An excerpt from the original text.(complete · 1458 words)
OF CONSTANCY
The law of resolution and constancy does not imply that we ought not, as
much as in us lies, to decline and secure ourselves from the mischiefs
and inconveniences that threaten us; nor, consequently, that we shall not
fear lest they should surprise us: on the contrary, all decent and honest
ways and means of securing ourselves from harms, are not only permitted,
but, moreover, commendable, and the business of constancy chiefly is,
bravely to stand to, and stoutly to suffer those inconveniences which are
not possibly to be avoided. So that there is no supple motion of body,
nor any movement in the handling of arms, how irregular or ungraceful
soever, that we need condemn, if they serve to protect us from the blow
that is made against us.
Several very warlike nations have made use of a retreating and flying way
of fight as a thing of singular advantage, and, by so doing, have made
their backs more dangerous to their enemies than their faces. Of which
kind of fighting the Turks still retain something in their practice of
arms; and Socrates, in Plato, laughs at Laches, who had defined fortitude
to be a standing firm in the ranks against the enemy. “What!” says he,
“would it, then, be a reputed cowardice to overcome them by giving
ground?” urging, at the same time, the authority of Homer, who commends
in AEneas the science of flight. And whereas Laches, considering better
of it, admits the practice as to the Scythians, and, in general, all
cavalry whatever, he again attacks him with the example of the
Lacedaemonian foot--a nation of all other the most obstinate in
maintaining their ground--who, in the battle of Plataea, not being able
to break into the Persian phalanx, bethought themselves to disperse and
retire, that by the enemy supposing they fled, they might break and
disunite that vast body of men in the pursuit, and by that stratagem
obtained the victory.
As for the Scythians, ‘tis said of them, that when Darius went his
expedition to subdue them, he sent, by a herald, highly to reproach their
king, that he always retired before him and declined a battle; to which
Idanthyrses,--[Herod., iv. 127.]--for that was his name, returned
answer, that it was not for fear of him, or of any man living, that he
did so, but that it was the way of marching in practice with his nation,
who had neither tilled fields, cities, nor houses to defend, or to fear
the enemy should make any advantage of but that if he had such a stomach
to fight, let him but come to view their ancient places of sepulture, and
there he should have his fill.
Nevertheless, as to cannon-shot, when a body of men are drawn up in the
face of a train of artillery, as the occasion of war often requires, it
is unhandsome to quit their post to avoid the danger, forasmuch as by
reason of its violence and swiftness we account it inevitable; and many a
one, by ducking, stepping aside, and such other motions of fear, has
been, at all events, sufficiently laughed at by his companions. And yet,
in the expedition that the Emperor Charles V. made against us into
Provence, the Marquis de Guast going to reconnoitre the city of Arles,
and advancing out of the cover of a windmill, under favour of which he
had made his approach, was perceived by the Seigneurs de Bonneval and the
Seneschal of Agenois, who were walking upon the ‘theatre aux ayenes’; who
having shown him to the Sieur de Villiers, commissary of the artillery,
he pointed a culverin so admirably well, and levelled it so exactly right
against him, that had not the Marquis, seeing fire given to it, slipped
aside, it was certainly concluded the shot had taken him full in the
body. And, in like manner, some years before, Lorenzo de’ Medici, Duke
of Urbino, and father to the queen-mother--[Catherine de’ Medici, mother
of Henry III.]--laying siege to Mondolfo, a place in the territories of
the Vicariat in Italy, seeing the cannoneer give fire to a piece that
pointed directly against him, it was well for him that he ducked, for
otherwise the shot, that only razed the top of his head, had doubtless
hit him full in the breast. To say truth, I do not think that these
evasions are performed upon the account of judgment; for how can any man
living judge of high or low aim on so sudden an occasion? And it is much
more easy to believe that fortune favoured their apprehension, and that
it might be as well at another time to make them face the danger, as to
seek to avoid it. For my own part, I confess I cannot forbear starting
when the rattle of a harquebuse thunders in my ears on a sudden, and in a
place where I am not to expect it, which I have also observed in others,
braver fellows than I.
Neither do the Stoics pretend that the soul of their philosopher need be
proof against the first visions and fantasies that surprise him; but, as
to a natural subjection, consent that he should tremble at the terrible
noise of thunder, or the sudden clatter of some falling ruin, and be
affrighted even to paleness and convulsion; and so in other passions,
provided his judgment remain sound and entire, and that the seat of his
reason suffer no concussion nor alteration, and that he yield no consent
to his fright and discomposure. To him who is not a philosopher, a
fright is the same thing in the first part of it, but quite another thing
in the second; for the impression of passions does not remain
superficially in him, but penetrates farther, even to the very seat of
reason, infecting and corrupting it, so that he judges according to his
fear, and conforms his behaviour to it. In this verse you may see the
true state of the wise Stoic learnedly and plainly expressed:--
“Mens immota manet; lachrymae volvuntur inanes.”
[“Though tears flow, the mind remains unmoved.”
--Virgil, AEneid, iv. 449]
The Peripatetic sage does not exempt himself totally from perturbations
of mind, but he moderates them.
ETEXT EDITOR’S BOOKMARKS:
Almanacs
Being dead they were then by one day happier than he
Books I read over again, still smile upon me with fresh novelty
Death discharges us of all our obligations
Difference betwixt memory and understanding
Do thine own work, and know thyself
Effect and performance are not at all in our power
Fantastic gibberish of the prophetic canting
Folly of gaping after future things
Good to be certain and finite, and evil, infinite and uncertain
He who lives everywhere, lives nowhere
If they chop upon one truth, that carries a mighty report
Impotencies that so unseasonably surprise the lover
Let it be permitted to the timid to hope
Light griefs can speak: deep sorrows are dumb
Look, you who think the gods have no care of human things
Nature of judgment to have it more deliberate and more slow
Nature of wit is to have its operation prompt and sudden
Nor have other tie upon one another, but by our word
Old men who retain the memory of things past
Pity is reputed a vice amongst the Stoics
Rather complain of ill-fortune than be ashamed of victory
Reverse of truth has a hundred thousand forms
Say of some compositions that they stink of oil and of the lamp
Solon, that none can be said to be happy until he is dead
Strong memory is commonly coupled with infirm judgment
Stumble upon a truth amongst an infinite number of lies
Suffer those inconveniences which are not possibly to be avoided
Superstitiously to seek out in the stars the ancient causes
Their pictures are not here who were cast away
Things I say are better than those I write
We are masters of nothing but the will
We cannot be bound beyond what we are able to perform
Where the lion’s skin is too short
ESSAYS OF MICHEL DE MONTAIGNE
Translated by Charles Cotton
Edited by William Carew Hazlitt
1877
CONTENTS OF VOLUME 3.
XIII. The ceremony of the interview of princes.
XIV. That men are justly punished for being obstinate in the defence
of a fort that is not in reason to be defended
XV. Of the punishment of cowardice.
XVI. A proceeding of some ambassadors.
XVII. Of fear.
XVIII. That men are not to judge of our happiness till after death.
XIX. That to study philosophy is to learn to die.
XX. Of the force of imagination.
XXI. That the profit of one man is the damage of another.
Master this chapter. Complete your experience
Purchase the complete book to access all chapters and support classic literature
As an Amazon Associate, we earn a small commission from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.
Available in paperback, hardcover, and e-book formats
Let's Analyse the Pattern
True strength lies in knowing when to stand firm and when to bend, choosing tactics based on long-term success rather than short-term ego protection.
Why This Matters
Connect literature to life
This chapter teaches how to separate emotional impulses from strategic thinking, showing when to stand firm versus when to adapt.
Practice This Today
This week, notice when your first instinct is to dig in your heels—ask yourself if this battle serves your long-term interests or just your immediate ego.
Now let's explore the literary elements.
Key Quotes & Analysis
"The law of resolution and constancy does not imply that we ought not, as much as in us lies, to decline and secure ourselves from the mischiefs and inconveniences that threaten us"
Context: Montaigne opens by challenging the common belief that true strength means never avoiding danger
This quote reframes courage from blind stubbornness to intelligent self-protection. Montaigne argues that real strength includes knowing when to step back and protect yourself from preventable harm.
In Today's Words:
Being strong doesn't mean you have to take every hit - smart people avoid problems they can avoid
"Several very warlike nations have made use of a retreating and flying way of fight as a thing of singular advantage, and have made their backs more dangerous to their enemies than their faces"
Context: Montaigne provides historical examples of successful military retreats
This challenges the idea that retreat equals weakness by showing how strategic withdrawal can be more effective than direct confrontation. It validates tactical thinking over macho posturing.
In Today's Words:
Some of the toughest fighters win by backing up at the right time - sometimes running away is the smartest move
"What! would it, then, be a reputed cowardice to overcome them by giving ground?"
Context: Socrates questions Laches' rigid definition of courage in Plato's dialogue
This rhetorical question exposes the flaw in thinking that courage always looks the same. It suggests that winning through strategic retreat shows more wisdom than losing through stubborn resistance.
In Today's Words:
Wait - you're calling it cowardice to win by stepping back? That doesn't make sense
Thematic Threads
Social Expectations
In This Chapter
Montaigne challenges society's rigid definition of courage as never backing down or showing fear
Development
Building on earlier themes of questioning conventional wisdom about how people should behave
In Your Life:
You might feel pressure to appear strong in situations where admitting uncertainty would actually be wiser
Personal Growth
In This Chapter
Growth comes from learning to separate natural human responses from character flaws
Development
Continues Montaigne's theme of self-acceptance while still striving for improvement
In Your Life:
You can acknowledge your fears and limitations without seeing them as personal failures
Identity
In This Chapter
Montaigne shows how true identity remains constant even when tactics change
Development
Deepens earlier exploration of authentic self versus social performance
In Your Life:
You can adapt your approach to different situations without compromising who you are
Human Relationships
In This Chapter
Strategic retreat and flexibility strengthen rather than weaken relationships
Development
Introduced here as counterpoint to rigid social expectations
In Your Life:
Your relationships might improve when you choose cooperation over always being right
You now have the context. Time to form your own thoughts.
Discussion Questions
- 1
What examples does Montaigne give of situations where backing down or retreating actually led to victory?
analysis • surface - 2
Why does Montaigne think there's a difference between having a natural fear response and being a coward?
analysis • medium - 3
Think about your workplace or family situations. Where do you see people confusing stubbornness with strength?
application • medium - 4
Describe a time when you had to choose between standing your ground and stepping back strategically. How did you decide, and what happened?
application • deep - 5
What does Montaigne's view of courage teach us about the difference between our automatic reactions and our conscious choices?
reflection • deep
Critical Thinking Exercise
Map Your Battle Choices
Think of three current conflicts or challenges in your life - at work, home, or in relationships. For each one, write down whether you're currently approaching it with rigid resistance or strategic flexibility. Then identify what you're really trying to protect or achieve in each situation.
Consider:
- •Ask yourself: Is this about my ego or my actual interests?
- •Consider: What would stepping back strategically look like here?
- •Evaluate: Which battles are worth fighting and which are distractions?
Journaling Prompt
Write about a time when you stayed rigid in a situation where flexibility would have served you better. What were you afraid would happen if you bent? Looking back, what would you do differently now?
Coming Up Next...
Chapter 13: The Art of Social Protocol
Next, Montaigne turns to the elaborate rituals of power, examining how princes and dignitaries perform their authority through ceremony. He'll reveal what these formal dances of status really accomplish—and what they cost the performers.




