Summary
Montaigne examines Julius Caesar's military genius through specific examples from his campaigns, revealing timeless principles of leadership under pressure. Rather than downplaying threats to his troops, Caesar deliberately exaggerated enemy strength—reasoning that soldiers fight harder when they expect tough opposition than when they're caught off guard by it. He maintained strict operational security, sharing plans only at the last moment and changing routes when soldiers guessed his intentions. Caesar understood timing as a weapon, using diplomatic negotiations to buy time while positioning his forces. His relationship with his troops balanced familiarity with authority—calling them 'fellow soldiers' to build loyalty while enforcing discipline through swift, decisive punishment when necessary. Montaigne contrasts Caesar's calculated boldness with Alexander's impulsive courage, noting that Caesar took enormous personal risks but always with strategic purpose. The chapter reveals Caesar's physical courage through dramatic examples: swimming across rivers in full armor, crossing enemy lines in disguise, and facing superior forces with unwavering confidence. Yet as Caesar aged, he became more cautious, understanding that accumulated glory required protection. Montaigne presents Caesar not as a reckless warrior but as a master strategist who understood that leadership means managing both perception and reality, inspiring confidence while making hard calculations about when to risk everything.
Coming Up in Chapter 91
From the battlefield wisdom of Caesar, Montaigne turns to explore the remarkable strength and virtue found in three extraordinary women, examining how feminine courage and wisdom manifest differently but no less powerfully than masculine heroism.
Share it with friends
An excerpt from the original text.(~500 words)
OBSERVATION ON THE MEANS TO CARRY ON A WAR ACCORDING TO JULIUS CAESAR ‘Tis related of many great leaders that they have had certain books in particular esteem, as Alexander the Great, Homer; Scipio Africanus, Xenophon; Marcus Brutus, Polybius; Charles V., Philip’de Comines; and ‘tis said that, in our times, Machiavelli is elsewhere still in repute; but the late Marshal Strozzi, who had taken Caesar for his man, doubtless made the best choice, seeing that it indeed ought to be the breviary of every soldier, as being the true and sovereign pattern of the military art. And, moreover, God knows with that grace and beauty he has embellished that rich matter, with so pure, delicate, and perfect expression, that, in my opinion, there are no writings in the world comparable to his, as to that business. I will set down some rare and particular passages of his wars that remain in my memory. His army, being in some consternation upon the rumour that was spread of the great forces that king Juba was leading against him, instead of abating the apprehension which his soldiers had conceived at the news and of lessening to them the forces of the enemy, having called them all together to encourage and reassure them, he took a quite contrary way to what we are used to do, for he told them that they need no more trouble themselves with inquiring after the enemy’s forces, for that he was certainly informed thereof, and then told them of a number much surpassing both the truth and the report that was current in his army; following the advice of Cyrus in Xenophon, forasmuch as the deception is not of so great importance to find an enemy weaker than we expected, than to find him really very strong, after having been made to believe that he was weak. It was always his use to accustom his soldiers simply to obey, without taking upon them to control, or so much as to speak of their captain’s designs, which he never communicated to them but upon the point of execution; and he took a delight, if they discovered anything of what he intended, immediately to change his orders to deceive them; and to that purpose, would often, when he had assigned his quarters in a place, pass forward and lengthen his day’s march, especially if it was foul and rainy weather. The Swiss, in the beginning of his wars in Gaul, having sent to him to demand a free passage over the Roman territories, though resolved to hinder them by force, he nevertheless spoke kindly to the messengers, and took some respite to return an answer, to make use of that time for the calling his army together. These silly people did not know how good a husband he was of his time: for he often repeats that it is the best part of a captain to know how to make use of occasions, and his diligence in his exploits is,...
Master this chapter. Complete your experience
Purchase the complete book to access all chapters and support classic literature
As an Amazon Associate, we earn a small commission from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.
Available in paperback, hardcover, and e-book formats
Intelligence Amplifier™ Analysis
The Road of Strategic Vulnerability
Leaders build stronger authority by honestly acknowledging challenges while demonstrating competence to handle them.
Why This Matters
Connect literature to life
This chapter teaches how to distinguish between leaders who manage perception and those who manipulate it—Caesar's strategic honesty versus political spin.
Practice This Today
Next time someone in authority delivers bad news, notice whether they acknowledge reality while showing competence, or whether they minimize problems and blame others—the difference reveals character.
Now let's explore the literary elements.
Terms to Know
Breviary
A handbook or manual containing essential information for daily use, originally a book of prayers for clergy. Montaigne calls Caesar's writings the 'breviary of every soldier' meaning the essential guidebook for military leadership.
Modern Usage:
We still talk about someone's 'playbook' or 'bible' for their profession - the go-to resource they always reference.
Operational Security
The practice of keeping plans and movements secret from enemies. Caesar excelled at this, sharing information only when necessary and changing plans when secrecy was compromised.
Modern Usage:
Companies use this concept when launching new products, and individuals practice it when job hunting while still employed.
Reverse Psychology
Caesar's tactic of telling soldiers the enemy was stronger than rumored, knowing they'd fight harder when prepared for tough opposition than when caught off guard by unexpected strength.
Modern Usage:
Parents use this when they tell kids a task will be really hard, knowing the child will try harder to prove them wrong.
Strategic Timing
Using negotiations and delays as weapons to buy time for better positioning. Caesar would engage in talks not to make peace, but to move his forces into better positions.
Modern Usage:
Seen in business negotiations where one party stalls to improve their leverage, or in dating when someone plays hard to get.
Calculated Risk
Taking enormous personal risks but always with strategic purpose behind them. Caesar's courage wasn't reckless - every dangerous act served a larger military goal.
Modern Usage:
Entrepreneurs exhibit this when they invest everything in a startup, or when someone quits a safe job for a better opportunity.
Leading from the Front
Caesar's practice of sharing dangers with his troops, calling them 'fellow soldiers' and personally facing the same risks he asked of them.
Modern Usage:
Good managers today do this by working late alongside their team during crunch time instead of just demanding overtime.
Characters in This Chapter
Julius Caesar
Military strategist and leader
The central figure whose leadership methods Montaigne analyzes. Caesar demonstrates how to manage troops through psychology, maintain authority while building loyalty, and take calculated risks for strategic advantage.
Modern Equivalent:
The CEO who works alongside employees during crisis
Alexander the Great
Comparative example
Montaigne contrasts Alexander's impulsive, emotion-driven courage with Caesar's calculated strategic thinking. Alexander represents raw bravery without the careful planning that made Caesar superior.
Modern Equivalent:
The talented but reckless entrepreneur who burns out
King Juba
Military opponent
An enemy leader whose approaching forces caused panic among Caesar's troops. Caesar used the threat of Juba's army as a teaching moment, deliberately exaggerating the danger to prepare his soldiers mentally.
Modern Equivalent:
The intimidating competitor that forces you to raise your game
Marshal Strozzi
Contemporary military leader
A modern example Montaigne cites who chose Caesar as his model for military leadership, validating Caesar's enduring relevance as a strategic thinker.
Modern Equivalent:
The successful executive who studies classic business cases
Key Quotes & Analysis
"He told them that they need no more trouble themselves with inquiring after the enemy's forces, for that he was certainly informed thereof"
Context: When his troops were panicking about King Juba's approaching army
This shows Caesar's mastery of military psychology. Instead of calming fears by minimizing the threat, he took control by claiming superior intelligence and then deliberately overstated enemy strength to prepare his troops mentally for a tough fight.
In Today's Words:
Stop worrying about what you don't know - I've got the real information, and here's what we're really up against.
"It indeed ought to be the breviary of every soldier"
Context: Describing Caesar's military writings as essential reading
Montaigne argues that Caesar's accounts aren't just historical records but practical manuals for leadership. The word 'breviary' suggests these writings should be consulted daily, like a prayer book.
In Today's Words:
This should be every leader's go-to handbook.
"He took a quite contrary way to what we are used to do"
Context: Explaining how Caesar handled his troops' fear differently than expected
This highlights Caesar's counterintuitive leadership style. Where most leaders would try to calm fears by downplaying threats, Caesar understood that soldiers fight better when they're mentally prepared for the worst-case scenario.
In Today's Words:
He did the exact opposite of what most people would do in that situation.
Thematic Threads
Leadership
In This Chapter
Caesar's balance of vulnerability and authority through honest communication about dangers while maintaining strategic control
Development
Introduced here as practical leadership framework
In Your Life:
You might use this when managing a team at work or guiding family through difficult times.
Trust
In This Chapter
Caesar builds loyalty by sharing real information about threats rather than false reassurances
Development
Introduced here as foundation for authentic relationships
In Your Life:
You might apply this when friends ask for honest advice about their problems.
Perception
In This Chapter
Caesar carefully controls how his courage and caution are perceived, understanding that timing affects interpretation
Development
Introduced here as conscious image management
In Your Life:
You might recognize this when deciding how to present challenges to your family or coworkers.
Courage
In This Chapter
Caesar's physical bravery is always calculated—dramatic but purposeful, not reckless
Development
Introduced here as strategic rather than impulsive
In Your Life:
You might apply this when deciding which workplace battles are worth fighting.
Growth
In This Chapter
Caesar evolves from impulsive risk-taking to calculated caution as he gains experience and responsibility
Development
Introduced here as wisdom gained through experience
In Your Life:
You might recognize this in your own evolution from taking unnecessary risks to choosing battles more carefully.
You now have the context. Time to form your own thoughts.
Discussion Questions
- 1
Why did Caesar tell his troops the enemy was stronger than they actually were, and how did this strategy work?
analysis • surface - 2
What's the difference between Caesar's calculated risks and Alexander's impulsive courage, and why does this distinction matter for leadership?
analysis • medium - 3
Where do you see Caesar's pattern of 'strategic honesty about challenges' working in your workplace, family, or community today?
application • medium - 4
Think of a situation where you need to lead others through difficulty. How would you apply Caesar's approach of sharing challenges while maintaining confidence?
application • deep - 5
What does Caesar's evolution from bold risk-taker to careful protector of his reputation teach us about how leadership needs change over time?
reflection • deep
Critical Thinking Exercise
Practice Strategic Transparency
Think of a current challenge you're facing where you need others' cooperation - at work, home, or in your community. Write two versions of how you'd present this challenge: first, the way most people do it (downplaying problems or pretending everything's fine), then using Caesar's approach (honest about the difficulty but confident about handling it together). Compare how each version would likely be received.
Consider:
- •How does acknowledging difficulty actually build trust rather than create panic?
- •What's the difference between sharing problems and sharing panic?
- •How can you be honest about challenges while still projecting leadership confidence?
Journaling Prompt
Write about a time when someone in authority lied to you about how difficult something would be. How did you feel when you discovered the truth? Now write about a time when someone was upfront about challenges from the start. Which approach made you more willing to follow their lead?
Coming Up Next...
Chapter 91: Three Women Who Loved Truly
As the story unfolds, you'll explore to recognize authentic love versus performative grief, while uncovering shared values matter more than grand gestures in relationships. These lessons connect the classic to contemporary challenges we all face.