Summary
Marx tackles a puzzle that affects every worker who's ever wondered why jobs pay differently around the world. He shows that comparing wages between countries is like comparing apples to oranges—you can't just look at the dollar amounts. A factory worker in Germany might earn less per hour than one in England, but if the German worker produces less in that hour, they're actually more expensive to employ. Marx breaks down the real factors that determine wages: cost of living, worker training, productivity levels, and work intensity. He uses concrete examples from textile factories across Europe to show how English workers, despite earning higher wages, actually cost their employers less per unit of work produced because they're more productive. The chapter reveals how capitalism creates a global hierarchy where more developed countries can pay higher wages while still being more competitive. Marx also critiques economist Henry Carey's simplistic theory that wages automatically rise with productivity, showing how this ignores the reality of surplus value extraction. This analysis helps explain why manufacturing jobs migrate to countries with lower wages, and why 'good jobs' tend to cluster in more developed economies. The chapter demonstrates that wage differences aren't just about supply and demand, but about the entire structure of capitalist competition on a global scale.
Coming Up in Chapter 23
Having examined how wages vary globally, Marx now turns to a fundamental question: what happens when capitalism simply maintains itself at the same level? Simple reproduction reveals the hidden mechanisms that keep the system running day after day.
Share it with friends
An excerpt from the original text.(~500 words)
NATIONAL DIFFERENCES OF WAGES Economic Manuscripts: Capital Vol. I - Chapter Twenty-Two Karl Marx. Capital Volume One Chapter Twenty-Two: National Differences of Wages In the 17th chapter we were occupied with the manifold combinations which may bring about a change in magnitude of the value of labour-power — this magnitude being considered either absolutely or relatively, i.e., as compared with surplus-value; whilst on the other hand, the quantum of the means of subsistence in which the price of labour is realized might again undergo fluctuations independent of, or different from, the changes of this price. As has been already said, the simple translation of the value, or respectively of the price, of labour-power into the exoteric form of wages transforms all these laws into laws of the fluctuations of wages. That which appears in these fluctuations of wages within a single country as a series of varying combinations, may appear in different countries as contemporaneous difference of national wages. In the comparison of the wages in different nations, we must therefore take into account all the factors that determine changes in the amount of the value of labour-power; the price and the extent of the prime necessaries of life as naturally and historically developed, the cost of training the labourers, the part played by the labour of women and children, the productiveness of labour, its extensive and intensive magnitude. Even the most superficial comparison requires the reduction first of the average day-wage for the same trades, in different countries, to a uniform working-day. After this reduction to the same terms of the day-wages, time-wage must again be translated into piece-wage, as the latter only can be a measure both of the productivity and the intensity of labour. In every country there is a certain average intensity of labour below which the labour for the production of a commodity requires more than the socially necessary time, and therefore does not reckon as labour of normal quality. Only a degree of intensity above the national average affects, in a given country, the measure of value by the mere duration of the working-time. This is not the case on the universal market, whose integral parts are the individual countries. The average intensity of labour changes from country to country; here it is greater, there less. These national averages form a scale, whose unit of measure is the average unit of universal labour. The more intense national labour, therefore, as compared with the less intense, produces in the same time more value, which expresses itself in more money. But the law of value in its international application is yet more modified by the fact that on the world-market the more productive national labour reckons also as the more intense, so long as the more productive nation is not compelled by competition to lower the selling price of its commodities to the level of their value. In proportion as capitalist production is developed in a country, in the same proportion do the national intensity and...
Master this chapter. Complete your experience
Purchase the complete book to access all chapters and support classic literature
As an Amazon Associate, we earn a small commission from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.
Available in paperback, hardcover, and e-book formats
Intelligence Amplifier™ Analysis
The Road of Hidden Costs - Why the Cheapest Option Isn't Always Cheapest
The tendency to choose options based on visible upfront costs while ignoring productivity, quality, and long-term factors that determine true value.
Why This Matters
Connect literature to life
This chapter teaches how to see past surface prices to total cost of ownership, including hidden multipliers that change the real math.
Practice This Today
This week, notice when someone offers you a 'deal'—ask what hidden costs might make it more expensive than it appears, and calculate the real cost per result you want.
Now let's explore the literary elements.
Terms to Know
National differences of wages
The variation in pay rates between different countries for similar work. Marx argues you can't just compare dollar amounts - you have to factor in productivity, cost of living, and work intensity to understand real wage differences.
Modern Usage:
This explains why call center jobs moved to India or why manufacturing shifted to China - it's not just about lower wages, but about the total cost per unit of work produced.
Intensive and extensive magnitude of labor
Intensive means how hard workers work during their hours (pace, effort). Extensive means how many hours they work total. Both affect the real value employers get from wages paid.
Modern Usage:
Think about how some jobs expect you to be 'always on' (extensive) while others demand peak performance every minute (intensive) - both strategies extract more value from the same wage.
Reduction of wages to comparable terms
Marx's method for fairly comparing wages across countries by accounting for differences in productivity, living costs, and work conditions. Raw wage numbers lie - you need the full picture.
Modern Usage:
Like when job sites show 'cost of living adjusted' salaries, or when people debate whether $15/hour goes further in rural areas than cities.
Price of labor-power vs. wages
Labor-power is what workers actually sell (their ability to work). Wages are just how this gets paid out. The wage form disguises how much value workers actually create versus what they receive.
Modern Usage:
This is why 'competitive wages' often means 'we pay just enough to keep you here' - the wage hides how much profit your work actually generates.
Surplus-value in international competition
Countries with higher productivity can pay higher wages while still extracting more profit per worker. This creates a global hierarchy where advanced economies dominate through superior exploitation.
Modern Usage:
Explains why tech companies can pay Silicon Valley engineers $200K while still being more profitable than companies paying $30K elsewhere - higher productivity enables both higher wages and higher profits.
Cost of training laborers
The investment required to develop workers' skills, which varies dramatically between countries and affects wage levels. More skilled workers command higher wages but also produce more value.
Modern Usage:
Why companies prefer hiring experienced workers over training new ones, and why countries with better education systems tend to have higher-wage economies.
Characters in This Chapter
The English factory worker
Example of high-wage, high-productivity labor
Marx uses English textile workers to show how higher wages can actually mean lower costs for employers when productivity is high enough. They earn more per hour but produce so much more that they're cheaper per unit of output.
Modern Equivalent:
The experienced nurse who handles twice as many patients efficiently
The German factory worker
Contrasting example of lower-wage, lower-productivity labor
Despite earning less than English workers, German workers actually cost more per unit produced because their productivity lags behind. This illustrates how wage comparisons can be misleading.
Modern Equivalent:
The new employee who takes longer to complete tasks despite being paid less
Henry Carey
Economic theorist Marx critiques
American economist who claimed wages naturally rise with productivity. Marx demolishes this theory by showing how capitalists capture most productivity gains as surplus value, not higher wages.
Modern Equivalent:
The business consultant who promises trickle-down benefits that never materialize
The Continental European worker
Representative of intermediate wage-productivity levels
Marx uses various European examples to show the spectrum between high-wage England and lower-wage regions, demonstrating how national development affects worker compensation.
Modern Equivalent:
Workers in mid-tier cities who earn less than coastal elites but more than rural areas
Key Quotes & Analysis
"Even the most superficial comparison requires the reduction first of the average day-wage for the same trades, in different countries, to a uniform working-day."
Context: Explaining why simple wage comparisons between countries are meaningless
Marx insists that comparing wages fairly requires accounting for differences in work hours, intensity, and productivity. Raw numbers hide the real story of exploitation and competition.
In Today's Words:
You can't just compare paychecks - you have to look at what people actually do for that money and how much value they create.
"The more productive country works with a higher intensity of labour-power, and its products cost less in proportion to their value."
Context: Explaining how advanced economies maintain competitive advantage
This reveals how developed countries can pay higher wages while still dominating global markets. Higher productivity allows both better worker compensation and greater capitalist profits.
In Today's Words:
Countries with better technology and training can pay their workers more and still beat everyone else on price.
"What appears in these fluctuations of wages within a single country as a series of varying combinations, may appear in different countries as contemporaneous difference of national wages."
Context: Connecting domestic wage variations to international wage differences
Marx shows that the same forces creating wage inequality within countries also create wage differences between countries. It's all part of the same capitalist dynamic.
In Today's Words:
The reasons some jobs pay more than others in your town are the same reasons some countries have higher wages than others.
Thematic Threads
Class
In This Chapter
Marx shows how wage differences between countries reflect deeper class structures and development levels, not just supply and demand
Development
Expanded from individual worker exploitation to international class hierarchies
In Your Life:
Your job's pay reflects not just your skills but your region's entire economic development level
Competition
In This Chapter
Global competition forces countries and workers to compete on productivity, not just wages
Development
Extended from factory competition to international economic competition
In Your Life:
You're competing not just with local workers but with global labor markets
Productivity
In This Chapter
Worker productivity determines real value to employers, making high wages potentially profitable
Development
Introduced here as key factor in wage determination
In Your Life:
Your job security depends more on your output per hour than your hourly rate
Measurement
In This Chapter
Marx reveals how surface-level wage comparisons hide the real economics of labor costs
Development
Builds on earlier themes about value measurement and surplus extraction
In Your Life:
What looks like a good deal often isn't when you measure the right things
Systems
In This Chapter
National economic systems create different conditions for productivity and wages
Development
Expanded from individual workplace systems to national economic structures
In Your Life:
Your opportunities are shaped by the economic system you're embedded in
You now have the context. Time to form your own thoughts.
Discussion Questions
- 1
Marx shows that German workers earned less per hour than English workers, but actually cost their employers more per unit of work produced. What made the 'cheaper' workers more expensive?
analysis • surface - 2
Why do you think Marx focused on productivity per hour rather than just hourly wages when comparing workers across countries?
analysis • medium - 3
Where have you seen this 'cheap upfront, expensive overall' pattern in your own life - maybe with purchases, services, or job decisions?
application • medium - 4
If you were hiring for your department or choosing between service providers, how would you calculate the real cost beyond the sticker price?
application • deep - 5
Marx suggests that what looks like a good deal often isn't. What does this reveal about how we naturally evaluate choices, and why we get fooled by surface appearances?
reflection • deep
Critical Thinking Exercise
Calculate the Hidden Cost
Think of a recent purchase or decision where you chose the cheapest option. Map out what it actually cost you over time - not just money, but time, stress, quality, and opportunity costs. Then compare it to what the more expensive option would have cost total. Calculate which was really the better deal.
Consider:
- •Include hidden costs like your time, follow-up problems, and missed opportunities
- •Factor in reliability, durability, and performance differences
- •Consider what you learned about evaluating 'bargains' going forward
Journaling Prompt
Write about a time when paying more upfront would have saved you money, time, or stress in the long run. What warning signs will you watch for next time you're tempted by a 'too good to be true' deal?
Coming Up Next...
Chapter 23: The Endless Cycle
What lies ahead teaches us systems perpetuate themselves even when they seem to change, and shows us workers stay trapped despite appearing free to leave. These patterns appear in literature and life alike.