Summary
Smith traces how medieval cities transformed from collections of essentially enslaved craftsmen into independent economic powerhouses. After Rome's fall, landowners retreated to fortified castles while towns became home to traders and artisans who were little better than serfs—they couldn't even marry their daughters without their lord's permission or pass property to their children. But these townspeople discovered something powerful: collective action. By banding together to pay taxes as a group rather than individually, they gained leverage with kings who needed reliable revenue. Smart rulers realized that prosperous, independent cities were valuable allies against rebellious nobles who threatened royal authority. The king's enemies became the merchants' enemies too, creating a natural partnership. Cities negotiated for self-governance, built walls for protection, and established their own courts and militias. This security allowed commerce to flourish in ways impossible in the lawless countryside, where any accumulated wealth would be stolen. Towns near rivers or coasts could trade globally, importing luxuries that local nobles craved and gradually introducing manufacturing. Some cities grew so powerful they became independent republics, forcing rural nobles to abandon their castles and live as ordinary citizens. Meanwhile, agricultural regions remained trapped in subsistence living because violence made investment pointless. This chapter reveals how economic freedom isn't just about individual rights—it requires institutional frameworks that protect property, enable cooperation, and create incentives for productive work rather than predatory extraction.
Coming Up in Chapter 20
Smith now examines the flip side of this urban revolution: how the wealth and trade of these newly independent cities began transforming the very countryside that had once oppressed them, creating the economic foundations of the modern world.
Share it with friends
An excerpt from the original text.(~500 words)
OF THE RISE AND PROGRESS OF CITIES AND TOWNS, AFTER THE FALL OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE. The inhabitants of cities and towns were, after the fall of the Roman empire, not more favoured than those of the country. They consisted, indeed, of a very different order of people from the first inhabitants of the ancient republics of Greece and Italy. These last were composed chiefly of the proprietors of lands, among whom the public territory was originally divided, and who found it convenient to build their houses in the neighbourhood of one another, and to surround them with a wall, for the sake of common defence. After the fall of the Roman empire, on the contrary, the proprietors of land seem generally to have lived in fortified castles on their own estates, and in the midst of their own tenants and dependants. The towns were chiefly inhabited by tradesmen and mechanics, who seem, in those days, to have been of servile, or very nearly of servile condition. The privileges which we find granted by ancient charters to the inhabitants of some of the principal towns in Europe, sufficiently show what they were before those grants. The people to whom it is granted as a privilege, that they might give away their own daughters in marriage without the consent of their lord, that upon their death their own children, and not their lord, should succeed to their goods, and that they might dispose of their own effects by will, must, before those grants, have been either altogether, or very nearly, in the same state of villanage with the occupiers of land in the country. They seem, indeed, to have been a very poor, mean set of people, who seemed to travel about with their goods from place to place, and from fair to fair, like the hawkers and pedlars of the present times. In all the different countries of Europe then, in the same manner as in several of the Tartar governments of Asia at present, taxes used to be levied upon the persons and goods of travellers, when they passed through certain manors, when they went over certain bridges, when they carried about their goods from place to place in a fair, when they erected in it a booth or stall to sell them in. These different taxes were known in England by the names of passage, pontage, lastage, and stallage. Sometimes the king, sometimes a great lord, who had, it seems, upon some occasions, authority to do this, would grant to particular traders, to such particularly as lived in their own demesnes, a general exemption from such taxes. Such traders, though in other respects of servile, or very nearly of servile condition, were upon this account called free traders. They, in return, usually paid to their protector a sort of annual poll-tax. In those days protection was seldom granted without a valuable consideration, and this tax might perhaps be considered as compensation for what their patrons might lose by...
Master this chapter. Complete your experience
Purchase the complete book to access all chapters and support classic literature
As an Amazon Associate, we earn a small commission from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.
Available in paperback, hardcover, and e-book formats
Intelligence Amplifier™ Analysis
The Road of Collective Leverage - How the Powerless Gain Power
Isolated individuals remain powerless, but organized groups sharing common interests can negotiate from positions of strength by offering collective value that's difficult to replace.
Why This Matters
Connect literature to life
This chapter teaches how to identify when you have more leverage than you realize by recognizing your collective value to those in authority.
Practice This Today
This week, notice when individual complaints get dismissed but group concerns suddenly get attention, and look for others who share your workplace frustrations.
Now let's explore the literary elements.
Terms to Know
Servile condition
A legal status where people weren't quite slaves but had no real freedom - they couldn't marry, inherit property, or move without their lord's permission. Medieval craftsmen and traders lived under these restrictions despite having valuable skills.
Modern Usage:
We see this in exploitative employment contracts where workers can't quit, compete, or negotiate - like non-compete clauses that trap people in bad jobs.
Ancient charters
Legal documents where kings granted basic human rights to townspeople as special privileges - like the right to marry who you want or pass property to your children. These weren't natural rights but had to be negotiated and paid for.
Modern Usage:
Similar to how workers today have to fight for basic benefits like healthcare or family leave that should be standard.
Collective bargaining
Medieval towns discovered they had more power negotiating as a group than as individuals. By pooling their tax payments and presenting united demands, they could make deals with kings who needed reliable revenue.
Modern Usage:
This is exactly how labor unions work today - individual workers have little power, but together they can negotiate better wages and conditions.
Fortified castles
After Rome fell, wealthy landowners built defensive strongholds on their estates and lived surrounded by armed dependents. This isolated them from trade and commerce but provided security in a lawless world.
Modern Usage:
Like gated communities today - wealthy people isolating themselves for security but missing out on the economic opportunities of diverse, connected neighborhoods.
Municipal independence
Cities that gained the right to govern themselves, make their own laws, and defend their own interests rather than being controlled by rural nobles. This self-governance was essential for commerce to flourish.
Modern Usage:
Similar to how local governments today can set their own business regulations and tax policies to attract investment and economic development.
Commercial security
The protection of property and trade that allowed merchants to accumulate wealth without fear of theft or arbitrary seizure. Cities provided this through walls, guards, and legal systems that rural areas lacked.
Modern Usage:
Like having reliable banking, insurance, and legal systems today - you need to trust that your investments and savings are protected before you'll take economic risks.
Characters in This Chapter
Medieval townspeople
Collective protagonists
Craftsmen and traders who started as essentially serfs but discovered the power of organizing together. They negotiated with kings for basic rights and gradually built independent, prosperous cities through collective action.
Modern Equivalent:
Workers forming unions or small business owners banding together to negotiate with big corporations
Feudal lords
Antagonists
Rural nobles who controlled the countryside through force and tried to keep townspeople in servile conditions. Their power declined as cities became independent and economically important to kings.
Modern Equivalent:
Old-school bosses who resist worker organizing and try to keep employees dependent and powerless
Kings and sovereigns
Strategic allies
Rulers who needed reliable tax revenue and found that prosperous, independent cities were better allies than rebellious nobles. They granted city charters in exchange for political and financial support.
Modern Equivalent:
Politicians who support small business and worker rights because they need those votes and tax revenues
Ancient proprietors
Historical contrast
The original landowners of Greek and Roman cities who built towns for mutual defense while remaining essentially equal citizens. Smith contrasts them with medieval serfs to show how far urban dwellers had fallen.
Modern Equivalent:
Small town business owners who are invested in their community rather than outside corporate interests
Key Quotes & Analysis
"The people to whom it is granted as a privilege, that they might give away their own daughters in marriage without the consent of their lord, that upon their death their own children, and not their lord, should succeed to their goods"
Context: Smith describes the basic human rights that medieval townspeople had to negotiate for as special privileges
This shows how completely powerless these skilled workers were - they couldn't even control their own families or property. What we consider basic human rights had to be bought and negotiated for.
In Today's Words:
Imagine having to get your boss's permission to let your daughter marry who she wants, or having your boss inherit your house when you die instead of your kids
"The towns were chiefly inhabited by tradesmen and mechanics, who seem, in those days, to have been of servile, or very nearly of servile condition"
Context: Smith explains the low social status of urban craftsmen after Rome's fall
Despite having valuable skills, these workers had almost no legal rights or social standing. Their expertise didn't translate to freedom or respect in the feudal system.
In Today's Words:
The people who actually made things and provided services were treated like they barely owned themselves
"The proprietors of land seem generally to have lived in fortified castles on their own estates, and in the midst of their own tenants and dependants"
Context: Contrasting medieval landowners with ancient city-builders
This isolation of the wealthy from commerce and trade networks ultimately weakened their economic position compared to the connected, cooperative cities.
In Today's Words:
The rich people locked themselves away in their private compounds with their employees, cutting themselves off from where the real business was happening
Thematic Threads
Class
In This Chapter
Medieval craftsmen transform from essentially enslaved workers to independent citizens through collective organization
Development
Builds on earlier themes of class mobility, showing how economic organization can overcome birth status
In Your Life:
Your job title matters less than your ability to organize with others who share your interests
Security
In This Chapter
Cities build walls, courts, and militias to protect commerce and accumulated wealth from predators
Development
Extends security themes to show how institutional frameworks enable economic growth
In Your Life:
Your financial progress depends on systems that protect your investments and savings from being stolen or lost
Cooperation
In This Chapter
Merchants band together for collective tax payment, creating leverage with kings who need reliable revenue
Development
Introduced here as foundation for economic power
In Your Life:
Working with others who share your goals multiplies your individual power in ways that benefit everyone
Innovation
In This Chapter
Secure cities develop manufacturing and global trade while rural areas remain trapped in subsistence
Development
Shows how security enables innovation and risk-taking
In Your Life:
You can only invest in your future when you're not constantly worried about immediate survival
Power
In This Chapter
Cities grow so powerful they force rural nobles to abandon castles and live as ordinary citizens
Development
Demonstrates how economic power can overcome traditional authority
In Your Life:
Economic independence gives you choices that traditional authority figures can't control
You now have the context. Time to form your own thoughts.
Discussion Questions
- 1
How did medieval craftsmen transform from powerless individuals into influential city dwellers who could negotiate with kings?
analysis • surface - 2
Why did kings find it advantageous to grant independence to cities rather than keep tight control over individual craftsmen?
analysis • medium - 3
Where do you see this same pattern of collective bargaining creating power that individuals lack in your workplace, community, or family life?
application • medium - 4
If you were facing a situation where you felt powerless as an individual, how would you identify potential allies and build collective leverage?
application • deep - 5
What does this chapter reveal about the relationship between security, cooperation, and prosperity in any community?
reflection • deep
Critical Thinking Exercise
Map Your Power Networks
Think of a current situation where you feel you have little individual influence - at work, in your community, or dealing with an institution. Draw a simple map showing who else might share your concerns or interests. Identify what value your potential group could offer that the other party needs or wants.
Consider:
- •Look for people with the same problem, not just people you like
- •Consider what the other party gains from the current situation and what they might lose
- •Think about timing - when would your collective voice have the most impact
Journaling Prompt
Write about a time when you felt powerless in a situation. How might the outcome have been different if you had organized with others who shared your concerns?
Coming Up Next...
Chapter 20: How Cities Transformed the Countryside
In the next chapter, you'll discover economic hubs create prosperity beyond their borders, and learn merchants make better improvers than traditional landowners. These insights reveal timeless patterns that resonate in our own lives and relationships.