Summary
Smith tackles a crucial question: do we approve of virtuous behavior simply because it's useful, or is there something deeper at work? He argues that while utility does make actions appear beautiful to us, it's not the primary reason we admire virtue. Think of how we view a prudent person versus a well-designed machine - both are useful, but our feelings about them are fundamentally different. Smith examines various virtues like prudence, self-control, generosity, and public spirit, showing that we don't first calculate their usefulness and then approve. Instead, we feel an immediate sense of rightness when someone's actions align with what an impartial observer would expect. When a soldier sacrifices his life for his officer, he's not doing a cost-benefit analysis - he's acting according to how he knows any fair-minded person would view the situation. The utility of his action adds an extra layer of beauty to our perception, but it's not what makes us admire him in the first place. This distinction matters because it reveals that moral approval runs deeper than mere calculation. We respond to the harmony between someone's feelings and what we sense is appropriate to the situation. A person raised in complete isolation might recognize the practical value of good behavior, but wouldn't feel the shame or pride that comes from social moral judgment. Our moral sentiments are fundamentally social - they depend on our ability to imagine how an impartial spectator would view our actions.
Coming Up in Chapter 31
Smith turns to examine how custom and fashion shape our moral judgments, exploring why the same action can seem virtuous in one society and vicious in another. He'll reveal how social trends influence not just what we wear, but what we consider right and wrong.
Share it with friends
An excerpt from the original text.(~500 words)
Of the beauty which the appearance of utility bestows upon the characters and actions of men; and how far the perception of this beauty may be regarded as one of the original principles of approbation. The characters of men, as well as the contrivances of art, or the institutions of civil government, may be fitted either to promote or to disturb the happiness both of the individual and of the society. The prudent, the equitable, the active, resolute, and sober character promises prosperity and satisfaction, both to the person himself and to every one connected with him. The rash, the insolent, the slothful, effeminate, and voluptuous, on the contrary, forebodes ruin to the individual, and misfortune to all who have any thing to do with him. The first turn of mind has at least all the beauty 251which can belong to the most perfect machine that was ever invented for promoting the most agreeable purpose: and the second all the deformity of the most awkward and clumsy contrivance. What institution of government could tend so much to promote the happiness of mankind as the general prevalence of wisdom and virtue? All government is but an imperfect remedy for the deficiency of these. Whatever beauty, therefore, can belong to civil government upon account of its utility, must in a far superior degree belong to these. On the contrary, what civil policy can be so ruinous and destructive as the vices of men? The fatal effects of bad government arise from nothing, but that it does not sufficiently guard against the mischiefs which human wickedness gives occasion to. This beauty and deformity which characters appear to derive from their usefulness or inconveniency, are apt to strike, in a peculiar manner, those who consider, in an abstract and philosophical light, the actions and conduct of mankind. When a philosopher goes to examine why humanity is approved of, or cruelty condemned, he does not always form to himself, in a very clear and distinct manner, the conception of any one particular action either of cruelty or of humanity, but is commonly contented with the vague and indeterminate idea which the general names of those qualities suggest to him. But it is in particular instances only that the propriety or impropriety, the merit or demerit of actions is very obvious and discernible. It is only when particular examples are given that we perceive distinctly either the concord or disagreement between our own affections and those of the agent, or feel a social gratitude arise 252towards him in the one case, or a sympathetic resentment in the other. When we consider virtue and vice in an abstract and general manner, the qualities by which they excite these several sentiments seem in a great measure to disappear, and the sentiments themselves become less obvious and discernible. On the contrary, the happy effects of the one and the fatal consequences of the other seem then to rise up to the view, and as it were to stand out...
Master this chapter. Complete your experience
Purchase the complete book to access all chapters and support classic literature
As an Amazon Associate, we earn a small commission from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.
Available in paperback, hardcover, and e-book formats
Intelligence Amplifier™ Analysis
The Road of True Recognition - Why We Admire What We Admire
We first feel whether behavior is right through social instincts, then practical benefits add extra appeal.
Why This Matters
Connect literature to life
This chapter teaches how to distinguish between people who do right because it feels right versus those calculating advantages.
Practice This Today
This week, notice when someone does something good - pay attention to whether your respect comes instantly or after you think about the benefits.
Now let's explore the literary elements.
Terms to Know
Impartial Spectator
Smith's concept of an imaginary fair-minded observer who judges our actions without personal bias. This internal voice helps us evaluate whether our behavior is appropriate by asking 'What would a reasonable person think of this?'
Modern Usage:
We use this when we step back and ask ourselves 'How would this look to someone who doesn't know me?' before making decisions.
Utility
The practical usefulness or benefit something provides. Smith argues that while we notice when virtuous behavior is useful, that's not why we admire it - we admire it because it feels right.
Modern Usage:
We see this in how we judge people - we respect someone who helps others even when it's not practical for them.
Moral Sentiments
The feelings and emotions that guide our sense of right and wrong. Smith believes these come from our ability to imagine how others would judge our actions, not from cold calculation.
Modern Usage:
This is our gut feeling about whether something is right or wrong, like feeling ashamed when we cut in line even if no one notices.
Propriety
The quality of being appropriate or suitable to the situation. Smith argues we approve of actions that match what we'd expect from someone in that position.
Modern Usage:
We see this when we judge whether someone's reaction fits the situation - like expecting a parent to be protective or a leader to stay calm in crisis.
Sympathy
For Smith, this means our ability to imagine and share the feelings of others. It's not just feeling sorry for someone, but actually putting ourselves in their shoes.
Modern Usage:
This is what happens when we watch someone get hurt and wince ourselves, or feel nervous watching someone give a speech.
Benevolence
Acting with genuine care for others' wellbeing. Smith distinguishes between doing good because it's useful versus doing good because you truly care about others.
Modern Usage:
We see this difference between someone who volunteers for the tax write-off versus someone who genuinely wants to help.
Characters in This Chapter
The Prudent Person
moral exemplar
Smith's example of someone whose character naturally promotes both their own happiness and that of everyone around them. Their careful, thoughtful approach to life creates stability and trust.
Modern Equivalent:
The reliable coworker everyone turns to for advice
The Rash and Insolent Person
negative example
Represents the type of character that brings misfortune to themselves and others through impulsive, arrogant behavior. Smith uses them to show how character flaws ripple outward.
Modern Equivalent:
The drama-creating friend who always makes bad decisions
The Virtuous Soldier
moral hero
Smith's example of someone who sacrifices for duty not because they calculated the benefits, but because they know it's what an impartial observer would expect in that situation.
Modern Equivalent:
The first responder who runs toward danger
The Person Raised in Isolation
thought experiment subject
Smith's hypothetical person who might understand utility but wouldn't feel moral emotions like shame or pride because they lack social connection. Shows that morality is fundamentally social.
Modern Equivalent:
Someone who understands rules but doesn't feel the social pressure to follow them
Key Quotes & Analysis
"The prudent, the equitable, the active, resolute, and sober character promises prosperity and satisfaction, both to the person himself and to every one connected with him."
Context: Smith is explaining how certain character traits naturally benefit everyone around them
This shows Smith's belief that virtue isn't just personal - it radiates outward. Good character traits create a positive ripple effect that benefits entire communities, not just the individual.
In Today's Words:
When someone has their act together, everyone around them benefits too.
"All government is but an imperfect remedy for the deficiency of these."
Context: Smith is arguing that wisdom and virtue in individuals are more powerful than any government institution
This reveals Smith's belief that personal character matters more than systems or rules. Laws and institutions can only do so much - real social harmony comes from people choosing to act well.
In Today's Words:
Rules and laws are just backup plans for when people don't do the right thing on their own.
"What institution of government could tend so much to promote the happiness of mankind as the general prevalence of wisdom and virtue?"
Context: Smith is comparing the power of individual virtue to governmental institutions
Smith is making the case that character development is the ultimate social policy. If everyone acted with wisdom and virtue, we'd need fewer laws and enforcement mechanisms.
In Today's Words:
The best way to fix society is for people to actually be good people.
Thematic Threads
Social Expectations
In This Chapter
Smith shows how our moral approval stems from imagining what an impartial observer would think, not from calculating usefulness
Development
Deepens from earlier chapters about the impartial spectator—now we see it's the primary source of moral judgment
In Your Life:
You judge yourself and others based on imagined social standards before considering practical outcomes
Human Relationships
In This Chapter
Our moral sentiments are fundamentally social—they require the ability to imagine others' perspectives
Development
Builds on relationship themes by showing how moral connection depends on shared social understanding
In Your Life:
Your deepest relationships involve people whose actions feel 'right' to you socially, not just practically beneficial
Identity
In This Chapter
A person raised in isolation might recognize practical value but wouldn't feel moral shame or pride
Development
Extends identity themes by showing how moral identity requires social context and shared expectations
In Your Life:
Your sense of right and wrong is shaped by the communities you've been part of, not just logical analysis
Class
In This Chapter
The soldier sacrificing for his officer shows how social roles create moral expectations beyond utility
Development
Continues class themes by examining how social position influences moral duty and recognition
In Your Life:
Your work role or social position creates moral expectations that go beyond job descriptions or practical requirements
You now have the context. Time to form your own thoughts.
Discussion Questions
- 1
According to Smith, what's the difference between admiring a virtuous person and admiring a well-designed machine?
analysis • surface - 2
Why does Smith think we don't calculate usefulness first and then decide to approve of good behavior?
analysis • medium - 3
Think of someone you immediately respected at work or in your community. Did you analyze their usefulness first, or did you have a gut reaction?
application • medium - 4
How would you use Smith's 'impartial observer' test when facing a difficult decision in your own life?
application • deep - 5
What does this two-layer recognition system reveal about how humans are wired for social living?
reflection • deep
Critical Thinking Exercise
Test Your Recognition Hierarchy
Think of three people you respect - at work, in your family, or in your community. For each person, write down your immediate gut reaction to them, then identify what practical benefits their behavior creates. Notice which came first: your instinctive approval or your recognition of their usefulness.
Consider:
- •Pay attention to how quickly you formed your opinion versus how long it took to identify practical benefits
- •Notice if the practical benefits make your respect feel stronger or more justified
- •Consider whether you'd still respect these people even if the practical benefits disappeared
Journaling Prompt
Write about a time when you had to make a choice between what felt right and what seemed most practically beneficial. How did you decide, and how did it turn out?
Coming Up Next...
Chapter 31: Why We Follow Fashion Trends
As the story unfolds, you'll explore habit shapes what we find beautiful or ugly, while uncovering social status influences our taste preferences. These lessons connect the classic to contemporary challenges we all face.