Summary
At Anna Pávlovna's salon, the conversation turns heated when Pierre defends Napoleon Bonaparte while everyone else condemns him. The guests are horrified by Napoleon's recent coronation and his execution of the Duke d'Enghien, but Pierre argues that Napoleon was justified—that he saved France from chaos and preserved the good parts of the Revolution. His passionate defense makes everyone uncomfortable, especially when he calls the Revolution 'a grand thing.' Anna Pávlovna desperately tries to redirect the conversation, while the other guests attack Pierre's position. Prince Andrew offers some balance by suggesting they should judge Napoleon differently as a man versus as a ruler, but the damage is done. Finally, Prince Hippolyte tells a rambling, pointless story about a Moscow lady and her maid to break the tension. This chapter reveals how political beliefs can isolate us socially and shows Pierre as someone who speaks his mind regardless of consequences. It also demonstrates the power dynamics of salon society, where certain opinions are simply not acceptable, no matter how sincerely held. The scene captures a universal experience: being the only person in the room with an unpopular opinion and watching others unite against you.
Coming Up in Chapter 6
The social awkwardness lingers as the evening continues, but new conversations and characters will soon shift the focus away from Pierre's controversial outburst.
Share it with friends
An excerpt from the original text.(~500 words)
A“nd what do you think of this latest comedy, the coronation at Milan?” asked Anna Pávlovna, “and of the comedy of the people of Genoa and Lucca laying their petitions before Monsieur Buonaparte, and Monsieur Buonaparte sitting on a throne and granting the petitions of the nations? Adorable! It is enough to make one’s head whirl! It is as if the whole world had gone crazy.” Prince Andrew looked Anna Pávlovna straight in the face with a sarcastic smile. “‘Dieu me la donne, gare à qui la touche!’’ * They say he was very fine when he said that,” he remarked, repeating the words in Italian: “‘Dio mi l’ha dato. Guai a chi la tocchi!’’ * God has given it to me, let him who touches it beware! “I hope this will prove the last drop that will make the glass run over,” Anna Pávlovna continued. “The sovereigns will not be able to endure this man who is a menace to everything.” “The sovereigns? I do not speak of Russia,” said the vicomte, polite but hopeless: “The sovereigns, madame... What have they done for Louis XVII, for the Queen, or for Madame Elizabeth? Nothing!” and he became more animated. “And believe me, they are reaping the reward of their betrayal of the Bourbon cause. The sovereigns! Why, they are sending ambassadors to compliment the usurper.” And sighing disdainfully, he again changed his position. Prince Hippolyte, who had been gazing at the vicomte for some time through his lorgnette, suddenly turned completely round toward the little princess, and having asked for a needle began tracing the Condé coat of arms on the table. He explained this to her with as much gravity as if she had asked him to do it. “Bâton de gueules, engrêlé de gueules d’azur—maison Condé,” said he. The princess listened, smiling. “If Buonaparte remains on the throne of France a year longer,” the vicomte continued, with the air of a man who, in a matter with which he is better acquainted than anyone else, does not listen to others but follows the current of his own thoughts, “things will have gone too far. By intrigues, violence, exile, and executions, French society—I mean good French society—will have been forever destroyed, and then....” He shrugged his shoulders and spread out his hands. Pierre wished to make a remark, for the conversation interested him, but Anna Pávlovna, who had him under observation, interrupted: “The Emperor Alexander,” said she, with the melancholy which always accompanied any reference of hers to the Imperial family, “has declared that he will leave it to the French people themselves to choose their own form of government; and I believe that once free from the usurper, the whole nation will certainly throw itself into the arms of its rightful king,” she concluded, trying to be amiable to the royalist emigrant. “That is doubtful,” said Prince Andrew. “Monsieur le Vicomte quite rightly supposes that matters have already gone too far. I think it will be difficult to...
Master this chapter. Complete your experience
Purchase the complete book to access all chapters and support classic literature
As an Amazon Associate, we earn a small commission from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.
Available in paperback, hardcover, and e-book formats
Intelligence Amplifier™ Analysis
The Road of Unpopular Truth
Groups punish members who voice uncomfortable truths that threaten the group's comfortable consensus.
Why This Matters
Connect literature to life
This chapter teaches how to detect when a group has created invisible limits around acceptable opinions and the cost of crossing those lines.
Practice This Today
This week, notice when conversations have unspoken rules about what can and cannot be said—then decide consciously whether challenging those boundaries is worth the social cost.
Now let's explore the literary elements.
Terms to Know
Salon society
Elite social gatherings where wealthy people discussed politics, art, and ideas. These weren't just parties - they were where important opinions were formed and social connections made. Having the 'wrong' opinion could destroy your reputation.
Modern Usage:
Like exclusive networking events or high-end book clubs where certain views are expected and going against the grain can cost you professionally.
Napoleon's coronation
Napoleon crowned himself Emperor of France in 1804, shocking European royalty who saw him as an upstart commoner. He later crowned himself King of Italy, which is what Anna Pavlovna calls a 'comedy' - she's outraged by his audacity.
Modern Usage:
When someone from humble beginnings rises to power and the establishment can't accept their legitimacy, like attacking a politician's working-class background.
Political isolation
When your beliefs make you an outsider in your social group. Pierre experiences this when he defends Napoleon while everyone else condemns him. His honesty costs him social comfort.
Modern Usage:
Being the only person at Thanksgiving dinner defending an unpopular political position and watching the whole table turn against you.
The French Revolution
The violent overthrow of the French monarchy (1789-1799) that terrified other European rulers. To aristocrats like Anna Pavlovna's guests, it represents chaos and the dangerous idea that common people can challenge authority.
Modern Usage:
Any major social movement that threatens existing power structures, like civil rights movements that make establishment figures uncomfortable.
Social deflection
When someone deliberately changes the subject to avoid uncomfortable topics. Prince Hippolyte tells his pointless story to break the tension after Pierre's controversial statements.
Modern Usage:
When someone starts talking about the weather or sports after an awkward political argument at work.
Duke d'Enghien execution
Napoleon had this French royal executed in 1804, which shocked European aristocracy. It proved Napoleon would kill nobility without hesitation, making him seem like a dangerous revolutionary.
Modern Usage:
A controversial action by a leader that their opponents use as proof of their dangerous character, like a political scandal that defines how people view someone.
Characters in This Chapter
Pierre
Social outsider
Defends Napoleon passionately while everyone else condemns him. His sincere beliefs make him socially awkward and isolated. He speaks his truth regardless of consequences, showing both integrity and poor social skills.
Modern Equivalent:
The coworker who brings up controversial topics at company parties
Anna Pavlovna
Social hostess/controller
Tries desperately to manage the conversation and maintain social harmony. She's horrified by Pierre's defense of Napoleon and works to redirect the discussion away from dangerous topics.
Modern Equivalent:
The friend who always tries to keep group conversations 'light' and gets stressed when anyone mentions politics
Prince Andrew
Voice of reason
Offers a more balanced view by suggesting they judge Napoleon as a man versus as a ruler. He tries to find middle ground in the heated discussion, showing diplomatic skills.
Modern Equivalent:
The person who says 'I can see both sides' during heated arguments
The vicomte
Political critic
Attacks other European rulers for not doing enough to stop Napoleon. He's passionate about royalist causes and becomes animated when discussing political betrayals.
Modern Equivalent:
The political pundit who's always outraged about compromise and demands ideological purity
Prince Hippolyte
Tension breaker
Tells a rambling, pointless story about a Moscow lady to break the uncomfortable silence after the political argument. His story serves no purpose except social deflection.
Modern Equivalent:
The person who tells random stories or jokes when conversations get too serious
Key Quotes & Analysis
"Dieu me la donne, gare à qui la touche!"
Context: Repeating Napoleon's words about his crown
This French phrase means 'God gives it to me, beware who touches it!' It shows Napoleon's defiant attitude toward his critics and his belief that his power is divinely sanctioned, which both impresses and horrifies the aristocrats.
In Today's Words:
God gave me this position, so don't even think about messing with me!
"The Revolution was a grand thing!"
Context: During his passionate defense of Napoleon
This statement shocks the aristocratic gathering because it praises the very movement that destroyed their class's power. Pierre's enthusiasm for revolutionary ideals reveals his idealistic nature and political naivety.
In Today's Words:
That whole movement was actually amazing and necessary!
"What have they done for Louis XVII, for the Queen, or for Madame Elizabeth? Nothing!"
Context: Criticizing European rulers for not helping French royalty
The vicomte is frustrated that other monarchs didn't do more to save the French royal family during the Revolution. This shows how the aristocracy felt abandoned by their own class during times of crisis.
In Today's Words:
They completely abandoned their own people when they needed help most!
Thematic Threads
Social Conformity
In This Chapter
The salon guests unite against Pierre's defense of Napoleon, prioritizing group harmony over honest debate
Development
Building from earlier chapters showing how aristocratic society enforces acceptable behavior
In Your Life:
You might see this when your workplace punishes honest feedback or your family shuts down uncomfortable conversations
Intellectual Courage
In This Chapter
Pierre stands alone defending his unpopular views about Napoleon despite social pressure
Development
Introduced here as Pierre's defining characteristic
In Your Life:
You face this choice whenever you must decide between speaking truth and keeping peace
Class Expectations
In This Chapter
Anna Pavlovna desperately tries to control the conversation to maintain proper salon decorum
Development
Continues the theme of aristocratic social rules governing behavior
In Your Life:
You might experience this in professional settings where certain topics are simply 'not discussed'
Political Polarization
In This Chapter
The guests cannot tolerate any nuanced view of Napoleon—he must be completely evil
Development
Introduced here showing how political beliefs divide social groups
In Your Life:
You see this in how families and friendships fracture over political disagreements today
Identity Formation
In This Chapter
Pierre's willingness to be disliked for his beliefs reveals his emerging sense of self
Development
Building from his earlier awkwardness into genuine conviction
In Your Life:
You face this when deciding whether to adapt your personality to fit in or stay true to your values
You now have the context. Time to form your own thoughts.
Discussion Questions
- 1
Why does everyone at the salon turn against Pierre when he defends Napoleon?
analysis • surface - 2
What does Anna Pavlovna's desperate attempt to change the subject tell us about how groups handle dissent?
analysis • medium - 3
Where have you seen this same pattern play out in your workplace, family, or social media?
application • medium - 4
When is it worth speaking an unpopular truth, and when should you stay quiet?
application • deep - 5
What does this scene reveal about the difference between being right and being accepted?
reflection • deep
Critical Thinking Exercise
Map Your Own Salon Moments
Think of a time when you voiced an unpopular opinion in a group setting. Write down what happened: What was the opinion? How did the group react? What was the social cost? Now analyze the pattern: Was the group protecting a belief, a person, or their own comfort? How could you have navigated it differently?
Consider:
- •Consider whether your unpopular opinion was actually true or just contrarian
- •Think about what the group was really defending beyond the surface disagreement
- •Reflect on whether the social cost was worth the principle you stood for
Journaling Prompt
Write about a current situation where you're holding back an unpopular truth. What's stopping you from speaking up? What would happen if you did? What would happen if you didn't?
Coming Up Next...
Chapter 6: The Awkward Exit and Hidden Motives
As the story unfolds, you'll explore social awkwardness can actually reveal authentic character, while uncovering people make career choices for the wrong reasons. These lessons connect the classic to contemporary challenges we all face.