Summary
As Candide and Martin sail toward France, their contrasting worldviews come into sharp focus through casual conversation. Martin paints France as a collection of fools, schemers, and pretenders, describing Paris as chaos where everyone seeks pleasure but few find it. His bitter perspective stems from personal experience—he was robbed, falsely imprisoned, and forced into menial work just to survive. When Candide asks whether humans have always been violent and corrupt, Martin responds with a devastating analogy: hawks have always eaten pigeons, so why would humans be any different? This comparison reveals Martin's fatalistic belief that cruelty and selfishness are simply human nature. Candide starts to object, mentioning free will, but the conversation ends as they reach Bordeaux. This chapter showcases how two people can experience similar hardships yet draw opposite conclusions. While Candide clings to optimism despite his suffering, Martin has embraced pessimism as his shield against disappointment. Their debate touches on fundamental questions about human nature, progress, and whether we can choose to be better than our worst impulses. Martin's hawk-and-pigeon analogy is particularly powerful because it sounds logical while being deeply reductive—it suggests that complex human behavior can be explained by simple animal instincts. The chapter demonstrates how philosophical discussions often reveal more about the speakers' psychological states than about universal truths.
Coming Up in Chapter 22
Candide and Martin's theoretical debates about human nature are about to get a reality check as they experience France firsthand. Will Paris live up to Martin's cynical expectations, or will Candide find reasons to maintain his stubborn optimism?
Share it with friends
An excerpt from the original text.(~500 words)
CANDIDE AND MARTIN, REASONING, DRAW NEAR THE COAST OF FRANCE. At length they descried the coast of France. "Were you ever in France, Mr. Martin?" said Candide. "Yes," said Martin, "I have been in several provinces. In some one-half of the people are fools, in others they are too cunning; in some they are weak and simple, in others they affect to be witty; in all, the principal occupation is love, the next is slander, and the third is talking nonsense." "But, Mr. Martin, have you seen Paris?" "Yes, I have. All these kinds are found there. It is a chaos--a confused multitude, where everybody seeks pleasure and scarcely any one finds it, at least as it appeared to me. I made a short stay there. On my arrival I was robbed of all I had by pickpockets at the fair of St. Germain. I myself was taken for a robber and was imprisoned for eight days, after which I served as corrector of the press to gain the money necessary for my return to Holland on foot. I knew the whole scribbling rabble, the party rabble, the fanatic rabble. It is said that there are very polite people in that city, and I wish to believe it." "For my part, I have no curiosity to see France," said Candide. "You may easily imagine that after spending a month at El Dorado I can desire to behold nothing upon earth but Miss Cunegonde. I go to await her at Venice. We shall pass through France on our way to Italy. Will you bear me company?" "With all my heart," said Martin. "It is said that Venice is fit only for its own nobility, but that strangers meet with a very good reception if they have a good deal of money. I have none of it; you have, therefore I will follow you all over the world." "But do you believe," said Candide, "that the earth was originally a sea, as we find it asserted in that large book belonging to the captain?" "I do not believe a word of it," said Martin, "any more than I do of the many ravings which have been published lately." "But for what end, then, has this world been formed?" said Candide. "To plague us to death," answered Martin. "Are you not greatly surprised," continued Candide, "at the love which these two girls of the Oreillons had for those monkeys, of which I have already told you?" "Not at all," said Martin. "I do not see that that passion was strange. I have seen so many extraordinary things that I have ceased to be surprised." "Do you believe," said Candide, "that men have always massacred each other as they do to-day, that they have always been liars, cheats, traitors, ingrates, brigands, idiots, thieves, scoundrels, gluttons, drunkards, misers, envious, ambitious, bloody-minded, calumniators, debauchees, fanatics, hypocrites, and fools?" "Do you believe," said Martin, "that hawks have always eaten pigeons when they have found them?" "Yes, without...
Master this chapter. Complete your experience
Purchase the complete book to access all chapters and support classic literature
As an Amazon Associate, we earn a small commission from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.
Available in paperback, hardcover, and e-book formats
Intelligence Amplifier™ Analysis
The Road of Philosophical Armor - When Worldviews Become Shields
When painful experiences crystallize into rigid worldviews that protect against future disappointment but also prevent growth and connection.
Why This Matters
Connect literature to life
This chapter teaches how to separate someone's lived experience from their philosophical conclusions about life.
Practice This Today
This week, notice when someone presents their personal disappointments as universal truths—then ask what wisdom you can extract without adopting their worldview.
Now let's explore the literary elements.
Terms to Know
Pessimism vs Optimism
Two opposing philosophical outlooks on life and human nature. Pessimism expects the worst outcomes and believes suffering is inevitable, while optimism expects good outcomes and believes things can improve. This chapter shows both worldviews in action through Martin and Candide's conversation.
Modern Usage:
We see this split constantly - some people always expect the worst while others stay hopeful despite setbacks.
Satire
A literary technique that uses humor, irony, and exaggeration to criticize human behavior or society. Voltaire uses Martin's bitter observations about French society to mock both blind optimism and complete cynicism.
Modern Usage:
Modern satirists like comedians and social media creators use the same technique to point out society's problems through humor.
Free Will
The philosophical concept that humans can make genuine choices and aren't just controlled by instinct or fate. The chapter touches on whether people choose to be cruel or if it's just their nature.
Modern Usage:
This debate continues today in discussions about personal responsibility versus circumstances that shape behavior.
Human Nature
The fundamental characteristics and tendencies that define how humans typically behave. Martin argues that cruelty and selfishness are simply built into people, like instincts in animals.
Modern Usage:
We still debate whether people are naturally good or bad, especially when explaining crime, politics, or workplace behavior.
Philosophical Worldview
A person's fundamental beliefs about how the world works and what life means. These beliefs shape how someone interprets every experience they have.
Modern Usage:
Everyone has a worldview that colors how they see news, relationships, and opportunities - it's like wearing tinted glasses.
Social Commentary
Using art or literature to criticize or examine society's problems and behaviors. Martin's descriptions of French society serve as Voltaire's way of pointing out social issues.
Modern Usage:
Movies, TV shows, and social media posts often contain social commentary about current issues and problems.
Characters in This Chapter
Martin
Pessimistic philosopher companion
Serves as Candide's opposite, representing complete cynicism about human nature. His bitter experiences have convinced him that people are naturally cruel and selfish, like hawks eating pigeons. He describes French society as chaotic and corrupt based on his personal suffering there.
Modern Equivalent:
The coworker who's been burned too many times and expects the worst from everyone
Candide
Optimistic protagonist
Still maintains hope despite his own terrible experiences, showing how two people can interpret similar hardships completely differently. He's less interested in philosophical debates about society and more focused on his personal goal of finding Cunegonde.
Modern Equivalent:
The person who stays positive and focused on their goals despite everyone telling them to be realistic
Key Quotes & Analysis
"In some one-half of the people are fools, in others they are too cunning; in some they are weak and simple, in others they affect to be witty; in all, the principal occupation is love, the next is slander, and the third is talking nonsense."
Context: Martin describing French society to Candide as they approach the coast
This quote reveals Martin's cynical worldview and serves as Voltaire's satirical take on French society. Martin sees only negative traits in people and reduces complex human behavior to simple, unflattering categories.
In Today's Words:
Half the people are idiots, the other half are scheming. Everyone's either weak or trying too hard to be clever. Mostly they just chase romance, gossip, and talk trash.
"It is a chaos--a confused multitude, where everybody seeks pleasure and scarcely any one finds it."
Context: Describing Paris to Candide
This captures Martin's view of modern city life as fundamentally unsatisfying despite everyone's pursuit of happiness. It reflects the emptiness he sees in society's values and the futility of human desires.
In Today's Words:
It's complete chaos - millions of people chasing happiness but nobody actually finding it.
"You may easily imagine that after spending a month at El Dorado I can desire to behold nothing upon earth but Miss Cunegonde."
Context: Explaining why he has no interest in seeing France
Shows how Candide's optimism is now focused entirely on personal love rather than broader philosophical questions. His experience in paradise has made him prioritize individual happiness over understanding society.
In Today's Words:
After seeing perfection, the only thing I care about now is finding the woman I love.
Thematic Threads
Class
In This Chapter
Martin's cynicism about French society reflects his experience of being pushed to society's margins—robbed, imprisoned, forced into menial work
Development
Continues from earlier chapters showing how social position shapes worldview and survival strategies
In Your Life:
Your economic struggles might make you cynical about 'the system,' but that cynicism can become a trap that prevents you from seeing opportunities.
Identity
In This Chapter
Martin has built his entire identity around being the realist who sees through illusions, while Candide clings to his optimistic identity
Development
Develops the theme of how people construct identity around their philosophical positions rather than remaining flexible
In Your Life:
You might define yourself as 'the practical one' or 'the positive one' so strongly that you can't adapt when situations require different approaches.
Human Nature
In This Chapter
Martin's hawk-and-pigeon analogy reduces complex human behavior to simple animal instincts, while Candide hints at free will
Development
Introduced here as a central philosophical debate that will likely continue throughout their journey
In Your Life:
When you're hurt, you might convince yourself that people 'never change' to protect yourself, but this belief can become a self-fulfilling prophecy.
Personal Growth
In This Chapter
Both characters are stuck—Candide in naive optimism, Martin in defensive pessimism—neither allowing experience to create nuanced wisdom
Development
Continues the pattern of characters learning the wrong lessons from their experiences
In Your Life:
Your past experiences should inform your decisions, not imprison them—wisdom means staying open to being surprised by people.
Social Expectations
In This Chapter
Martin describes French society as full of people pretending to seek pleasure while actually miserable, suggesting widespread social performance
Development
Builds on earlier themes about the gap between social appearances and reality
In Your Life:
The pressure to appear happy or successful on social media might be making you as miserable as the French society Martin describes.
You now have the context. Time to form your own thoughts.
Discussion Questions
- 1
What specific experiences shaped Martin's belief that humans are naturally cruel and selfish?
analysis • surface - 2
Why does Martin use the hawk-and-pigeon comparison to explain human behavior, and what does this reveal about how he processes his painful experiences?
analysis • medium - 3
Think about someone you know who always expects the worst from people or situations. What painful experiences might have led them to this protective mindset?
application • medium - 4
When you've been hurt repeatedly in similar ways, how do you protect yourself without becoming so closed off that you miss genuine opportunities for connection or growth?
application • deep - 5
What's the difference between learning from bad experiences and letting those experiences write the rules for your entire future?
reflection • deep
Critical Thinking Exercise
Trace Your Protective Philosophy
Think of one area where you've developed a 'rule' about how the world works based on painful experiences - maybe about relationships, work, family, or money. Write down that rule, then trace it back to the specific experiences that created it. Finally, identify one small way you could test whether that rule still serves you or if it's become unnecessary armor.
Consider:
- •Your rule might have been necessary protection at the time it formed
- •Rules based on pain often contain some truth but miss important exceptions
- •The goal isn't to become naive, but to stay open to new evidence
Journaling Prompt
Write about a time when someone surprised you by acting better than your protective rules predicted they would. How did that challenge your assumptions, and what did you learn about the difference between wisdom and cynicism?
Coming Up Next...
Chapter 22: Candide Discovers Parisian Society
The coming pages reveal to recognize when people are exploiting your naivety or wealth, and teach us cultural sophistication often masks moral corruption. These discoveries help us navigate similar situations in our own lives.