An excerpt from the original text.(complete · 1056 words)
hen Ermólov, having been sent by Kutúzov to inspect the position, told
the field marshal that it was impossible to fight there before Moscow
and that they must retreat, Kutúzov looked at him in silence.
“Give me your hand,” said he and, turning it over so as to feel the
pulse, added: “You are not well, my dear fellow. Think what you are
saying!”
Kutúzov could not yet admit the possibility of retreating beyond Moscow
without a battle.
On the Poklónny Hill, four miles from the Dorogomílov gate of Moscow,
Kutúzov got out of his carriage and sat down on a bench by the roadside.
A great crowd of generals gathered round him, and Count Rostopchín, who
had come out from Moscow, joined them. This brilliant company separated
into several groups who all discussed the advantages and disadvantages
of the position, the state of the army, the plans suggested, the
situation of Moscow, and military questions generally. Though they had
not been summoned for the purpose, and though it was not so called, they
all felt that this was really a council of war. The conversations all
dealt with public questions. If anyone gave or asked for personal
news, it was done in a whisper and they immediately reverted to general
matters. No jokes, or laughter, or smiles even, were seen among all
these men. They evidently all made an effort to hold themselves at the
height the situation demanded. And all these groups, while talking
among themselves, tried to keep near the commander in chief (whose
bench formed the center of the gathering) and to speak so that he might
overhear them. The commander in chief listened to what was being said
and sometimes asked them to repeat their remarks, but did not himself
take part in the conversations or express any opinion. After hearing
what was being said by one or other of these groups he generally turned
away with an air of disappointment, as though they were not speaking of
anything he wished to hear. Some discussed the position that had been
chosen, criticizing not the position itself so much as the mental
capacity of those who had chosen it. Others argued that a mistake had
been made earlier and that a battle should have been fought two days
before. Others again spoke of the battle of Salamanca, which was
described by Crosart, a newly arrived Frenchman in a Spanish uniform.
(This Frenchman and one of the German princes serving with the Russian
army were discussing the siege of Saragossa and considering the
possibility of defending Moscow in a similar manner.) Count Rostopchín
was telling a fourth group that he was prepared to die with the city
train bands under the walls of the capital, but that he still could not
help regretting having been left in ignorance of what was happening, and
that had he known it sooner things would have been different.... A
fifth group, displaying the profundity of their strategic perceptions,
discussed the direction the troops would now have to take. A sixth group
was talking absolute nonsense. Kutúzov’s expression grew more and more
preoccupied and gloomy. From all this talk he saw only one thing: that
to defend Moscow was a physical impossibility in the full meaning of
those words, that is to say, so utterly impossible that if any senseless
commander were to give orders to fight, confusion would result but the
battle would still not take place. It would not take place because the
commanders not merely all recognized the position to be impossible, but
in their conversations were only discussing what would happen after its
inevitable abandonment. How could the commanders lead their troops to
a field of battle they considered impossible to hold? The lower-grade
officers and even the soldiers (who too reason) also considered the
position impossible and therefore could not go to fight, fully convinced
as they were of defeat. If Bennigsen insisted on the position being
defended and others still discussed it, the question was no longer
important in itself but only as a pretext for disputes and intrigue.
This Kutúzov knew well.
Bennigsen, who had chosen the position, warmly displayed his Russian
patriotism (Kutúzov could not listen to this without wincing) by
insisting that Moscow must be defended. His aim was as clear as daylight
to Kutúzov: if the defense failed, to throw the blame on Kutúzov who had
brought the army as far as the Sparrow Hills without giving battle; if
it succeeded, to claim the success as his own; or if battle were not
given, to clear himself of the crime of abandoning Moscow. But this
intrigue did not now occupy the old man’s mind. One terrible question
absorbed him and to that question he heard no reply from anyone. The
question for him now was: “Have I really allowed Napoleon to reach
Moscow, and when did I do so? When was it decided? Can it have been
yesterday when I ordered Plátov to retreat, or was it the evening
before, when I had a nap and told Bennigsen to issue orders? Or was it
earlier still?... When, when was this terrible affair decided? Moscow
must be abandoned. The army must retreat and the order to do so must
be given.” To give that terrible order seemed to him equivalent to
resigning the command of the army. And not only did he love power to
which he was accustomed (the honours awarded to Prince Prozoróvski,
under whom he had served in Turkey, galled him), but he was convinced
that he was destined to save Russia and that that was why, against
the Emperor’s wish and by the will of the people, he had been chosen
commander in chief. He was convinced that he alone could maintain
command of the army in these difficult circumstances, and that in all
the world he alone could encounter the invincible Napoleon without fear,
and he was horrified at the thought of the order he had to issue. But
something had to be decided, and these conversations around him which
were assuming too free a character must be stopped.
He called the most important generals to him.
“My head, be it good or bad, must depend on itself,” said he, rising
from the bench, and he rode to Filí where his carriages were waiting.
Master this chapter. Complete your experience
Purchase the complete book to access all chapters and support classic literature
As an Amazon Associate, we earn a small commission from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.
Available in paperback, hardcover, and e-book formats
Let's Analyse the Pattern
When external constraints create genuinely impossible situations, but social pressure demands we perform decision-making instead of acknowledging hard realities.
Why This Matters
Connect literature to life
This chapter teaches how to distinguish between real decision-making and performative discussions that avoid hard truths.
Practice This Today
This week, notice when meetings or family discussions circle around obvious conclusions—practice being the person who names the real constraints clearly.
Now let's explore the literary elements.
Key Quotes & Analysis
"Give me your hand. You are not well, my dear fellow. Think what you are saying!"
Context: When Ermólov suggests they must retreat from Moscow without fighting
Kutúzov's reaction shows how desperately he wants to reject this reality. Checking Ermólov's pulse suggests the very idea of retreat is like a sickness that needs to be cured.
In Today's Words:
You must be crazy to even suggest that!
"Though they had not been summoned for the purpose, and though it was not so called, they all felt that this was really a council of war"
Context: Describing the gathering of generals around Kutúzov on Poklónny Hill
Shows how crisis creates its own gravity, pulling people together even without formal organization. The weight of the moment makes everyone understand what's really happening.
In Today's Words:
Nobody called a meeting, but everyone knew this was where the big decision would be made.
"They evidently all made an effort to hold themselves at the height the situation demanded"
Context: Describing how the generals behaved during the impromptu council
Everyone understands the gravity of the moment and tries to rise to it, suppressing normal human reactions like jokes or casual conversation. The situation demands their best selves.
In Today's Words:
Everyone was trying to be as serious and professional as this terrible situation required.
Thematic Threads
Leadership
In This Chapter
Kutúzov must make a decision that will define his legacy while knowing any choice invites criticism
Development
Evolved from earlier battlefield tactics to existential command responsibility
In Your Life:
You might face this when managing a team through impossible corporate demands or family crises with no good options
Responsibility
In This Chapter
Kutúzov tortures himself over when exactly he allowed Napoleon to reach Moscow, searching for the moment of failure
Development
Deepened from personal duty to crushing weight of national consequences
In Your Life:
You might recognize this when replaying every decision that led to a major loss or failure in your life
Political Theater
In This Chapter
Generals debate positions and reference history while everyone knows defense is impossible
Development
Introduced here as avoidance mechanism during crisis
In Your Life:
You might see this in workplace meetings where everyone discusses solutions to problems they know are unfixable
Isolation
In This Chapter
Kutúzov realizes he alone can lead the army through this crisis, despite the crushing burden
Development
Expanded from social isolation to the ultimate loneliness of command
In Your Life:
You might feel this when facing a major family or work decision that ultimately only you can make
Sacred Loss
In This Chapter
Abandoning Moscow feels like surrendering not just territory but Russia's sacred heart
Development
Introduced here as the cost of survival versus meaning
In Your Life:
You might experience this when forced to give up something deeply meaningful to preserve something essential
You now have the context. Time to form your own thoughts.
Discussion Questions
- 1
Why does Kutúzov refuse to accept Ermólov's suggestion about retreat, even going so far as to check his pulse?
analysis • surface - 2
What's really happening when the generals debate battle positions and reference historical sieges instead of directly addressing whether Moscow can be defended?
analysis • medium - 3
Think of a time when everyone around a problem knew the truth but no one would say it directly. What made speaking honestly feel impossible?
application • medium - 4
When you face a situation where all your options feel like betrayal of something important, how do you decide what to sacrifice?
application • deep - 5
What does Kutúzov's isolation in this decision reveal about the burden of leadership when there are no good choices?
reflection • deep
Critical Thinking Exercise
Name the Impossible Choice
Think of a current situation in your life, workplace, or family where everyone is talking around a problem instead of naming it directly. Write down what the real constraints are versus what people are pretending the options are. Then identify what decision actually needs to be made.
Consider:
- •What makes speaking the truth feel dangerous or disloyal in this situation?
- •Who benefits from keeping the real constraints unnamed?
- •What would change if someone said the quiet part out loud?
Journaling Prompt
Write about a time when you had to make a decision that felt like betraying something important to you. How did you navigate choosing between competing loyalties or values?
Coming Up Next...
Chapter 233: The Burden of Impossible Choices
At Filí, Kutúzov must finally make the choice that will determine Russia's fate. The generals gather for a formal council where Moscow's destiny—and perhaps the war itself—will be decided once and for all.




