Summary
Smith examines three ancient approaches to living well, each offering a different recipe for internal balance. Plato viewed the mind like a small government with three departments: reason as the wise ruler, pride-based emotions as the security force, and pleasure-seeking desires as the maintenance crew. When reason stays in charge and the other two departments do their jobs without overstepping, you get what Plato called justice—not just fairness to others, but harmony within yourself. Aristotle took a different angle, arguing that virtue lies in the sweet spot between extremes. Courage sits between cowardice and recklessness; generosity between stinginess and wasteful spending. But Aristotle emphasized that knowing what's right isn't enough—you need to practice it until balanced responses become automatic habits. The Stoics, led by Zeno, pushed this further, teaching that a wise person should remain emotionally steady regardless of circumstances. They believed we should choose what promotes wellbeing when possible, but accept whatever happens as part of a larger plan we can't fully see. Smith notes that while these ancient systems offer valuable insights about emotional regulation and decision-making, they don't fully explain why we feel differently about harmful actions versus merely foolish ones, or why generous acts deserve special recognition beyond just being 'proper.' These frameworks provide useful tools for self-management, but they're incomplete guides to moral life.
Coming Up in Chapter 34
Having explored virtue as balance and propriety, Smith turns to examine systems that place virtue in prudence—the practical wisdom of looking out for your own interests. But is self-interest really the foundation of moral behavior?
Share it with friends
An excerpt from the original text.(~500 words)
Of those systems which make virtue consist in propriety. According to Plato, to Aristotle, and to Zeno, virtue consists in the propriety of conduct, or in the suitableness of the affection from which we act to the object which excites it. I. In the system of Plato[8] the soul is considered as something like a little state or republic, composed of three different faculties or orders. 8. See Plato de Rep. lib. iv. 296The first is the judging faculty, the faculty which determines not only what are the proper means for attaining any end, but also what ends are fit to be pursued, and what degree of relative value we ought to put upon each. This faculty Plato called, as it is very properly called reason, and considered it as what had a right to be the governing principle of the whole. Under this appellation, it is evident, he comprehended not only that faculty by which we judge of truth and falsehood, but that by which we judge of the propriety or impropriety of desires and affections. The different passions and appetites, the natural subject of this ruling principle, but which are so apt to rebel against their master, he reduced to two different classes or orders. The first consisted of those passions, which are founded in pride and resentment, or in what the schoolmen called the irascible part of the soul; ambition, animosity, the love of honour, and the dread of shame, the desire of victory, superiority, and revenge; all those passions, in short, which are supposed either to rise from, or to denote what, by a metaphor in our language, we commonly call spirit or natural fire. The second consisted of those passions which are founded in the love of pleasure, or in what the schoolmen called the concupiscible part of the soul. It comprehended all the appetites of the body, the love of ease and security, and of all sensual gratifications. It rarely happens that we break in upon that plan of conduct, which the governing principle prescribes, and which in all our cool hours we had laid down to ourselves as what was most proper for us to pursue, 297but when prompted by one or other of those two different sets of passions; either by ungovernable ambition and resentment, or by the importunate solicitations of present ease and pleasure. But though these two orders of passions are so apt to mislead us, they are still considered as necessary parts of human nature: the first having been given to defend us against injuries, to assert our rank and dignity in the world, to make us aim at what is noble and honourable, and to make us distinguish those who act in the same manner; the second to provide for the support and necessities of the body. In the strength, acuteness, and perfection of the governing principle was placed the essential virtue of prudence, which, according to Plato, consisted in a just and clear discernment, founded upon general...
Master this chapter. Complete your experience
Purchase the complete book to access all chapters and support classic literature
As an Amazon Associate, we earn a small commission from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.
Available in paperback, hardcover, and e-book formats
Intelligence Amplifier™ Analysis
The Road of Three Ancient Blueprints
Different emotional challenges require different management frameworks, and choosing the right approach for each situation builds resilience and effectiveness.
Why This Matters
Connect literature to life
This chapter teaches how to choose the right emotional management strategy based on your specific situation and internal state.
Practice This Today
This week, notice when you're overwhelmed and try Plato's hierarchy—ask which part of you should be in charge right now, reason, emotions, or desires.
Now let's explore the literary elements.
Terms to Know
Propriety
Acting in a way that fits the situation - having emotions and responses that match what's actually happening. It's about emotional appropriateness, not just following rules.
Modern Usage:
We see this when someone stays calm during a crisis or gets appropriately excited about good news - their reaction fits the moment.
Irascible passions
The pride-based emotions like anger, ambition, desire for respect, and fear of shame. These are the feelings that make us want to fight, compete, or defend our reputation.
Modern Usage:
This shows up as road rage, workplace competition, social media arguments, or the burning shame when someone disrespects us publicly.
Concupiscible appetites
The pleasure-seeking desires for things like food, comfort, sex, and material goods. These are our basic wants that can easily get out of control.
Modern Usage:
Think shopping addiction, binge-watching, overeating, or any time we want something right now without thinking about consequences.
Golden mean
Aristotle's idea that virtue is the middle ground between two extremes. Courage sits between cowardice and recklessness, generosity between stinginess and waste.
Modern Usage:
We use this when we talk about work-life balance, moderate drinking, or being assertive without being aggressive.
Stoic philosophy
A way of thinking that emphasizes controlling your reactions to events rather than trying to control the events themselves. Accept what you can't change, act on what you can.
Modern Usage:
This appears in modern therapy, self-help books, and the phrase 'it is what it is' - focusing on your response rather than the situation.
Habitual virtue
The idea that being good isn't about knowing what's right, but practicing good choices until they become automatic responses. Virtue as muscle memory.
Modern Usage:
Like developing any skill - you practice being patient, generous, or honest until it becomes your natural reaction without thinking about it.
Characters in This Chapter
Plato
Ancient philosopher
Presents the first system Smith examines, comparing the mind to a small government with reason as ruler, pride-emotions as enforcers, and desires as workers. When all three work in harmony under reason's leadership, you achieve internal justice.
Modern Equivalent:
The therapist who helps you understand your different emotional parts and how they should work together
Aristotle
Ancient philosopher
Offers the second approach Smith discusses, arguing that virtue lies in finding the right balance between extremes and that this balance must be practiced until it becomes habit, not just understood intellectually.
Modern Equivalent:
The life coach who focuses on building better habits through consistent practice rather than just talking about problems
Zeno
Stoic philosopher
Represents the third system, teaching that wise people should remain emotionally steady regardless of circumstances, accepting what happens as part of a larger plan while making good choices when possible.
Modern Equivalent:
The calm person at work who never seems rattled by chaos and always responds thoughtfully instead of reacting emotionally
Key Quotes & Analysis
"The soul is considered as something like a little state or republic, composed of three different faculties or orders"
Context: Smith explains Plato's model of how the mind works
This metaphor helps us understand internal conflict as different parts of ourselves wanting different things, rather than just being confused or weak. It suggests we need internal leadership and organization.
In Today's Words:
Your mind is like a small government with different departments that need to work together under good leadership
"Virtue consists in the propriety of conduct, or in the suitableness of the affection from which we act to the object which excites it"
Context: Smith defines what these philosophers meant by living well
This captures the idea that being good isn't about following rigid rules, but about having responses that fit the situation. Your anger, joy, or fear should match what's actually happening.
In Today's Words:
Being a good person means having reactions that make sense for what's actually going on
"The different passions and appetites, the natural subject of this ruling principle, but which are so apt to rebel against their master"
Context: Explaining why internal harmony is difficult to achieve
This acknowledges that our emotions and desires naturally resist being managed by reason. It's normal for our feelings to push back against our better judgment - the challenge is maintaining good leadership.
In Today's Words:
Your emotions and wants naturally fight against what your rational mind knows is best
Thematic Threads
Personal Growth
In This Chapter
Smith examines how ancient philosophers developed systematic approaches to emotional development and character building
Development
Expanded from individual moral development to structured frameworks for self-improvement
In Your Life:
You might recognize the need for different strategies to handle stress at work versus conflicts at home
Social Expectations
In This Chapter
The chapter explores how different philosophical schools defined what constitutes proper behavior and emotional responses
Development
Building on earlier discussions of social approval to examine formal systems of behavioral standards
In Your Life:
You might notice how different social settings require different versions of emotional self-control
Human Relationships
In This Chapter
Smith analyzes how these ancient frameworks help people interact more effectively by managing their own emotional responses
Development
Evolved from sympathy-based connection to systematic approaches for relationship navigation
In Your Life:
You might find that practicing emotional balance makes your relationships with family and coworkers less volatile
Class
In This Chapter
The philosophical approaches Smith discusses were originally developed for educated elites but contain practical wisdom applicable across social levels
Development
Continued exploration of how moral insights transcend social boundaries
In Your Life:
You might realize that emotional management skills matter more than formal education in determining life outcomes
You now have the context. Time to form your own thoughts.
Discussion Questions
- 1
Smith describes three ancient approaches to staying emotionally balanced—Plato's mind-as-government, Aristotle's middle path, and Stoic acceptance. Which approach sounds most familiar to how you already handle stress?
analysis • surface - 2
Why do you think all three ancient systems focused on practice and habit-building rather than just understanding what's right? What's the difference between knowing and doing?
analysis • medium - 3
Think about a recent conflict at work or home. How might each framework—Plato's reason-in-charge, Aristotle's balance, or Stoic acceptance—have changed how you handled it?
application • medium - 4
Aristotle taught that virtue becomes automatic through repetition, like muscle memory. What's one emotional response you'd like to practice until it becomes your natural reaction?
application • deep - 5
Smith notes these frameworks help with self-management but don't fully explain moral judgment. What situations require more than just staying balanced—where you need to take a stand?
reflection • deep
Critical Thinking Exercise
Build Your Personal Framework Toolkit
Think of three recent situations where you felt emotionally overwhelmed or made a decision you regret. For each situation, identify which ancient framework might have helped: Plato's reason-as-manager for when emotions hijacked your thinking, Aristotle's middle path for when you swung too far in one direction, or Stoic acceptance for when you fought against unchangeable circumstances. Write one specific practice you could use next time.
Consider:
- •Focus on situations where you had some control over your response
- •Consider which framework feels most natural to your personality
- •Think about how to practice these responses before you need them
Journaling Prompt
Describe a person you know who seems naturally balanced in difficult situations. What do they do differently? Which ancient framework do they seem to use instinctively, and how could you adapt their approach to your own life?
Coming Up Next...
Chapter 34: The Pleasure Principle Philosophy
Moving forward, we'll examine ancient philosophers justified virtue through self-interest rather than moral duty, and understand pain avoidance and pleasure seeking might drive all human behavior. These insights bridge the gap between classic literature and modern experience.