Summary
Socrates drops a bombshell: women should be guardians too, trained exactly like men in war, athletics, and governance. His friends demand details about this radical equality, sensing he's been dodging the hardest questions. Through the metaphor of male and female guard dogs who share the same duties, Socrates argues that gender differences are mostly superficial—like being bald versus hairy. What matters is aptitude, not anatomy. He pushes further with his second 'wave': abolishing private families among guardians. Children would be raised communally, with carefully orchestrated breeding festivals ensuring the best pairings while preventing incest through complex calculations. No parent would know their biological child, making every guardian a parent to all. This isn't cruelty but strategy—when everyone is family, private interests vanish and the state becomes truly unified. Warriors would take their children to observe battles from safe distances, preparing the next generation. The third and greatest wave nearly drowns them all: none of this works unless philosophers become kings or kings become philosophers. Socrates knows this sounds absurd, but insists that only those who understand true justice, beauty, and goodness—not just their shadows—can create the ideal state. Regular people see only opinions and appearances, while philosophers grasp eternal truths. Without philosophical leadership, even the best-designed society remains a dream.
Coming Up in Chapter 6
Having declared that philosophers must rule, Socrates now faces the harder question: what exactly makes someone a true philosopher? The answer will challenge everything Glaucon thinks he knows about wisdom, power, and the nature of reality itself.
Share it with friends
An excerpt from the original text.(~500 words)
BOOK V. I was going to enumerate the four forms of vice or decline in states, when Polemarchus—he was sitting a little farther from me than Adeimantus—taking him by the coat and leaning towards him, said something in an undertone, of which I only caught the words, ‘Shall we let him off?’ ‘Certainly not,’ said Adeimantus, raising his voice. Whom, I said, are you not going to let off? ‘You,’ he said. Why? ‘Because we think that you are not dealing fairly with us in omitting women and children, of whom you have slily disposed under the general formula that friends have all things in common.’ And was I not right? ‘Yes,’ he replied, ‘but there are many sorts of communism or community, and we want to know which of them is right. The company, as you have just heard, are resolved to have a further explanation.’ Thrasymachus said, ‘Do you think that we have come hither to dig for gold, or to hear you discourse?’ Yes, I said; but the discourse should be of a reasonable length. Glaucon added, ‘Yes, Socrates, and there is reason in spending the whole of life in such discussions; but pray, without more ado, tell us how this community is to be carried out, and how the interval between birth and education is to be filled up.’ Well, I said, the subject has several difficulties—What is possible? is the first question. What is desirable? is the second. ‘Fear not,’ he replied, ‘for you are speaking among friends.’ That, I replied, is a sorry consolation; I shall destroy my friends as well as myself. Not that I mind a little innocent laughter; but he who kills the truth is a murderer. ‘Then,’ said Glaucon, laughing, ‘in case you should murder us we will acquit you beforehand, and you shall be held free from the guilt of deceiving us.’ Socrates proceeds:—The guardians of our state are to be watch-dogs, as we have already said. Now dogs are not divided into hes and shes—we do not take the masculine gender out to hunt and leave the females at home to look after their puppies. They have the same employments—the only difference between them is that the one sex is stronger and the other weaker. But if women are to have the same employments as men, they must have the same education—they must be taught music and gymnastics, and the art of war. I know that a great joke will be made of their riding on horseback and carrying weapons; the sight of the naked old wrinkled women showing their agility in the palaestra will certainly not be a vision of beauty, and may be expected to become a famous jest. But we must not mind the wits; there was a time when they might have laughed at our present gymnastics. All is habit: people have at last found out that the exposure is better than the concealment of the person, and now they laugh no more. Evil...
Master this chapter. Complete your experience
Purchase the complete book to access all chapters and support classic literature
As an Amazon Associate, we earn a small commission from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.
Available in paperback, hardcover, and e-book formats
Intelligence Amplifier™ Analysis
The Road of Radical Redesign
When systems are fundamentally broken, only 'radical' solutions that challenge core assumptions can create real change.
Why This Matters
Connect literature to life
This chapter teaches you to identify when 'that's impossible' really means 'that would change everything'—and why that's exactly what broken systems need.
Practice This Today
This week, notice when someone dismisses a solution as 'too radical'—then ask yourself if the real objection is that it would actually work.
Now let's explore the literary elements.
Terms to Know
Guardian
The warrior-philosopher class in Plato's ideal state, responsible for protecting and governing society. They live communally without private property or traditional families.
Modern Usage:
Like military officers or police who are expected to put public service above personal interests
Communism of women and children
Plato's radical proposal where guardians share spouses and raise children collectively, with no one knowing their biological family. This eliminates private loyalties that could threaten state unity.
Modern Usage:
Similar to how some kibbutzim or intentional communities raise children collectively
Philosopher-king
A ruler who understands eternal truths and reality itself, not just appearances. Plato argues only these individuals can create true justice because they see beyond personal interests.
Modern Usage:
The ideal of technocratic leadership - experts running things based on knowledge, not popularity
The Three Waves
Socrates' three radical proposals that each seem more impossible than the last: gender equality, abolishing nuclear families, and requiring philosopher rulers. Each 'wave' threatens to drown the argument.
Modern Usage:
Like presenting increasingly controversial ideas to test how far people will follow your logic
Noble lie
A falsehood told by rulers for the greater good, like the rigged breeding lottery that secretly pairs the best guardians while seeming random.
Modern Usage:
Government propaganda or 'spin' justified as being for public benefit
Forms/Ideas
The eternal, perfect versions of things that exist beyond our physical world. Philosophers study these truths while everyone else sees only shadows and copies.
Modern Usage:
Like the difference between understanding the principle behind something versus just memorizing facts
Characters in This Chapter
Socrates
protagonist and primary speaker
Drops three bombshell proposals about gender equality, communal families, and philosopher rulers. He knows these ideas sound crazy but argues they're logically necessary for a just state.
Modern Equivalent:
The radical professor who backs you into agreeing with wild conclusions
Glaucon
challenger and questioner
Demands Socrates explain his vague comments about women and children. He's both skeptical and fascinated, pushing Socrates to defend ideas that seem impossible.
Modern Equivalent:
The friend who won't let you off the hook when you say something controversial
Adeimantus
supporting challenger
Teams up with Polemarchus to force Socrates to elaborate on his communism proposal. He insists on getting specific details, not general principles.
Modern Equivalent:
The coworker who asks for receipts when you make bold claims
Polemarchus
instigator
Whispers to Adeimantus that they shouldn't let Socrates dodge the hard questions about women and communal living. He sparks the confrontation that drives the chapter.
Modern Equivalent:
The friend who starts drama by pointing out what everyone's thinking
Thrasymachus
skeptical observer
Sarcastically asks if they came to dig for gold or hear philosophy, implying Socrates is wasting their time with impossible dreams.
Modern Equivalent:
The cynical realist who thinks all idealism is naive
Key Quotes & Analysis
"Friends have all things in common"
Context: The phrase Socrates used earlier that his friends now demand he explain fully
This seemingly simple statement contains radical implications about property, family, and social organization. It's the seed from which Plato grows his vision of communal living among guardians.
In Today's Words:
Real friends share everything - but what if we took that literally?
"Do you think that we have come hither to dig for gold, or to hear you discourse?"
Context: Expressing frustration at the lengthy philosophical discussion
Thrasymachus represents practical people who think philosophy is a waste of time compared to making money. His sarcasm highlights the tension between material and intellectual pursuits.
In Today's Words:
Did we come here to get rich or to talk about impossible dreams?
"There is no practice of a profession which belongs to woman as woman or to man as man; natural capacities are equally distributed in both sexes"
Context: Arguing for gender equality among guardians
Revolutionary for ancient Greece, Socrates argues that gender differences are superficial compared to individual talents. He's not saying men and women are identical, but that both can be warriors or philosophers.
In Today's Words:
Being male or female doesn't determine what job you can do - talent does
"Until philosophers are kings, or the kings and princes of this world have the spirit and power of philosophy... cities will never have rest from their evils"
Context: Presenting his most radical proposal
The climax of Plato's political philosophy - only those who understand truth itself should rule. This seems impossible because philosophers don't want power and powerful people rarely seek wisdom.
In Today's Words:
Nothing will get better until the people in charge actually know what they're doing
Thematic Threads
Equality
In This Chapter
Women should be guardians with identical training and roles as men
Development
Extends justice principle from city structure to gender roles
In Your Life:
When you're told you can't do something because of who you are, not what you can do
Unity
In This Chapter
Abolishing private families creates one unified guardian class
Development
Builds on earlier theme of city harmony through specialized roles
In Your Life:
When personal interests conflict with what's best for your team or workplace
Truth vs Opinion
In This Chapter
Only philosophers who see reality, not shadows, should rule
Development
Introduced here as foundation for philosopher-king concept
In Your Life:
When you need someone who understands the real problem, not just what it looks like
Radical Solutions
In This Chapter
Three 'waves' of increasingly shocking proposals to fix society
Development
Escalates from city structure to complete social revolution
In Your Life:
When fixing something properly means suggesting changes that make people uncomfortable
You now have the context. Time to form your own thoughts.
Discussion Questions
- 1
What were Socrates' three radical proposals for the guardian class, and which one did he think would be most shocking?
analysis • surface - 2
Why does Socrates use the example of guard dogs to argue for women guardians? How does this strategy help him make his point?
analysis • medium - 3
Where do you see 'that's how we've always done it' blocking obvious improvements in your workplace or community?
application • medium - 4
If you had to propose a 'radical' fix for a broken system you deal with daily, how would you present it to overcome resistance?
application • deep - 5
What does this chapter reveal about why people defend broken systems even when better solutions exist?
reflection • deep
Critical Thinking Exercise
Design Your Guard Dog Argument
Think of a 'radical' change you'd like to see in your workplace, family, or community. Now find a simple comparison (like Socrates' guard dogs) where your idea already works naturally. Write out how you'd present your idea using this comparison to bypass emotional resistance.
Consider:
- •What obvious example shows your 'radical' idea is actually normal somewhere else?
- •What emotional objections will people raise that your comparison can defuse?
- •How can you acknowledge the change is hard while showing it's not wrong?
Journaling Prompt
Describe a time when you or someone else successfully introduced a big change by making it seem less threatening. What strategies worked?
Coming Up Next...
Chapter 6: The Ship of Fools
As the story unfolds, you'll explore true experts are often ignored while charlatans gain influence, while uncovering public opinion corrupts even the best minds and intentions. These lessons connect the classic to contemporary challenges we all face.