Summary
Tolstoy ends his epic by tackling the biggest question of all: Are we truly free, or just following invisible laws like everything else in nature? He presents the central paradox of human existence—from the outside, science shows us we're controlled by forces beyond our control, but from the inside, we absolutely know we're free to choose. When you lift your hand right now, you feel that choice. When you decide to keep reading or put this book down, that feels like your decision. Tolstoy argues this isn't an illusion—it's the most real thing about being human. He criticizes those who think science has solved the mystery by explaining our brains and evolution. That's like plasterers who cover up the windows while fixing the walls—they're missing the whole point. The freedom we feel isn't something reason can explain away because consciousness operates on a different level than logic. This matters because without feeling free, we couldn't live. Every human drive—for wealth, love, power, or meaning—is really a drive for more freedom. Tolstoy suggests we don't need to solve this paradox to live with it. We can accept that we're both determined beings following natural laws AND free agents making real choices. The contradiction doesn't paralyze us—it defines us. This final philosophical meditation caps a novel that has shown us characters wrestling with fate and choice throughout history's greatest upheaval.
Share it with friends
An excerpt from the original text.(~500 words)
F history dealt only with external phenomena, the establishment of this simple and obvious law would suffice and we should have finished our argument. But the law of history relates to man. A particle of matter cannot tell us that it does not feel the law of attraction or repulsion and that that law is untrue, but man, who is the subject of history, says plainly: I am free and am therefore not subject to the law. The presence of the problem of man’s free will, though unexpressed, is felt at every step of history. All seriously thinking historians have involuntarily encountered this question. All the contradictions and obscurities of history and the false path historical science has followed are due solely to the lack of a solution of that question. If the will of every man were free, that is, if each man could act as he pleased, all history would be a series of disconnected incidents. If in a thousand years even one man in a million could act freely, that is, as he chose, it is evident that one single free act of that man’s in violation of the laws governing human action would destroy the possibility of the existence of any laws for the whole of humanity. If there be a single law governing the actions of men, free will cannot exist, for then man’s will is subject to that law. In this contradiction lies the problem of free will, which from most ancient times has occupied the best human minds and from most ancient times has been presented in its whole tremendous significance. The problem is that regarding man as a subject of observation from whatever point of view—theological, historical, ethical, or philosophic—we find a general law of necessity to which he (like all that exists) is subject. But regarding him from within ourselves as what we are conscious of, we feel ourselves to be free. This consciousness is a source of self-cognition quite apart from and independent of reason. Through his reason man observes himself, but only through consciousness does he know himself. Apart from consciousness of self no observation or application of reason is conceivable. To understand, observe, and draw conclusions, man must first of all be conscious of himself as living. A man is only conscious of himself as a living being by the fact that he wills, that is, is conscious of his volition. But his will—which forms the essence of his life—man recognizes (and can but recognize) as free. If, observing himself, man sees that his will is always directed by one and the same law (whether he observes the necessity of taking food, using his brain, or anything else) he cannot recognize this never-varying direction of his will otherwise than as a limitation of it. Were it not free it could not be limited. A man’s will seems to him to be limited just because he is not conscious of it except as free. You say: I am not...
Master this chapter. Complete your experience
Purchase the complete book to access all chapters and support classic literature
As an Amazon Associate, we earn a small commission from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.
Available in paperback, hardcover, and e-book formats
Intelligence Amplifier™ Analysis
The Road of Living the Paradox
The simultaneous experience of being both constrained by forces beyond our control and genuinely free to make meaningful choices.
Why This Matters
Connect literature to life
This chapter teaches how to hold contradictory truths simultaneously without needing to resolve them into false simplicity.
Practice This Today
This week, notice when you feel both trapped and free in the same situation—then ask what real choices exist within your actual constraints.
Now let's explore the literary elements.
Terms to Know
Free Will
The philosophical question of whether humans truly make independent choices or if everything we do is determined by forces beyond our control. Tolstoy presents this as the central paradox of human existence - we feel free from the inside but appear controlled from the outside.
Modern Usage:
This debate shows up in discussions about criminal justice, personal responsibility, and whether people can really change their lives.
Historical Determinism
The idea that historical events follow predictable laws and patterns, like objects in physics. Tolstoy argues that if historians want to find laws governing human behavior, they must grapple with the problem that humans believe they choose their actions.
Modern Usage:
We see this when economists try to predict market crashes or political scientists try to forecast election outcomes - human unpredictability always throws off the models.
Scientific Materialism
The belief that everything, including human consciousness and choice, can be explained through physical laws and brain chemistry. Tolstoy criticizes this view as missing the essential experience of being human.
Modern Usage:
This appears in debates about whether our personalities are just genetics and brain chemistry, or if there's something more to human consciousness.
Consciousness vs. Reason
Tolstoy distinguishes between our immediate awareness of being free (consciousness) and our logical attempts to understand that freedom (reason). He argues consciousness gives us direct access to truth that reasoning cannot reach.
Modern Usage:
This shows up when your gut feeling conflicts with logical analysis - sometimes you 'just know' something even when you can't explain why.
Paradox
A contradiction that seems impossible to resolve but reveals a deeper truth. For Tolstoy, the free will paradox isn't a problem to solve but a fundamental aspect of human existence we must accept.
Modern Usage:
We live with paradoxes daily - wanting security but craving adventure, needing independence but seeking connection.
Natural Laws
The scientific principles that govern how matter and energy behave, like gravity or thermodynamics. Tolstoy questions whether human actions can be reduced to these same types of predictable patterns.
Modern Usage:
This comes up in discussions about whether human behavior follows patterns like addiction cycles or economic trends.
Characters in This Chapter
Tolstoy (as narrator/philosopher)
Philosophical guide
Tolstoy steps forward as himself in this chapter to directly address the reader about the deepest questions raised by his entire novel. He's not telling a story here but sharing his hard-won wisdom about human nature.
Modern Equivalent:
The wise mentor who's lived through everything and wants to share the big picture lessons
Key Quotes & Analysis
"A particle of matter cannot tell us that it does not feel the law of attraction or repulsion and that that law is untrue, but man, who is the subject of history, says plainly: I am free and am therefore not subject to the law."
Context: Tolstoy is explaining why studying humans is different from studying physics
This captures the essential difference between humans and everything else in nature. Rocks don't argue with gravity, but humans insist they make real choices. Tolstoy suggests this isn't stubbornness but insight into something science misses.
In Today's Words:
A rock can't argue with gravity, but people will always insist they have real choices, and maybe they're right about something science doesn't understand.
"If the will of every man were free, that is, if each man could act as he pleased, all history would be a series of disconnected incidents."
Context: Tolstoy is exploring what would happen if humans were completely free
This shows Tolstoy working through the logical problem: complete freedom would mean chaos, but complete determinism would mean we're just sophisticated machines. He's looking for a middle path that preserves both human dignity and historical patterns.
In Today's Words:
If everyone could do absolutely whatever they wanted, history would just be random chaos with no patterns.
"In this contradiction lies the problem of free will, which from most ancient times has occupied the best human minds and from most ancient times has been presented in its whole tremendous significance."
Context: Tolstoy is acknowledging this is an ancient philosophical puzzle
Tolstoy places himself in conversation with thousands of years of human thought. He's not claiming to solve the mystery but to illuminate why it matters so much. The 'tremendous significance' suggests our humanity depends on grappling with this question.
In Today's Words:
This contradiction between feeling free and being controlled has puzzled the smartest people throughout history, and for good reason - it's huge.
Thematic Threads
Human Agency
In This Chapter
Tolstoy argues that human consciousness of freedom is irreducible and real, despite external determinism
Development
Culmination of the novel's exploration of how characters navigate fate versus choice throughout historical upheaval
In Your Life:
You experience this every time you feel both limited by circumstances and responsible for your choices
Philosophical Paradox
In This Chapter
The contradiction between scientific determinism and experienced freedom doesn't need resolution to be livable
Development
Final synthesis of the novel's questioning of historical forces versus individual will
In Your Life:
You face daily paradoxes that don't need solving—being independent yet needing others, planning while accepting uncertainty
Consciousness
In This Chapter
Tolstoy positions consciousness as operating on a different level than rational explanation
Development
Builds on characters' moments of insight throughout the novel that transcend logical analysis
In Your Life:
Your gut feelings and intuitive knowledge often matter more than what you can rationally explain
Human Drive
In This Chapter
All human desires—for wealth, love, power—are fundamentally drives for greater freedom
Development
Explains the motivations driving all characters throughout the epic's scope
In Your Life:
Your deepest wants usually stem from seeking more control over your life circumstances
Living with Mystery
In This Chapter
Tolstoy suggests we can live productively with unresolved fundamental questions about existence
Development
Final answer to the novel's persistent questioning of life's meaning and human purpose
In Your Life:
You can act decisively even when you don't understand everything about your situation
You now have the context. Time to form your own thoughts.
Discussion Questions
- 1
According to Tolstoy, what's the central contradiction of human existence that we all experience daily?
analysis • surface - 2
Why does Tolstoy argue that trying to solve the freedom vs. determinism debate scientifically misses the point entirely?
analysis • medium - 3
Think about your current job or main responsibility - where do you feel completely constrained by forces beyond your control, and where do you still experience real choice?
application • medium - 4
When someone feels stuck and says 'nothing I do matters,' what would Tolstoy suggest they're missing about their situation?
application • deep - 5
How might accepting both our limitations and our freedom simultaneously change how we approach major life decisions?
reflection • deep
Critical Thinking Exercise
Map Your Freedom Within Constraints
Choose one area of your life where you feel most trapped or limited - work, finances, family obligations, health, etc. Draw two columns: 'What I Cannot Control' and 'What I Can Still Choose.' Fill both sides honestly. Then circle the three most important choices you're actually making within those constraints.
Consider:
- •Don't minimize real constraints - financial pressure, health issues, and family needs are genuinely limiting
- •Don't overlook small choices - your attitude, timing, and response style are often more powerful than they appear
- •Look for choices you might be giving away unnecessarily - where are you acting constrained when you actually have options?
Journaling Prompt
Write about a time when you felt completely powerless but later realized you had been making choices all along. What did you learn about the difference between external constraints and internal freedom?