Amplified ClassicsAmplified Classics
Literature MattersLife IndexEducators
Sign inSign up
The Essays of Montaigne - When Bad Means Serve Good Ends

Michel de Montaigne

The Essays of Montaigne

When Bad Means Serve Good Ends

Home›Books›The Essays of Montaigne›Chapter 79
Previous
79 of 107
Next

Summary

Montaigne explores a troubling but persistent reality: sometimes societies must use morally questionable methods to achieve necessary goals. He compares nations to human bodies that need periodic 'bloodletting' to stay healthy. Just as doctors sometimes purge even healthy patients to prevent dangerous imbalances, countries often need to release internal pressures before they explode. He gives historical examples of this principle in action. Ancient Rome deliberately maintained foreign wars partly to give their restless young men an outlet for violence, preventing civil unrest at home. Medieval kings would send troublesome nobles on foreign campaigns to clear out potential rebels. Even today, Montaigne notes, leaders consider redirecting internal conflicts toward external enemies. He examines other morally complex examples: Sparta forced slaves to get drunk so citizens would see the ugliness of excess and avoid it themselves. Roman gladiator games, while brutal, taught citizens courage and acceptance of death. These practices worked—they achieved their intended social benefits—but at terrible moral cost. Montaigne doesn't endorse these methods, but he acknowledges a harsh truth: sometimes the choice isn't between good and evil, but between different kinds of harm. The weakness of human nature often forces leaders into impossible positions where any action causes suffering. This essay forces readers to grapple with uncomfortable questions about leadership, sacrifice, and the gap between moral ideals and practical necessity.

Coming Up in Chapter 80

From the moral complexities of leadership, Montaigne turns to examine what made Rome truly great—and what lessons their rise and fall hold for understanding power in any age.

Share it with friends

Previous ChapterNext Chapter
GO ADS FREE — JOIN US

An excerpt from the original text.(complete · 1406 words)

OF ILL MEANS EMPLOYED TO A GOOD END

There is wonderful relation and correspondence in this universal
government of the works of nature, which very well makes it appear that
it is neither accidental nor carried on by divers masters. The diseases
and conditions of our bodies are, in like manner, manifest in states and
governments; kingdoms and republics are founded, flourish, and decay with
age as we do. We are subject to a repletion of humours, useless and
dangerous: whether of those that are good (for even those the physicians
are afraid of; and seeing we have nothing in us that is stable, they say
that a too brisk and vigorous perfection of health must be abated by art,
lest our nature, unable to rest in any certain condition, and not having
whither to rise to mend itself, make too sudden and too disorderly a
retreat; and therefore prescribe wrestlers to purge and bleed, to qualify
that superabundant health)
, or else a repletion of evil humours, which is
the ordinary cause of sickness. States are very often sick of the like
repletion, and various sorts of purgations have commonly been applied.
Some times a great multitude of families are turned out to clear the
country, who seek out new abodes elsewhere and encroach upon others.
After this manner our ancient Franks came from the remotest part of
Germany to seize upon Gaul, and to drive thence the first inhabitants;
so was that infinite deluge of men made up who came into Italy under the
conduct of Brennus and others; so the Goths and Vandals, and also the
people who now possess Greece, left their native country to go settle
elsewhere, where they might have more room; and there are scarce two or
three little corners in the world that have not felt the effect of such
removals. The Romans by this means erected their colonies; for,
perceiving their city to grow immeasurably populous, they eased it of the
most unnecessary people, and sent them to inhabit and cultivate the lands
conquered by them; sometimes also they purposely maintained wars with
some of their enemies, not only to keep their own men in action, for fear
lest idleness, the mother of corruption, should bring upon them some
worse inconvenience:

“Et patimur longae pacis mala; saevior armis
Luxuria incumbit.”

[“And we suffer the ills of a long peace; luxury is more pernicious
than war.”--Juvenal, vi. 291.]

but also to serve for a blood-letting to their Republic, and a little to
evaporate the too vehement heat of their youth, to prune and clear the
branches from the stock too luxuriant in wood; and to this end it was
that they maintained so long a war with Carthage.

In the treaty of Bretigny, Edward III., king of England, would not, in
the general peace he then made with our king, comprehend the controversy
about the Duchy of Brittany, that he might have a place wherein to
discharge himself of his soldiers, and that the vast number of English he
had brought over to serve him in his expedition here might not return
back into England. And this also was one reason why our King Philip
consented to send his son John upon a foreign expedition, that he might
take along with him a great number of hot young men who were then in his
pay.

There--are many in our times who talk at this rate, wishing that
this hot emotion that is now amongst us might discharge itself in some
neighbouring war, for fear lest all the peccant humours that now reign in
this politic body of ours may diffuse themselves farther, keep the fever
still in the height, and at last cause our total ruin; and, in truth, a
foreign is much more supportable than a civil war, but I do not believe
that God will favour so unjust a design as to offend and quarrel with
others for our own advantage:

“Nil mihi tam valde placeat, Rhamnusia virgo,
Quod temere invitis suscipiatur heris.”

[“Rhamnusian virgin, let nothing ever so greatly please me which is
taken without justice from the unwilling owners”
--Catullus, lxviii. 77.]

And yet the weakness of our condition often pushes us upon the necessity
of making use of ill means to a good end. Lycurgus, the most perfect
legislator that ever was, virtuous and invented this very unjust practice
of making the helots, who were their slaves, drunk by force, to the end
that the Spartans, seeing them so lost and buried in wine, might abhor
the excess of this vice. And yet those were still more to blame who of
old gave leave that criminals, to what sort of death soever condemned,
should be cut up alive by the physicians, that they might make a true
discovery of our inward parts, and build their art upon greater
certainty; for, if we must run into excesses, it is more excusable to do
it for the health of the soul than that of the body; as the Romans
trained up the people to valour and the contempt of dangers and death by
those furious spectacles of gladiators and fencers, who, having to fight
it out to the last, cut, mangled, and killed one another in their
presence:

“Quid vesani aliud sibi vult ars impia ludi,
Quid mortes juvenum, quid sanguine pasta voluptas?”

[“What other end does the impious art of the gladiators propose to
itself, what the slaughter of young men, what pleasure fed with
blood.”--Prudentius, Contra Symmachum, ii. 643.]

and this custom continued till the Emperor Theodosius’ time:

“Arripe dilatam tua, dux, in tempora famam,
Quodque patris superest, successor laudis habeto
Nullus in urbe cadat, cujus sit poena voluptas....
Jam solis contenta feris, infamis arena
Nulla cruentatis homicidia ludat in armis.”

[“Prince, take the honours delayed for thy reign, and be successor
to thy fathers; henceforth let none at Rome be slain for sport. Let
beasts’ blood stain the infamous arena, and no more homicides be
there acted.”--Prudentius, Contra Symmachum, ii. 643.]

It was, in truth, a wonderful example, and of great advantage for the
training up the people, to see every day before their eyes a hundred; two
hundred, nay, a thousand couples of men armed against one another, cut
one another to pieces with so great a constancy of courage, that they
were never heard to utter so much as one syllable of weakness or
commiseration; never seen to turn their backs, nor so much as to make one
cowardly step to evade a blow, but rather exposed their necks to the
adversary’s sword and presented themselves to receive the stroke; and
many of them, when wounded to death, have sent to ask the spectators if
they were satisfied with their behaviour, before they lay down to die
upon the place. It was not enough for them to fight and to die bravely,
but cheerfully too; insomuch that they were hissed and cursed if they
made any hesitation about receiving their death. The very girls
themselves set them on:

“Consurgit ad ictus,
Et, quoties victor ferrum jugulo inserit, illa
Delicias ait esse suas, pectusque jacentis
Virgo modesta jubet converso pollice rumpi.”

[“The modest virgin is so delighted with the sport, that she
applauds the blow, and when the victor bathes his sword in his
fellow’s throat, she says it is her pleasure, and with turned thumb
orders him to rip up the bosom of the prostrate victim.”
--Prudentius, Contra Symmachum, ii. 617.]

The first Romans only condemned criminals to this example: but they
afterwards employed innocent slaves in the work, and even freemen too,
who sold themselves to this purpose, nay, moreover, senators and knights
of Rome, and also women:

“Nunc caput in mortem vendunt, et funus arena,
Atque hostem sibi quisque parat, cum bella quiescunt.”

[“They sell themselves to death and the circus, and, since the wars
are ceased, each for himself a foe prepares.”
--Manilius, Astron., iv. 225.]

“Hos inter fremitus novosque lusus....
Stat sexus rudis insciusque ferri,
Et pugnas capit improbus viriles;”

[“Amidst these tumults and new sports, the tender sex, unskilled in
arms, immodestly engaged in manly fights.”
--Statius, Sylv., i. 6, 51.]

which I should think strange and incredible, if we were not accustomed
every day to see in our own wars many thousands of men of other nations,
for money to stake their blood and their lives in quarrels wherein they
have no manner of concern.

Master this chapter. Complete your experience

Purchase the complete book to access all chapters and support classic literature

Read Free on GutenbergBuy at Powell'sBuy on Amazon

As an Amazon Associate, we earn a small commission from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.

Available in paperback, hardcover, and e-book formats

GO ADS FREE — JOIN US

Let's Analyse the Pattern

Pattern: The Damage Control Dilemma
Sometimes the choice isn't between right and wrong—it's between different kinds of damage. Montaigne reveals a brutal pattern: leaders often must choose harmful methods to prevent worse outcomes. This isn't corruption or weakness; it's the mathematics of damage control when all options cause pain. The mechanism works like a pressure valve. When internal tensions build—restless energy, competing interests, dangerous imbalances—leaders face a choice: let the pressure explode unpredictably, or channel it in a controlled direction. Rome sent young men to war not from bloodlust, but because idle warriors become revolutionaries. Medieval kings exiled troublemakers not from cruelty, but because civil war kills more than foreign campaigns. The moral cost is real, but so is the alternative. You see this everywhere today. Hospital administrators cut nursing staff knowing patient care suffers, because bankruptcy would close the hospital entirely. Parents work double shifts missing family time, because eviction would destroy the family completely. Managers promote incompetent but connected employees, because workplace harmony prevents the department from imploding. Union leaders accept bad contracts, because strikes would cost members their jobs permanently. Each choice sacrifices something important to preserve something essential. When you recognize this pattern, ask three questions: What pressure is building? What are ALL the options, not just the clean ones? What's the real cost of doing nothing? Sometimes the moral choice isn't the pure choice—it's the one that minimizes total harm. Don't judge leaders facing impossible decisions until you understand what explosion they're preventing. But also don't let 'necessity' become an excuse for choices made from convenience or cowardice. When you can distinguish between genuine impossible choices and manufactured justifications—that's amplified intelligence. It helps you make hard decisions without losing your moral compass, and evaluate leaders without naive idealism.

When all available choices cause harm, leaders must select the option that minimizes total damage rather than preserving moral purity.

Why This Matters

Connect literature to life

Skill: Distinguishing Necessary Harm from Convenient Cruelty

This chapter teaches how to evaluate whether difficult decisions stem from genuine impossible circumstances or from leaders avoiding harder but cleaner solutions.

Practice This Today

This week, notice when someone justifies harmful actions as 'necessary'—ask yourself: what other options did they really have, and what explosion are they claiming to prevent?

GO ADS FREE — JOIN US

Now let's explore the literary elements.

Key Quotes & Analysis

"We have nothing in us that is stable, and seeing that a too brisk and vigorous perfection of health must be abated by art"

— Montaigne

Context: Explaining why doctors would bleed even healthy patients

This reveals Montaigne's belief that nothing in life stays balanced naturally - even good things can become dangerous if left unchecked. It sets up his argument that societies, like bodies, need artificial interventions to maintain stability.

In Today's Words:

Nothing stays perfect forever, so sometimes you have to mess with things that are working fine to prevent bigger problems later.

"Various sorts of purgations have commonly been applied to states very often sick of the like repletion"

— Montaigne

Context: Comparing political solutions to medical treatments

Montaigne directly links political and medical 'cures,' suggesting that harsh measures in government aren't necessarily evil - they might be medicine. This challenges readers to think about whether tough policies are cruelty or healing.

In Today's Words:

Countries get sick just like people do, and sometimes they need harsh medicine to get better.

"The weakness of human nature often forces leaders into impossible positions where any action causes suffering"

— Montaigne

Context: Reflecting on the moral dilemmas leaders face

This quote captures the essay's central tragedy - that leadership often means choosing between different kinds of harm rather than between good and evil. Montaigne shows sympathy for those who must make terrible decisions.

In Today's Words:

Sometimes there are no good choices, only less bad ones, and somebody has to pick.

Thematic Threads

Leadership

In This Chapter

Montaigne examines how leaders must sometimes choose harmful methods to prevent worse outcomes, like redirecting internal conflicts toward external enemies

Development

Introduced here

In Your Life:

You might face this when managing a team where every decision disappoints someone, forcing you to choose the least damaging option.

Moral Complexity

In This Chapter

The essay grapples with practices that work effectively but violate moral ideals, like using brutal gladiator games to teach citizens courage

Development

Introduced here

In Your Life:

You encounter this when workplace policies you disagree with actually prevent bigger problems from occurring.

Social Control

In This Chapter

Montaigne describes how societies use morally questionable methods like forced intoxication of slaves to teach citizens by negative example

Development

Introduced here

In Your Life:

You see this when institutions use fear tactics or uncomfortable truths to modify behavior for the greater good.

Human Nature

In This Chapter

The essay acknowledges that human weakness often forces leaders into impossible positions where any action causes suffering

Development

Introduced here

In Your Life:

You experience this when family dynamics force you to choose between enabling someone or causing immediate pain through tough love.

Practical Necessity

In This Chapter

Montaigne shows how effective governance sometimes requires choosing between different kinds of harm rather than pursuing ideal solutions

Development

Introduced here

In Your Life:

You face this when budget constraints force you to prioritize some family needs while sacrificing others.

GO ADS FREE — JOIN US

You now have the context. Time to form your own thoughts.

Discussion Questions

  1. 1

    According to Montaigne, why did ancient Rome deliberately maintain foreign wars instead of focusing on peace at home?

    analysis • surface
  2. 2

    What does Montaigne mean when he compares nations to human bodies that need 'bloodletting' to stay healthy?

    analysis • medium
  3. 3

    Where do you see leaders today choosing harmful methods to prevent worse outcomes? Think about your workplace, community, or family.

    application • medium
  4. 4

    When facing an impossible choice between different kinds of harm, how would you decide which option causes less total damage?

    application • deep
  5. 5

    What does this essay reveal about the gap between moral ideals and practical leadership? Can someone be both ethical and effective?

    reflection • deep

Critical Thinking Exercise

10 minutes

Map Your Impossible Choice

Think of a difficult decision you're facing or have faced where all options seem to cause some kind of harm. Draw three columns: Option A consequences, Option B consequences, Do Nothing consequences. List both immediate and long-term effects for each choice. Then identify which option minimizes total damage, not just the damage you can see clearly.

Consider:

  • •Consider hidden costs of inaction - what problems grow worse if left alone?
  • •Distinguish between harm you cause directly versus harm you allow to continue
  • •Ask who benefits from keeping the current situation unchanged

Journaling Prompt

Write about a time when you had to choose between bad options. What helped you decide? Looking back, do you think you minimized total harm, or just avoided the harm that felt most uncomfortable to you personally?

Coming Up Next...

Chapter 80: The True Scale of Power

From the moral complexities of leadership, Montaigne turns to examine what made Rome truly great—and what lessons their rise and fall hold for understanding power in any age.

Continue to Chapter 80
Previous
The Art of Moving Fast
Contents
Next
The True Scale of Power

Continue Exploring

The Essays of Montaigne Study GuideTeaching ResourcesEssential Life IndexBrowse by ThemeAll Books

You Might Also Like

Crime and Punishment cover

Crime and Punishment

Fyodor Dostoevsky

Explores personal growth

Jane Eyre cover

Jane Eyre

Charlotte Brontë

Explores personal growth

Great Expectations cover

Great Expectations

Charles Dickens

Explores personal growth

The Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde cover

The Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde

Robert Louis Stevenson

Explores personal growth

Browse all 47+ books

Share This Chapter

Know someone who'd enjoy this? Spread the wisdom!

TwitterFacebookLinkedInEmail

Read ad-free with Prestige

Get rid of ads, unlock study guides and downloads, and support free access for everyone.

Subscribe to PrestigeCreate free account
Intelligence Amplifier
Intelligence Amplifier™Powering Amplified Classics

Exploring human-AI collaboration through books, essays, and philosophical dialogues. Classic literature transformed into navigational maps for modern life.

2025 Books

→ The Amplified Human Spirit→ The Alarming Rise of Stupidity Amplified→ San Francisco: The AI Capital of the World
Visit intelligenceamplifier.org
hello@amplifiedclassics.com

AC Originals

→ The Last Chapter First→ You Are Not Lost→ The Lit of Love→ The Wealth Paradox
Arvintech
arvintechAmplify your Mind
Visit at arvintech.com

Navigate

  • Home
  • Library
  • Essential Life Index
  • How It Works
  • Subscribe
  • Account
  • About
  • Contact
  • Authors
  • Suggest a Book
  • Landings

Made For You

  • Students
  • Educators
  • Families
  • Readers
  • Literary Analysis
  • Finding Purpose
  • Letting Go
  • Recovering from a Breakup
  • Corruption
  • Gaslighting in the Classics

Newsletter

Weekly insights from the classics. Amplify Your Mind.

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Cookie Policy
  • Accessibility

Why Public Domain?

We focus on public domain classics because these timeless works belong to everyone. No paywalls, no restrictions—just wisdom that has stood the test of centuries, freely accessible to all readers.

Public domain books have shaped humanity's understanding of love, justice, ambition, and the human condition. By amplifying these works, we help preserve and share literature that truly belongs to the world.

© 2025 Amplified Classics™. All Rights Reserved.

Intelligence Amplifier™ and Amplified Classics™ are proprietary trademarks of Arvin Lioanag.

Copyright Protection: All original content, analyses, discussion questions, pedagogical frameworks, and methodology are protected by U.S. and international copyright law. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, web scraping, or use for AI training is strictly prohibited. See our Copyright Notice for details.

Disclaimer: The information provided on this website is for general informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute professional, legal, financial, or technical advice. While we strive to ensure accuracy and relevance, we make no warranties regarding completeness, reliability, or suitability. Any reliance on such information is at your own risk. We are not liable for any losses or damages arising from use of this site. By using this site, you agree to these terms.