Summary
Prince Andrew returns to Petersburg with high hopes of implementing military reforms, but quickly discovers that good ideas mean nothing without the right connections. The Emperor, who once seemed approachable, now gives him the cold shoulder—a reminder that personal chemistry often trumps professional competence in positions of power. When Andrew tries to go through proper channels, presenting his military reform proposal to Count Arakchéev, the Minister of War, he encounters a perfect example of bureaucratic tyranny. Arakchéev's waiting room is a masterclass in power dynamics: important people reduced to nervous supplicants, everyone afraid of the man behind the door. The minister himself proves to be exactly what Andrew feared—a petty tyrant who dismisses months of careful work with a scrawled, barely literate rejection note. Arakchéev's criticism that Andrew's proposal 'resembles an imitation of the French military code' reveals how nationalism and personal prejudice can override practical considerations. The scene captures a universal frustration: having your best efforts casually destroyed by someone who may not even understand them. Andrew's polite professionalism in the face of such dismissive treatment shows his character, while Arakchéev's offer of an unpaid committee position adds insult to injury. This chapter exposes how institutional inertia and personal power can strangle progress, a dynamic that remains painfully relevant in modern workplaces and government.
Coming Up in Chapter 111
Andrew's encounter with the brutal machinery of government bureaucracy has left him disillusioned, but his story in Petersburg is far from over. New opportunities and unexpected encounters await.
Share it with friends
An excerpt from the original text.(~500 words)
Prince Andrew arrived in Petersburg in August, 1809. It was the time when the youthful Speránski was at the zenith of his fame and his reforms were being pushed forward with the greatest energy. That same August the Emperor was thrown from his calèche, injured his leg, and remained three weeks at Peterhof, receiving Speránski every day and no one else. At that time the two famous decrees were being prepared that so agitated society—abolishing court ranks and introducing examinations to qualify for the grades of Collegiate Assessor and State Councilor—and not merely these but a whole state constitution, intended to change the existing order of government in Russia: legal, administrative, and financial, from the Council of State down to the district tribunals. Now those vague liberal dreams with which the Emperor Alexander had ascended the throne, and which he had tried to put into effect with the aid of his associates, Czartorýski, Novosíltsev, Kochubéy, and Strógonov—whom he himself in jest had called his Comité de salut public—were taking shape and being realized. Now all these men were replaced by Speránski on the civil side, and Arakchéev on the military. Soon after his arrival Prince Andrew, as a gentleman of the chamber, presented himself at court and at a levee. The Emperor, though he met him twice, did not favor him with a single word. It had always seemed to Prince Andrew before that he was antipathetic to the Emperor and that the latter disliked his face and personality generally, and in the cold, repellent glance the Emperor gave him, he now found further confirmation of this surmise. The courtiers explained the Emperor’s neglect of him by His Majesty’s displeasure at Bolkónski’s not having served since 1805. “I know myself that one cannot help one’s sympathies and antipathies,” thought Prince Andrew, “so it will not do to present my proposal for the reform of the army regulations to the Emperor personally, but the project will speak for itself.” He mentioned what he had written to an old field marshal, a friend of his father’s. The field marshal made an appointment to see him, received him graciously, and promised to inform the Emperor. A few days later Prince Andrew received notice that he was to go to see the Minister of War, Count Arakchéev. On the appointed day Prince Andrew entered Count Arakchéev’s waiting room at nine in the morning. He did not know Arakchéev personally, had never seen him, and all he had heard of him inspired him with but little respect for the man. “He is Minister of War, a man trusted by the Emperor, and I need not concern myself about his personal qualities: he has been commissioned to consider my project, so he alone can get it adopted,” thought Prince Andrew as he waited among a number of important and unimportant people in Count Arakchéev’s waiting room. During his service, chiefly as an adjutant, Prince Andrew had seen the anterooms of many important men, and the different...
Master this chapter. Complete your experience
Purchase the complete book to access all chapters and support classic literature
As an Amazon Associate, we earn a small commission from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.
Available in paperback, hardcover, and e-book formats
Intelligence Amplifier™ Analysis
The Road of Bureaucratic Immunity
Those with institutional power can make poor decisions without facing consequences, while merit-based ideas get dismissed by incompetent gatekeepers.
Why This Matters
Connect literature to life
This chapter teaches how to identify when someone's resistance to your ideas stems from protecting their position rather than legitimate concerns about your proposal.
Practice This Today
This week, notice when someone dismisses your suggestion—ask yourself if implementing it would make them less important or threaten their control.
Now let's explore the literary elements.
Terms to Know
Bureaucratic gatekeeping
When people in administrative positions use their power to control access to services, decisions, or opportunities, often creating unnecessary barriers. In this chapter, Arakchéev uses his position to intimidate visitors and dismiss ideas without proper consideration.
Modern Usage:
We see this when DMV clerks make simple tasks complicated, or when HR departments create endless hoops to jump through for basic requests.
Court politics
The complex web of personal relationships, favoritism, and power plays that determine who gets ahead in royal or government circles. Success depends more on who likes you than what you can do.
Modern Usage:
This is office politics on steroids - think about how the boss's golf buddies get promoted while hardworking employees get overlooked.
Reform movement
Organized efforts to change existing systems and make them more efficient or fair. Speránski was trying to modernize Russia's government structure, much like how Andrew wants to improve the military.
Modern Usage:
We see reform movements in healthcare, education, and criminal justice - people trying to fix broken systems that resist change.
Nationalist prejudice
Rejecting good ideas simply because they come from another country or culture. Arakchéev dismisses Andrew's military reforms for 'resembling French methods' rather than judging them on merit.
Modern Usage:
This shows up when people reject proven solutions just because they're 'foreign' - like refusing to learn from other countries' successful policies.
Institutional inertia
The tendency of large organizations to resist change and maintain the status quo, even when change would be beneficial. Established systems protect themselves from reform.
Modern Usage:
This is why it takes forever to update outdated workplace procedures or why schools resist new teaching methods that actually work.
Power intimidation
Using your position to make others feel small and uncertain, often through deliberate rudeness or making people wait. It's a way to assert dominance without actually demonstrating competence.
Modern Usage:
Think of doctors who keep patients waiting for hours, or supervisors who respond to emails with one-word answers to show they're too important for courtesy.
Characters in This Chapter
Prince Andrew
Reform-minded protagonist
Returns to Petersburg hoping to implement military reforms but faces the harsh reality of bureaucratic politics. His idealism crashes against institutional resistance and personal prejudice.
Modern Equivalent:
The dedicated employee with great ideas who keeps getting shut down by management
Speránski
Successful reformer
The Emperor's current favorite who is successfully implementing government reforms. Represents what Andrew hopes to become - someone with both good ideas and the political skill to implement them.
Modern Equivalent:
The consultant who somehow gets the CEO's ear and actually makes changes happen
Count Arakchéev
Bureaucratic antagonist
The Minister of War who dismisses Andrew's carefully prepared military reforms with barely literate scorn. Embodies the worst aspects of entrenched power - petty, prejudiced, and threatened by competence.
Modern Equivalent:
The micromanaging boss who shoots down every suggestion and takes credit for others' work
Emperor Alexander
Distant authority figure
Once seemed approachable to Andrew but now gives him the cold shoulder at court functions. Shows how personal chemistry affects professional opportunities at the highest levels.
Modern Equivalent:
The company CEO who used to be friendly but now acts like they don't know you
Key Quotes & Analysis
"It had always seemed to Prince Andrew before that he was antipathetic to the Emperor and that the latter disliked his face and his whole personality."
Context: Andrew realizes the Emperor is deliberately ignoring him at court
This captures the painful awareness that sometimes people just don't like you, regardless of your qualifications or efforts. Andrew's self-awareness about this dynamic shows his maturity, but also his helplessness against personal chemistry in professional settings.
In Today's Words:
The boss just doesn't like me, and there's nothing I can do about it.
"Written by someone who doesn't know his business and should be turned out of the army!"
Context: His dismissive response to Andrew's military reform proposal
This brutal rejection reveals how threatened mediocre leaders feel when confronted with genuine competence. Arakchéev's attack is personal rather than substantive, showing he can't engage with the actual ideas.
In Today's Words:
This person is making me look bad, so I need to destroy them before anyone notices.
"Your excellency, I was only following the order you gave me, to let you know of all business."
Context: Nervously explaining why he brought Andrew's proposal to the minister's attention
Shows how toxic leadership creates an atmosphere of fear where even doing your job correctly becomes risky. The aide is terrified of being blamed for simply following instructions.
In Today's Words:
I was just doing what you told me to do - please don't yell at me.
Thematic Threads
Class
In This Chapter
Andrew's aristocratic status means nothing when facing institutional power—Arakchéev's bureaucratic position trumps noble birth
Development
Evolution from earlier themes of inherited privilege to showing how institutional power creates new hierarchies
In Your Life:
Your credentials or background won't protect you from bad bosses or broken systems
Merit vs. Politics
In This Chapter
Andrew's carefully researched military reforms are dismissed not on their merits but due to political prejudice and nationalism
Development
Introduced here as a new lens for understanding how good ideas fail in institutional settings
In Your Life:
Your best work can be rejected for reasons that have nothing to do with quality
Power Dynamics
In This Chapter
Arakchéev's waiting room becomes a theater of humiliation where accomplished people are reduced to nervous supplicants
Development
Builds on earlier explorations of social power by showing how institutional authority operates differently than social status
In Your Life:
Powerful people often use waiting and dismissal as tools to reinforce their dominance over you
Institutional Inertia
In This Chapter
The military bureaucracy resists reform not because change is bad, but because change threatens existing power structures
Development
Introduced here as explanation for why progress is so difficult in established systems
In Your Life:
Organizations often resist your good ideas because change threatens someone's position or comfort
Personal Dignity
In This Chapter
Andrew maintains professional composure despite being treated dismissively, showing how to preserve self-respect in degrading situations
Development
Continues Andrew's character growth in learning to navigate disappointment without losing integrity
In Your Life:
How you respond to unfair treatment reveals and shapes your character more than the treatment itself
You now have the context. Time to form your own thoughts.
Discussion Questions
- 1
What specific obstacles does Prince Andrew encounter when trying to implement his military reforms, and how does each person in power respond to his ideas?
analysis • surface - 2
Why does Count Arakchéev dismiss Andrew's proposal so casually, and what does his rejection note reveal about how he makes decisions?
analysis • medium - 3
Where have you seen similar patterns of bureaucratic immunity in your workplace, school, or community—situations where someone in power can make poor decisions without facing consequences?
application • medium - 4
If you were in Andrew's position, how would you modify your approach to get your ideas heard by someone like Arakchéev?
application • deep - 5
What does this chapter reveal about the relationship between institutional power and personal accountability, and why do these dynamics persist across different time periods and cultures?
reflection • deep
Critical Thinking Exercise
Map the Power Dynamic
Think of a situation where you need approval or support from someone in authority—a boss, administrator, committee, or official. Map out their incentives, fears, and ego triggers the way Andrew should have done with Arakchéev. What motivates them beyond the official job description? What threatens their position or reputation?
Consider:
- •Consider what success looks like from their perspective, not yours
- •Identify who they answer to and what pressures they face from above
- •Think about their personal biases and past experiences that might influence their decisions
Journaling Prompt
Write about a time when you had a great idea that got shot down by someone in authority. Looking back, what did you misunderstand about their position or priorities? How might you approach it differently now?
Coming Up Next...
Chapter 111: The Power Player's Game
As the story unfolds, you'll explore to navigate elite circles when you're the outsider, while uncovering powerful people cultivate mystery and measured speech. These lessons connect the classic to contemporary challenges we all face.