An excerpt from the original text.(complete · 569 words)
OF THE BATTLE OF DREUX
[December 19, 1562, in which the Catholics, under the command of the
Duc de Guise and the Constable de Montmorenci, defeated the
Protestants, commanded by the Prince de Conde. See Sismondi, Hist.
des Francais, vol. xviii., p. 354.]
Our battle of Dreux is remarkable for several extraordinary incidents;
but such as have no great kindness for M. de Guise, nor much favour his
reputation, are willing to have him thought to blame, and that his making
a halt and delaying time with the forces he commanded, whilst the
Constable, who was general of the army, was racked through and through
with the enemy’s artillery, his battalion routed, and himself taken
prisoner, is not to be excused; and that he had much better have run the
hazard of charging the enemy in flank, than staying for the advantage of
falling in upon the rear, to suffer so great and so important a loss.
But, besides what the event demonstrated, he who will consider it without
passion or prejudice will easily be induced to confess that the aim and
design, not of a captain only, but of every private soldier, ought to
regard the victory in general, and that no particular occurrences, how
nearly soever they may concern his own interest, should divert him from
that pursuit. Philopoemen, in an encounter with Machanidas, having sent
before a good strong party of his archers and slingers to begin the
skirmish, and these being routed and hotly pursued by the enemy, who,
pushing on the fortune of their arms, and in that pursuit passing by the
battalion where Philopoemen was, though his soldiers were impatient to
fall on, he did not think fit to stir from his post nor to present
himself to the enemy to relieve his men, but having suffered these to be
chased and cut in pieces before his face, charged in upon the enemy’s
foot when he saw them left unprotected by the horse, and notwithstanding
that they were Lacedaemonians, yet taking them in the nick, when thinking
themselves secure of the victory, they began to disorder their ranks; he
did this business with great facility, and then put himself in pursuit of
Machanidas. Which case is very like that of Monsieur de Guise.
In that bloody battle betwixt Agesilaus and the Boeotians, which
Xenophon, who was present at it, reports to be the sharpest that he had
ever seen, Agesilaus waived the advantage that fortune presented him, to
let the Boeotian battalions pass by and then to charge them in the rear,
how certain soever he might make himself of the victory, judging it would
rather be an effect of conduct than valour, to proceed that way; and
therefore, to show his prowess, rather chose with a marvellous ardour of
courage to charge them in the front; but he was well beaten and well
wounded for his pains, and constrained at last to disengage himself, and
to take the course he had at first neglected; opening his battalion to
give way to this torrent of Boeotians, and they being passed by, taking
notice that they marched in disorder, like men who thought themselves out
of danger, he pursued and charged them in flank; yet could not so prevail
as to bring it to so general a rout but that they leisurely retreated,
still facing about upon him till they had retired to safety.
Master this chapter. Complete your experience
Purchase the complete book to access all chapters and support classic literature
As an Amazon Associate, we earn a small commission from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.
Available in paperback, hardcover, and e-book formats
Let's Analyse the Pattern
Choosing long-term effectiveness over short-term reputation, even when it makes you look bad to observers.
Why This Matters
Connect literature to life
This chapter teaches how to recognize when immediate action serves ego rather than effectiveness.
Practice This Today
This week, notice when you feel pressure to 'do something' immediately—pause and ask whether you're solving the problem or managing your reputation.
Now let's explore the literary elements.
Key Quotes & Analysis
"The aim and design, not of a captain only, but of every private soldier, ought to regard the victory in general, and that no particular occurrences, how nearly soever they may concern his own interest, should divert him from that pursuit."
Context: Montaigne defending why commanders must focus on overall victory rather than immediate concerns
This captures Montaigne's core argument that true leadership requires putting the bigger goal above personal feelings or immediate pressures. It's about having the discipline to see the forest, not just the trees.
In Today's Words:
Everyone needs to keep their eye on the real prize, not get distracted by whatever crisis is happening right now, even if it affects them personally.
"He who will consider it without passion or prejudice will easily be induced to confess that the aim and design ought to regard the victory in general."
Context: Montaigne asking readers to look past their emotional reactions to see the strategic wisdom
Montaigne is calling out how our emotions cloud our judgment about what's actually smart. He's asking us to step back from our gut reactions and think strategically.
In Today's Words:
If you can get past your feelings about it, you'll see that focusing on the big picture was actually the right call.
"No particular occurrences, how nearly soever they may concern his own interest, should divert him from that pursuit."
Context: Explaining why leaders must resist the urge to abandon strategy for immediate concerns
This is about the hardest part of leadership - staying focused on what matters most even when people you care about are suffering. It's brutal but necessary wisdom.
In Today's Words:
Don't let whatever's happening right now, even if it hits close to home, make you lose sight of what you're really trying to accomplish.
Thematic Threads
Leadership
In This Chapter
True leadership often requires making unpopular decisions that serve the greater good rather than immediate appearances
Development
Introduced here
In Your Life:
You might face this when you have to make an unpopular decision at work that protects your team in the long run.
Social Expectations
In This Chapter
Society expects immediate, visible action even when patience and strategy would be more effective
Development
Builds on earlier themes about conformity versus wisdom
In Your Life:
You feel pressure to respond immediately to family drama when stepping back might actually help more.
Pride
In This Chapter
Personal reputation and honor can conflict with practical effectiveness and wise decision-making
Development
Deepens from previous discussions of ego and self-image
In Your Life:
You might choose to argue a point to save face rather than admit you were wrong and move forward.
Wisdom
In This Chapter
True wisdom sometimes appears as cowardice or indifference to those who don't understand the bigger picture
Development
Continues Montaigne's exploration of how wisdom differs from conventional thinking
In Your Life:
Your careful, measured responses to conflict might be seen as weakness by people who prefer dramatic confrontation.
You now have the context. Time to form your own thoughts.
Discussion Questions
- 1
Why did critics call the Duc de Guise a coward when he chose not to immediately help his fellow commander at the Battle of Dreux?
analysis • surface - 2
How does Montaigne use the examples of Philopoemen and Agesilaus to show the difference between strategic thinking and acting for appearances?
analysis • medium - 3
Think of a time when someone you know was criticized for not jumping in to help immediately. Looking back, do you think they made the right choice? Why?
application • medium - 4
When have you faced pressure to 'do something' even when you suspected waiting or holding back might be wiser? How did you handle it?
application • deep - 5
What does this chapter reveal about why we often choose actions that make us look good over actions that actually work?
reflection • deep
Critical Thinking Exercise
Map Your Next Strategic Wait
Think of a current situation where you feel pressure to act immediately or jump in to help. Write down what immediate action people expect from you, then list what might happen if you wait and gather more information or let things play out. Consider both the short-term judgment you might face and the long-term outcomes of each approach.
Consider:
- •What are you really protecting - your reputation or the best outcome?
- •Who benefits most from immediate action versus strategic patience?
- •What information might become available if you wait that could change your approach?
Journaling Prompt
Write about a time when you acted too quickly to avoid looking bad, or when you held back despite criticism and it turned out to be the right choice. What did that experience teach you about the difference between courage and wisdom?
Coming Up Next...
Chapter 46: The Power and Peril of Names
From battlefield strategy, Montaigne turns to something far more personal yet equally complex: the strange power that names hold over our lives and identities. What's really in a name, and why does it matter more than we think?




