Summary
Utterson finally gets his chance to confront Jekyll about Hyde during a private dinner conversation. What starts as a pleasant evening between old friends quickly turns tense when Utterson brings up Jekyll's troubling will that leaves everything to the mysterious Hyde. Jekyll's reaction is immediate and alarming - his face goes pale, his eyes darken, and he becomes evasive and incoherent. Despite Utterson's genuine offer to help and his promise of confidentiality, Jekyll insists the situation isn't as bad as it seems and claims he can 'be rid of Mr. Hyde' whenever he chooses. Yet in the same breath, he begs Utterson to look after Hyde if anything happens to him, calling the man he supposedly can control 'poor Hyde' and asking for justice on his behalf. This contradiction reveals Jekyll's internal conflict - he's both afraid of Hyde and protective of him. Utterson, though skeptical and clearly uncomfortable, agrees to help Hyde for Jekyll's sake. The chapter exposes the painful reality of watching a friend in denial about a destructive relationship. Jekyll's insistence that this is a 'private matter' that 'cannot be mended by talking' shows how isolation and shame can trap people in harmful situations, even when help is offered by those who care about them.
Coming Up in Chapter 4
Nearly a year passes in relative quiet until London is shocked by a brutal crime that will shatter the uneasy peace. The violence is so savage and the victim so prominent that it captures the entire city's attention - and draws Utterson deeper into the mystery.
Share it with friends
An excerpt from the original text.(~500 words)
A fortnight later, by excellent good fortune, the doctor gave one of his pleasant dinners to some five or six old cronies, all intelligent, reputable men and all judges of good wine; and Mr. Utterson so contrived that he remained behind after the others had departed. This was no new arrangement, but a thing that had befallen many scores of times. Where Utterson was liked, he was liked well. Hosts loved to detain the dry lawyer, when the light-hearted and loose-tongued had already their foot on the threshold; they liked to sit a while in his unobtrusive company, practising for solitude, sobering their minds in the man’s rich silence after the expense and strain of gaiety. To this rule, Dr. Jekyll was no exception; and as he now sat on the opposite side of the fire—a large, well-made, smooth-faced man of fifty, with something of a slyish cast perhaps, but every mark of capacity and kindness—you could see by his looks that he cherished for Mr. Utterson a sincere and warm affection. “I have been wanting to speak to you, Jekyll,” began the latter. “You know that will of yours?” A close observer might have gathered that the topic was distasteful; but the doctor carried it off gaily. “My poor Utterson,” said he, “you are unfortunate in such a client. I never saw a man so distressed as you were by my will; unless it were that hide-bound pedant, Lanyon, at what he called my scientific heresies. O, I know he’s a good fellow—you needn’t frown—an excellent fellow, and I always mean to see more of him; but a hide-bound pedant for all that; an ignorant, blatant pedant. I was never more disappointed in any man than Lanyon.” “You know I never approved of it,” pursued Utterson, ruthlessly disregarding the fresh topic. “My will? Yes, certainly, I know that,” said the doctor, a trifle sharply. “You have told me so.” “Well, I tell you so again,” continued the lawyer. “I have been learning something of young Hyde.” The large handsome face of Dr. Jekyll grew pale to the very lips, and there came a blackness about his eyes. “I do not care to hear more,” said he. “This is a matter I thought we had agreed to drop.” “What I heard was abominable,” said Utterson. “It can make no change. You do not understand my position,” returned the doctor, with a certain incoherency of manner. “I am painfully situated, Utterson; my position is a very strange—a very strange one. It is one of those affairs that cannot be mended by talking.” “Jekyll,” said Utterson, “you know me: I am a man to be trusted. Make a clean breast of this in confidence; and I make no doubt I can get you out of it.” “My good Utterson,” said the doctor, “this is very good of you, this is downright good of you, and I cannot find words to thank you in. I believe you fully; I would trust you before...
Master this chapter. Complete your experience
Purchase the complete book to access all chapters and support classic literature
As an Amazon Associate, we earn a small commission from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.
Available in paperback, hardcover, and e-book formats
Intelligence Amplifier™ Analysis
The Road of Protective Denial
The tendency to defend and protect someone who is harming us, becoming more defensive as the harm increases.
Why This Matters
Connect literature to life
This chapter teaches how to identify when someone defends harmful behavior while simultaneously asking others to manage its consequences.
Practice This Today
This week, notice when someone says 'I can handle it' while asking you to fix problems they created—that's the Jekyll-Hyde split in action.
Now let's explore the literary elements.
Terms to Know
Cronies
Close friends who have known each other for years, often meeting regularly. In Victorian society, these were typically men of the same social class who shared meals and conversation. The word suggests both loyalty and exclusivity.
Modern Usage:
We still talk about someone's 'cronies' - usually their inner circle of longtime friends or colleagues who stick together.
Hide-bound pedant
Someone who is rigid, narrow-minded, and overly focused on rules or traditional ways of thinking. Jekyll uses this insult to describe Dr. Lanyon, who disapproves of Jekyll's unconventional scientific experiments.
Modern Usage:
We call these people 'by-the-book' types or say someone is 'stuck in their ways' when they refuse to consider new ideas.
Scientific heresies
Experiments or theories that go against accepted scientific beliefs of the time. In the 1880s, respectable doctors were expected to follow established medical practices, not pursue radical new ideas.
Modern Usage:
Today we might say someone is 'pushing boundaries' or working on 'cutting-edge research' that makes colleagues uncomfortable.
Practicing for solitude
The idea that quiet, thoughtful company helps prepare you for being alone with your thoughts. Utterson's calm presence helps people transition from social excitement to peaceful reflection.
Modern Usage:
We call this 'decompressing' - spending time with someone who helps you wind down and process your thoughts.
Private matter
Something personal that you don't want others involved in, even when they're trying to help. Jekyll repeatedly insists his situation with Hyde is nobody else's business.
Modern Usage:
People still say 'it's personal' or 'I can handle it myself' when they're struggling but don't want intervention.
Slyish cast
A facial expression or look that suggests someone might be cunning or secretive. The narrator notes this quality in Jekyll's otherwise kind appearance.
Modern Usage:
We might say someone has a 'mischievous look' or 'something in their eyes' that hints at hidden depths.
Characters in This Chapter
Mr. Utterson
Concerned friend and advocate
He finally confronts Jekyll about the troubling will and offers genuine help. Despite his discomfort with the situation, he promises to protect Hyde for Jekyll's sake, showing true loyalty.
Modern Equivalent:
The friend who stages an intervention
Dr. Jekyll
Friend in denial
His physical reaction to discussing Hyde - going pale, eyes darkening - reveals his fear. He contradicts himself by claiming control over Hyde while begging Utterson to protect him.
Modern Equivalent:
The friend caught in a toxic relationship who insists they're fine
Mr. Hyde
Absent threat
Though not present, Hyde dominates the conversation. Jekyll's contradictory feelings - calling him both controllable and needing protection - show the complexity of their connection.
Modern Equivalent:
The destructive person everyone's worried about but won't discuss directly
Dr. Lanyon
Disapproving colleague
Mentioned as someone who judges Jekyll's scientific work harshly. His criticism adds to Jekyll's sense of isolation and defensiveness about his experiments.
Modern Equivalent:
The judgmental coworker who makes you feel like an outsider
Key Quotes & Analysis
"I never saw a man so distressed as you were by my will"
Context: Jekyll tries to deflect Utterson's concerns about the will with humor
This reveals that Utterson's worry has been obvious and ongoing. Jekyll's attempt to make light of it shows he's uncomfortable with the attention but also touched by his friend's concern.
In Today's Words:
I've never seen anyone as worried about my business as you are
"The moment I choose, I can be rid of Mr. Hyde"
Context: Jekyll insists he has control over the Hyde situation
This is classic denial language - claiming power over something that's clearly out of control. The confidence in his voice contradicts his physical reaction and later pleas for help.
In Today's Words:
I can end this whenever I want to
"I only ask for justice; I only ask you to help him for my sake"
Context: Jekyll begs Utterson to look after Hyde if something happens
The word 'justice' is telling - it suggests Hyde might be misunderstood rather than evil. Jekyll's protective instinct reveals a deep emotional connection he can't explain.
In Today's Words:
Just give him a fair chance and help him out because you care about me
"This is a matter I thought we had agreed to drop"
Context: Jekyll tries to shut down the conversation about Hyde
This shows Jekyll's desperation to avoid the topic. He's trying to use their friendship to avoid accountability, a common tactic when people feel cornered.
In Today's Words:
I thought we weren't going to talk about this anymore
Thematic Threads
Denial
In This Chapter
Jekyll insists he can control Hyde while simultaneously begging protection for him
Development
Introduced here as active self-deception rather than simple ignorance
In Your Life:
You might recognize this when you find yourself making excuses for someone's harmful behavior toward you.
Loyalty
In This Chapter
Utterson agrees to help Hyde despite his misgivings, purely out of friendship with Jekyll
Development
Builds on Utterson's earlier concern, showing how loyalty can become enabling
In Your Life:
You face this when your loyalty to a friend conflicts with what you know is right.
Control
In This Chapter
Jekyll claims he can 'be rid of Hyde' whenever he chooses, asserting false control
Development
Introduced here as Jekyll's primary delusion about his situation
In Your Life:
You might tell yourself you can quit a bad habit 'anytime' while never actually doing it.
Isolation
In This Chapter
Jekyll insists this is a 'private matter' that cannot be helped by others
Development
Develops from earlier secrecy into active rejection of help
In Your Life:
You might push away people trying to help when you're ashamed of your situation.
Contradiction
In This Chapter
Jekyll simultaneously claims control over Hyde while begging others to protect him
Development
Introduced here as evidence of Jekyll's fractured thinking
In Your Life:
You might notice yourself giving conflicting messages when you're not being honest about a problem.
You now have the context. Time to form your own thoughts.
Discussion Questions
- 1
Why does Jekyll become so defensive when Utterson brings up Hyde, and what does his physical reaction (pale face, dark eyes) tell us?
analysis • surface - 2
Jekyll says he can 'be rid of Mr. Hyde' whenever he chooses, but then begs Utterson to protect Hyde. What does this contradiction reveal about Jekyll's mental state?
analysis • medium - 3
Where have you seen this pattern of someone defending a person or situation that's clearly harmful to them? What made it hard for them to see the truth?
application • medium - 4
If you were in Utterson's position—wanting to help a friend who keeps defending someone toxic—what approach would you take?
application • deep - 5
Why do people often become the strongest defenders of those who hurt them? What psychological need does this defense serve?
reflection • deep
Critical Thinking Exercise
Decode the Defense Mechanism
Think of a situation where someone you know defended a person or relationship that seemed harmful to outsiders. Write a brief analysis of what the defender might have been protecting—their identity, their hope, their sense of control, or something else. Then consider what it would take for them to face reality without losing face.
Consider:
- •What would the defender have to admit about themselves if they acknowledged the harm?
- •What fears might be driving their need to protect this person or situation?
- •How could someone offer help in a way that doesn't threaten their sense of dignity or control?
Journaling Prompt
Write about a time when you defended someone or something that others saw as harmful to you. What were you really protecting, and what finally helped you see the situation clearly?
Coming Up Next...
Chapter 4: The Murder of Sir Danvers Carew
Moving forward, we'll examine violence escalates from small irritations to explosive rage, and understand witnesses matter - and how fear can make people disappear. These insights bridge the gap between classic literature and modern experience.