Summary
Marx reveals the brutal truth behind capitalism's origins: it wasn't born from innovation or hard work, but from systematic theft. In England from the 1400s to 1700s, landlords used every trick—legal, illegal, and violent—to steal land from peasants who had farmed it for centuries. They destroyed villages, burned homes, and turned farmland into sheep pastures because wool was more profitable. The government passed laws trying to stop this, but the rich ignored them. The Church's land was seized during the Reformation and given to wealthy speculators. Even common lands where peasants grazed animals and gathered fuel were stolen through parliamentary acts that legalized theft. The most horrific example comes from Scotland, where the Duchess of Sutherland evicted 15,000 people from 794,000 acres, burning their homes and replacing them with 131,000 sheep. Those who survived were pushed to rocky coastlines with barely enough land to live. This wasn't progress—it was organized violence that created both the landless workers capitalism needed and the concentrated wealth it required. Marx shows how every fortune has a foundation of theft, and every 'free' worker was freed from their land by force. Understanding this history helps you see through modern narratives that present economic inequality as natural rather than manufactured.
Coming Up in Chapter 28
The land theft was just the beginning. Next, Marx exposes the bloody laws designed to terrorize the newly homeless into accepting starvation wages—and the savage punishments for those who refused to submit.
Share it with friends
An excerpt from the original text.(~500 words)
EXPROPRIATION OF THE AGRICULTURAL POPULATION FROM THE LAND Economic Manuscripts: Capital Vol. I - Chapter Twenty-Seven Karl Marx. Capital Volume One Chapter Twenty-Seven: Expropriation of the Agricultural Population from the Land In England, serfdom had practically disappeared in the last part of the 14th century. The immense majority of the population consisted then, and to a still larger extent, in the 15th century, of free peasant proprietors, whatever was the feudal title under which their right of property was hidden. In the larger seignorial domains, the old bailiff, himself a serf, was displaced by the free farmer. The wage labourers of agriculture consisted partly of peasants, who utilised their leisure time by working on the large estates, partly of an independent special class of wage labourers, relatively and absolutely few in numbers. The latter also were practically at the same time peasant farmers, since, besides their wages, they had allotted to them arable land to the extent of 4 or more acres, together with their cottages. Besides they, with the rest of the peasants, enjoyed the usufruct of the common land, which gave pasture to their cattle, furnished them with timber, fire-wood, turf, &c. In all countries of Europe, feudal production is characterised by division of the soil amongst the greatest possible number of subfeudatories. The might of the feudal lord, like that of the sovereign, depended not on the length of his rent roll, but on the number of his subjects, and the latter depended on the number of peasant proprietors. Although, therefore, the English land, after the Norman Conquest, was distributed in gigantic baronies, one of which often included some 900 of the old Anglo-Saxon lordships, it was bestrewn with small peasant properties, only here and there interspersed with great seignorial domains. Such conditions, together with the prosperity of the towns so characteristic of the 15th century, allowed of that wealth of the people which Chancellor Fortescue so eloquently paints in his “Laudes legum Angliae;” but it excluded the possibility of capitalistic wealth. The prelude of the revolution that laid the foundation of the capitalist mode of production, was played in the last third of the 15th, and the first decade of the 16th century. A mass of free proletarians was hurled on the labour market by the breaking-up of the bands of feudal retainers, who, as Sir James Steuart well says, “everywhere uselessly filled house and castle.” Although the royal power, itself a product of bourgeois development, in its strife after absolute sovereignty forcibly hastened on the dissolution of these bands of retainers, it was by no means the sole cause of it. In insolent conflict with king and parliament, the great feudal lords created an incomparably larger proletariat by the forcible driving of the peasantry from the land, to which the latter had the same feudal right as the lord himself, and by the usurpation of the common lands. The rapid rise of the Flemish wool manufactures, and the corresponding rise in the price of wool...
Master this chapter. Complete your experience
Purchase the complete book to access all chapters and support classic literature
As an Amazon Associate, we earn a small commission from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.
Available in paperback, hardcover, and e-book formats
Intelligence Amplifier™ Analysis
The Road of Justified Theft - How Systems Legitimize Taking What Isn't Theirs
Powerful actors systematically take resources from the powerless while using legal, moral, or institutional frameworks to make the theft appear legitimate and necessary.
Why This Matters
Connect literature to life
This chapter teaches you to see through noble language to identify when powerful interests are systematically taking what belongs to others.
Practice This Today
This week, notice when institutions claim they're helping you while taking something away—that's usually justified theft in action.
Now let's explore the literary elements.
Terms to Know
Enclosure
The process of wealthy landowners fencing off common lands that peasants had used for centuries to graze animals and gather resources. What was once shared became private property through legal manipulation and force.
Modern Usage:
Like when corporations buy up affordable housing and turn it into luxury developments, pricing out longtime residents.
Expropriation
Forcibly taking someone's property, usually through legal tricks or outright theft. Marx uses this to describe how peasants lost their land to create capitalism's workforce.
Modern Usage:
Similar to eminent domain when governments take private property, or when gentrification forces people from neighborhoods they've lived in for generations.
Primitive Accumulation
Marx's term for the violent origins of capitalism - how the first capitalists got their wealth by stealing land and resources rather than earning it through fair trade or innovation.
Modern Usage:
Explains how many family fortunes started with exploitation, like how some tech billionaires built empires on unpaid labor or stolen ideas.
Feudal Production
The medieval economic system where land was divided among many small farmers who owed service to lords but had some security and rights to their plots.
Modern Usage:
Like how gig workers today have some independence but depend entirely on platform owners who can change the rules anytime.
Common Land
Land that belonged to the whole community where peasants could graze animals, gather firewood, and hunt. These shared resources were essential for survival but were gradually stolen by the wealthy.
Modern Usage:
Similar to public parks, libraries, or community centers that everyone depends on but are constantly threatened by budget cuts or privatization.
Clearing of Estates
The practice of evicting entire villages to convert farmland into more profitable uses, especially sheep farming for wool export. Thousands of families were made homeless overnight.
Modern Usage:
Like mass evictions when landlords convert apartment buildings to condos, or when factories close and move overseas, destroying entire communities.
Characters in This Chapter
The Free Peasant Proprietors
Tragic victims
These were independent farmers who owned small plots and had rights to common lands. They represented the majority of England's population before being systematically dispossessed through enclosure and violence.
Modern Equivalent:
Small business owners being pushed out by big corporations
The Seignorial Lords
Primary antagonists
Wealthy landowners who used legal manipulation, violence, and government connections to steal peasant lands and convert them to profitable sheep farming. They prioritized profit over human welfare.
Modern Equivalent:
Corporate executives who lay off thousands to boost stock prices
The Duchess of Sutherland
Ultimate villain
Evicted 15,000 people from 794,000 acres in Scotland, burning their homes and replacing them with sheep. Her actions represent the most extreme example of capitalist brutality Marx describes.
Modern Equivalent:
A slumlord who burns down affordable housing to build luxury developments
The Displaced Agricultural Workers
Emerging proletariat
Former peasants forced off their land who had no choice but to work for wages. They became capitalism's first industrial workforce, having lost all means of independent survival.
Modern Equivalent:
Workers stuck in the gig economy after losing stable jobs
Key Quotes & Analysis
"The spoliation of the church's property, the fraudulent alienation of the State domains, the robbery of the common lands, the usurpation of feudal and clan property, and its transformation into modern private property under circumstances of reckless terrorism, were just so many idyllic methods of primitive accumulation."
Context: Marx summarizing how capitalism's wealth was built on systematic theft
This quote reveals Marx's bitter irony - he calls these violent methods 'idyllic' to mock economists who romanticize capitalism's origins. Every form of wealth accumulation he lists involved stealing from ordinary people.
In Today's Words:
All the wealth at the top came from robbing everyone else - stealing church land, grabbing public property, and taking away what communities shared.
"The advance made by the 18th century shows itself in this, that the law itself becomes now the instrument of the theft of the people's land."
Context: Describing how legal systems were corrupted to legitimize land theft
Marx shows how power corrupts even the law itself. When the wealthy control government, they rewrite laws to make their theft legal while criminalizing resistance.
In Today's Words:
By the 1700s, they didn't even bother hiding it - they just changed the laws to make stealing legal.
"The history of this, their expropriation, is written in the annals of mankind in letters of blood and fire."
Context: Describing the violent dispossession of peasants from their land
Marx uses vivid imagery to emphasize that capitalism's birth required massive violence and suffering. This wasn't peaceful economic evolution but organized brutality against ordinary people.
In Today's Words:
The story of how they stole people's land is written in blood - it was violent, brutal, and traumatic.
Thematic Threads
Class
In This Chapter
The violent creation of a propertyless working class through systematic land theft disguised as economic progress
Development
Builds on earlier chapters about worker exploitation by revealing how workers became propertyless in the first place
In Your Life:
You might recognize how your family lost economic security not through personal failure, but through systematic policy changes that benefited the wealthy
Power
In This Chapter
How legal and governmental institutions serve to legitimize and protect the theft of resources by the powerful
Development
Expands previous discussions of economic power to show how political power enables systematic theft
In Your Life:
You see this when local governments approve developments that displace long-term residents while claiming economic development
Violence
In This Chapter
The brutal physical force used to remove peasants from their ancestral lands, including burning homes and mass evictions
Development
Reveals that capitalism's foundation required massive organized violence, not peaceful market evolution
In Your Life:
You might recognize how evictions, foreclosures, and utility shutoffs are forms of legalized violence that maintain economic hierarchies
Narrative Control
In This Chapter
How history gets rewritten to make systematic theft appear as natural economic development and progress
Development
Introduced here as a key mechanism for maintaining illegitimate power structures
In Your Life:
You see this when media frames your economic struggles as personal choices rather than results of systematic wealth extraction
Identity
In This Chapter
How people's fundamental identity shifted from land-connected peasants to 'free' but propertyless wage workers
Development
Shows how class identity was artificially created through violent dispossession
In Your Life:
You might recognize how economic insecurity has become part of your identity rather than seeing it as an imposed condition
You now have the context. Time to form your own thoughts.
Discussion Questions
- 1
How did English landlords actually steal peasant land between the 1400s and 1700s? What specific methods did they use?
analysis • surface - 2
Why didn't the government laws protecting peasants actually work? What does this tell us about how power really operates?
analysis • medium - 3
Where do you see the 'justified theft' pattern today - someone taking what belongs to others while making it sound legal and necessary?
application • medium - 4
When institutions or companies claim they're helping you while taking something away, how can you protect yourself from this pattern?
application • deep - 5
What does this chapter reveal about how economic inequality is actually created versus how we're usually told it happens?
reflection • deep
Critical Thinking Exercise
Decode the Justification
Think of a recent change in your community - a hospital closure, rent increases, store closures, job cuts, or policy change that hurt working people. Write down the official explanation you were given for why this change was 'necessary.' Then rewrite that same situation from the perspective of who actually benefited financially. What story would they tell privately versus publicly?
Consider:
- •Who made money from this change, even if they weren't mentioned in the official story?
- •What language was used to make the change sound inevitable rather than chosen?
- •What would have happened if the people affected had organized to resist?
Journaling Prompt
Write about a time when you realized that an official explanation for why you were losing something didn't match who was actually benefiting. How did that change how you evaluate similar situations now?
Coming Up Next...
Chapter 28: The Violence Behind Wage Labor
What lies ahead teaches us societies use violence to force economic compliance when persuasion fails, and shows us understanding historical context reveals hidden power structures in current systems. These patterns appear in literature and life alike.