Summary
Tolstoy delivers a masterclass in human psychology during crisis. While we imagine everyone during Napoleon's invasion was consumed with patriotic fervor, the reality was messier and more human. Those who tried hardest to be heroes—organizing regiments, preparing supplies, making grand speeches—often did more harm than good. Meanwhile, ordinary people focused on their immediate concerns (like Nicholas worrying about pay and quarters) actually kept society functioning. Nicholas gets sent to buy horses in Voronezh, far from the coming battle, and he's genuinely relieved. Away from the army's chaos, he rediscovers simple pleasures: clean villages, flirtatious women, good wine, and social status. At the governor's party, he becomes the center of attention—a dashing hussar officer who represents everything romantic about the war, while an Italian prisoner serves as his living trophy. Nicholas flirts shamelessly with a married woman, oblivious to her husband's growing discomfort. Tolstoy shows us how people create their own bubbles of normalcy even during historical upheavals. The chapter reveals that authentic action often matters more than performed heroism, and that sometimes stepping back from the grand narrative allows us to see—and contribute to—what really needs doing. It's a profound meditation on how ordinary self-interest can serve the greater good better than conscious attempts at greatness.
Coming Up in Chapter 268
Nicholas's romantic adventures in Voronezh are about to take an unexpected turn. His carefree flirtation with provincial society will soon collide with deeper emotions and more serious consequences than he anticipated.
Share it with friends
An excerpt from the original text.(~500 words)
T is natural for us who were not living in those days to imagine that when half Russia had been conquered and the inhabitants were fleeing to distant provinces, and one levy after another was being raised for the defense of the fatherland, all Russians from the greatest to the least were solely engaged in sacrificing themselves, saving their fatherland, or weeping over its downfall. The tales and descriptions of that time without exception speak only of the self-sacrifice, patriotic devotion, despair, grief, and the heroism of the Russians. But it was not really so. It appears so to us because we see only the general historic interest of that time and do not see all the personal human interests that people had. Yet in reality those personal interests of the moment so much transcend the general interests that they always prevent the public interest from being felt or even noticed. Most of the people at that time paid no attention to the general progress of events but were guided only by their private interests, and they were the very people whose activities at that period were most useful. Those who tried to understand the general course of events and to take part in it by self-sacrifice and heroism were the most useless members of society, they saw everything upside down, and all they did for the common good turned out to be useless and foolish—like Pierre’s and Mamónov’s regiments which looted Russian villages, and the lint the young ladies prepared and that never reached the wounded, and so on. Even those, fond of intellectual talk and of expressing their feelings, who discussed Russia’s position at the time involuntarily introduced into their conversation either a shade of pretense and falsehood or useless condemnation and anger directed against people accused of actions no one could possibly be guilty of. In historic events the rule forbidding us to eat of the fruit of the Tree of Knowledge is specially applicable. Only unconscious action bears fruit, and he who plays a part in an historic event never understands its significance. If he tries to realize it his efforts are fruitless. The more closely a man was engaged in the events then taking place in Russia the less did he realize their significance. In Petersburg and in the provinces at a distance from Moscow, ladies, and gentlemen in militia uniforms, wept for Russia and its ancient capital and talked of self-sacrifice and so on; but in the army which retired beyond Moscow there was little talk or thought of Moscow, and when they caught sight of its burned ruins no one swore to be avenged on the French, but they thought about their next pay, their next quarters, of Matrëshka the vivandière, and like matters. As the war had caught him in the service, Nicholas Rostóv took a close and prolonged part in the defense of his country, but did so casually, without any aim at self-sacrifice, and he therefore looked at what was...
Master this chapter. Complete your experience
Purchase the complete book to access all chapters and support classic literature
As an Amazon Associate, we earn a small commission from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.
Available in paperback, hardcover, and e-book formats
Intelligence Amplifier™ Analysis
The Road of Performed vs. Authentic Action
Those who perform heroism loudest often contribute least, while practical focus on immediate needs creates genuine value.
Why This Matters
Connect literature to life
This chapter teaches how to distinguish between people who perform caring and those who actually contribute.
Practice This Today
This week, notice when someone's loudest advocacy corresponds with their smallest actual effort—then quietly focus on what genuinely needs doing.
Now let's explore the literary elements.
Terms to Know
Patriotic fervor
The intense emotional devotion to one's country during times of crisis, often involving grand gestures and public displays of loyalty. Tolstoy shows how this can become performative rather than genuinely helpful.
Modern Usage:
We see this during natural disasters when people rush to volunteer but sometimes create more chaos than help.
Self-sacrifice paradox
Tolstoy's observation that people who try hardest to be heroes often do the least good, while those focused on their own immediate needs actually serve society better. It's about authentic action versus performed virtue.
Modern Usage:
Like how the most helpful coworkers are often those just doing their jobs well, not the ones making grand speeches about teamwork.
Historical perspective
The way we view past events as more unified and purposeful than they actually were. People living through history don't see the big picture - they're just trying to get through their day.
Modern Usage:
We romanticize past decades as simpler times when people actually faced the same messy, confusing daily struggles we do.
Social bubble
The way people create pockets of normalcy and pleasure even during major crises. Nicholas finds parties and flirtation while Napoleon approaches Moscow.
Modern Usage:
How people still go to restaurants and post on social media during economic crashes or pandemics.
Hussar
Elite cavalry officers known for their flashy uniforms and romantic reputation. They were the glamorous face of the military, often more for show than serious fighting.
Modern Usage:
Like fighter pilots or special forces today - the military roles that capture public imagination and get the movies made about them.
Personal interests vs. public good
Tolstoy's insight that individual self-interest often serves society better than conscious attempts to serve the greater good. It's about natural function versus forced virtue.
Modern Usage:
How small business owners focused on their own success often create more jobs than politicians promising economic programs.
Characters in This Chapter
Nicholas Rostov
Young cavalry officer
Sent away from the front to buy horses, Nicholas is relieved to escape the war's chaos. At a governor's party, he becomes the center of attention and flirts shamelessly, showing how people seek normalcy during crisis.
Modern Equivalent:
The guy who gets transferred to a cushy assignment during layoffs and makes the most of it
Pierre Bezukhov
Well-meaning but ineffective nobleman
Mentioned as an example of someone whose attempts at heroism backfire. His regiment ends up looting Russian villages instead of helping defend them.
Modern Equivalent:
The wealthy volunteer who shows up at disasters with good intentions but no practical skills
The Italian prisoner
War trophy
Serves as Nicholas's living proof of military success at the party. Represents how people use others to enhance their own social status during times of crisis.
Modern Equivalent:
The person who brings their veteran friend to parties to seem more interesting
The governor's wife
Married woman and flirtation target
Enjoys the attention from the dashing young officer while her husband grows increasingly uncomfortable. Shows how people seek excitement even in inappropriate situations.
Modern Equivalent:
The married coworker who enjoys flirting with the new hire at office parties
Key Quotes & Analysis
"Most of the people at that time paid no attention to the general progress of events but were guided only by their private interests, and they were the very people whose activities at that period were most useful."
Context: Tolstoy explaining why ordinary self-interest served Russia better than grand patriotic gestures
This reveals Tolstoy's core insight about human nature during crisis. People doing their actual jobs - farmers farming, merchants trading, soldiers following orders - kept society functioning better than those trying to be heroes.
In Today's Words:
The people just trying to pay their bills and do their jobs actually kept everything running better than the ones making grand speeches about saving the country.
"Those who tried to understand the general course of events and to take part in it by self-sacrifice and heroism were the most useless members of society."
Context: Tolstoy's observation about why conscious attempts at heroism often backfire
This challenges our romantic notions about crisis response. Tolstoy suggests that authentic, natural action matters more than performed virtue or trying too hard to be significant.
In Today's Words:
The people who kept talking about how they were going to save everyone usually just got in the way of people actually getting stuff done.
"It appears so to us because we see only the general historic interest of that time and do not see all the personal human interests that people had."
Context: Explaining why we misunderstand how people actually lived through historical events
Tolstoy reminds us that people in the past were just as human as we are - worried about rent, relationships, and daily survival, not constantly thinking about their place in history.
In Today's Words:
We think everyone back then was obsessed with the big picture, but they were just trying to get through their regular problems like we are.
Thematic Threads
Authentic Action
In This Chapter
Nicholas's horse-buying mission serves the war better than theatrical patriotism at home
Development
Builds on earlier themes of genuine versus performed duty
In Your Life:
The work that feels mundane to you might be exactly what's needed most
Social Performance
In This Chapter
Nicholas becomes the romantic war hero at the party, playing a role for social approval
Development
Continues exploration of how people adapt their identity to social expectations
In Your Life:
You might find yourself performing a version of yourself that others want to see
Crisis Response
In This Chapter
During national emergency, ordinary self-interest often serves better than conscious heroism
Development
Deepens Tolstoy's examination of how people actually behave during historical events
In Your Life:
In family or workplace crises, focusing on your actual responsibilities might help more than grand gestures
Class Privilege
In This Chapter
Nicholas enjoys his status as dashing officer while others bear the war's real costs
Development
Ongoing theme of how class position shapes experience and responsibility
In Your Life:
Your advantages might blind you to others' struggles or your own real obligations
Self-Knowledge
In This Chapter
Nicholas's relief at avoiding battle represents honest self-assessment rather than cowardice
Development
Continues theme of characters discovering their true capacities and limitations
In Your Life:
Your honest assessment of what you can handle might be wisdom, not weakness
You now have the context. Time to form your own thoughts.
Discussion Questions
- 1
Why does Nicholas feel relieved to be sent away from the main army to buy horses, and what does this reveal about his character?
analysis • surface - 2
Tolstoy suggests that people trying hardest to be heroes often do more harm than good. What examples does he give, and why might this happen?
analysis • medium - 3
Think about your workplace or community. Who makes the most noise about helping, and who actually does the most work? What patterns do you notice?
application • medium - 4
When have you been assigned a task that seemed less important but turned out to be genuinely useful? How did you recognize its value?
application • deep - 5
What does this chapter suggest about the relationship between authentic contribution and visible performance? How might this change how you approach your own work?
reflection • deep
Critical Thinking Exercise
Map the Performers vs. the Contributors
Think of a situation in your life where there's a lot of talk about improvement or helping - maybe at work, in your family, or community. Make two columns: 'Loud Helpers' (people who talk most about the cause) and 'Quiet Workers' (people who actually do the daily tasks). Notice the patterns without judgment - just observe who does what.
Consider:
- •Look for people whose relief at avoiding spotlight tasks might signal they're positioned to do real work
- •Notice how the loudest voices about problems often create more meetings than solutions
- •Consider whether you're currently performing help or providing it - both have value, but serve different purposes
Journaling Prompt
Write about a time when you were assigned what seemed like an unglamorous task that turned out to be genuinely important. What did you learn about the difference between looking useful and being useful?
Coming Up Next...
Chapter 268: The Matchmaker's Gambit
What lies ahead teaches us social pressure can override personal convictions, and shows us confiding in strangers sometimes feels safer than talking to family. These patterns appear in literature and life alike.