they hurt us. What matters is why they did what they did. When someone helps you but their motives were selfish or wrong, you might benefit from their actions, but they don't deserve your gratitude or society's praise. It's like when a coworker covers your shift not to help you, but to impress the boss - you got the help, but they don't deserve special thanks. On the flip side, we only truly sympathize with someone's anger and desire for revenge when the person who hurt them acted from bad motives. If someone accidentally causes harm while trying to do good, we don't think they deserve punishment, even if the results were terrible. Smith is showing us that moral judgment isn't about outcomes alone - it's about the heart behind the action. This matters because it explains why we sometimes feel conflicted about praising successful people or punishing those who cause harm. Our moral instincts are actually quite sophisticated: we're constantly reading not just what people do, but why they do it. Understanding this helps us navigate our own relationships and judgments more clearly, recognizing that true merit comes from good intentions paired with beneficial actions.
Coming Up in Chapter 18
Having established how we judge merit and blame, Smith will now dive deeper into analyzing exactly how our sense of what people deserve actually works in practice.
Share it with friends
An excerpt from the original text.(~500 words)
Recapitulation of the foregoing Chapters. We do not, therefore, thoroughly and heartily sympathize with the gratitude of one man towards another, merely because this other has been the cause of his good fortune, unless he has been the cause of it from motives which we entirely go along with. Our heart must adopt the principles of the agent, and go along with all the affections which influenced his conduct, before it can entirely sympathize with, and beat time to, the gratitude of the person who has been benefited by his actions. If in the conduct of the benefactor there appears to have been no propriety, how beneficial soever its effects, it does not seem to demand, or necessarily to require, any proportionable recompense. But when to the beneficent tendency of the action is joined the propriety of the affection from which it proceeds, when we entirely sympathize and go along with the motives of the agent, the love which we conceive for him upon his own account, enhances and enlivens our fellow-feeling 110with the gratitude of those who owe their prosperity to his good conduct. His actions seem then to demand, and, if I may say so, to call aloud for a proportionable recompense. We then entirely enter into that gratitude which prompts to bestow it. The benefactor seems then to be the proper object of reward, when we thus entirely sympathize with, and approve of, that sentiment which prompts to reward him. When we approve of, and go along with, the affection from which the action proceeds, we must necessarily approve of the action, and regard the person towards whom it is directed as its proper and suitable object. 2. In the same manner, we cannot at all sympathize with the resentment of one man against another, merely because this other has been the cause of his misfortune, unless he has been the cause of it from motives which we cannot enter into. Before we can adopt the resentment of the sufferer, we must disapprove of the motives of the agent, and feel that our heart renounces all sympathy with the affections which influenced his conduct. If there appears to have been no impropriety in these, how fatal soever the tendency of the action which proceeds from them to those against whom it is directed, it does not seem to deserve any punishment, or to be the proper object of any resentment. But when to the hurtfulness of the action is joined the impropriety of the affection from whence it proceeds, when our heart rejects with abhorrence all fellow-feeling with the motives of the agent, 111we then heartily and entirely sympathize with the resentment of the sufferer. Such actions seem then to deserve, and, if I may say so, to call aloud for, a proportionable punishment; and we entirely enter into, and thereby approve of, that resentment which prompts to inflict it. The offender necessarily seems then to be the proper object of punishment, when we thus entirely sympathize...
Master this chapter. Complete your experience
Purchase the complete book to access all chapters and support classic literature
As an Amazon Associate, we earn a small commission from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.
Available in paperback, hardcover, and e-book formats
Intelligence Amplifier™ Analysis
The Road of True Merit - Reading Hearts, Not Just Results
Humans judge worthiness based on perceived motives behind actions, not just outcomes alone.
Why This Matters
Connect literature to life
This chapter teaches how to detect the difference between helpful actions driven by good motives versus self-interest.
Practice This Today
This week, notice when someone helps you - ask yourself whether they seem genuinely caring or performing for an audience, and notice how differently you feel about each type of help.
Now let's explore the literary elements.
Terms to Know
Sympathize
In Smith's usage, this means to emotionally connect with and understand someone's feelings - not just feeling sorry for them, but actually sharing their emotional experience. It's the foundation of all moral judgment because we can only approve or disapprove of actions when we can imagine ourselves in someone else's shoes.
Modern Usage:
We still use this when we say 'I can relate to that' or when we feel genuinely connected to someone's experience rather than just pitying them.
Propriety
The rightness or appropriateness of an action based on the motives behind it, not just the results. Smith argues that we judge actions as proper when the emotions and intentions driving them seem reasonable and justified in the situation.
Modern Usage:
This is what we mean when we say someone did something 'for the right reasons' or when we judge whether someone's reaction was appropriate to the situation.
Merit
The quality that makes someone deserving of reward or praise. According to Smith, true merit requires both good intentions and beneficial results - you need both the right heart and the right outcome.
Modern Usage:
We see this in workplace evaluations, relationship judgments, and social recognition - we don't just reward success, we reward people who succeed while trying to do good.
Benefactor
Someone who helps or does good for others. Smith distinguishes between those who help from genuine care versus those who help for selfish reasons, arguing that only the former deserve true gratitude.
Modern Usage:
Today we might call someone a benefactor, donor, or helper, but we still make Smith's distinction between those who help genuinely versus those doing it for appearances or personal gain.
Proportionable recompense
A reward or response that matches the moral worth of an action. Smith argues that the reward should fit not just what someone did, but why they did it - good motives deserve greater recognition than selfish ones, even if the results are similar.
Modern Usage:
This shows up in how we decide on tips, bonuses, thank-you notes, or public recognition - we give more credit to those who helped us from genuine care.
Fellow-feeling
The emotional connection we feel with others when we can understand and share their experiences. It's stronger than sympathy because it involves actually feeling what they feel, not just understanding it intellectually.
Modern Usage:
We experience this when we say 'I feel you' or when someone's joy or pain becomes our own because we've been in similar situations.
Characters in This Chapter
The Agent
The person taking action
This is Smith's term for whoever is doing something that affects others. The agent's motives determine whether their actions deserve praise or blame, regardless of the outcome.
Modern Equivalent:
The coworker, friend, or family member whose actions impact your life
The Benefactor
The helper or giver
Someone who provides help or benefits to others. Smith examines whether they deserve gratitude based on their true motivations, not just their helpful actions.
Modern Equivalent:
The person who does you a favor - could be genuine or could have ulterior motives
The Person Benefited
The recipient of help
The one who receives good treatment or assistance. Smith explores when their gratitude is justified and when society should support their thankfulness.
Modern Equivalent:
The person receiving help, gifts, or favors who has to figure out how much gratitude is actually owed
Key Quotes & Analysis
"We do not, therefore, thoroughly and heartily sympathize with the gratitude of one man towards another, merely because this other has been the cause of his good fortune, unless he has been the cause of it from motives which we entirely go along with."
Context: Smith explains why we don't automatically approve when someone feels grateful for help they received.
This reveals that our moral instincts are more sophisticated than simple cause-and-effect thinking. We naturally evaluate not just what people do, but why they do it, before deciding if gratitude or praise is deserved.
In Today's Words:
Just because someone helped you doesn't mean they deserve your thanks - it depends on why they helped you in the first place.
"If in the conduct of the benefactor there appears to have been no propriety, how beneficial soever its effects, it does not seem to demand, or necessarily to require, any proportionable recompense."
Context: Smith argues that good results don't automatically earn someone reward if their motives were wrong.
This challenges the idea that 'results are all that matter.' Smith shows that we instinctively know the difference between someone who helps us genuinely versus someone who helps us accidentally or for selfish reasons.
In Today's Words:
Even if someone's actions helped you out, they don't deserve special credit if they were doing it for the wrong reasons.
"His actions seem then to demand, and, if I may say so, to call aloud for a proportionable recompense."
Context: Smith describes how we feel when someone acts from both good motives and achieves good results.
This captures that feeling when we know someone truly deserves recognition - when their heart was in the right place AND they made a positive difference. It's why some thank-yous feel inadequate.
In Today's Words:
When someone helps you for the right reasons, it feels like they really deserve to be rewarded for it.
Thematic Threads
Human Relationships
In This Chapter
Smith shows how relationships depend on reading authentic intentions behind actions
Development
Builds on earlier discussions of sympathy to reveal how we actually evaluate people's worth
In Your Life:
You probably sense when someone's kindness feels genuine versus performed, even if you can't explain why.
Social Expectations
In This Chapter
Society expects us to judge merit by both actions and motives, creating complex moral calculations
Development
Expands the framework of social approval to include motive-reading as a social skill
In Your Life:
You navigate daily social situations by constantly reading whether people's behavior matches their stated intentions.
Personal Growth
In This Chapter
Understanding that others judge our motives pushes us toward authentic self-improvement
Development
Connects to earlier themes about self-command by showing external motivation for internal change
In Your Life:
Knowing people can sense your true intentions might motivate you to examine why you really do things.
Class
In This Chapter
Merit based on motive levels the playing field - good intentions matter regardless of social position
Development
Challenges earlier class-based judgments by suggesting moral worth transcends social status
In Your Life:
You might judge a wealthy person's charity differently if you suspect it's just for tax benefits versus genuine care.
You now have the context. Time to form your own thoughts.
Discussion Questions
- 1
According to Smith, why don't we automatically feel grateful when someone helps us, even if we benefit from their actions?
analysis • surface - 2
Smith argues we judge people by their motives, not just outcomes. What makes this judgment process so sophisticated and automatic?
analysis • medium - 3
Think about your workplace or family relationships. Can you identify a time when you sensed someone's true motives didn't match their helpful actions?
application • medium - 4
When someone causes you harm accidentally while trying to help, how should Smith's insight change how you respond compared to intentional harm?
application • deep - 5
What does our ability to read motives behind actions reveal about what humans truly value in relationships and society?
reflection • deep
Critical Thinking Exercise
Decode the Motive Behind the Action
Think of a recent situation where someone helped you or you helped someone else. Write down what actually happened, then dig deeper into the real motives involved. Were the intentions genuine care, obligation, self-interest, or something else? How did recognizing the true motive affect your feelings about the situation?
Consider:
- •Look beyond the surface action to what drove the behavior
- •Consider how you would have felt differently if the motives were different
- •Notice how your gut reaction already detected the true intention
Journaling Prompt
Write about a time when you misjudged someone's motives - either assuming bad intentions when they were good, or good intentions when they were selfish. What clues did you miss, and how would you read the situation differently now?
Coming Up Next...
Chapter 18: How We Judge Right and Wrong
What lies ahead teaches us we feel good about heroes and angry at villains - it's built into how we connect with others, and shows us our sense of justice comes from imagining ourselves in someone else's shoes. These patterns appear in literature and life alike.