Summary
After his morning outburst, Napoleon completely shifts tactics with the Russian envoy Balashëv, inviting him to dinner and treating him like an old friend. This isn't genuine warmth—it's calculated manipulation. Napoleon peppers Balashëv with questions about Moscow, clearly planning his invasion while pretending it's casual curiosity. When Balashëv subtly reminds him that Spain (where France is currently losing) is also very religious, Napoleon completely misses the diplomatic burn. The chapter reveals Napoleon's dangerous self-delusion: he genuinely believes everything he does is right simply because he's the one doing it. He's so convinced of his own superiority that he assumes everyone around him must adore him. In a creepy power move, he pulls Balashëv's ear—considered a great honor at the French court—while mocking his loyalty to the Russian emperor. The scene shows how autocrats create their own reality bubbles, surrounded by people who either fear them or flatter them. Balashëv maintains his dignity through polite restraint, but he's clearly uncomfortable being treated as Napoleon's personal cheerleader. This dinner marks the final diplomatic exchange before war begins—Napoleon's charm offensive fails because it was never really about diplomacy, just about feeding his ego while he planned his invasion.
Coming Up in Chapter 175
With diplomacy officially dead and Balashëv dismissed, the machinery of war begins to turn. The stage is set for one of history's most catastrophic military campaigns.
Share it with friends
An excerpt from the original text.(~500 words)
After all that Napoleon had said to him—those bursts of anger and the last dryly spoken words: “I will detain you no longer, General; you shall receive my letter,” Balashëv felt convinced that Napoleon would not wish to see him, and would even avoid another meeting with him—an insulted envoy—especially as he had witnessed his unseemly anger. But, to his surprise, Balashëv received, through Duroc, an invitation to dine with the Emperor that day. Bessières, Caulaincourt, and Berthier were present at that dinner. Napoleon met Balashëv cheerfully and amiably. He not only showed no sign of constraint or self-reproach on account of his outburst that morning, but, on the contrary, tried to reassure Balashëv. It was evident that he had long been convinced that it was impossible for him to make a mistake, and that in his perception whatever he did was right, not because it harmonized with any idea of right and wrong, but because he did it. The Emperor was in very good spirits after his ride through Vílna, where crowds of people had rapturously greeted and followed him. From all the windows of the streets through which he rode, rugs, flags, and his monogram were displayed, and the Polish ladies, welcoming him, waved their handkerchiefs to him. At dinner, having placed Balashëv beside him, Napoleon not only treated him amiably but behaved as if Balashëv were one of his own courtiers, one of those who sympathized with his plans and ought to rejoice at his success. In the course of conversation he mentioned Moscow and questioned Balashëv about the Russian capital, not merely as an interested traveler asks about a new city he intends to visit, but as if convinced that Balashëv, as a Russian, must be flattered by his curiosity. “How many inhabitants are there in Moscow? How many houses? Is it true that Moscow is called ‘Holy Moscow’? How many churches are there in Moscow?” he asked. And receiving the reply that there were more than two hundred churches, he remarked: “Why such a quantity of churches?” “The Russians are very devout,” replied Balashëv. “But a large number of monasteries and churches is always a sign of the backwardness of a people,” said Napoleon, turning to Caulaincourt for appreciation of this remark. Balashëv respectfully ventured to disagree with the French Emperor. “Every country has its own character,” said he. “But nowhere in Europe is there anything like that,” said Napoleon. “I beg your Majesty’s pardon,” returned Balashëv, “besides Russia there is Spain, where there are also many churches and monasteries.” This reply of Balashëv’s, which hinted at the recent defeats of the French in Spain, was much appreciated when he related it at Alexander’s court, but it was not much appreciated at Napoleon’s dinner, where it passed unnoticed. The uninterested and perplexed faces of the marshals showed that they were puzzled as to what Balashëv’s tone suggested. “If there is a point we don’t see it, or it is not at all witty,” their expressions...
Master this chapter. Complete your experience
Purchase the complete book to access all chapters and support classic literature
As an Amazon Associate, we earn a small commission from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.
Available in paperback, hardcover, and e-book formats
Intelligence Amplifier™ Analysis
The Road of Justified Delusion
When power holders reframe their manipulation as generosity and genuinely believe everyone should be grateful for their attention.
Why This Matters
Connect literature to life
This chapter teaches how to recognize when someone's sudden warmth is actually an attempt to co-opt your opposition into compliance.
Practice This Today
This week, notice when someone who previously dismissed you suddenly treats you as their closest ally—ask yourself what they might want you to legitimize or support.
Now let's explore the literary elements.
Terms to Know
Diplomatic immunity
The principle that foreign ambassadors and envoys can't be arrested or harmed, even during conflicts. Balashëv represents Russia but must be treated with respect even as Napoleon plans war.
Modern Usage:
We still see this when diplomats get special treatment or when countries expel rather than arrest foreign officials during disputes.
Autocratic mindset
The psychological state where absolute rulers believe everything they do is automatically right simply because they have power. Napoleon shows this by feeling no guilt about his morning tantrum.
Modern Usage:
We see this in CEOs, politicians, or bosses who never admit mistakes because they've convinced themselves their position makes them infallible.
Charm offensive
Using excessive friendliness and attention to manipulate someone after treating them badly. Napoleon switches from rage to fake warmth to keep Balashëv off-balance.
Modern Usage:
Abusive partners often do this after fights, or manipulative bosses who yell then act like your best friend the next day.
Court ritual
Formal behaviors and ceremonies that show respect to rulers. Napoleon pulling Balashëv's ear was considered a great honor in French court culture.
Modern Usage:
We still have workplace hierarchies and social rituals that show status, like who gets invited to executive meetings or company retreats.
Intelligence gathering
Napoleon's casual questions about Moscow aren't small talk—he's collecting military information while pretending to be friendly.
Modern Usage:
People still pump others for information while acting casual, whether it's workplace gossip or competitive business intelligence.
Echo chamber
When powerful people surround themselves with admirers who never challenge them. Napoleon assumes everyone loves him because that's all he hears.
Modern Usage:
Social media algorithms and celebrity culture create similar bubbles where people only hear praise and agreement.
Characters in This Chapter
Napoleon
Antagonist/emperor
Demonstrates classic narcissistic behavior by switching from rage to charm without any self-awareness. His questions about Moscow reveal he's already planning invasion while pretending diplomacy.
Modern Equivalent:
The toxic boss who screams at you then acts like your best friend an hour later
Balashëv
Russian diplomat/protagonist
Maintains professional dignity despite Napoleon's manipulation attempts. His discomfort shows how normal people react to being used as props in a narcissist's performance.
Modern Equivalent:
The employee trying to stay professional while their boss makes everything weird and personal
Duroc
Napoleon's aide
Delivers the dinner invitation, showing how autocrats use intermediaries to manage their image and control access.
Modern Equivalent:
The executive assistant who manages their boss's moods and schedules
Bessières, Caulaincourt, and Berthier
Napoleon's generals/courtiers
Present at dinner as silent witnesses to Napoleon's performance, representing the audience every narcissist needs for validation.
Modern Equivalent:
The yes-men who nod along at meetings while the boss performs for visitors
Key Quotes & Analysis
"It was evident that he had long been convinced that it was impossible for him to make a mistake, and that in his perception whatever he did was right, not because it harmonized with any idea of right and wrong, but because he did it."
Context: Explaining Napoleon's complete lack of self-doubt about his morning tantrum
This perfectly captures the dangerous psychology of absolute power. Napoleon has moved beyond normal moral reasoning into pure ego—he's right because he's Napoleon, not because his actions are actually justified.
In Today's Words:
He was so used to being in charge that he literally couldn't imagine being wrong about anything—if he did it, it must be right.
"Napoleon not only treated him amiably but behaved as if Balashëv were one of his own courtiers, one of those who sympathized with his plans and ought to rejoice at his success."
Context: Describing how Napoleon treats the Russian envoy at dinner
Napoleon can't conceive that someone might genuinely oppose him, so he assumes Balashëv must secretly admire him. This shows how narcissists project their own need for approval onto everyone else.
In Today's Words:
He acted like Balashëv was his buddy who should be excited about his plans, completely missing that the guy represented the enemy.
"From all the windows of the streets through which he rode, rugs, flags, and his monogram were displayed, and the Polish ladies, welcoming him, waved their handkerchiefs to him."
Context: Describing the crowd's reception that put Napoleon in such good spirits
Napoleon feeds off public adoration and uses it to justify his actions. The staged nature of this welcome (rugs and flags don't appear spontaneously) shows how autocrats create their own validation.
In Today's Words:
Everyone was putting on a big show for him with decorations and cheering, which made him feel like he could do no wrong.
Thematic Threads
Power
In This Chapter
Napoleon's complete inability to see his manipulation as anything other than generous friendship
Development
Evolved from earlier scenes showing various characters wielding different types of power
In Your Life:
You might see this in managers who think their controlling behavior is 'mentorship' or family members who use guilt as 'caring.'
Self-Deception
In This Chapter
Napoleon genuinely believes he's being charming while planning invasion and mocking Balashëv's loyalty
Development
Building on previous characters' various forms of self-delusion about their motives
In Your Life:
You might catch yourself justifying behavior you know is wrong by reframing it as necessary or helpful.
Dignity
In This Chapter
Balashëv maintains composure and politeness despite being manipulated and mocked
Development
Continues the thread of characters choosing dignity over reaction in difficult circumstances
In Your Life:
You might need to stay professional with difficult people while protecting yourself internally.
Social Performance
In This Chapter
The entire dinner is theater—Napoleon performing friendship while Balashëv performs diplomatic courtesy
Development
Ongoing theme of how social expectations force people into performative roles
In Your Life:
You might find yourself performing enthusiasm or agreement to keep peace in toxic situations.
Reality Distortion
In This Chapter
Napoleon's court treats his ear-pulling as an honor, creating an alternate reality around his behavior
Development
Developing theme of how power structures create their own versions of normal
In Your Life:
You might work in environments where toxic behavior gets rebranded as 'company culture' or 'high standards.'
You now have the context. Time to form your own thoughts.
Discussion Questions
- 1
Why does Napoleon switch from angry outburst to friendly dinner host with Balashëv?
analysis • surface - 2
What does Napoleon's ear-pulling gesture reveal about how he views power and relationships?
analysis • medium - 3
Where have you seen someone in power genuinely believe their manipulation is actually kindness or leadership?
application • medium - 4
How would you protect yourself in a situation like Balashëv's, where someone with power over you is being manipulative while believing they're being generous?
application • deep - 5
What happens to people when they gain enough power that no one can safely tell them the truth?
reflection • deep
Critical Thinking Exercise
Map the Power Bubble
Think of someone in your life who has power over others (boss, family member, authority figure). Draw or describe their 'power bubble' - who tells them what they want to hear, who stays silent out of fear, and who might be giving them honest feedback. Then identify where you fit in that bubble and what that means for how you interact with them.
Consider:
- •People in power bubbles often can't tell the difference between genuine respect and fear-based compliance
- •The bigger the bubble, the more disconnected they become from reality
- •Your position in their bubble determines your safety and your strategy
Journaling Prompt
Write about a time when you had to navigate someone who had power over you but seemed completely unaware of how their behavior affected others. What worked? What didn't? What would you do differently now?
Coming Up Next...
Chapter 175: The Weight of Unfinished Business
In the next chapter, you'll discover unresolved conflicts poison our ability to move forward, and learn returning home after major life changes can feel disorienting. These insights reveal timeless patterns that resonate in our own lives and relationships.