An excerpt from the original text.(complete · 989 words)
OF QUICK OR SLOW SPEECH
“Onc ne furent a touts toutes graces donnees.”
[“All graces were never yet given to any one man.”--A verse
in one of La Brebis’ Sonnets.]
So we see in the gift of eloquence, wherein some have such a facility and
promptness, and that which we call a present wit so easy, that they are
ever ready upon all occasions, and never to be surprised; and others more
heavy and slow, never venture to utter anything but what they have long
premeditated, and taken great care and pains to fit and prepare.
Now, as we teach young ladies those sports and exercises which are most
proper to set out the grace and beauty of those parts wherein their
chiefest ornament and perfection lie, so it should be in these two
advantages of eloquence, to which the lawyers and preachers of our age
seem principally to pretend. If I were worthy to advise, the slow
speaker, methinks, should be more proper for the pulpit, and the other
for the bar: and that because the employment of the first does naturally
allow him all the leisure he can desire to prepare himself, and besides,
his career is performed in an even and unintermitted line, without stop
or interruption; whereas the pleader’s business and interest compels him
to enter the lists upon all occasions, and the unexpected objections and
replies of his adverse party jostle him out of his course, and put him,
upon the instant, to pump for new and extempore answers and defences.
Yet, at the interview betwixt Pope Clement and King Francis at
Marseilles, it happened, quite contrary, that Monsieur Poyet, a man bred
up all his life at the bar, and in the highest repute for eloquence,
having the charge of making the harangue to the Pope committed to him,
and having so long meditated on it beforehand, as, so they said, to have
brought it ready made along with him from Paris; the very day it was to
have been pronounced, the Pope, fearing something might be said that
might give offence to the other princes’ ambassadors who were there
attending on him, sent to acquaint the King with the argument which he
conceived most suiting to the time and place, but, by chance, quite
another thing to that Monsieur de Poyet had taken so much pains about: so
that the fine speech he had prepared was of no use, and he was upon the
instant to contrive another; which finding himself unable to do, Cardinal
du Bellay was constrained to perform that office. The pleader’s part is,
doubtless, much harder than that of the preacher; and yet, in my opinion,
we see more passable lawyers than preachers, at all events in France.
It should seem that the nature of wit is to have its operation prompt and
sudden, and that of judgment to have it more deliberate and more slow.
But he who remains totally silent, for want of leisure to prepare himself
to speak well, and he also whom leisure does noways benefit to better
speaking, are equally unhappy.
‘Tis said of Severus Cassius that he spoke best extempore, that he stood
more obliged to fortune than to his own diligence; that it was an
advantage to him to be interrupted in speaking, and that his adversaries
were afraid to nettle him, lest his anger should redouble his eloquence.
I know, experimentally, the disposition of nature so impatient of tedious
and elaborate premeditation, that if it do not go frankly and gaily to
work, it can perform nothing to purpose. We say of some compositions
that they stink of oil and of the lamp, by reason of a certain rough
harshness that laborious handling imprints upon those where it has been
employed. But besides this, the solicitude of doing well, and a certain
striving and contending of a mind too far strained and overbent upon its
undertaking, breaks and hinders itself like water, that by force of its
own pressing violence and abundance, cannot find a ready issue through
the neck of a bottle or a narrow sluice. In this condition of nature,
of which I am now speaking, there is this also, that it would not be
disordered and stimulated with such passions as the fury of Cassius (for
such a motion would be too violent and rude); it would not be jostled,
but solicited; it would be roused and heated by unexpected, sudden, and
accidental occasions. If it be left to itself, it flags and languishes;
agitation only gives it grace and vigour. I am always worst in my own
possession, and when wholly at my own disposition: accident has more
title to anything that comes from me than I; occasion, company, and even
the very rising and falling of my own voice, extract more from my fancy
than I can find, when I sound and employ it by myself. By which means,
the things I say are better than those I write, if either were to be
preferred, where neither is worth anything. This, also, befalls me, that
I do not find myself where I seek myself, and I light upon things more by
chance than by any inquisition of my own judgment. I perhaps sometimes
hit upon something when I write, that seems quaint and sprightly to me,
though it will appear dull and heavy to another.--But let us leave these
fine compliments; every one talks thus of himself according to his
talent. But when I come to speak, I am already so lost that I know not
what I was about to say, and in such cases a stranger often finds it out
before me. If I should make erasure so often as this inconvenience
befalls me, I should make clean work; occasion will, at some other time,
lay it as visible to me as the light, and make me wonder what I should
stick at.
Master this chapter. Complete your experience
Purchase the complete book to access all chapters and support classic literature
As an Amazon Associate, we earn a small commission from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.
Available in paperback, hardcover, and e-book formats
Let's Analyse the Pattern
Trying too hard to control how we communicate actually blocks our natural abilities and authentic expression.
Why This Matters
Connect literature to life
This chapter teaches how to identify whether you're a preparer or a spontaneous responder, and how to protect that authentic style under pressure.
Practice This Today
This week, notice when you communicate most effectively—is it in planned conversations or unexpected moments?—then start asking for the conditions you need instead of forcing yourself into uncomfortable communication styles.
Now let's explore the literary elements.
Key Quotes & Analysis
"All graces were never yet given to any one man"
Context: Opening the essay to establish that everyone has different strengths
This sets up Montaigne's main point that there's no single 'right' way to communicate well. Some people are quick speakers, others are careful preparers, and both have value. It's about recognizing and working with your natural abilities rather than fighting against them.
In Today's Words:
Nobody's perfect at everything - we all have our own strengths.
"The slow speaker, methinks, should be more proper for the pulpit, and the other for the bar"
Context: Montaigne suggesting that different communication styles suit different professions
This shows his practical wisdom about matching your natural abilities to the right environment. He's not saying one style is better than another - he's saying context matters. Understanding this can help people find where they naturally excel.
In Today's Words:
Put people where their communication style works best - don't force a square peg into a round hole.
"I am better at second-hand than at first-hand"
Context: Montaigne reflecting on how he speaks better when responding to others than when initiating conversation
This honest self-assessment reveals something many people experience but rarely admit - that we often perform better when we're reacting to others rather than trying to start from scratch. It shows the value of knowing how you work best.
In Today's Words:
I'm better at bouncing ideas off people than coming up with stuff on my own.
Thematic Threads
Authenticity
In This Chapter
Montaigne argues that forced eloquence blocks natural expression, while genuine interaction reveals our best thoughts
Development
Introduced here as core theme
In Your Life:
You might notice you give better advice to friends in casual conversations than in formal settings where you're trying to sound wise.
Class
In This Chapter
The pressure to perform for authority figures (like the Pope) can destroy even expert competence
Development
Builds on earlier explorations of social hierarchy
In Your Life:
You might find yourself tongue-tied around bosses or doctors but articulate with peers at your level.
Self-Knowledge
In This Chapter
Montaigne honestly examines his own communication patterns, noting when he succeeds and fails
Development
Continues his pattern of unflinching self-examination
In Your Life:
You might discover you think more clearly while walking or talking than sitting quietly trying to 'think hard.'
Social Expectations
In This Chapter
The expectation to be instantly eloquent in all situations ignores natural human variation in communication styles
Development
Expands on how social pressure distorts natural behavior
In Your Life:
You might feel pressure to be equally articulate in texts, emails, and face-to-face conversations when each requires different skills.
Human Relationships
In This Chapter
Our best insights often emerge through genuine interaction with others rather than solitary preparation
Development
Introduces the idea that thinking is collaborative
In Your Life:
You might find you solve problems better by talking them through with someone than by sitting alone trying to figure them out.
You now have the context. Time to form your own thoughts.
Discussion Questions
- 1
What happened to Monsieur Poyet when he tried to abandon his prepared speech style for the Pope?
analysis • surface - 2
Why does Montaigne compare overthinking to water under too much pressure trying to flow through a narrow opening?
analysis • medium - 3
Where do you see people today getting stuck because they're trying too hard to perform instead of being authentic?
application • medium - 4
How would you help someone recognize when they're overthinking themselves into poor performance?
application • deep - 5
What does this chapter reveal about the relationship between preparation and spontaneity in human communication?
reflection • deep
Critical Thinking Exercise
Map Your Communication Patterns
Think of three recent conversations where you felt either really confident or completely tongue-tied. For each situation, write down what was happening around you, how much you had prepared, and whether you were trying to impress someone. Look for patterns in when you communicate naturally versus when you get stuck.
Consider:
- •Notice whether you perform better with preparation time or spontaneous responses
- •Pay attention to who was present - some people bring out your authentic voice, others make you perform
- •Consider whether the stakes felt high or low, and how that affected your communication
Journaling Prompt
Write about a time when you surprised yourself by saying exactly the right thing without planning it. What was different about that moment compared to times when you rehearsed but still felt awkward?
Coming Up Next...
Chapter 11: When Fortune Tellers Fail
Next, Montaigne turns his attention to those who claim to predict the future, examining whether there's any truth to prognostications and what our fascination with fortune-telling reveals about human nature.




