An excerpt from the original text.(complete · 5586 words)
HE APPLE OF DISCORD.
Besides Fifine Beck’s mother, another power had a word to say to M.
Paul and me, before that covenant of friendship could be ratified. We
were under the surveillance of a sleepless eye: Rome watched jealously
her son through that mystic lattice at which I had knelt once, and to
which M. Emanuel drew nigh month by month—the sliding panel of the
confessional.
“Why were you so glad to be friends with M. Paul?” asks the reader.
“Had he not long been a friend to you? Had he not given proof on proof
of a certain partiality in his feelings?”
Yes, he had; but still I liked to hear him say so earnestly—that he was
my close, true friend; I liked his modest doubts, his tender
deference—that trust which longed to rest, and was grateful when taught
how. He had called me “sister.” It was well. Yes; he might call me what
he pleased, so long as he confided in me. I was willing to be his
sister, on condition that he did not invite me to fill that relation to
some future wife of his; and tacitly vowed as he was to celibacy, of
this dilemma there seemed little danger.
Through most of the succeeding night I pondered that evening’s
interview. I wanted much the morning to break, and then listened for
the bell to ring; and, after rising and dressing, I deemed prayers and
breakfast slow, and all the hours lingering, till that arrived at last
which brought me the lesson of literature. My wish was to get a more
thorough comprehension of this fraternal alliance: to note with how
much of the brother he would demean himself when we met again; to prove
how much of the sister was in my own feelings; to discover whether I
could summon a sister’s courage, and he a brother’s frankness.
He came. Life is so constructed, that the event does not, cannot, will
not, match the expectation. That whole day he never accosted me. His
lesson was given rather more quietly than usual, more mildly, and also
more gravely. He was fatherly to his pupils, but he was not brotherly
to me. Ere he left the classe, I expected a smile, if not a word; I got
neither: to my portion fell one nod—hurried, shy.
This distance, I argued, is accidental—it is involuntary; patience, and
it will vanish. It vanished not; it continued for days; it increased. I
suppressed my surprise, and swallowed whatever other feelings began to
surge.
Well might I ask when he offered fraternity—“Dare I rely on you?” Well
might he, doubtless knowing himself, withhold all pledge. True, he had
bid me make my own experiments—tease and try him. Vain injunction!
Privilege nominal and unavailable! Some women might use it! Nothing in
my powers or instinct placed me amongst this brave band. Left alone, I
was passive; repulsed, I withdrew; forgotten—my lips would not utter,
nor my eyes dart a reminder. It seemed there had been an error
somewhere in my calculations, and I wanted for time to disclose it.
But the day came when, as usual, he was to give me a lesson. One
evening in seven he had long generously bestowed on me, devoting it to
the examination of what had been done in various studies during the
past week, and to the preparation of work for the week in prospect. On
these occasions my schoolroom was anywhere, wherever the pupils and the
other teachers happened to be, or in their close vicinage, very often
in the large second division, where it was easy to choose a quiet nook
when the crowding day pupils were absent, and the few boarders gathered
in a knot about the surveillante’s estrade.
On the customary evening, hearing the customary hour strike, I
collected my books and papers, my pen and ink, and sought the large
division.
In classe there was no one, and it lay all in cool deep shadow; but
through the open double doors was seen the carré, filled with pupils
and with light; over hall and figures blushed the westering sun. It
blushed so ruddily and vividly, that the hues of the walls and the
variegated tints of the dresses seemed all fused in one warm glow. The
girls were seated, working or studying; in the midst of their circle
stood M. Emanuel, speaking good-humouredly to a teacher. His dark
paletôt, his jetty hair, were tinged with many a reflex of crimson; his
Spanish face, when he turned it momentarily, answered the sun’s
animated kiss with an animated smile. I took my place at a desk.
The orange-trees, and several plants, full and bright with bloom,
basked also in the sun’s laughing bounty; they had partaken it the
whole day, and now asked water. M. Emanuel had a taste for gardening;
he liked to tend and foster plants. I used to think that working
amongst shrubs with a spade or a watering-pot soothed his nerves; it
was a recreation to which he often had recourse; and now he looked to
the orange-trees, the geraniums, the gorgeous cactuses, and revived
them all with the refreshment their drought needed. His lips meantime
sustained his precious cigar, that (for him) first necessary and prime
luxury of life; its blue wreaths curled prettily enough amongst the
flowers, and in the evening light. He spoke no more to the pupils, nor
to the mistresses, but gave many an endearing word to a small
spanieless (if one may coin a word), that nominally belonged to the
house, but virtually owned him as master, being fonder of him than any
inmate. A delicate, silky, loving, and lovable little doggie she was,
trotting at his side, looking with expressive, attached eyes into his
face; and whenever he dropped his bonnet-grec or his handkerchief,
which he occasionally did in play, crouching beside it with the air of
a miniature lion guarding a kingdom’s flag.
There were many plants, and as the amateur gardener fetched all the
water from the well in the court, with his own active hands, his work
spun on to some length. The great school-clock ticked on. Another hour
struck. The carré and the youthful group lost the illusion of sunset.
Day was drooping. My lesson, I perceived, must to-night be very short;
but the orange-trees, the cacti, the camelias were all served now. Was
it my turn?
Alas! in the garden were more plants to be looked after,—favourite
rose-bushes, certain choice flowers; little Sylvie’s glad bark and
whine followed the receding paletôt down the alleys. I put up some of
my books; I should not want them all; I sat and thought; and waited,
involuntarily deprecating the creeping invasion of twilight.
Sylvie, gaily frisking, emerged into view once more, heralding the
returning paletôt; the watering-pot was deposited beside the well; it
had fulfilled its office; how glad I was! Monsieur washed his hands in
a little stone bowl. There was no longer time for a lesson now; ere
long the prayer-bell must ring; but still we should meet; he would
speak; a chance would be offered of reading in his eyes the riddle of
his shyness. His ablutions over, he stood, slowly re-arranging his
cuffs, looking at the horn of a young moon, set pale in the opal sky,
and glimmering faint on the oriel of Jean Baptiste. Sylvie watched the
mood contemplative; its stillness irked her; she whined and jumped to
break it. He looked down.
“Petite exigeante,” said he; “you must not be forgotten one moment, it
seems.”
He stopped, lifted her in his arms, sauntered across the court, within
a yard of the line of windows near one of which I sat: he sauntered
lingeringly, fondling the spaniel in his bosom, calling her tender
names in a tender voice. On the front-door steps he turned; once again
he looked at the moon, at the grey cathedral, over the remoter spires
and house-roofs fading into a blue sea of night-mist; he tasted the
sweet breath of dusk, and noted the folded bloom of the garden; he
suddenly looked round; a keen beam out of his eye rased the white
façade of the classes, swept the long line of croisées. I think he
bowed; if he did, I had no time to return the courtesy. In a moment he
was gone; the moonlit threshold lay pale and shadowless before the
closed front door.
Gathering in my arms all that was spread on the desk before me, I
carried back the unused heap to its place in the third classe. The
prayer-bell rang; I obeyed its summons.
The morrow would not restore him to the Rue Fossette, that day being
devoted entirely to his college. I got through my teaching; I got over
the intermediate hours; I saw evening approaching, and armed myself for
its heavy ennuis. Whether it was worse to stay with my co-inmates, or
to sit alone, I had not considered; I naturally took up the latter
alternative; if there was a hope of comfort for any moment, the heart
or head of no human being in this house could yield it; only under the
lid of my desk could it harbour, nestling between the leaves of some
book, gilding a pencil-point, the nib of a pen, or tinging the black
fluid in that ink-glass. With a heavy heart I opened my desk-lid; with
a weary hand I turned up its contents.
One by one, well-accustomed books, volumes sewn in familiar covers,
were taken out and put back hopeless: they had no charm; they could not
comfort. Is this something new, this pamphlet in lilac? I had not seen
it before, and I re-arranged my desk this very day—this very afternoon;
the tract must have been introduced within the last hour, while we were
at dinner.
I opened it. What was it? What would it say to me?
It was neither tale nor poem, neither essay nor history; it neither
sung, nor related, not discussed. It was a theological work; it
preached and it persuaded.
I lent to it my ear very willingly, for, small as it was, it possessed
its own spell, and bound my attention at once. It preached Romanism; it
persuaded to conversion. The voice of that sly little book was a
honeyed voice; its accents were all unction and balm. Here roared no
utterance of Rome’s thunders, no blasting of the breath of her
displeasure. The Protestant was to turn Papist, not so much in fear of
the heretic’s hell, as on account of the comfort, the indulgence, the
tenderness Holy Church offered: far be it from her to threaten or to
coerce; her wish was to guide and win. She persecute? Oh dear no! not
on any account!
This meek volume was not addressed to the hardened and worldly; it was
not even strong meat for the strong: it was milk for babes: the mild
effluence of a mother’s love towards her tenderest and her youngest;
intended wholly and solely for those whose head is to be reached
through the heart. Its appeal was not to intellect; it sought to win
the affectionate through their affections, the sympathizing through
their sympathies: St. Vincent de Paul, gathering his orphans about him,
never spoke more sweetly.
I remember one capital inducement to apostacy was held out in the fact
that the Catholic who had lost dear friends by death could enjoy the
unspeakable solace of praying them out of purgatory. The writer did not
touch on the firmer peace of those whose belief dispenses with
purgatory altogether: but I thought of this; and, on the whole,
preferred the latter doctrine as the most consolatory. The little book
amused, and did not painfully displease me. It was a canting,
sentimental, shallow little book, yet something about it cheered my
gloom and made me smile; I was amused with the gambols of this unlicked
wolf-cub muffled in the fleece, and mimicking the bleat of a guileless
lamb. Portions of it reminded me of certain Wesleyan Methodist tracts I
had once read when a child; they were flavoured with about the same
seasoning of excitation to fanaticism. He that had written it was no
bad man, and while perpetually betraying the trained cunning—the cloven
hoof of his system—I should pause before accusing himself of
insincerity. His judgment, however, wanted surgical props; it was
rickety.
I smiled then over this dose of maternal tenderness, coming from the
ruddy old lady of the Seven Hills; smiled, too, at my own
disinclination, not to say disability, to meet these melting favours.
Glancing at the title-page, I found the name of “Père Silas.” A
fly-leaf bore in small, but clear and well-known pencil characters:
“From P. C. D. E. to L—y.” And when I saw this I laughed: but not in my
former spirit. I was revived.
A mortal bewilderment cleared suddenly from my head and vision; the
solution of the Sphinx-riddle was won; the conjunction of those two
names, Père Silas and Paul Emanuel, gave the key to all. The penitent
had been with his director; permitted to withhold nothing; suffered to
keep no corner of his heart sacred to God and to himself; the whole
narrative of our late interview had been drawn from him; he had avowed
the covenant of fraternity, and spoken of his adopted sister. How could
such a covenant, such adoption, be sanctioned by the Church? Fraternal
communion with a heretic! I seemed to hear Père Silas annulling the
unholy pact; warning his penitent of its perils; entreating, enjoining
reserve, nay, by the authority of his office, and in the name, and by
the memory of all M. Emanuel held most dear and sacred, commanding the
enforcement of that new system whose frost had pierced to the marrow of
my bones.
These may not seem pleasant hypotheses; yet, by comparison, they were
welcome. The vision of a ghostly troubler hovering in the background,
was as nothing, matched with the fear of spontaneous change arising in
M. Paul himself.
At this distance of time, I cannot be sure how far the above
conjectures were self-suggested: or in what measure they owed their
origin and confirmation to another quarter. Help was not wanting.
This evening there was no bright sunset: west and east were one cloud;
no summer night-mist, blue, yet rose-tinged, softened the distance; a
clammy fog from the marshes crept grey round Villette. To-night the
watering-pot might rest in its niche by the well: a small rain had been
drizzling all the afternoon, and still it fell fast and quietly. This
was no weather for rambling in the wet alleys, under the dripping
trees; and I started to hear Sylvie’s sudden bark in the garden—her
bark of welcome. Surely she was not accompanied and yet this glad,
quick bark was never uttered, save in homage to one presence.
Through the glass door and the arching berceau, I commanded the deep
vista of the allée défendue: thither rushed Sylvie, glistening through
its gloom like a white guelder-rose. She ran to and fro, whining,
springing, harassing little birds amongst the bushes. I watched five
minutes; no fulfilment followed the omen. I returned to my books;
Sylvie’s sharp bark suddenly ceased. Again I looked up. She was
standing not many yards distant, wagging her white feathery tail as
fast as the muscle would work, and intently watching the operations of
a spade, plied fast by an indefatigable hand. There was M. Emanuel,
bent over the soil, digging in the wet mould amongst the rain-laden and
streaming shrubs, working as hard as if his day’s pittance were yet to
earn by the literal sweat of his brow.
In this sign I read a ruffled mood. He would dig thus in frozen snow on
the coldest winter day, when urged inwardly by painful emotion, whether
of nervous excitation, or, sad thoughts of self-reproach. He would dig
by the hour, with knit brow and set teeth, nor once lift his head, or
open his lips.
Sylvie watched till she was tired. Again scampering devious, bounding
here, rushing there, snuffing and sniffing everywhere; she at last
discovered me in classe. Instantly she flew barking at the panes, as if
to urge me forth to share her pleasure or her master’s toil; she had
seen me occasionally walking in that alley with M. Paul; and I doubt
not, considered it my duty to join him now, wet as it was.
She made such a bustle that M. Paul at last looked up, and of course
perceived why, and at whom she barked. He whistled to call her off; she
only barked the louder. She seemed quite bent upon having the glass
door opened. Tired, I suppose, with her importunity, he threw down his
spade, approached, and pushed the door ajar. Sylvie burst in all
impetuous, sprang to my lap, and with her paws at my neck, and her
little nose and tongue somewhat overpoweringly busy about my face,
mouth, and eyes, flourished her bushy tail over the desk, and scattered
books and papers far and wide.
M. Emanuel advanced to still the clamour and repair the disarrangement.
Having gathered up the books, he captured Sylvie, and stowed her away
under his paletôt, where she nestled as quiet as a mouse, her head just
peeping forth. She was very tiny, and had the prettiest little innocent
face, the silkiest long ears, the finest dark eyes in the world. I
never saw her, but I thought of Paulina de Bassompierre: forgive the
association, reader, it would occur.
M. Paul petted and patted her; the endearments she received were not to
be wondered at; she invited affection by her beauty and her vivacious
life.
While caressing the spaniel, his eye roved over the papers and books
just replaced; it settled on the religious tract. His lips moved; he
half checked the impulse to speak. What! had he promised never to
address me more? If so, his better nature pronounced the vow “more
honoured in the breach than in the observance,” for with a second
effort, he spoke.—“You have not yet read the brochure, I presume? It is
not sufficiently inviting?”
I replied that I had read it.
He waited, as if wishing me to give an opinion upon it unasked.
Unasked, however, I was in no mood to do or say anything. If any
concessions were to be made—if any advances were demanded—that was the
affair of the very docile pupil of Père Silas, not mine. His eye
settled upon me gently: there was mildness at the moment in its blue
ray—there was solicitude—a shade of pathos; there were meanings
composite and contrasted—reproach melting into remorse. At the moment
probably, he would have been glad to see something emotional in me. I
could not show it. In another minute, however, I should have betrayed
confusion, had I not bethought myself to take some quill-pens from my
desk, and begin soberly to mend them.
I knew that action would give a turn to his mood. He never liked to see
me mend pens; my knife was always dull-edged—my hand, too, was
unskilful; I hacked and chipped. On this occasion I cut my own
finger—half on purpose. I wanted to restore him to his natural state,
to set him at his ease, to get him to chide.
“Maladroit!” he cried at last, “she will make mincemeat of her hands.”
He put Sylvie down, making her lie quiet beside his bonnet-grec, and,
depriving me of the pens and penknife, proceeded to slice, nib, and
point with the accuracy and celerity of a machine.
“Did I like the little book?” he now inquired.
Suppressing a yawn, I said I hardly knew.
“Had it moved me?”
“I thought it had made me a little sleepy.”
(After a pause) “Allons donc! It was of no use taking that tone with
him. Bad as I was—and he should be sorry to have to name all my faults
at a breath—God and nature had given me ‘trop de sensibilité et de
sympathie’ not to be profoundly affected by an appeal so touching.”
“Indeed!” I responded, rousing myself quickly, “I was not affected at
all—not a whit.”
And in proof, I drew from my pocket a perfectly dry handkerchief, still
clean and in its folds.
Hereupon I was made the object of a string of strictures rather piquant
than polite. I listened with zest. After those two days of unnatural
silence, it was better than music to hear M. Paul haranguing again just
in his old fashion. I listened, and meantime solaced myself and Sylvie
with the contents of a bonbonnière, which M. Emanuel’s gifts kept well
supplied with chocolate comfits: It pleased him to see even a small
matter from his hand duly appreciated. He looked at me and the spaniel
while we shared the spoil; he put up his penknife. Touching my hand
with the bundle of new-cut quills, he said:—“Dites donc, petite
sœur—speak frankly—what have you thought of me during the last two
days?”
But of this question I would take no manner of notice; its purport made
my eyes fill. I caressed Sylvie assiduously. M. Paul, leaning—over the
desk, bent towards me:—“I called myself your brother,” he said: “I
hardly know what I am—brother—friend—I cannot tell. I know I think of
you—I feel I wish, you well—but I must check myself; you are to be
feared. My best friends point out danger, and whisper caution.”
“You do right to listen to your friends. By all means be cautious.”
“It is your religion—your strange, self-reliant, invulnerable creed,
whose influence seems to clothe you in, I know not what, unblessed
panoply. You are good—Père Silas calls you good, and loves you—but your
terrible, proud, earnest Protestantism, there is the danger. It
expresses itself by your eye at times; and again, it gives you certain
tones and certain gestures that make my flesh creep. You are not
demonstrative, and yet, just now—when you handled that tract—my God! I
thought Lucifer smiled.”
“Certainly I don’t respect that tract—what then?”
“Not respect that tract? But it is the pure essence of faith, love,
charity! I thought it would touch you: in its gentleness, I trusted
that it could not fail. I laid it in your desk with a prayer: I must
indeed be a sinner: Heaven will not hear the petitions that come
warmest from my heart. You scorn my little offering. Oh, cela me fait
mal!”
“Monsieur, I don’t scorn it—at least, not as your gift. Monsieur, sit
down; listen to me. I am not a heathen, I am not hard-hearted, I am not
unchristian, I am not dangerous, as they tell you; I would not trouble
your faith; you believe in God and Christ and the Bible, and so do I.”
“But do you believe in the Bible? Do you receive Revelation? What
limits are there to the wild, careless daring of your country and sect.
Père Silas dropped dark hints.”
By dint of persuasion, I made him half-define these hints; they
amounted to crafty Jesuit-slanders. That night M. Paul and I talked
seriously and closely. He pleaded, he argued. I could not argue—a
fortunate incapacity; it needed but triumphant, logical opposition to
effect all the director wished to be effected; but I could talk in my
own way—the way M. Paul was used to—and of which he could follow the
meanderings and fill the hiatus, and pardon the strange stammerings,
strange to him no longer. At ease with him, I could defend my creed and
faith in my own fashion; in some degree I could lull his prejudices. He
was not satisfied when he went away, hardly was he appeased; but he was
made thoroughly to feel that Protestants were not necessarily the
irreverent Pagans his director had insinuated; he was made to
comprehend something of their mode of honouring the Light, the Life,
the Word; he was enabled partly to perceive that, while their
veneration for things venerable was not quite like that cultivated in
his Church, it had its own, perhaps, deeper power—its own more solemn
awe.
I found that Père Silas (himself, I must repeat, not a bad man, though
the advocate of a bad cause) had darkly stigmatized Protestants in
general, and myself by inference, with strange names, had ascribed to
us strange “isms;” Monsieur Emanuel revealed all this in his frank
fashion, which knew not secretiveness, looking at me as he spoke with a
kind, earnest fear, almost trembling lest there should be truth in the
charges. Père Silas, it seems, had closely watched me, had ascertained
that I went by turns, and indiscriminately, to the three Protestant
Chapels of Villette—the French, German, and English—id est, the
Presbyterian, Lutheran, Episcopalian. Such liberality argued in the
father’s eyes profound indifference—who tolerates all, he reasoned, can
be attached to none. Now, it happened that I had often secretly
wondered at the minute and unimportant character of the differences
between these three sects—at the unity and identity of their vital
doctrines: I saw nothing to hinder them from being one day fused into
one grand Holy Alliance, and I respected them all, though I thought
that in each there were faults of form, incumbrances, and trivialities.
Just what I thought, that did I tell M. Emanuel, and explained to him
that my own last appeal, the guide to which I looked, and the teacher
which I owned, must always be the Bible itself, rather than any sect,
of whatever name or nation.
He left me soothed, yet full of solicitude, breathing a wish, as strong
as a prayer, that if I were wrong, Heaven would lead me right. I heard,
poured forth on the threshold, some fervid murmurings to “Marie, Reine
du Ciel,” some deep aspiration that his hope might yet be mine.
Strange! I had no such feverish wish to turn him from the faith of his
fathers. I thought Romanism wrong, a great mixed image of gold and
clay; but it seemed to me that this Romanist held the purer elements
of his creed with an innocency of heart which God must love.
The preceding conversation passed between eight and nine o’clock of the
evening, in a schoolroom of the quiet Rue Fossette, opening on a
sequestered garden. Probably about the same, or a somewhat later hour
of the succeeding evening, its echoes, collected by holy obedience,
were breathed verbatim in an attent ear, at the panel of a
confessional, in the hoary church of the Magi. It ensued that Père
Silas paid a visit to Madame Beck, and stirred by I know not what
mixture of motives, persuaded her to let him undertake for a time the
Englishwoman’s spiritual direction.
Hereupon I was put through a course of reading—that is, I just glanced
at the books lent me; they were too little in my way to be thoroughly
read, marked, learned, or inwardly digested. And besides, I had a book
up-stairs, under my pillow, whereof certain chapters satisfied my needs
in the article of spiritual lore, furnishing such precept and example
as, to my heart’s core, I was convinced could not be improved on.
Then Père Silas showed me the fair side of Rome, her good works; and
bade me judge the tree by its fruits.
In answer, I felt and I avowed that these works were not the fruits
of Rome; they were but her abundant blossoming, but the fair promise
she showed the world, that bloom when set, savoured not of charity; the
apple full formed was ignorance, abasement, and bigotry. Out of men’s
afflictions and affections were forged the rivets of their servitude.
Poverty was fed and clothed, and sheltered, to bind it by obligation to
“the Church;” orphanage was reared and educated that it might grow up
in the fold of “the Church;” sickness was tended that it might die
after the formula and in the ordinance of “the Church;” and men were
overwrought, and women most murderously sacrificed, and all laid down a
world God made pleasant for his creatures’ good, and took up a cross,
monstrous in its galling weight, that they might serve Rome, prove her
sanctity, confirm her power, and spread the reign of her tyrant
“Church.”
For man’s good was little done; for God’s glory, less. A thousand ways
were opened with pain, with blood-sweats, with lavishing of life;
mountains were cloven through their breasts, and rocks were split to
their base; and all for what? That a Priesthood might march straight on
and straight upward to an all-dominating eminence, whence they might at
last stretch the sceptre of their Moloch “Church.”
It will not be. God is not with Rome, and, were human sorrows still for
the Son of God, would he not mourn over her cruelties and ambitions, as
once he mourned over the crimes and woes of doomed Jerusalem!
Oh, lovers of power! Oh, mitred aspirants for this world’s kingdoms! an
hour will come, even to you, when it will be well for your
hearts—pausing faint at each broken beat—that there is a Mercy beyond
human compassions, a Love, stronger than this strong death which even
you must face, and before it, fall; a Charity more potent than any sin,
even yours; a Pity which redeems worlds—nay, absolves Priests.
My third temptation was held out in the pomp of Rome—the glory of her
kingdom. I was taken to the churches on solemn occasions—days of fête
and state; I was shown the Papal ritual and ceremonial. I looked at it.
Many people—men and women—no doubt far my superiors in a thousand ways,
have felt this display impressive, have declared that though their
Reason protested, their Imagination was subjugated. I cannot say the
same. Neither full procession, nor high mass, nor swarming tapers, nor
swinging censers, nor ecclesiastical millinery, nor celestial
jewellery, touched my imagination a whit. What I saw struck me as
tawdry, not grand; as grossly material, not poetically spiritual.
This I did not tell Père Silas; he was old, he looked venerable:
through every abortive experiment, under every repeated disappointment,
he remained personally kind to me, and I felt tender of hurting his
feelings. But on the evening of a certain day when, from the balcony of
a great house, I had been made to witness a huge mingled procession of
the church and the army—priests with relics, and soldiers with weapons,
an obese and aged archbishop, habited in cambric and lace, looking
strangely like a grey daw in bird-of-paradise plumage, and a band of
young girls fantastically robed and garlanded—then I spoke my mind to
M. Paul.
“I did not like it,” I told him; “I did not respect such ceremonies; I
wished to see no more.”
And having relieved my conscience by this declaration, I was able to go
on, and, speaking more currently and clearly than my wont, to show him
that I had a mind to keep to my reformed creed; the more I saw of
Popery the closer I clung to Protestantism; doubtless there were errors
in every church, but I now perceived by contrast how severely pure was
my own, compared with her whose painted and meretricious face had been
unveiled for my admiration. I told him how we kept fewer forms between
us and God; retaining, indeed, no more than, perhaps, the nature of
mankind in the mass rendered necessary for due observance. I told him I
could not look on flowers and tinsel, on wax-lights and embroidery, at
such times and under such circumstances as should be devoted to lifting
the secret vision to Him whose home is Infinity, and His
being—Eternity. That when I thought of sin and sorrow, of earthly
corruption, mortal depravity, weighty temporal woe—I could not care for
chanting priests or mumming officials; that when the pains of existence
and the terrors of dissolution pressed before me—when the mighty hope
and measureless doubt of the future arose in view—then, even the
scientific strain, or the prayer in a language learned and dead,
harassed: with hindrance a heart which only longed to cry—“God be
merciful to me, a sinner!”
When I had so spoken, so declared my faith, and so widely severed
myself, from him I addressed—then, at last, came a tone accordant, an
echo responsive, one sweet chord of harmony in two conflicting spirits.
“Whatever say priests or controversialists,” murmured M. Emanuel, “God
is good, and loves all the sincere. Believe, then, what you can;
believe it as you can; one prayer, at least, we have in common; I also
cry—‘O Dieu, sois appaisé envers moi qui suis pécheur!’”
He leaned on the back of my chair. After some thought he again spoke:
“How seem in the eyes of that God who made all firmaments, from whose
nostrils issued whatever of life is here, or in the stars shining
yonder—how seem the differences of man? But as Time is not for God, nor
Space, so neither is Measure, nor Comparison. We abase ourselves in our
littleness, and we do right; yet it may be that the constancy of one
heart, the truth and faith of one mind according to the light He has
appointed, import as much to Him as the just motion of satellites about
their planets, of planets about their suns, of suns around that mighty
unseen centre incomprehensible, irrealizable, with strange mental
effort only divined.
“God guide us all! God bless you, Lucy!”
Master this chapter. Complete your experience
Purchase the complete book to access all chapters and support classic literature
As an Amazon Associate, we earn a small commission from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.
Available in paperback, hardcover, and e-book formats
Let's Analyse the Pattern
Organizations use loyalty and belonging to override individual judgment about personal relationships and choices.
Why This Matters
Connect literature to life
This chapter teaches how to recognize when organizations manipulate loyalty and belonging to control individual relationships and choices.
Practice This Today
This week, notice when your workplace, family, or community frames personal choices as loyalty tests—then ask who actually benefits from their preferred outcome.
Now let's explore the literary elements.
Key Quotes & Analysis
"Rome watched jealously her son through that mystic lattice at which I had knelt once, and to which M. Emanuel drew nigh month by month—the sliding panel of the confessional."
Context: Lucy realizes the Catholic Church is monitoring Paul's friendship with her through confession
This reveals how religious institutions can invade the most personal relationships. The word 'jealously' suggests the church sees Lucy as competition for Paul's loyalty.
In Today's Words:
The organization was keeping tabs on him through their regular check-ins, watching his every move like a jealous partner.
"I liked his modest doubts, his tender deference—that trust which longed to rest, and was grateful when taught how."
Context: Lucy reflects on why she values Paul's friendship and vulnerability
Shows Lucy appreciates Paul's emotional honesty and willingness to be vulnerable. This contrasts with the rigid authority of his religious superiors.
In Today's Words:
I loved that he could admit when he wasn't sure about things, that he trusted me enough to let his guard down.
"He had called me 'sister.' It was well. Yes; he might call me what he pleased, so long as he confided in me."
Context: Lucy accepts Paul's attempt to define their relationship in safe, familial terms
Lucy understands Paul needs to frame their relationship in religiously acceptable terms, but she values the emotional intimacy more than the label.
In Today's Words:
I didn't care what he called our relationship as long as he kept being real with me.
Thematic Threads
Religious Control
In This Chapter
The Catholic Church uses Paul's confessor to manipulate his feelings for Lucy, framing love as spiritual betrayal
Development
Builds on earlier religious tensions, now showing direct institutional interference in personal life
In Your Life:
You might face pressure from religious communities to abandon relationships or choices that don't align with doctrine
Authentic Faith
In This Chapter
Lucy and Paul discover their genuine spiritual beliefs transcend denominational boundaries and institutional demands
Development
Evolves from Lucy's earlier spiritual struggles to finding common ground despite different traditions
In Your Life:
You might find deeper spiritual connection with people outside your official religious community
Divided Loyalty
In This Chapter
Paul must choose between his confessor's demands and his genuine affection for Lucy
Development
Intensifies the ongoing tension between Paul's institutional obligations and personal desires
In Your Life:
You might face pressure to choose between organizational loyalty and personal relationships
Independent Thought
In This Chapter
Both Lucy and Paul think for themselves about theology despite external pressure to conform
Development
Continues Lucy's pattern of intellectual independence, now showing Paul developing similar courage
In Your Life:
You might need to trust your own judgment when institutions pressure you to abandon critical thinking
Human Connection
In This Chapter
Lucy and Paul's honest conversation reveals their capacity for understanding across religious differences
Development
Deepens their relationship from earlier chapters, showing genuine intimacy emerging despite obstacles
In Your Life:
You might find that honest communication can bridge differences that institutions claim are unbridgeable
You now have the context. Time to form your own thoughts.
Discussion Questions
- 1
What specific actions does Paul's confessor take to interfere with his friendship with Lucy, and how does Paul initially respond?
analysis • surface - 2
Why does the Catholic Church see Paul's friendship with Protestant Lucy as threatening, and what does this reveal about institutional control?
analysis • medium - 3
Where do you see organizations today pressuring people to choose loyalty to the group over personal relationships?
application • medium - 4
When facing pressure to abandon a relationship for institutional reasons, how would you determine whether the concern is legitimate or manipulative?
application • deep - 5
What does this chapter reveal about the difference between genuine spiritual guidance and institutional control disguised as moral concern?
reflection • deep
Critical Thinking Exercise
Map Your Loyalty Conflicts
Think of a time when an organization you belonged to (workplace, family, church, political group) pressured you to distance yourself from someone or something you valued. Draw a simple diagram showing the organization, yourself, and the relationship in question. Then identify what the organization claimed was at stake versus what you personally experienced as valuable about that relationship.
Consider:
- •Organizations often frame personal choices as loyalty tests to increase their control
- •The institution's stated concerns may mask their real fear of losing influence over you
- •Your direct experience of a relationship is more reliable than someone else's interpretation of it
Journaling Prompt
Write about a current situation where you feel torn between institutional expectations and personal values. What would change if you trusted your own judgment over the organization's narrative?
Coming Up Next...
Chapter 37: Love's Perfect Resolution
After their intense religious debate, Lucy and Paul must navigate the aftermath of their theological confrontation. Will their newfound understanding survive the continued pressure from religious authorities, or will external forces finally succeed in driving them apart?




