Summary
Montaigne explores how we judge and understand ourselves and the world around us. He argues that our judgment is like a tool we use for everything, but we must recognize our limitations and not pretend to know more than we do. He believes we reveal our true selves not in grand moments, but in everyday activities - how Alexander plays chess tells us as much about him as how he conquers nations. The essay centers on two ancient philosophers: Democritus, who laughed at human foolishness, and Heraclitus, who wept over human suffering. Montaigne sides with the laughing philosopher, arguing that finding life ridiculous shows more wisdom than finding it tragic. He suggests we're more foolish than evil, more vain than truly miserable. The key insight is that external events don't determine our happiness or misery - our internal perspective does. Death terrifies some people while others welcome it; the same event, different reactions. Montaigne concludes that we shouldn't blame outside forces for our problems because we control how we interpret and respond to everything that happens to us. This chapter teaches us that self-knowledge comes from honest observation of our reactions to small, everyday situations, not just our behavior during major life events.
Coming Up in Chapter 51
Next, Montaigne turns his sharp eye to the gap between our words and our actions, exploring why we often say one thing but do another, and what this reveals about human nature.
Share it with friends
An excerpt from the original text.(~500 words)
OF DEMOCRITUS AND HERACLITUS The judgment is an utensil proper for all subjects, and will have an oar in everything: which is the reason, that in these Essays I take hold of all occasions where, though it happen to be a subject I do not very well understand, I try, however, sounding it at a distance, and finding it too deep for my stature, I keep me on the shore; and this knowledge that a man can proceed no further, is one effect of its virtue, yes, one of those of which it is most proud. One while in an idle and frivolous subject, I try to find out matter whereof to compose a body, and then to prop and support it; another while, I employ it in a noble subject, one that has been tossed and tumbled by a thousand hands, wherein a man can scarce possibly introduce anything of his own, the way being so beaten on every side that he must of necessity walk in the steps of another: in such a case, ‘tis the work of the judgment to take the way that seems best, and of a thousand paths, to determine that this or that is the best. I leave the choice of my arguments to fortune, and take that she first presents to me; they are all alike to me, I never design to go through any of them; for I never see all of anything: neither do they who so largely promise to show it others. Of a hundred members and faces that everything has, I take one, onewhile to look it over only, another while to ripple up the skin, and sometimes to pinch it to the bones: I give a stab, not so wide but as deep as I can, and am for the most part tempted to take it in hand by some new light I discover in it. Did I know myself less, I might perhaps venture to handle something or other to the bottom, and to be deceived in my own inability; but sprinkling here one word and there another, patterns cut from several pieces and scattered without design and without engaging myself too far, I am not responsible for them, or obliged to keep close to my subject, without varying at my own liberty and pleasure, and giving up myself to doubt and uncertainty, and to my own governing method, ignorance. All motion discovers us: the very same soul of Caesar, that made itself so conspicuous in marshalling and commanding the battle of Pharsalia, was also seen as solicitous and busy in the softer affairs of love and leisure. A man makes a judgment of a horse, not only by seeing him when he is showing off his paces, but by his very walk, nay, and by seeing him stand in the stable. Amongst the functions of the soul, there are some of a lower and meaner form; he who does not see her in those inferior...
Master this chapter. Complete your experience
Purchase the complete book to access all chapters and support classic literature
As an Amazon Associate, we earn a small commission from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.
Available in paperback, hardcover, and e-book formats
Intelligence Amplifier™ Analysis
The Road of Internal Weather - How Your Inner Climate Controls Everything
Your interpretation of events, not the events themselves, determines your emotional experience and life outcomes.
Why This Matters
Connect literature to life
This chapter teaches how to recognize that your emotional reactions reveal your interpretation habits, not the objective truth of situations.
Practice This Today
This week, notice when you have a strong reaction to something small - a delayed text, a parking ticket, a coworker's comment - and ask yourself what story you're telling about what it means.
Now let's explore the literary elements.
Terms to Know
Judgment
Montaigne's term for our ability to evaluate and make sense of experiences. He sees it as a tool we use constantly, but warns we must know its limits. It's not about being smart, but about being honest about what we actually understand.
Modern Usage:
We see this when people admit 'I don't know enough about that to have an opinion' instead of pretending to be experts on everything.
Democritus and Heraclitus
Two ancient Greek philosophers representing opposite responses to life. Democritus laughed at human foolishness while Heraclitus wept at human suffering. Montaigne uses them to explore whether we should find life funny or tragic.
Modern Usage:
We see these types in every workplace - the person who laughs off drama versus the one who takes everything as a personal tragedy.
Self-knowledge through small actions
Montaigne's belief that we learn more about ourselves from everyday behaviors than from major life events. How someone handles minor frustrations reveals more than how they act during crises.
Modern Usage:
We see this when someone's true character shows in how they treat waiters or react to traffic, not just in big moments.
Fortune
Montaigne's word for the random events and circumstances that happen to us. He argues that fortune doesn't determine our happiness - our response to it does. External events are neutral until we interpret them.
Modern Usage:
We see this when two people lose the same job - one sees opportunity, the other sees disaster.
Vanity versus evil
Montaigne's distinction between human foolishness and genuine malice. He believes most of our problems come from being silly, self-important, or ignorant rather than actually evil or malicious.
Modern Usage:
We see this in social media drama where people aren't usually trying to hurt others - they're just being thoughtless or showing off.
Internal perspective
The idea that our inner attitude and interpretation of events matters more than the events themselves. The same situation can be heaven or hell depending on how we choose to view it.
Modern Usage:
We see this when some people thrive in chaos while others fall apart in perfect conditions - it's all about mindset.
Characters in This Chapter
Democritus
philosophical model
The ancient philosopher who laughed at human behavior, finding our mistakes and pretensions amusing rather than tragic. Montaigne admires his ability to see the comedy in human nature instead of getting upset by it.
Modern Equivalent:
The coworker who finds office politics hilarious instead of stressful
Heraclitus
philosophical contrast
The ancient philosopher who wept over human suffering and took everything seriously. Montaigne uses him to represent the tendency to see life as tragic and overwhelming rather than absurd.
Modern Equivalent:
The friend who turns every setback into a major crisis
Alexander
historical example
Montaigne references Alexander the Great to show that we reveal our true selves in small actions like playing games, not just in conquering empires. Even great leaders show their character in trivial moments.
Modern Equivalent:
The CEO whose real personality shows when they're stuck in traffic
Montaigne
narrator and philosopher
The author examining his own thought processes and limitations. He admits he doesn't understand everything but tries to be honest about what he can and cannot know.
Modern Equivalent:
The honest friend who admits when they're out of their depth
Key Quotes & Analysis
"The judgment is an utensil proper for all subjects, and will have an oar in everything"
Context: Opening the essay about how we use our judgment constantly
Montaigne warns that we apply our judgment to everything, even things we don't understand. The image of judgment wanting 'an oar in everything' suggests we try to steer conversations and decisions we're not qualified for.
In Today's Words:
We all think we're experts on everything and want to weigh in on every topic.
"This knowledge that a man can proceed no further, is one effect of its virtue, yes, one of those of which it is most proud"
Context: Discussing the wisdom of knowing our limits
True wisdom isn't knowing everything - it's knowing when you've reached the edge of your understanding. Montaigne sees intellectual humility as a strength, not a weakness.
In Today's Words:
The smartest thing you can do is admit when you don't know something.
"I never see all of anything"
Context: Explaining his approach to writing and thinking
Montaigne admits he only sees partial truths and incomplete pictures. This honesty about his limitations is what makes his insights trustworthy - he's not pretending to have all the answers.
In Today's Words:
I never have the whole story, and neither does anyone else.
"We are more full of wind than of wickedness"
Context: Comparing human vanity to genuine evil
Montaigne argues most human problems come from being full of hot air - pride, pretension, and self-importance - rather than actual malice. We're more foolish than evil.
In Today's Words:
Most people aren't bad, they're just full of themselves.
Thematic Threads
Self-Knowledge
In This Chapter
Montaigne argues we learn more about ourselves from everyday reactions than from grand gestures
Development
Deepens from earlier chapters about honest self-observation
In Your Life:
Notice how you react to small frustrations - they reveal your true character patterns more than major crises do
Personal Agency
In This Chapter
We control our responses to events even when we can't control the events themselves
Development
Builds on themes of individual responsibility for one's choices
In Your Life:
You have more power over your happiness than you think - it lies in how you interpret what happens to you
Wisdom vs Folly
In This Chapter
Montaigne sides with Democritus who laughed at human foolishness rather than Heraclitus who wept
Development
Continues exploration of what constitutes true wisdom
In Your Life:
Finding humor in life's absurdities often shows more wisdom than taking everything tragically seriously
Judgment
In This Chapter
Our judgment is a tool we use constantly but must recognize its limitations
Development
Expands on earlier discussions about the fallibility of human perception
In Your Life:
Question your automatic judgments about situations - they might be revealing more about you than about reality
Human Nature
In This Chapter
Humans are more foolish than evil, more vain than truly miserable
Development
Offers a compassionate but realistic view of human limitations
In Your Life:
When people disappoint you, consider that they're probably being foolish rather than malicious
You now have the context. Time to form your own thoughts.
Discussion Questions
- 1
Montaigne compares two ancient philosophers - one who laughed at humanity and one who wept. What does each reaction reveal about how they interpreted the same human behaviors?
analysis • surface - 2
Why does Montaigne argue that watching someone play chess tells us as much about their character as watching them lead an army?
analysis • medium - 3
Think about a recent stressful situation at work or home. How did different people react to the same event? What does this tell you about the role of perspective?
application • medium - 4
Montaigne claims we control our reactions to events, not the events themselves. How would you apply this principle the next time someone cuts you off in traffic or criticizes your work?
application • deep - 5
If our internal perspective creates our experience more than external events do, what does this suggest about where we should focus our energy when life gets difficult?
reflection • deep
Critical Thinking Exercise
Track Your Weather System
For the next three days, notice your automatic reactions to small irritations - a slow computer, a rude cashier, unexpected traffic. Write down the event and your first interpretation. Then practice finding two alternative ways to interpret the same situation. This reveals your default 'weather patterns' of thinking.
Consider:
- •Small daily reactions reveal your interpretation habits more clearly than major crises
- •Your first reaction is usually automatic - the alternatives require conscious choice
- •Notice if you tend toward catastrophizing, personalizing, or minimizing situations
Journaling Prompt
Write about a time when you completely changed your mind about a situation. What shifted your perspective? How did your emotional experience change when your interpretation changed?
Coming Up Next...
Chapter 51: When Words Become Weapons of Deception
As the story unfolds, you'll explore fancy language often hides empty thinking, while uncovering simple, direct communication builds trust. These lessons connect the classic to contemporary challenges we all face.