An excerpt from the original text.(complete · 1183 words)
fter all that Napoleon had said to him—those bursts of anger and the
last dryly spoken words: “I will detain you no longer, General; you
shall receive my letter,” Balashëv felt convinced that Napoleon would
not wish to see him, and would even avoid another meeting with him—an
insulted envoy—especially as he had witnessed his unseemly anger. But,
to his surprise, Balashëv received, through Duroc, an invitation to dine
with the Emperor that day.
Bessières, Caulaincourt, and Berthier were present at that dinner.
Napoleon met Balashëv cheerfully and amiably. He not only showed no sign
of constraint or self-reproach on account of his outburst that morning,
but, on the contrary, tried to reassure Balashëv. It was evident that
he had long been convinced that it was impossible for him to make a
mistake, and that in his perception whatever he did was right, not
because it harmonized with any idea of right and wrong, but because he
did it.
The Emperor was in very good spirits after his ride through Vílna, where
crowds of people had rapturously greeted and followed him. From all
the windows of the streets through which he rode, rugs, flags, and his
monogram were displayed, and the Polish ladies, welcoming him, waved
their handkerchiefs to him.
At dinner, having placed Balashëv beside him, Napoleon not only treated
him amiably but behaved as if Balashëv were one of his own courtiers,
one of those who sympathized with his plans and ought to rejoice at
his success. In the course of conversation he mentioned Moscow and
questioned Balashëv about the Russian capital, not merely as an
interested traveler asks about a new city he intends to visit, but as
if convinced that Balashëv, as a Russian, must be flattered by his
curiosity.
“How many inhabitants are there in Moscow? How many houses? Is it true
that Moscow is called ‘Holy Moscow’? How many churches are there in
Moscow?” he asked.
And receiving the reply that there were more than two hundred churches,
he remarked:
“Why such a quantity of churches?”
“The Russians are very devout,” replied Balashëv.
“But a large number of monasteries and churches is always a sign of the
backwardness of a people,” said Napoleon, turning to Caulaincourt for
appreciation of this remark.
Balashëv respectfully ventured to disagree with the French Emperor.
“Every country has its own character,” said he.
“But nowhere in Europe is there anything like that,” said Napoleon.
“I beg your Majesty’s pardon,” returned Balashëv, “besides Russia there
is Spain, where there are also many churches and monasteries.”
This reply of Balashëv’s, which hinted at the recent defeats of the
French in Spain, was much appreciated when he related it at Alexander’s
court, but it was not much appreciated at Napoleon’s dinner, where it
passed unnoticed.
The uninterested and perplexed faces of the marshals showed that they
were puzzled as to what Balashëv’s tone suggested. “If there is a point
we don’t see it, or it is not at all witty,” their expressions seemed
to say. So little was his rejoinder appreciated that Napoleon did not
notice it at all and naïvely asked Balashëv through what towns the
direct road from there to Moscow passed. Balashëv, who was on the alert
all through the dinner, replied that just as “all roads lead to Rome,”
so all roads lead to Moscow: there were many roads, and “among them the
road through Poltáva, which Charles XII chose.” Balashëv involuntarily
flushed with pleasure at the aptitude of this reply, but hardly had
he uttered the word Poltáva before Caulaincourt began speaking of the
badness of the road from Petersburg to Moscow and of his Petersburg
reminiscences.
After dinner they went to drink coffee in Napoleon’s study, which four
days previously had been that of the Emperor Alexander. Napoleon sat
down, toying with his Sèvres coffee cup, and motioned Balashëv to a
chair beside him.
Napoleon was in that well-known after-dinner mood which, more than
any reasoned cause, makes a man contented with himself and disposed to
consider everyone his friend. It seemed to him that he was surrounded
by men who adored him: and he felt convinced that, after his dinner,
Balashëv too was his friend and worshiper. Napoleon turned to him with a
pleasant, though slightly ironic, smile.
“They tell me this is the room the Emperor Alexander occupied? Strange,
isn’t it, General?” he said, evidently not doubting that this remark
would be agreeable to his hearer since it went to prove his, Napoleon’s,
superiority to Alexander.
Balashëv made no reply and bowed his head in silence.
“Yes. Four days ago in this room, Wintzingerode and Stein were
deliberating,” continued Napoleon with the same derisive and
self-confident smile. “What I can’t understand,” he went on, “is that
the Emperor Alexander has surrounded himself with my personal enemies.
That I do not... understand. Has he not thought that I may do the same?”
and he turned inquiringly to Balashëv, and evidently this thought turned
him back on to the track of his morning’s anger, which was still fresh
in him.
“And let him know that I will do so!” said Napoleon, rising and pushing
his cup away with his hand. “I’ll drive all his Württemberg, Baden, and
Weimar relations out of Germany.... Yes. I’ll drive them out. Let him
prepare an asylum for them in Russia!”
Balashëv bowed his head with an air indicating that he would like to
make his bow and leave, and only listened because he could not help
hearing what was said to him. Napoleon did not notice this expression;
he treated Balashëv not as an envoy from his enemy, but as a man
now fully devoted to him and who must rejoice at his former master’s
humiliation.
“And why has the Emperor Alexander taken command of the armies? What is
the good of that? War is my profession, but his business is to reign
and not to command armies! Why has he taken on himself such a
responsibility?”
Again Napoleon brought out his snuffbox, paced several times up and down
the room in silence, and then, suddenly and unexpectedly, went up to
Balashëv and with a slight smile, as confidently, quickly, and simply
as if he were doing something not merely important but pleasing to
Balashëv, he raised his hand to the forty-year-old Russian general’s
face and, taking him by the ear, pulled it gently, smiling with his lips
only.
To have one’s ear pulled by the Emperor was considered the greatest
honor and mark of favor at the French court.
“Well, adorer and courtier of the Emperor Alexander, why don’t you say
anything?” said he, as if it was ridiculous, in his presence, to be the
adorer and courtier of anyone but himself, Napoleon. “Are the horses
ready for the general?” he added, with a slight inclination of his head
in reply to Balashëv’s bow. “Let him have mine, he has a long way to
go!”
The letter taken by Balashëv was the last Napoleon sent to Alexander.
Every detail of the interview was communicated to the Russian monarch,
and the war began....
Master this chapter. Complete your experience
Purchase the complete book to access all chapters and support classic literature
As an Amazon Associate, we earn a small commission from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.
Available in paperback, hardcover, and e-book formats
Let's Analyse the Pattern
When power holders reframe their manipulation as generosity and genuinely believe everyone should be grateful for their attention.
Why This Matters
Connect literature to life
This chapter teaches how to recognize when someone's sudden warmth is actually an attempt to co-opt your opposition into compliance.
Practice This Today
This week, notice when someone who previously dismissed you suddenly treats you as their closest ally—ask yourself what they might want you to legitimize or support.
Now let's explore the literary elements.
Key Quotes & Analysis
"It was evident that he had long been convinced that it was impossible for him to make a mistake, and that in his perception whatever he did was right, not because it harmonized with any idea of right and wrong, but because he did it."
Context: Explaining Napoleon's complete lack of self-doubt about his morning tantrum
This perfectly captures the dangerous psychology of absolute power. Napoleon has moved beyond normal moral reasoning into pure ego—he's right because he's Napoleon, not because his actions are actually justified.
In Today's Words:
He was so used to being in charge that he literally couldn't imagine being wrong about anything—if he did it, it must be right.
"Napoleon not only treated him amiably but behaved as if Balashëv were one of his own courtiers, one of those who sympathized with his plans and ought to rejoice at his success."
Context: Describing how Napoleon treats the Russian envoy at dinner
Napoleon can't conceive that someone might genuinely oppose him, so he assumes Balashëv must secretly admire him. This shows how narcissists project their own need for approval onto everyone else.
In Today's Words:
He acted like Balashëv was his buddy who should be excited about his plans, completely missing that the guy represented the enemy.
"From all the windows of the streets through which he rode, rugs, flags, and his monogram were displayed, and the Polish ladies, welcoming him, waved their handkerchiefs to him."
Context: Describing the crowd's reception that put Napoleon in such good spirits
Napoleon feeds off public adoration and uses it to justify his actions. The staged nature of this welcome (rugs and flags don't appear spontaneously) shows how autocrats create their own validation.
In Today's Words:
Everyone was putting on a big show for him with decorations and cheering, which made him feel like he could do no wrong.
Thematic Threads
Power
In This Chapter
Napoleon's complete inability to see his manipulation as anything other than generous friendship
Development
Evolved from earlier scenes showing various characters wielding different types of power
In Your Life:
You might see this in managers who think their controlling behavior is 'mentorship' or family members who use guilt as 'caring.'
Self-Deception
In This Chapter
Napoleon genuinely believes he's being charming while planning invasion and mocking Balashëv's loyalty
Development
Building on previous characters' various forms of self-delusion about their motives
In Your Life:
You might catch yourself justifying behavior you know is wrong by reframing it as necessary or helpful.
Dignity
In This Chapter
Balashëv maintains composure and politeness despite being manipulated and mocked
Development
Continues the thread of characters choosing dignity over reaction in difficult circumstances
In Your Life:
You might need to stay professional with difficult people while protecting yourself internally.
Social Performance
In This Chapter
The entire dinner is theater—Napoleon performing friendship while Balashëv performs diplomatic courtesy
Development
Ongoing theme of how social expectations force people into performative roles
In Your Life:
You might find yourself performing enthusiasm or agreement to keep peace in toxic situations.
Reality Distortion
In This Chapter
Napoleon's court treats his ear-pulling as an honor, creating an alternate reality around his behavior
Development
Developing theme of how power structures create their own versions of normal
In Your Life:
You might work in environments where toxic behavior gets rebranded as 'company culture' or 'high standards.'
You now have the context. Time to form your own thoughts.
Discussion Questions
- 1
Why does Napoleon switch from angry outburst to friendly dinner host with Balashëv?
analysis • surface - 2
What does Napoleon's ear-pulling gesture reveal about how he views power and relationships?
analysis • medium - 3
Where have you seen someone in power genuinely believe their manipulation is actually kindness or leadership?
application • medium - 4
How would you protect yourself in a situation like Balashëv's, where someone with power over you is being manipulative while believing they're being generous?
application • deep - 5
What happens to people when they gain enough power that no one can safely tell them the truth?
reflection • deep
Critical Thinking Exercise
Map the Power Bubble
Think of someone in your life who has power over others (boss, family member, authority figure). Draw or describe their 'power bubble' - who tells them what they want to hear, who stays silent out of fear, and who might be giving them honest feedback. Then identify where you fit in that bubble and what that means for how you interact with them.
Consider:
- •People in power bubbles often can't tell the difference between genuine respect and fear-based compliance
- •The bigger the bubble, the more disconnected they become from reality
- •Your position in their bubble determines your safety and your strategy
Journaling Prompt
Write about a time when you had to navigate someone who had power over you but seemed completely unaware of how their behavior affected others. What worked? What didn't? What would you do differently now?
Coming Up Next...
Chapter 175: The Weight of Unfinished Business
With diplomacy officially dead and Balashëv dismissed, the machinery of war begins to turn. The stage is set for one of history's most catastrophic military campaigns.




