Summary
Smith reveals how our moral compass actually works: we judge ourselves by imagining how an impartial spectator would view our actions. Just as we need a mirror to see our physical appearance, we need society to reflect back our moral character. A person raised in complete isolation would have no concept of right or wrong—it's only through seeing others' reactions that we develop moral awareness. Smith introduces the concept of the 'impartial spectator'—an imaginary judge within our minds who represents the perspective of a fair, unbiased observer. This inner voice becomes our moral guide, though it's often corrupted by self-interest and passion. The chapter explores how we're naturally more concerned with our own small troubles than massive distant suffering (Smith's famous example: losing a finger versus China being destroyed by earthquake), yet something within us—this impartial spectator—calls us to act morally despite our selfish instincts. Smith argues that moral rules don't come from abstract philosophy but from accumulated experience of what actions consistently earn approval or condemnation. When we see murder, we don't first consult a rule against killing—we feel immediate horror, and from many such experiences, we form general principles. This internal moral judge, though imperfect and often biased by our emotions, represents humanity's attempt to rise above pure self-interest and act with genuine fairness toward others.
Coming Up in Chapter 27
Having established how our inner moral judge develops, Smith next explores why these general moral rules carry such powerful authority over us—and how they connect to our deepest beliefs about divine justice and cosmic order.
Share it with friends
An excerpt from the original text.(~500 words)
N what manner our own judgments refer to what ought to be the judgments of others: and of the origin of general rules. A great part, perhaps the greatest part, of human happiness and misery arises from the view of our past conduct, and from the degree of approbation or disapprobation which we feel from the consideration of it. But in whatever manner it may affect us, our sentiments of this kind have always some secret reference either to what are, or to what upon a certain condition would be, or to what we imagine ought to be the sentiments of others. We examine it as we imagine an impartial spectator would examine it. If upon placing ourselves in his situation we thoroughly enter into all the passions and motives which influenced it, we approve of it by sympathy with the approbation of this supposed equitable judge. If otherwise, we enter into his disapprobation and condemn it. Was it possible that a human creature could grow up to manhood in some solitary place without any communication with his own species, he could no more think of his own character, of the propriety or demerit of his own sentiments and conduct, of the beauty or deformity of his own mind, than of the beauty or deformity of his own face. All these are objects which he cannot easily see, which naturally he does not look at; and with regard to which he 181is provided with no mirror which can present them to his view. Bring him into society, and he is immediately provided with the mirror which he wanted before. It is placed in the countenance and behaviour of those he lives with, which always mark when they enter into, and when they disapprove of his sentiments; and it is here that he first views the propriety and impropriety of his own passions, the beauty and deformity of his own mind. To a man who from his birth was a stranger to society, the objects of his passions, the external bodies which either pleased or hurt him, would occupy his whole attention. The passions themselves, the desires or aversions, the joys or sorrows, which those objects excited, though of all things the most immediately present to him, could scarce ever be the objects of his thoughts. The idea of them could never interest him so much as to call upon his attentive consideration. The consideration of his joy could in him excite no new joy, nor that of his sorrow any new sorrow, though the consideration of the causes of those passions might often excite both. Bring him into society, and all his own passions will immediately become the causes of new passions. He will observe that mankind approve of some of them, and are disgusted by others. He will be elevated in the one case, and cast down in the other; his desires and aversions, his joys and sorrows will now often become the causes of new desires and new...
Master this chapter. Complete your experience
Purchase the complete book to access all chapters and support classic literature
As an Amazon Associate, we earn a small commission from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.
Available in paperback, hardcover, and e-book formats
Intelligence Amplifier™ Analysis
The Road of the Inner Judge - How We Actually Make Moral Decisions
We judge ourselves through an imaginary impartial observer, but this inner moral compass gets distorted by self-interest, emotions, and toxic social influences.
Why This Matters
Connect literature to life
This chapter teaches you to recognize when your moral compass has been corrupted by the wrong mirrors—fear, pressure, or people-pleasing.
Practice This Today
This week, notice when you feel guilty or proud about something, then ask yourself: whose imagined judgment am I really responding to, and would a truly fair person see it the same way?
Now let's explore the literary elements.
Terms to Know
Impartial Spectator
Smith's concept of an imaginary fair judge inside our minds who watches and evaluates our actions without bias. This inner voice represents how a reasonable, unbiased person would view our behavior. It's our conscience, but based on social standards rather than personal feelings.
Modern Usage:
When you ask yourself 'What would people think if they knew I did this?' you're consulting your impartial spectator.
Moral Mirror
Smith's metaphor that we need other people to reflect our moral character back to us, just like we need a physical mirror to see our appearance. Without social feedback, we can't judge if our actions are right or wrong.
Modern Usage:
Social media reactions, workplace feedback, and family responses all serve as moral mirrors showing us how others see our behavior.
Sympathy
In Smith's usage, this means our ability to imagine ourselves in someone else's situation and feel what they feel. It's not just pity - it's the mental act of putting yourself in another person's shoes to understand their experience.
Modern Usage:
When you watch someone get embarrassed on TV and feel embarrassed yourself, that's Smith's version of sympathy in action.
Approbation
Approval or praise from others. Smith argues we desperately want this from society - it's not just nice to have, it's essential for our sense of moral worth. We judge our actions by whether they earn approbation or disapprobation (disapproval).
Modern Usage:
Getting likes on social media, positive performance reviews, or compliments from friends all provide the approbation Smith says we crave.
General Rules
Moral principles that develop from repeated experiences of what actions consistently earn approval or blame. Smith argues we don't start with abstract rules - we form them after seeing patterns in how people react to behaviors.
Modern Usage:
Workplace codes of conduct and social etiquette rules develop this way - from seeing what behaviors repeatedly cause problems or praise.
Propriety
The quality of being appropriate or suitable for a situation. Smith uses this to describe actions that fit what the impartial spectator would approve of - not too much emotion, not too little, but just right for the circumstances.
Modern Usage:
Knowing how to act at a funeral versus a party, or adjusting your behavior for a job interview versus hanging with friends, shows understanding of propriety.
Characters in This Chapter
The Solitary Human
Hypothetical example
Smith's thought experiment of a person raised completely alone, without any human contact. This person would have no concept of right and wrong because they'd never seen others' reactions to behavior. Shows that morality is learned through society, not born within us.
Modern Equivalent:
The person who grew up completely isolated from social norms
The Impartial Spectator
Internal moral judge
The imaginary fair observer inside our minds who evaluates our actions without bias or self-interest. This figure represents our conscience, but one trained by social experience rather than personal desire. Sometimes gets corrupted by our emotions and self-interest.
Modern Equivalent:
Your inner voice asking 'What would a reasonable person think of this?'
Key Quotes & Analysis
"We examine it as we imagine an impartial spectator would examine it."
Context: Smith explaining how we judge our own past actions
This reveals the core of Smith's moral theory - we don't judge ourselves directly, but by imagining how a fair, unbiased observer would see us. Our moral sense comes from this mental exercise of stepping outside ourselves.
In Today's Words:
We judge ourselves by thinking 'What would someone fair and reasonable think if they saw me do this?'
"A human creature could grow up to manhood in some solitary place without any communication with his own species, he could no more think of his own character...than of the beauty or deformity of his own face."
Context: Smith's thought experiment about moral development in isolation
This comparison between moral and physical appearance shows that both require outside perspective to be understood. Just as we need mirrors for our looks, we need society for our moral character. It proves morality is learned, not innate.
In Today's Words:
If you grew up completely alone, you'd have no idea if you were a good or bad person, just like you wouldn't know if you were attractive without ever seeing a mirror.
"All these are objects which he cannot easily see, which naturally he does not look at; and with regard to which he is provided with no mirror which can present them to his view."
Context: Continuing the mirror metaphor for moral self-awareness
Smith emphasizes that moral self-knowledge is impossible without social reflection. The mirror metaphor makes abstract moral philosophy concrete - we literally cannot see our own moral character without others to reflect it back to us.
In Today's Words:
You can't see your own moral character any more than you can see your own face - you need others to show you what you look like morally.
Thematic Threads
Social Expectations
In This Chapter
Smith shows how moral standards come from society's reactions, not abstract rules—we learn right and wrong by watching what gets rewarded or punished
Development
Introduced here
In Your Life:
You might find yourself following unspoken rules that don't actually serve you, like never asking for help because you learned 'independence is virtue.'
Identity
In This Chapter
Our sense of moral self comes entirely from imagining how others see us—without social mirrors, we'd have no moral identity at all
Development
Introduced here
In Your Life:
Your self-worth might depend too heavily on others' approval, making it hard to make decisions that disappoint people but serve your wellbeing.
Human Relationships
In This Chapter
Smith reveals that morality is fundamentally social—it emerges from our need to live together and predict each other's behavior
Development
Introduced here
In Your Life:
You might struggle with moral decisions when isolated, but find clarity by imagining how someone you respect would view the situation.
Personal Growth
In This Chapter
Developing a more accurate inner judge requires conscious effort to resist corruption from self-interest and social pressure
Development
Introduced here
In Your Life:
Growth happens when you learn to question your automatic moral reactions and ask whether they're based on fairness or fear.
You now have the context. Time to form your own thoughts.
Discussion Questions
- 1
According to Smith, why would a person raised in complete isolation have no sense of right and wrong?
analysis • surface - 2
How does the 'impartial spectator' in our minds get corrupted by self-interest and emotions?
analysis • medium - 3
Where do you see people's inner moral judges being shaped by social media, workplace culture, or family dynamics today?
application • medium - 4
Think of a time when you felt guilty about something that wasn't actually wrong. How might your inner spectator have been corrupted in that situation?
application • deep - 5
If we develop moral judgment by watching others' reactions over time, what does this reveal about the responsibility we have in how we respond to people's actions?
reflection • deep
Critical Thinking Exercise
Audit Your Inner Judge
Think of a recent situation where you felt guilty, ashamed, or morally conflicted. Write down what your inner voice was telling you, then imagine you're explaining the situation to a fair stranger who has no stake in the outcome. What would this truly impartial observer say about your actions? Compare the two perspectives and notice where your inner judge might have been corrupted by fear, people-pleasing, or past experiences.
Consider:
- •Your inner judge was shaped by specific people and experiences - it's not neutral
- •Guilt and shame aren't always accurate moral indicators
- •An impartial spectator would focus on fairness, not on keeping others comfortable
Journaling Prompt
Write about a moral rule or expectation you follow that might actually be corrupted by someone else's interests rather than true fairness. How would you recalibrate this inner voice?
Coming Up Next...
Chapter 27: When Rules Matter More Than Feelings
The coming pages reveal moral rules provide stability when emotions fail us, and teach us acting from duty can be more reliable than acting from feeling. These discoveries help us navigate similar situations in our own lives.