Summary
Montaigne explores the delicate art of meaningful conversation and debate, arguing that we often learn more from observing what not to do than from copying good examples. He confesses his own impatience with fools while recognizing this as a character flaw, noting that true conversation requires the courage to be corrected and the wisdom to welcome opposition. The essay examines how people often mistake borrowed knowledge for their own understanding, speaking confidently about things they've merely heard rather than truly comprehended. Montaigne advocates for intellectual honesty, suggesting we should present ourselves authentically rather than hiding behind impressive-sounding but empty phrases. He criticizes both academic pretension and the tendency to judge people by their social position rather than their actual merit. The chapter reveals Montaigne's belief that real learning happens through genuine exchange of ideas, not through one-sided lectures or the parroting of received wisdom. He argues that conversation is more valuable than solitary study because it forces us to test our ideas against other minds, though he warns against the common trap of arguing to win rather than to discover truth.
Coming Up in Chapter 103
Having explored the art of conversation with others, Montaigne turns inward to examine the most complex topic of all: vanity and self-knowledge. In the final major essay, he confronts the paradox of writing about oneself while claiming to avoid vanity.
Share it with friends
An excerpt from the original text.(~500 words)
OF THE ART OF CONFERENCE ‘Tis a custom of our justice to condemn some for a warning to others. To condemn them for having done amiss, were folly, as Plato says, [Diogenes Laertius, however, in his Life of Plato, iii. 181, says that Plato’s offence was the speaking too freely to the tyrant.] for what is done can never be undone; but ‘tis to the end they may offend no more, and that others may avoid the example of their offence: we do not correct the man we hang; we correct others by him. I do the same; my errors are sometimes natural, incorrigible, and irremediable: but the good which virtuous men do to the public, in making themselves imitated, I, peradventure, may do in making my manners avoided: “Nonne vides, Albi ut male vivat filius? utque Barrus inops? magnum documentum, ne patriam rein Perdere guis velit;” [“Dost thou not see how ill the son of Albus lives? and how the indigent Barrus? a great warning lest any one should incline to dissipate his patrimony.”--Horace, Sat., i. 4, 109.] publishing and accusing my own imperfections, some one will learn to be afraid of them. The parts that I most esteem in myself, derive more honour from decrying, than for commending myself which is the reason why I so often fall into, and so much insist upon that strain. But, when all is summed up, a man never speaks of himself without loss; a man’s accusations of himself are always believed; his praises never: There may, peradventure, be some of my own complexion who better instruct myself by contrariety than by similitude, and by avoiding than by imitation. The elder Cato was regarding this sort of discipline, when he said, “that the wise may learn more of fools, than fools can of the wise”; and Pausanias tells us of an ancient player upon the harp, who was wont to make his scholars go to hear one who played very ill, who lived over against him, that they might learn to hate his discords and false measures. The horror of cruelty more inclines me to clemency, than any example of clemency could possibly do. A good rider does not so much mend my seat, as an awkward attorney or a Venetian, on horseback; and a clownish way of speaking more reforms mine than the most correct. The ridiculous and simple look of another always warns and advises me; that which pricks, rouses and incites much better than that which tickles. The time is now proper for us to reform backward; more by dissenting than by agreeing; by differing more than by consent. Profiting little by good examples, I make use of those that are ill, which are everywhere to be found: I endeavour to render myself as agreeable as I see others offensive; as constant as I see others fickle; as affable as I see others rough; as good as I see others evil: but I propose to myself impracticable measures. The...
Master this chapter. Complete your experience
Purchase the complete book to access all chapters and support classic literature
As an Amazon Associate, we earn a small commission from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.
Available in paperback, hardcover, and e-book formats
Intelligence Amplifier™ Analysis
The Road of Borrowed Authority - Why People Speak Loudest About What They Know Least
The tendency to speak most confidently about subjects we understand least, using borrowed language to mask our uncertainty.
Why This Matters
Connect literature to life
This chapter teaches how to recognize when someone is using borrowed authority to mask their lack of genuine understanding.
Practice This Today
This week, notice when people speak with suspicious certainty about complex topics—listen for buzzwords, absolute statements, and resistance to follow-up questions.
Now let's explore the literary elements.
Terms to Know
Conference
In Montaigne's time, this meant serious conversation or debate between equals, not a formal presentation. It was the art of exchanging ideas to learn from each other, requiring both speaking honestly and listening openly.
Modern Usage:
We see this in good workplace discussions where people actually listen to change their minds, not just wait for their turn to talk.
Borrowed knowledge
Information someone repeats without truly understanding it themselves. Montaigne criticized people who spoke confidently about things they'd only heard secondhand, mistaking memorized facts for real comprehension.
Modern Usage:
This is like people who share articles on social media without reading them, or repeat talking points they heard on TV as if they're experts.
Academic pretension
Using fancy words and complex ideas to sound smart rather than to communicate clearly. Montaigne saw this as intellectual dishonesty that prevented real learning and understanding.
Modern Usage:
Today this shows up as people using jargon to sound important in meetings, or posting quotes they don't understand to seem intellectual.
Intellectual honesty
The courage to admit what you don't know and to change your mind when presented with better evidence. Montaigne believed this was essential for real learning and meaningful conversation.
Modern Usage:
This is rare but valuable - like admitting you were wrong in an argument, or saying 'I don't know' instead of making something up.
Arguing to win vs. arguing to learn
The difference between trying to prove you're right versus trying to discover what's actually true. Montaigne warned that most people argue just to defeat others, missing chances to learn.
Modern Usage:
Social media debates are usually about winning, while good relationships involve discussions where both people might change their minds.
Learning from negative examples
The idea that we can learn what not to do by observing others' mistakes, sometimes more effectively than copying good examples. Montaigne used his own flaws as teaching tools.
Modern Usage:
This is why we learn from cautionary tales, bad boss stories, or watching reality TV disasters - seeing what not to do can be very instructive.
Characters in This Chapter
Montaigne
Self-examining narrator
He confesses his impatience with fools while recognizing this as a character flaw. Uses his own imperfections as examples of what to avoid, demonstrating intellectual honesty.
Modern Equivalent:
The self-aware friend who admits their flaws and learns from mistakes
Albus's son
Cautionary example
Referenced as someone who lives badly, serving as a warning to others about how not to behave. Represents the value of negative examples in teaching.
Modern Equivalent:
The coworker whose bad habits everyone talks about as a warning
Barrus
Cautionary example
Described as indigent, another example of someone whose poor choices serve as a lesson to others about managing resources and life decisions.
Modern Equivalent:
The relative who made bad financial decisions that the family uses as a cautionary tale
Plato
Philosophical authority
Cited to support the idea that punishment serves to warn others rather than fix past wrongs. Represents the use of classical wisdom to support arguments.
Modern Equivalent:
The respected expert whose quotes people use to back up their points
Key Quotes & Analysis
"A man never speaks of himself without loss; a man's accusations of himself are always believed"
Context: While discussing the paradox of self-revelation and reputation
This reveals the double bind of honesty - admitting flaws damages your reputation, but people trust self-criticism more than self-praise. Montaigne shows the cost of intellectual honesty.
In Today's Words:
When you admit your mistakes, people believe you, but it hurts your image - you can't win.
"The good which virtuous men do to the public, in making themselves imitated, I may do in making my manners avoided"
Context: Explaining why he openly discusses his character flaws
He argues that being a bad example can be as valuable as being a good one. This shows his willingness to sacrifice his reputation for the greater good of teaching others.
In Today's Words:
If good people help by being role models, maybe I can help by showing people what not to do.
"We do not correct the man we hang; we correct others by him"
Context: Discussing how justice works as a deterrent to others
This stark observation about punishment reveals Montaigne's understanding that consequences often serve future prevention rather than past correction. It shows his practical view of human behavior.
In Today's Words:
When we punish someone, we're really sending a message to everyone else about what happens when you break the rules.
Thematic Threads
Intellectual Honesty
In This Chapter
Montaigne advocates for presenting ourselves authentically rather than hiding behind impressive but empty phrases
Development
Building on earlier themes of self-knowledge and authentic living
In Your Life:
You might catch yourself using buzzwords at work to sound knowledgeable about things you've only heard about secondhand
Class and Social Position
In This Chapter
He criticizes judging people by social position rather than actual merit or understanding
Development
Continues his ongoing examination of how social hierarchies distort genuine human evaluation
In Your Life:
You might automatically defer to someone's opinion because of their title, even when their actual knowledge is limited
Learning Through Opposition
In This Chapter
Montaigne values conversation over solitary study because it tests ideas against other minds
Development
Expands his philosophy of learning through experience and interaction
In Your Life:
You might avoid difficult conversations that could actually help you refine your thinking and grow
Pride and Vulnerability
In This Chapter
He confesses his impatience with fools while recognizing this as a character flaw
Development
Continues his practice of honest self-examination and admission of personal flaws
In Your Life:
You might struggle with your own impatience toward people you consider less intelligent, missing opportunities to learn
Truth vs. Winning
In This Chapter
He warns against arguing to win rather than to discover truth through genuine exchange
Development
Builds on themes of authentic communication and genuine human connection
In Your Life:
You might find yourself in arguments where you're more focused on being right than understanding the other person's perspective
You now have the context. Time to form your own thoughts.
Discussion Questions
- 1
What does Montaigne notice about how confidently people speak versus how much they actually understand?
analysis • surface - 2
Why do people rely on borrowed phrases and recycled wisdom instead of admitting what they don't know?
analysis • medium - 3
Where do you see this pattern of fake confidence in your workplace, social media, or family conversations?
application • medium - 4
How would you handle a situation where someone is speaking with authority about something they clearly don't understand?
application • deep - 5
What does this pattern reveal about our fear of looking stupid, and how does that fear actually make us less intelligent?
reflection • deep
Critical Thinking Exercise
Track Your Confidence vs. Knowledge
For the next day, notice when you speak confidently about topics. Rate your actual knowledge on each topic from 1-10, then rate how confidently you spoke about it. Look for gaps where your confidence exceeded your knowledge. What topics trigger your 'borrowed authority' mode?
Consider:
- •Pay attention to topics where you repeat things you've heard rather than experienced
- •Notice if you speak more confidently in certain groups or situations
- •Watch for moments when you could have asked questions instead of making statements
Journaling Prompt
Write about a time when you realized you were speaking with false confidence. What were you afraid would happen if you admitted you didn't know something? How did that fear serve or hurt you?
Coming Up Next...
Chapter 103: The Vanity of Writing About Vanity
What lies ahead teaches us to recognize the productive power of admitting your own contradictions, and shows us distance from home can clarify what truly matters in your daily life. These patterns appear in literature and life alike.