An excerpt from the original text.(complete · 1690 words)
ext day Prince Andrew thought of the ball, but his mind did not dwell
on it long. “Yes, it was a very brilliant ball,” and then... “Yes,
that little Rostóva is very charming. There’s something fresh,
original, un-Petersburg-like about her that distinguishes her.” That
was all he thought about yesterday’s ball, and after his morning tea
he set to work.
But either from fatigue or want of sleep he was ill-disposed for work
and could get nothing done. He kept criticizing his own work, as he
often did, and was glad when he heard someone coming.
The visitor was Bítski, who served on various committees, frequented
all the societies in Petersburg, and was a passionate devotee of the new
ideas and of Speránski, and a diligent Petersburg newsmonger—one of
those men who choose their opinions like their clothes according to
the fashion, but who for that very reason appear to be the warmest
partisans. Hardly had he got rid of his hat before he ran into Prince
Andrew’s room with a preoccupied air and at once began talking. He
had just heard particulars of that morning’s sitting of the Council
of State opened by the Emperor, and he spoke of it enthusiastically. The
Emperor’s speech had been extraordinary. It had been a speech such as
only constitutional monarchs deliver. “The Sovereign plainly said
that the Council and Senate are estates of the realm, he said that the
government must rest not on authority but on secure bases. The Emperor
said that the fiscal system must be reorganized and the accounts
published,” recounted Bítski, emphasizing certain words and opening
his eyes significantly.
“Ah, yes! Today’s events mark an epoch, the greatest epoch in our
history,” he concluded.
Prince Andrew listened to the account of the opening of the Council of
State, which he had so impatiently awaited and to which he had attached
such importance, and was surprised that this event, now that it had
taken place, did not affect him, and even seemed quite insignificant. He
listened with quiet irony to Bítski’s enthusiastic account of it. A
very simple thought occurred to him: “What does it matter to me or to
Bítski what the Emperor was pleased to say at the Council? Can all that
make me any happier or better?”
And this simple reflection suddenly destroyed all the interest Prince
Andrew had felt in the impending reforms. He was going to dine that
evening at Speránski’s, “with only a few friends,” as the host
had said when inviting him. The prospect of that dinner in the intimate
home circle of the man he so admired had greatly interested Prince
Andrew, especially as he had not yet seen Speránski in his domestic
surroundings, but now he felt disinclined to go to it.
At the appointed hour, however, he entered the modest house Speránski
owned in the Taurida Gardens. In the parqueted dining room of this small
house, remarkable for its extreme cleanliness (suggesting that of a
monastery), Prince Andrew, who was rather late, found the friendly
gathering of Speránski’s intimate acquaintances already assembled
at five o’clock. There were no ladies present except Speránski’s
little daughter (long-faced like her father) and her governess. The
other guests were Gervais, Magnítski, and Stolýpin. While still in
the anteroom Prince Andrew heard loud voices and a ringing staccato
laugh—a laugh such as one hears on the stage. Someone—it sounded
like Speránski—was distinctly ejaculating ha-ha-ha. Prince Andrew
had never before heard Speránski’s famous laugh, and this ringing,
high-pitched laughter from a statesman made a strange impression on him.
He entered the dining room. The whole company were standing between two
windows at a small table laid with hors-d’oeuvres. Speránski, wearing
a gray swallow-tail coat with a star on the breast, and evidently still
the same waistcoat and high white stock he had worn at the meeting of
the Council of State, stood at the table with a beaming countenance. His
guests surrounded him. Magnítski, addressing himself to Speránski,
was relating an anecdote, and Speránski was laughing in advance at
what Magnítski was going to say. When Prince Andrew entered the room
Magnítski’s words were again crowned by laughter. Stolýpin gave
a deep bass guffaw as he munched a piece of bread and cheese. Gervais
laughed softly with a hissing chuckle, and Speránski in a high-pitched
staccato manner.
Still laughing, Speránski held out his soft white hand to Prince
Andrew.
“Very pleased to see you, Prince,” he said. “One moment...” he
went on, turning to Magnítski and interrupting his story. “We have
agreed that this is a dinner for recreation, with not a word about
business!” and turning again to the narrator he began to laugh afresh.
Prince Andrew looked at the laughing Speránski with astonishment,
regret, and disillusionment. It seemed to him that this was not
Speránski but someone else. Everything that had formerly appeared
mysterious and fascinating in Speránski suddenly became plain and
unattractive.
At dinner the conversation did not cease for a moment and seemed to
consist of the contents of a book of funny anecdotes. Before Magnítski
had finished his story someone else was anxious to relate something
still funnier. Most of the anecdotes, if not relating to the state
service, related to people in the service. It seemed that in this
company the insignificance of those people was so definitely accepted
that the only possible attitude toward them was one of good humored
ridicule. Speránski related how at the Council that morning a deaf
dignitary, when asked his opinion, replied that he thought so too.
Gervais gave a long account of an official revision, remarkable for the
stupidity of everybody concerned. Stolýpin, stuttering, broke into
the conversation and began excitedly talking of the abuses that existed
under the former order of things—threatening to give a serious turn
to the conversation. Magnítski starting quizzing Stolýpin about his
vehemence. Gervais intervened with a joke, and the talk reverted to its
former lively tone.
Evidently Speránski liked to rest after his labors and find amusement
in a circle of friends, and his guests, understanding his wish, tried
to enliven him and amuse themselves. But their gaiety seemed to Prince
Andrew mirthless and tiresome. Speránski’s high-pitched voice struck
him unpleasantly, and the incessant laughter grated on him like a false
note. Prince Andrew did not laugh and feared that he would be a damper
on the spirits of the company, but no one took any notice of his being
out of harmony with the general mood. They all seemed very gay.
He tried several times to join in the conversation, but his remarks were
tossed aside each time like a cork thrown out of the water, and he could
not jest with them.
There was nothing wrong or unseemly in what they said, it was witty and
might have been funny, but it lacked just that something which is the
salt of mirth, and they were not even aware that such a thing existed.
After dinner Speránski’s daughter and her governess rose. He patted
the little girl with his white hand and kissed her. And that gesture,
too, seemed unnatural to Prince Andrew.
The men remained at table over their port—English fashion. In the
midst of a conversation that was started about Napoleon’s Spanish
affairs, which they all agreed in approving, Prince Andrew began to
express a contrary opinion. Speránski smiled and, with an evident wish
to prevent the conversation from taking an unpleasant course, told a
story that had no connection with the previous conversation. For a few
moments all were silent.
Having sat some time at table, Speránski corked a bottle of wine and,
remarking, “Nowadays good wine rides in a carriage and pair,” passed
it to the servant and got up. All rose and continuing to talk loudly
went into the drawing room. Two letters brought by a courier were handed
to Speránski and he took them to his study. As soon as he had left
the room the general merriment stopped and the guests began to converse
sensibly and quietly with one another.
“Now for the recitation!” said Speránski on returning from
his study. “A wonderful talent!” he said to Prince Andrew, and
Magnítski immediately assumed a pose and began reciting some humorous
verses in French which he had composed about various well-known
Petersburg people. He was interrupted several times by applause. When
the verses were finished Prince Andrew went up to Speránski and took
his leave.
“Where are you off to so early?” asked Speránski.
“I promised to go to a reception.”
They said no more. Prince Andrew looked closely into those mirrorlike,
impenetrable eyes, and felt that it had been ridiculous of him to have
expected anything from Speránski and from any of his own activities
connected with him, or ever to have attributed importance to what
Speránski was doing. That precise, mirthless laughter rang in Prince
Andrew’s ears long after he had left the house.
When he reached home Prince Andrew began thinking of his life in
Petersburg during those last four months as if it were something new. He
recalled his exertions and solicitations, and the history of his project
of army reform, which had been accepted for consideration and which they
were trying to pass over in silence simply because another, a very poor
one, had already been prepared and submitted to the Emperor. He thought
of the meetings of a committee of which Berg was a member. He remembered
how carefully and at what length everything relating to form and
procedure was discussed at those meetings, and how sedulously and
promptly all that related to the gist of the business was evaded. He
recalled his labors on the Legal Code, and how painstakingly he had
translated the articles of the Roman and French codes into Russian,
and he felt ashamed of himself. Then he vividly pictured to himself
Boguchárovo, his occupations in the country, his journey to Ryazán;
he remembered the peasants and Dron the village elder, and mentally
applying to them the Personal Rights he had divided into paragraphs, he
felt astonished that he could have spent so much time on such useless
work.
Master this chapter. Complete your experience
Purchase the complete book to access all chapters and support classic literature
As an Amazon Associate, we earn a small commission from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.
Available in paperback, hardcover, and e-book formats
Let's Analyse the Pattern
The devastating realization that someone you've idealized is fundamentally empty, revealing that you've been following performance rather than substance.
Why This Matters
Connect literature to life
This chapter teaches how to distinguish between people who genuinely care about their work and those who are just putting on a show.
Practice This Today
This week, notice when someone's passion seems to turn on and off depending on their audience—that's your early warning system for empty performance.
Now let's explore the literary elements.
Key Quotes & Analysis
"Yes, that little Rostóva is very charming. There's something fresh, original, un-Petersburg-like about her that distinguishes her."
Context: Andrew briefly thinks about Natasha from the ball before dismissing the memory to focus on work
Shows how Andrew values authenticity over artificial sophistication. The phrase 'un-Petersburg-like' reveals his growing distaste for the fake social world he's trapped in, and hints at his attraction to genuine emotion.
In Today's Words:
That girl was really refreshing - she wasn't putting on an act like everyone else in this city.
"The government must rest not on authority but on secure bases."
Context: Bítski excitedly reports the Emperor's speech about constitutional reform to the Council of State
Represents the promise of systematic change that has Andrew and others hopeful about Russia's future. The emphasis on 'secure bases' suggests moving from personal rule to institutional structures.
In Today's Words:
The government should be built on solid systems and laws, not just whoever happens to be in charge.
"He kept criticizing his own work, as he often did, and was glad when he heard someone coming."
Context: Andrew struggles to focus on his legal work the morning after the ball
Shows Andrew's perfectionist nature and growing dissatisfaction with his bureaucratic tasks. His relief at the interruption suggests he's already losing faith in the importance of his work.
In Today's Words:
He couldn't stop finding fault with everything he was doing and was actually relieved when someone showed up to distract him.
Thematic Threads
Disillusionment
In This Chapter
Andrew's crushing realization that Speránski is hollow, and his four months of work meaningless
Development
Introduced here as Andrew's first major awakening to systemic emptiness
In Your Life:
You might feel this when discovering your 'dream job' is just corporate theater, or a respected leader is actually self-serving.
Class
In This Chapter
The dinner party reveals how the elite treat serious governance as entertainment and social positioning
Development
Continues the theme of how different classes experience power and responsibility differently
In Your Life:
You see this when management makes decisions that affect workers' lives while treating it as an abstract game.
Identity
In This Chapter
Andrew must reconstruct his sense of purpose after discovering his hero and his work are meaningless
Development
Andrew's identity crisis deepens as external validation proves hollow
In Your Life:
You face this when realizing you've built your professional identity around something that doesn't actually matter.
Power
In This Chapter
Speránski wields influence through performance and social connections rather than competence or integrity
Development
Explores how power often rewards appearance over substance
In Your Life:
You encounter this when the most promoted people at work are the best performers, not the best workers.
Purpose
In This Chapter
Andrew's search for meaningful work crashes against the reality that institutions often prioritize procedure over results
Development
Introduced here as Andrew realizes his legal reforms help no one
In Your Life:
You feel this when your job requires endless meetings and paperwork that seem disconnected from helping anyone.
You now have the context. Time to form your own thoughts.
Discussion Questions
- 1
What specifically does Andrew notice about Speránski during the dinner that changes his opinion of him?
analysis • surface - 2
Why do you think Andrew was so blind to Speránski's flaws before this dinner? What made him want to see his boss as a hero?
analysis • medium - 3
Think about leaders or organizations you've admired. Have you ever had a moment like Andrew's where you realized they weren't what you thought? What were the warning signs you might have missed?
application • medium - 4
If you were Andrew's friend, what advice would you give him about how to handle working for someone he no longer respects?
application • deep - 5
What does this chapter suggest about the difference between appearing important and actually being effective? Why do we sometimes confuse the two?
reflection • deep
Critical Thinking Exercise
Hero Reality Check
Think of someone you currently admire—a boss, public figure, or organization leader. Write down three specific things they've actually accomplished versus three ways they appear impressive. Then list three questions you could ask to test whether their reputation matches their results.
Consider:
- •Focus on concrete actions and outcomes, not just good intentions or inspiring words
- •Consider whether this person's success helps others or mainly helps themselves
- •Ask yourself if you're admiring them because they make you feel good about your own choices
Journaling Prompt
Write about a time when someone you looked up to disappointed you. What did you learn about choosing who to trust and follow?
Coming Up Next...
Chapter 125: When Love Awakens the Soul
Andrew's disillusionment with Petersburg politics will force him to make a crucial decision about his future. The question becomes: what does a man do when he discovers his life's work has been meaningless?




